ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Although androgen deprivation therapy is typically given long-term for men with metastatic prostate cancer, second-generation hormone therapies are generally discontinued before the subsequent line of treatment. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of continuing enzalutamide after progression in controlling metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with docetaxel and prednisolone. METHODS: PRESIDE was a two-period, multinational, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3b study done at 123 sites in Europe (in Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, and the UK). Patients were eligible for period 1 (P1) of the study if they had histologically confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma without neuroendocrine differentiation or small-cell features, serum testosterone concentrations of 1·73 nmol/L or less, and had progressed during androgen deprivation therapy with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist or after bilateral orchiectomy. In P1, patients received open-label enzalutamide 160 mg per day orally. At week 13, patients were assessed for either radiographic or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression (25% or more increase and 2 ng/mL or more above nadir). Patients who showed any decline in PSA at week 13 and subsequently progressed (radiographic progression, PSA progression, or both) were screened and enrolled in period 2 (P2), during which eligible patients were treated with up to ten cycles of intravenous docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks and oral prednisolone 10 mg/day, and randomly assigned (1:1) to oral enzalutamide 160 mg/day or oral placebo. Patients were stratified by type of disease progression. The block size was four and the overall number of blocks was 400. Patients, investigators, and study organisers were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival analysed in all patients in P2. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02288247, and is no longer recruiting. FINDINGS: Between Dec 1, 2014, and Feb 15, 2016, 816 patients were screened for P1 of the study. 688 patients were enrolled in P1 and 687 received open-label enzalutamide. In P2, 271 patients were randomly assigned at 73 sites to receive enzalutamide (n=136) or placebo (n=135). The data cutoff for analysis was April 30, 2020. Median progression-free survival with enzalutamide was 9·5 months (95% CI 8·3-10·9) versus 8·3 months (6·3-8·7) with placebo (hazard ratio 0·72 [95% CI 0·53-0·96]; p=0·027). The most common grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (17 [13%] of 136 patients in the enzalutamide group vs 12 [9%] of 135 patients in the placebo group) and asthenia (ten [7%] vs six [4%]). The most common grade 4 treatment-emergent adverse event in P2 was neutropenia (23 [17%] of 136 patients in the enzalutamide group vs 28 [21%] of 135 patients in the placebo group). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 67 (49%) of 136 patients in the enzalutamide group and 52 (39%) of 135 patients in the placebo group. Two (15%) of 13 deaths in the enzalutamide group (caused by septic shock and haematuria) and one (14%) of seven deaths in the placebo group (caused by actue kidney injury) were associated with docetaxel. INTERPRETATION: PRESIDE met its primary endpoint and showed that continuing enzalutamide with docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy delayed time to progression compared with docetaxel plus androgen deprivation therapy alone, supporting the hypothesis that enzalutamide maintenance could control persistent androgen-dependent clones in men with mCRPC who progress after treatment with enzalutamide alone. FUNDING: Astellas Pharma and Pfizer.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Neutropenia/epidemiology , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the associations between age at radical prostate cancer treatment and long-term global quality of life (QoL), physical function (PF), and treatment-related side effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This single-center, cross-sectional study included men treated for localized prostate cancer with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 2014-2018. Global QoL and PF were assessed by the European Organisation of Research and Treatment in Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire-C30 (QLQ-C30), side effects by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-26). Adjusted linear regression models were estimated to assess associations between age (continuous variable) at treatment and outcomes. QLQ-C30 scores were compared to normative data after dividing the cohort in two groups, <70 years and ≥70 years at treatment. RESULTS: Of 654 men included, 516 (79%) had undergone RARP, and 138 (21%) had undergone EBRT combined with androgen deprivation therapy for 93%. Mean time since treatment was 57 months. Median age at treatment was 68 (min-max 44-84) years. We found no statistically significant independent association between age at treatment and global QoL, PF or side effects, except for sexual function (regression coefficient [RC] -0.77; p < 0.001) and hormonal/vitality (RC 0.30; p = 0.006) function. Mean QLQ-C30 scores were slightly poorer than age-adjusted normative scores, for men <70 years (n = 411) as well as for men ≥70 years (n = 243) at treatment, but the differences were not beyond clinical significance. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of prostate cancer survivors, age at treatment had little impact on long-term QoL and function. Due to the cross-sectional design, short term impact or variation over time cannot be ruled out.
