Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in urinary tract infections identification and prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Shen, Li; An, Jialu; Wang, Nanding; Wu, Jin; Yao, Jia; Gao, Yumei.
Afiliación
  • Shen L; Department of Infection Control, Xi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.69 Feng Cheng 8th Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an, 710021, China.
  • An J; Department of Information Consultation, Library of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No.76 Yan Ta West Road, Yanta District, Xi'an, 710061, China.
  • Wang N; Department of Cardiology, Xi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.69 Feng Cheng 8th Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an, 710021, China.
  • Wu J; Department of Clinical Laboratory, Xi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.69 Feng Cheng 8th Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an, 710021, China.
  • Yao J; Experimental Center, Xi'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.69 Feng Cheng 8th Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an, 710021, China.
  • Gao Y; Xi'an Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No.69 Feng Cheng 8th Road, Weiyang District, Xi'an, 710021, China.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 464, 2024 Aug 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39088072
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) have been one of the most common bacterial infections in clinical practice worldwide. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based algorithms have been increasingly applied in UTI case identification and prediction. However, the overall performance of AI/ML algorithms in identifying and predicting UTI has not been evaluated. The purpose of this paper is to quantitatively evaluate the application value of AI/ML in identifying and predicting UTI cases.

METHODS:

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PubMed databases were systematically searched for articles published up to December 31, 2023. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool (QUADAS-2) and Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) were used to assess the risk of bias. Study characteristics and detailed algorithm information were extracted. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were synthesized using a bivariate mix-effects model. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were conducted to test the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS:

In total, 11 studies with 14 AI/ML models were included in the final meta-analysis. The overall pooled AUC was 0.89 (95%CI 0.86-0.92). Additionally, the pooled Sen, Spe, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.78 (95%CI 0.71-0.84), 0.89 (95%CI 0.83-0.93), 6.99 (95%CI 4.38-11.14), 0.25 (95%CI 0.18-0.34) and 28.07 (95%CI 14.27-55.20), respectively. The results of meta-regression suggested that reference standard definitions might be the source of heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION:

AI/ML algorithms appear to be promising to help clinicians detect and identify patients at high risk of UTIs. However, further studies are demanded to evaluate the application value of AI/ML more thoroughly.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Inteligencia Artificial / Aprendizaje Automático Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Urinarias / Inteligencia Artificial / Aprendizaje Automático Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China