Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
J Public Health (Oxf) ; 45(1): 214-217, 2023 03 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34651189

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment refusal, defined as active refusal of a patient to receive treatment despite physician recommendations, has not been extensively evaluated before in hepatitis C virus in the era of direct acting antivirals. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reasons for refusal to receive hepatitis C virus treatment in Egypt. METHODS: an observational study conducted between July 2018 and November 2019 in Egypt. Enrollment was done to all patients who refused to get hepatitis C virus treatment during the national screening and treatment campaign. Reasons for their refusal were identified using a questionnaire as an instrument for data collection. RESULTS: Out of the 220 280 Egyptian hepatitis C virus patients who did not show up to start treatment and were contacted to get therapy, only 84 patients (0.038%) refused to receive treatment. The main reason for their refusal was having concerns about treatment (82.14%) and their main concern was the fear of adverse events (85.5%). Other causes of refusal were non-satisfactory experience at treatment centers (13.09%) and patients preferred to receive complementary and alternative medicines (4.7%). Most patients (65.4%) trusted the efficacy of directly acting antivirals for hepatitis C. None of the study participants was found to suffer from any psychiatric morbidity and the average score of the GHQ-12 was 10.7155. CONCLUSION: Proper health education and awareness regarding hepatitis C virus treatment safety and efficacy is needed to increase treatment acceptance rates.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Hepatitis C , Humans , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus , Egypt/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 254, 2022 08 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35941548

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to investigate the effect of transforaminal injection of Magnesium sulphate versus Ozone on pain intensity, functional disability and the oxidative stress biomarkers; superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Glutathione (GSH) in patients with lumbar disc prolapse. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 135 patients having symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse, received either transforaminal injection of Magnesium sulphate with steroids, Ozone with steroids, or steroids alone. Assessment of pain severity and functional disability were done before intervention, 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months after intervention. Serum SOD and GSH were measured for all included patients before and 2 weeks after intervention. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in pain intensity and functional disability 2 weeks after intervention in the three groups, but at 1-month and 3-months after intervention, the significant improvement was in Mg sulphate and Ozone groups only. At 6-months follow up, Mg sulphate group only showed a significant improvement. There was a statistically significant increase in SOD and GSH serum levels, 2-weeks after intervention in both Magnesium sulphate (P-value = 0.002, 0.005 respectively) and ozone groups (P-value < 0.001, < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant change in SOD and GSH serum levels in control group. CONCLUSION: Transforaminal injection of Mg sulphate in patients with lumbar disc prolapse causes significant long-term improvement (up to 6 months) in pain intensity and functional disability. The serum levels of SOD and GSH were significantly increased at 2 weeks following both transforaminal injection of Mg sulphate and ozone.


Subject(s)
Intervertebral Disc Displacement , Ozone , Biomarkers , Humans , Injections, Epidural , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/complications , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/drug therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Magnesium Sulfate/therapeutic use , Oxidative Stress , Ozone/therapeutic use , Pain/drug therapy , Pain/etiology , Prolapse , Steroids/therapeutic use , Superoxide Dismutase , Treatment Outcome
3.
Int J Soc Psychiatry ; 69(5): 1202-1212, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36803107

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of mental health services in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), reluctance in seeking a mental health professional is widely prevalent. In many countries, psychiatric patients consult Traditional Healers (THs) prior to seeing mental health professionals. Data from the UAE on the pattern of consulting THs is limited. AIMS: To investigate patterns and factors for visiting THs in psychiatric patients in Abu Dhabi, the capital of UAE. METHOD: We conducted a cross-sectional study of patients attending the adult psychiatry clinic, Maudsley Health, Abu Dhabi. We assessed 214 patients for the pattern and possible factors for contact with THs on their pathway to psychiatric care. RESULTS: There were 58 males and 156 females. Most (43.5%) had a depressive disorder. Prior to consulting a mental health professional, 28% had seen a TH, of whom 36.7% had only one visit and 60% had seen only one TH. Advice from a friend or family member was the commonest reason for consulting THs (81.7%). Envy was the commonest explanation given by THs for symptoms (26.7%). Female gender and having a high school education or less significantly predicted contact with THs. CONCLUSIONS: Almost a third of our sample consulted THs prior to seeking psychiatric care. Closer collaboration with THs could help bridge the gap with psychiatrists to avoid delays in patients accessing psychiatric care, however caution is needed to mitigate the possible negative effects of such a collaboration.


Subject(s)
Mental Health Services , Traditional Medicine Practitioners , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , United Arab Emirates , Critical Pathways , Cross-Sectional Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL