Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Cancer ; 126(24): 5247-5255, 2020 12 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32975815

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We previously reported on a phase 2 study of everolimus plus bevacizumab across various nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) histologies and observed encouraging activity among patients with papillary RCC (pRCC) and unclassified RCC (uRCC) with a major papillary component. We subsequently expanded the study to enroll additional patients with pRCC variants. METHODS: Everolimus plus bevacizumab was administered at standard doses until disease progression or intolerance to therapy. The primary endpoint was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate; secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Correlative analyses included next-generation sequencing (NGS) from tumor and germline across >341 genes of interest. RESULTS: In addition to 19 patients with pRCC variants in the original cohort, 20 patients with similar features were enrolled on the expansion cohort (uRCC with papillary features [n = 24], pRCC [n = 14], and translocation-associated RCC with papillary features [n = 1]). Among 37 evaluable patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 78%, the median PFS was 13.7 months (95% CI, 10.8-16.4 months), and the ORR was 35%. With a median follow-up of 17.6 months, the median OS was 33.9 months (95% CI, 23.3-71.9). Tolerance was consistent with prior reports for everolimus plus bevacizumab. NGS results (n = 33) identified responses in patients with a wide spectrum of genomic alterations, including ARID1A, FH, and MET mutations. CONCLUSION: The expansion cohort results confirm robust activity of everolimus plus bevacizumab in metastatic pRCC variants, supporting this regimen as a standard option for this patient population.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Bevacizumab/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Everolimus/administration & dosage , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/genetics , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Everolimus/therapeutic use , Female , Fumarate Hydratase/genetics , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Kidney Neoplasms/genetics , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/genetics , Sequence Analysis, DNA , Survival Analysis , Transcription Factors/genetics , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 39(1): 30-37, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822275

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The objective response rate (ORR) for single-agent anti-programmed death receptor 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy is modest in patients with metastatic or recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to test whether radiotherapy may act synergistically with anti-PD-1 therapy to improve response through the abscopal effect. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, randomized, phase II trial of nivolumab (anti-PD-1 therapy) versus nivolumab plus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in patients with metastatic HNSCC. Patients had at least two metastatic lesions: one that could be safely irradiated and one measurable by RECIST version 1.1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by human papillomavirus status, to nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) or nivolumab (same dose) plus SBRT (9 Gy × 3) to 1 lesion. The primary end point was ORR in nonirradiated lesions, which was assessed by RECIST in patients with at least one available set of on-treatment images; safety was assessed in a per-protocol population. RESULTS: Between March 11, 2016, and June 22, 2018, 62 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 30) or nivolumab plus SBRT (n = 32). There was no statistically significant ORR difference between arms (34.5% [95% CI, 19.9% to 52.7%] v 29.0% [95% CI, 16.1% to 46.6%]; P = .86). There was no significant difference in overall survival (P = .75), progression-free survival (P = .79), or response duration (P = .26). Grade 3-5 toxicities were similar (13.3% v 9.7%; P = .70). CONCLUSION: We found no improvement in response and no evidence of an abscopal effect with the addition of SBRT to nivolumab in unselected patients with metastatic HNSCC.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Radiosurgery , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/pathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL