Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Algorithms for Assessing Agricultural Product Quality Using NIRS.
Ren, Jiwen; Xiong, Yuming; Chen, Xinyu; Hao, Yong.
Afiliación
  • Ren J; School of Mechatronics and Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Xiong Y; School of Mechatronics and Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China.
  • Chen X; Optoelectronics Department of Changzhou Institute of Technology, Changzhou 213000, China.
  • Hao Y; School of Mechatronics and Vehicle Engineering, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China.
Sensors (Basel) ; 24(16)2024 Aug 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39205133
ABSTRACT
The success of near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) analysis hinges on the precision and robustness of the calibration model. Shallow learning (SL) algorithms like partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) often fall short in capturing the interrelationships between adjacent spectral variables, and the analysis results are easily affected by spectral noise, which dramatically limits the breadth and depth of applications of NIRS. Deep learning (DL) methods, with their capacity to discern intricate features from limited samples, have been progressively integrated into NIRS. In this paper, two discriminant analysis problems, including wheat kernels and Yali pears as examples, and several representative calibration models were used to research the robustness and effectiveness of the model. Additionally, this article proposed a near-infrared calibration model, which was based on the Gramian angular difference field method and coordinate attention convolutional neural networks (G-CACNNs). The research results show that, compared with SL, spectral preprocessing has a smaller impact on the analysis accuracy of consensus learning (CL) and DL, and the latter has the highest analysis accuracy in the modeling results using the original spectrum. The accuracy of G-CACNNs in two discrimination tasks was 98.48% and 99.39%. Finally, this research compared the performance of various models under noise to evaluate the robustness and noise resistance of the proposed method.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sensors (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China