Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Reprod Domest Anim ; 53(1): 127-136, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28960537

ABSTRACT

Traditionally, extenders for bull semen included egg yolk or milk, but recently there has been a move to avoid material of animal origin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two commercial extenders (based on soya lecithin and liposomes) on bull sperm quality after cryopreservation. Post-thaw sperm quality was evaluated by computer-assisted sperm analysis and flow cytometric assessment of membrane integrity, chromatin integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, production of reactive oxygen species and tyrosine phosphorylation. Furthermore, an artificial insemination (AI) trial was conducted, and 56-day non-return rates were evaluated. Semen frozen in the liposome-based extender showed similar membrane integrity and higher mitochondrial membrane potential compared to those in the soya lecithin-based extender. Chromatin integrity and production of live H2 O2 + reactive oxygen species were similar in both extenders. Less superoxide was produced in the samples extended with liposome-based extender, with or without menadione stimulation. Chromatin integrity and tyrosine phosphorylation were not affected by either type of extender. No differences in 56-day non-return rate between extenders containing soya lecithin and liposomes were observed in the AI trial (66% ± 0.8 and 65% ± 0.8, respectively). In conclusion, the sperm quality of bull semen frozen in the two extenders that do not contain material of animal origin was similar, although the semen frozen in the liposome-based extender had higher mitochondrial membrane potential. Either extender could be used in situations where extenders containing material of animal origin are to be avoided.


Subject(s)
Cattle , Cryopreservation/veterinary , Cryoprotective Agents/pharmacology , Lecithins , Liposomes , Animals , Cell Membrane/drug effects , Cryopreservation/methods , Female , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Insemination, Artificial/veterinary , Male , Membrane Potential, Mitochondrial/drug effects , Semen Analysis , Semen Preservation/methods , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Glycine max , Spermatozoa/physiology , Vitamin K 3/pharmacology
2.
Anim Reprod Sci ; 187: 74-78, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29037850

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare sperm DNA fragmentation of frozen-thawed epididymal sperm of dogs using the SCSA (Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay) and SCDt (Sperm Chromatin Dispersion test). For this purpose, epididymis from neutered dogs were minced and incubated in a Tris-based extender. The recovered sperm were frozen in a two-step cooling protocol with Tris-based, egg yolk extender and increasing glycerol concentrations, and stored in liquid nitrogen. After thawing, each replica was incubated at 38°C for 24h. Sperm DNA fragmentation index (sDFi) was assessed by SCSA and SCDt at 0, 3, 6 and 24h of incubation and compared within treatments. The relationship and agreement between techniques were evaluated by Pearson's coefficient and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). The results were expressed as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). Both techniques indicated there was a significant increase of DNA fragmentation after 24h of incubation. Moderate correlation (r=0.65; P<0.01) but lack of agreement (ICC=0.451; P>0.05) was found between SCSA and SCDt. The lack of agreement indicates that SCSA and SCDt measure different aspects of DNA fragmentation. Four halo morphologies were detected after 24h of incubation using the SCDt: un-fragmented DNA with a small halo, fragmented DNA with large halo and two new halo presentations never described before for dog sperm: receding sperm with a disappearing halo and "bald" sperm without chromatin dispersion halo around the core. Sperm without a halo of chromatin dispersion are not described by the manufacturer and are similar to un-fragmented sperm, which could lead to erroneous results when using the SCDt. Further studies with different incubation periods and including the new morphologies described in this study should be performed. In conclusion, although SCSA and SCDt can evaluate the changes in the sperm DNA fragmentation dynamics of frozen-thawed epididymal dog sperm, these provided different findings on sperm DNA fragmentation.


Subject(s)
Cryopreservation/veterinary , Dogs/physiology , Epididymis/physiology , Semen Analysis/methods , Semen Preservation/veterinary , Spermatozoa/physiology , Animals , Chromatin/chemistry , DNA Fragmentation , Epididymis/cytology , Freezing , Male , Semen Preservation/methods , Spermatozoa/cytology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL