ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a further opportunity to prevent HIV, is available at the WIR-Walk In Ruhr, Centre for Sexual Health and Medicine, as part of an innovative model project for intersectoral PrEP care. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES: The present study describes the collective of persons provided with PrEP and how PrEP use influences sexual risk behaviour, the incidence of sexually transmitted diseases (STD) and adverse drug reactions. METHODS: A total of 139 men who started PrEP between 10/2017 and 12/2018 have been included in the study. During a period of 13 months of PrEP treatment, all PrEP users received questionnaires; side effects, HIV and other STI were also monitored via clinical laboratory examinations. RESULTS: The participants' average age was 38 years and 98.6% of them were men who had sex with men (MSM). Most of them had a high educational background; the unemployment rate was low. The average number of sexual partners within the last 6 months increased significantly, while the use of condoms decreased. In all, 44 STI were found in 34 participants within the first 4 months. No one was infected with HIV. Within the first 4 weeks of PrEP, 38.8% of the participants suffered from side effects, mainly gastrointestinal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Most of the participants were working in a job or a vocational training. The sexual risk behaviour increased in the course of using PrEP resulting in a high incidence of STD. Side effects appeared most frequently in the first few weeks after starting PrEP.
Subject(s)
HIV Infections/prevention & control , Homosexuality, Male , Intersectoral Collaboration , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis , Adult , Germany , Humans , Male , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In Germany, oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) was licensed in 2016. Health insurances have been covering the costs since 09/2019. This study compares the sociodemographic profiles of PrEP users before and after PrEP re-imbursement. METHODS: Participants were recruited in a cross-sectoral sexual health centre in Germany. baseline data were compared for 139 vs 138 individuals starting PrEP from 10/2017-12/2018 (pre-reimbursement cohort) and 09/2019-3/2020; respectively. The pre-reimbursement cohort was further analysed with respect to sexual behaviour and incident sexually transmitted infections (STIs). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the sociodemographic characteristics between the two cohorts. Almost all PrEP users were men-who-have-sex-with-men (MSM). Before reimbursement, fewer individuals used PrEP on a daily base, and more had used PrEP prior to enrolment. During follow-up (pre-reimbursement cohort), the number of sexual and condomless intercourse partners increased, so did the proportion engaging in Chemsex. Incidences of infections with C.trachomatis, N.gonorrhoeae, M.genitalium, and T.pallidum were 45.2; 36.8; 30.1; and 9.2, respectively, per 100 person-years. CONCLUSION: The goal to make PrEP available to a broader range of people with the covering of costs was only partially reached. Medically supervised use is important to detect and treat STIs.