Subject(s)
Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Quality of Life , Cross-Sectional Studies , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostate , Prostatectomy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It is unclear which radiotherapy technique and dose fractionation scheme is most effective in decreasing the risk of prostate cancer death. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study among 15 164 men in the Prostate Cancer database Sweden (version 4.0) treated with primary radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer in Sweden from 1998 to 2016. We calculated hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the association between the following exposure groups and outcome: conventionally fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to 78 Gy (39 × 2 Gy), EBRT combined with high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) (25 × 2 Gy + 2 × 10 Gy), conventionally fractionated EBRT to 70 Gy (35 × 2 Gy), and moderately hypofractionated (M-HF) dose-escalated EBRT (29 × 2.5 Gy or 22 × 3 Gy). RESULTS: Of the men, 7296 received conventionally fractionated EBRT to 78 Gy, 4657 EBRT combined with HDR-BT, 1672 conventionally fractionated EBRT to 70 Gy, and 1539 M-HF EBRT. Using EBRT to 78 Gy as the reference, the multivariable hazard ratios (95% CIs) of prostate cancer death was 0.64 (0.53 to 0.78) for EBRT combined with HDR-BT, 1.00 (0.80 to 1.27) for EBRT to 70 Gy, and 1.51 (0.99 to 2.32) for M-HF EBRT. The multivariable hazard ratios (95% CIs) for death from any cause were 0.79 (0.71 to 0.88), 0.99 (0.87 to 1.14), and 1.12 (0.88 to 1.42), respectively. The lower risk of prostate cancer death comparing EBRT combined with HDR-BT with conventionally fractionated EBRT to 78 Gy was more pronounced for men with high-risk or poorly differentiated tumors. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, EBRT combined with HDR-BT was the most effective radiotherapy treatment regimen, especially for poorly differentiated tumors. Randomized trials comparing EBRT combined with HDR-BT with dose-escalated EBRT should be a priority.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has improved patient survival for advanced prostate cancer (PCa). OBJECTIVE: This randomised trial aimed to evaluate whether six courses of docetaxel improved biochemical disease-free survival (BDFS) after radical radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- or high-risk PCa patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 376 patients were randomised in this multinational phase III study, and received either six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel 75â¯mg/m2 every 3 wk without continuous prednisone (arm A, nâ¯=â¯188) or surveillance (arm B, nâ¯=â¯188) after RT (NTC006653848). Neoadjuvant/adjuvant ADT was mandatory for all the patients. The primary endpoint was rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥2â¯ng/ml above the nadir PSA value. Intermediate- or high-risk PCa was defined as T2 with a Gleason score (GS) of 4â¯+â¯3, PSAâ¯>â¯10; T2, GS 8-10, ≤â¯70â¯ng/ml; or any T3. The patients were followed for 5â¯yr by assessing PSA levels every 3 mo for 2â¯yr and every 6 mo thereafter. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The study power was 89% to detect a difference in BDFS between groups, and the sample size calculation accounted for the T2/T3 distribution, where a 12%/15% difference in BDFS was assumed for the T2/T3 patients. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: All six cycles were completed in 147 (78%) of the patients in arm A. The median age was 67â¯yr in both treatment groups, 75% had T3 disease, and 47% had GS 8-10. The median follow-up was 59 mo (range 1-111â¯mo). The primary endpoint was observed for 58 patients in arm A (docetaxel) and for 57 patients in arm B (surveillance). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in the BDFS curves (pâ¯=â¯0.6) between the treatment groups. The 5-yr estimated biochemical progression rates were 31% for arm A and 28% for arm B. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 16% of the docetaxel patients. No deaths were related to the docetaxel treatment. There were 43 deaths during the trial, including 20 in arm A and 23 in arm B, of which nine and seven, respectively, were due to PCa. The hazard ratio from Cox multivariate analysis for PSA progression of arm A (docetaxel) versus arm B (surveillance) was 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.79-1.64, pâ¯=â¯0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant docetaxel without prednisone did not improve BDFS after radical RT with ADT for intermediate- or high-risk PCa. