Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 83(3)2022 03 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35324094

ABSTRACT

Objective: Quetiapine is approved as an adjunctive treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) and as monotherapy for bipolar depression. It is often used off-label for treating anxiety conditions and as an augmentation agent for treatment-resistant depression. However, its benefit in depression with comorbid anxiety disorders has not been systematically evaluated. The current study evaluated the benefit and tolerability of quetiapine as augmentation to first-line antidepressants for MDD comorbid with anxiety disorders.Methods: In this multicenter trial (June 2008-June 2013), 76 adults (aged 18-65 years) with a primary diagnosis of unipolar depression comorbid with at least 1 anxiety disorder (per DSM-IV-TR criteria) received flexible-dose quetiapine extended-release (XR) 50-300 mg/d or placebo as add-on for 12 weeks in a 2:1 ratio. Depression, anxiety, life satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed.Results: Depression, anxiety, and function improved significantly in both groups. On primary outcome measures, quetiapine was superior to placebo in improving depression (17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score: mean difference = -3.64; 95% CI, -7.01 to -0.27) and anxiety symptoms (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale score: mean difference = -4.02; 95% CI, -7.41 to -0.64), as well as Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale score (mean difference = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.15). On secondary measures including the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Penn State Worry Questionnaire, and Quality of Life Satisfaction and Enjoyment Questionnaire, quetiapine produced a greater degree of improvement compared to placebo, but group differences were not statistically significant. Quetiapine was well tolerated, with mostly minor and no serious adverse effects.Conclusions: Quetiapine augmentation may be a useful intervention for MDD with comorbid anxiety.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00688818.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Depressive Disorder, Major , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Anxiety Disorders/complications , Anxiety Disorders/drug therapy , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Delayed-Action Preparations/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Dibenzothiazepines/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Humans , Quality of Life , Quetiapine Fumarate/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome
2.
J ECT ; 25(1): 44-9, 2009 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18665102

ABSTRACT

UNLABELLED: The antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) are well documented, but studies to date have produced heterogeneous results in late-life depression. OBJECTIVE: To address this matter, we evaluated the efficacy of both high- and low-frequency rTMS delivered to the prefrontal cortex of older adults with treatment-resistant major depression. METHODS: Forty-nine older adults (69 +/- 6.7 years) with treatment-refractory major depressive disorders underwent a series of rTMS treatments as an adjuvant to pharmacotherapy. Patients received high-frequency rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, low-frequency stimulation to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, or a combination thereof, at 80-110% of the motor threshold. RESULTS: There was a modest, but statistically significant, mean reduction (24.7%) in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline to the end of treatment. Nine patients were classified as responders (50% HDRS reduction), and 4 patients reached remission status (final HDRS score <8). Similar improvements in HDRS scores were observed for high- and low-frequency rTMS. Treatment was generally well tolerated, and no serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the contention that in older adults with treatment-refractory depression, rTMS can be an effective treatment alternative for some patients.


Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome
3.
Behav Modif ; 41(2): 253-268, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27591430

ABSTRACT

Barlow et al. published the unified protocol (UP) for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders, focusing on common pathological factors across a variety of diagnoses. The limited UP research to date suggests that this treatment may be particularly useful for anxiety disorders. However, it has largely been evaluated only in individual treatment format. The current study examined the effectiveness of the UP treatment in a group format, with individuals with comorbid anxiety disorder symptoms. Twenty-six individuals with clinically significant anxiety symptoms in at least two of the following areas, social anxiety, worry, or panic, participated in a 14-week manualized group treatment using the UP. Significant decreases were found on general anxiety, worry, social anxiety, panic, depression, and negative affect, and increases on positive affect. The UP may hold promise for a transdiagnostic group treatment of comorbid anxiety symptoms, but further examination of this treatment is warranted.


Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Clinical Protocols , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychotherapy, Group/methods , Adult , Humans
4.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat ; 3(6): 919-24, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19300628

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: RTMS has been developed as a novel tool for treating depression but the clinical significance of this treatment has been variable, especially in the older depressed subjects. METHODS: Medication-resistant depressed patients 60 years or older were treated for two weeks (10 sessions) with high-frequency rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex at 100% of motor threshold. Each session consisted of 20 trains at 10Hz delivered in 8-second duration. The patients continued taking their psychotropic medications throughout the study. RESULTS: Nineteen of the 20 subjects completed the trial. One subject dropped out after 8 sessions because of discomfort. The average age of our patients was 66.8 years (6 males and 14 females). Six patients responded and there was a 31.6% mean reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores from baseline at the end of the treatment. There was statistically significant decrease from baseline in both HDRS and HARS scores at the end of treatment. rTMS was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These preliminary finding suggests that rTMS may be an effective treatment alternative to a subpopulation of medication resistant older depressed patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL