Everolimus for the prevention of allograft rejection and vasculopathy in cardiac-transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Everolimus, a novel proliferation inhibitor and immunosuppressive agent, may suppress cardiac-allograft vasculopathy. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial comparing everolimus with azathioprine in recipients of a first heart transplant. METHODS: A total of 634 patients were randomly assigned to receive 1.5 mg of everolimus per day (209 patients), 3.0 mg of everolimus per day (211 patients), or 1.0 to 3.0 mg of azathioprine per kilogram of body weight per day (214 patients), in combination with cyclosporine, corticosteroids, and statins. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of death, graft loss or retransplantation, loss to follow-up, biopsy-proved acute rejection of grade 3A, or rejection with hemodynamic compromise. RESULTS: At six months, the percentage of patients who had reached the primary efficacy end point was significantly smaller in the group given 3.0 mg of everolimus (27.0 percent, P<0.001) and the group given 1.5 mg of everolimus (36.4 percent, P=0.03) than in the azathioprine group (46.7 percent). Intravascular ultrasonography showed that the average increase in maximal intimal thickness 12 months after transplantation was significantly smaller in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. The incidence of vasculopathy was also significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (35.7 percent, P=0.045) and the 3.0-mg group (30.4 percent, P=0.01) than in the azathioprine group (52.8 percent). The rates of cytomegalovirus infection were significantly lower in the 1.5-mg group (7.7 percent, P<0.001) and the 3.0-mg group (7.6 percent, P<0.001) than in the azathioprine group (21.5 percent). Rates of bacterial infection were significantly higher in the 3.0-mg group than in the azathioprine group. Serum creatinine levels were also significantly higher in the two everolimus groups than in the azathioprine group. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus was more efficacious than azathioprine in reducing the severity and incidence of cardiac-allograft vasculopathy, suggesting that everolimus therapy may alleviate this serious problem.

A lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in de novo heart transplant recipients randomized to everolimus.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in recipients of cardiac transplants is associated with higher rates of morbidity. A recent phase III trial showed highly significantly (P<0.001) lower CMV rates with the proliferation signal inhibitor everolimus compared to azathioprine (AZA). To better define this association, data on CMV risk factors were collected retrospectively and analyzed. METHODS: Data on CMV risk factors from a multicenter phase III trial on de novo heart transplant recipients (n=634) receiving a triple immunosuppressive regimen randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg/day (group 1), everolimus 3 mg/day (group 2), or AZA (group 3) were merged with prospectively collected CMV-related outcome data and analyzed. RESULTS: CMV-positive donors (D+) and CMV-negative recipients (R-) were evenly distributed across groups 1-3 at 36/209 (17.2%), 48/211 (22.7%), and 38/214 (17.8%), respectively. CMV prophylaxis had been given for a mean (SD) of 175 (127.8), 183 (137.1), and 177 (132.9) days, respectively. In the high-risk D+/R- subgroup with prophylaxis, the proportions of patients with CMV infection compared with group 3 (12/29 [41.4%]) were 3/25 (12.0%) in group 1 (P=0.031) and 6/36 (16.7%) in group 2 (P=0.049). In D+/R+ subgroups either with or without prophylaxis, the everolimus groups had less CMV disease (P<0.001). The incidence of CMV syndrome, organ involvement, and laboratory evidence was lower with everolimus use compared to AZA. CONCLUSIONS: Everolimus is associated with lower rates of CMV infection, syndrome, or organ involvement, suggesting an additional advantage from the use of everolimus in cardiac transplant recipients.

Multicenter intravascular ultrasound validation study among heart transplant recipients: outcomes after five years.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the validity of first-year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) data as a surrogate marker for long-term outcome after heart transplantation. BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major impediment to long-term graft survival. Intravascular ultrasound is more sensitive than coronary angiography and detects intimal thickening (early CAV) in the coronary arteries of the donor heart. Single-center studies have suggested first-year IVUS results might be a surrogate marker for long-term outcome. METHODS: First-year IVUS results and subsequent five-year clinical follow-up data were reviewed in 125 heart transplant recipients from five institutions. The IVUS tapes (at baseline and one year) were re-analyzed at a core IVUS laboratory. The change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to one year was recorded for several matched sites in the same coronary artery. Patients were classified into two groups: those with >/=0.5 mm in the MIT in any matched site (group 1) and those with MIT <0.5 mm (group 2). RESULTS: Group 1 patients compared with group 2 patients had a higher incidence of death or graft loss (D/GL, 20.8% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.007), had more nonfatal major adverse cardiac events and/or D/GL (45.8% vs. 16.8%; p = 0.003), and had more findings of newly occurring angiographic luminal irregularities (65.2% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study suggests that progression of intimal thickening >/=0.5 mm in the first year after transplantation appears to be a reliable surrogate marker for subsequent mortality, nonfatal major adverse cardiac events, and development of angiographic CAV through five years after heart transplantation.