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared six cycles of adjuvant docetaxel given after radical external radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy to surveillance in intermediate- and high-risk localised prostate cancer. We found no overall benefit in this setting.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Docetaxel/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Watchful Waiting , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Risk AssessmentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A correlation exists between applied dose to the prostate and local tumour control. External radiotherapy of the prostate implies administering curative doses near the upper limit of normal tissue tolerance. Brachytherapy with a high dose rate permits an escalation of dose within the prostate without increasing the risk of side effects to the surrounding rectum and bladder. This article presents a study of the first 100 patients in Norway with localized/locally advanced prostate cancer treated with high dose-rate brachytherapy combined with external radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients belonging to an intermediate or high risk group and patients in whom radiotherapy was expected to give rise to increased toxicity (irrespective of the clinical stage) were included. Several hollow steel needles were implanted through the perineum into the gland during general anaesthesia. A small Iridium source with a short irradiation length was introduced stepwise and temporarily into each steel needle, according to a meticulate dosing plan. All patients came to an outpatient control 3-5 months after the combined treatment. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Median follow-up was 8 months. Acute side effects were scarce and few complications from the rectum were seen. The observation time was too short to evaluate the relapse-free survival. High dose rate brachytherapy is indicated in patients with prostate cancer of an intermediate or high risk or if a radiation dose with a full external beam proposes a hazard to the patient. Combined radiotherapy (external beam and high dose rate brachytherapy) is considered to be a standard treatment at the Norwegian Radium Hospital.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Contraindications , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy Dosage , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: PSA kinetics after curative radiotherapy for prostate cancer is an important part of the posttreatment evaluation. We analysed PSA bounce occurrence after combined high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) and external radiotherapy (ERT). MATERIAL & METHODS: We analysed 623 patients treated from 1995 to 2008. The median age was 66â¯years (47-79). The median initial PSA was 12â¯ng/ml (0.1-224). Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was given to 429 patients. ERT was given with 2â¯Gy fractions to 50â¯Gy and HDR-BT in two 10â¯Gy fractions. The median follow-up was 11â¯years (range 2-266â¯months). PSA bounce was defined as a temporary rise in PSA >0.2â¯ng/ml. PSA failure was defined according to the Phoenix definition. RESULTS: PSA bounce occurred in 159 patients (26%), where 56 patients had a bounce amplitude >2â¯ng/ml and 31 patients had multiple bounces. Median time to bounce peak was 15 (3-103) months with a median bounce value of 1.5 (0.3-12)ng/ml. Younger age and lower Gleason scores were associated with PSA bounce. In a Cox regression analysis with PSA bounce as a time-dependent covariate and adjusted for other prognostic factors, PSA bounce was associated with a lower risk for PSA failure (HRâ¯=â¯0.42; 95% confidence interval 0.26-0.70). CONCLUSION: PSA bounce after HDR-BT combined with ERT is common and associated with a good prognosis. As the relapse risk after an early bounce is very low, the findings should alert clinicians not to initiate salvage treatment too early. Research in prospective identification of PSA bounce is clinically relevant.