Catheter-directed thrombolytic intervention is effective for patients with massive and submassive pulmonary embolism.

BACKGROUND: Massive pulmonary embolism (MPE) is a significant cause of mortality and, with submassive pulmonary embolism (SPE), is associated with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, resulting in ongoing patient morbidity. Standard treatment is anticoagulation, although systemic thrombolytic therapy has been shown to reduce early mortality in patients with MPE and improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in patients with SPE. However, systemic lysis is associated with significant bleeding risk. Early reports of catheter-directed techniques (CDT) suggest favorable outcomes in patients with MPE and SPE with reduced risk of hemorrhage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety outcomes in MPE and SPE patients treated with CDT. METHODS: Seventeen patients treated with CDT for MPE and SPE were clinically and hemodynamically evaluated. Patients were grouped by severity of pulmonary embolism: MPE (n = 5) or SPE (n = 12). Pre- and post-interventional measures were assessed, including pulmonary artery pressures (PAPs), cardiac biomarkers, tricuspid regurgitation, right ventricular (RV) dilatation, and systolic function. Nine patients had contraindications to systemic thrombolytic therapy. RESULTS: PAP was elevated in 94% at presentation. The average dose of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) was 31 mg; 44 mg in MPE and 26 mg in SPE. Pre- and post-intervention PAPs were recorded in 13 patients. All demonstrated an acute reduction in posttreatment PAP, averaging 37%. At presentation, all MPE and 10 (83%) SPE patients showed both RV dilatation and reduced function on echocardiography, which normalized in 76% (13/17) and improved in 24% (4/17) after CDT. Patients who demonstrated left ventricle underfilling before CDT (2 [40%] MPE and 2 [20%] SPE) normalized after CDT. All MPE and 11 (92%) SPE patients had tricuspid regurgitation on echocardiography pretreatment, which resolved in 60% and 58% of MPE and SPE patients, respectively. One delayed mortality occurred in an MPE patient who was hypotensive and hypoxic at presentation. There was one puncture site bleed. CONCLUSIONS: CDT was successful in the acute management of patients with MPE and SPE. CDT rapidly restores cardiopulmonary hemodynamics using reduced doses of rt-PA. These observations suggest that CDT should be considered in MPE and SPE patients to rapidly restore cardiopulmonary hemodynamics, reduce acute morbidity and mortality, reduce bleeding complications, and potentially avoid long-term morbidity.

Role of coexisting contralateral primary venous disease in development of post-thrombotic syndrome following catheter-based treatment of iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that early clot removal benefits patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) by removing obstruction and preserving valve function. However, a substantial number of patients who had successful clot removal develop post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Residual thrombus and rethrombosis play a part in this phenomenon, but the role of coexisting primary chronic venous disease (PCVD) in these patients has not been studied. METHODS: All patients who underwent catheter-based techniques of thrombus removal for symptomatic acute iliofemoral DVT during a 5-year period compose the study group. These patients were assessed for PTS by the Villalta scale, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study on Quality of Life (VEINES-QOL) questionnaire. The presence of coexisting PCVD was determined by clinical and duplex ultrasound findings in the contralateral leg at the time of the initial DVT diagnosis. Patients who had coexisting PCVD were compared with those without PCVD. RESULTS: Forty patients (40 limbs) were included in the study group. At initial diagnosis, 15 patients (38%) had coexisting symptomatic primary valve reflux in the unaffected limb. After thrombolysis, 9 of 40 limbs (22%) had complete lysis, 29 (73%) had ≥ 50% to 99% lysis, and 2 (5%) had <50% lysis. The mean percentage of lysis in patients with or without PCVD was similar (78% vs 86%; P = .13). Patients without coexisting PCVD had significantly better Villalta score and VCSS compared with those with coexisting PCVD (Villalta score, 2.52 vs 3.27, P = .014; VCSS, 2.96 vs 3.29, P = .005). Forty-five percent of patients (18 of 40) developed PTS. Patients who developed PTS had less clot lysis than those without PTS. This was true for patients with coexisting PCVD (60% vs 85%; P = .025) and in patients without PCVD (75% vs 89%; P = .013). There was no significant difference in the VEINES-QOL score between those with or without PCVD (79.5 vs 80.5; P = .9). Patients who had reflux in the treated limb after lysis had a five times greater chance for development of PTS compared with those who retained normal valve function during follow-up (odds ratio, 5.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-17.045). However, in patients with normal veins in the contralateral leg, the chance of development of PTS was 1.5 times higher if reflux was present in the treated limb (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.043-10.253). CONCLUSIONS: Coexisting PCVD is a contributing factor to development of PTS after treatment of iliofemoral DVT with thrombus removal techniques.