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Radiotherapy DosageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) has optimal prerequisites in radiotherapy of prostate cancer (PC) with a conformal dose distribution and high doses per fraction giving a biological dose escalation. We report the outcome after HDR-BT and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) after 20â¯years of experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study includes 623 patients, median age of 66â¯years, treated from 1995 to 2008 and a median follow up of 11â¯years (range 2-266â¯months). Androgen deprivation therapy was given to 429 patients (69%). The HDR-BT was given with two 10â¯Gy fractions and the EBRT with 2â¯Gy fractions to 50â¯Gy. RESULTS: The 10-year PC-specific survival was 100%, 92%, 91%, and 75% for low-, intermediate-, high- and very high-risk patients respectively, and the 10-year probability of PSA relapse was 0%, 21%, 33%, and 65% respectively. The 10-year actuarial prevalence for ≥grade 2 GU- and GI-toxicities were 28% and 12% respectively and for ≥grade 3, 4% and 1% respectively. Urethral stricture was the most frequent GU complication with a 10-year actuarial incidence of 10%. Treatment without dose constraints for the urethra conferred a higher incidence 18%, compared to 5% after 2003 (pâ¯<â¯0.001). Sixteen patients experienced grade 4 GU toxicity, of which 13 were treated before 2003. No grade 4 rectal toxicity was seen. CONCLUSION: The combination of EBRT and HDR-BT with adequate dose constraints to risk organs provides satisfactory long-term tumour control even in high-risk patients. GI toxicity stabilised but GU toxicity progressed during the 10-year follow up.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, Conformal/methods , Aged , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Brachytherapy/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/etiology , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects , Urethral Stricture/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in prostate cancer (PC) is receiving increasing interest. The steep dose gradient gives a possibility to escalate the dose to the prostate. If the alpha/beta ratio is low for PC, hypofractionation will be of advantage. A retrospective analysis of outcome in patients (pts) consecutively treated with combined HDR-BT and conformal external beam radiotherapy (ERT) was performed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data from 214 pts treated consecutively from 1988 to 2000 were analysed. The median age was 64 years (50-77). Median follow up was 4 years (12-165 months). Pre-irradiatory endocrine therapy was given to 150 pts (70%). The pts were divided into low-, intermediate- and high (80/87/47 pts) risk groups according to the occurrence of none, one, or more risk factors defined by T-classification, PSA and histopathology. ERT was given with 2 Gy fractions to 50 Gy. HDR-BT consisted of two 10 Gy fractions. RESULTS: Overall 5-year biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) was 82%, and for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group bNED was 92, 88 and 61%, respectively. PSA-relapse was found in 17, local recurrence in 3 and distant metastases in 13 pts. Five pts died of PC. No recurrences were observed after 5 years. Severe late complications were few. Urethral stricture (13 pts) was the most frequent. No severe rectal complications were seen. CONCLUSION: Dose escalation with HDR-BT is safe and effective in radiotherapy of localised PC.
Subject(s)
Brachytherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Aged , Disease-Free Survival , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Proton boost of 20 Gy in daily 5 Gy fractions followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions were given to 278 patients with prostate cancer with T1b to T4N0M0 disease. Fifty-three percent of the patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (N-ADT). The medium followup was 57 months. The 5-year PSA progression-free survival was 100%, 95%, and 74% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. The toxicity evaluation was supported by a patient-reported questionnaire before every consultant visit. Cumulative probability and actuarial prevalence of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities are presented according to the RTOG classification. N-ADT did not influence curability. Mild pretreatment GU-symptoms were found to be a strong predictive factor for GU-toxicity attributable to treatment. The actuarial prevalence declined over 3 to 5 years for both GU and GI toxicities, indicating slow resolution of epithelial damage to the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tract. Bladder toxicities rather than gastrointestinal toxicities seem to be dose limiting. More than 5-year followup is necessary to reveal any sign of true progressive late side effects of the given treatment. Hypofractionated proton-boost combined with EBRT is associated with excellent curability of localized PC and acceptable frequencies of treatment toxicity.