Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Eur J Neurol ; 31(6): e16250, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cladribine tablets, a purine analogue antimetabolite, offer a unique treatment regimen, involving short courses at the start of the first and second year, with no further treatment needed in years 3 and 4. However, comprehensive evidence regarding patient outcomes beyond the initial 24 months of cladribine treatment is limited. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study enrolled 204 patients with multiple sclerosis who had completed the 2-year course of cladribine treatment. The primary outcomes were therapeutic choices and clinical disease activity assessed by annualized relapse rate after the 2-year treatment course. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were enrolled; most patients (75.4%) did not initiate new treatments in the 12 months postcladribine. The study found a significant reduction in annualized relapse rate at the 12-month follow-up after cladribine completion compared to the year prior to starting therapy (0.07 ± 0.25 vs. 0.82 ± 0.80, p < 0.001). Furthermore, patients with relapses during cladribine treatment were more likely to start new therapies, whereas older patients were less likely. The safety profile of cladribine was favorable, with lymphopenia being the primary registered adverse event. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides insights into therapeutic choices and disease activity following cladribine treatment. It highlights cladribine's effectiveness in reducing relapse rates and disability progression, reaffirming its favorable safety profile. Real-world data, aligned with previous reports, draw attention to ocrelizumab and natalizumab as common choices after cladribine. However, larger, prospective studies for validation and a more comprehensive understanding of cladribine's long-term impact are necessary.


Subject(s)
Cladribine , Immunosuppressive Agents , Humans , Cladribine/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Italy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy
2.
Front Immunol ; 14: 1161849, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37334371

ABSTRACT

Interferon-beta (IFN-ß) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is turning 30. The COVID-19 pandemic rejuvenated the interest in interferon biology in health and disease, opening translational opportunities beyond neuroinflammation. The antiviral properties of this molecule are in accord with the hypothesis of a viral etiology of MS, for which a credible culprit has been identified in the Epstein-Barr Virus. Likely, IFNs are crucial in the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection, as demonstrated by inherited and acquired impairments of the interferon response that predispose to a severe COVID-19 course. Accordingly, IFN-ß exerted protection against SARS-CoV-2 in people with MS (pwMS). In this viewpoint, we summarize the evidence on IFN-ß mechanisms of action in MS with a focus on its antiviral properties, especially against EBV. We synopsize the role of IFNs in COVID-19 and the opportunities and challenges of IFN-ß usage for this condition. Finally, we leverage the lessons learned in the pandemic to suggest a role of IFN-ß in long-COVID-19 and in special MS subpopulations.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Interferon-beta/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Interferons/therapeutic use , Interferons/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology
3.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 68: 104156, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36137347

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus 19 pandemic has raised new relevant questions regarding the management of patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with different immunosuppressive and immunomodulant drugs. In most COVID-19 outcomes analyses, due to the small available sample size, patients treated with cladribine were grouped with patients treated with other treatments. METHODS: Three major databases (PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) and the most recent MS congress libraries were searched for extracting original articles on COVID-19 and multiple sclerosis. The key inclusion criteria were the presence of data on pwMS treated with cladribine and with documented positivity for COVID-19. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Dutch Cochrane center critical review checklist proposed by MOOSE. A common-effect meta-analysis was used for estimating the pooled proportion of patients with severe events (hospitalizations, pneumonia, ICU admissions and deaths) and heterogeneity was assessed by the I2 statistic. RESULTS: 13 articles were included in the analysis and the median quality of the articles reached a level of 4. The selected studies included 5138 patients with COVID-19, of whom 107 (2.1%) were treated with cladribine. Pooled estimates of hospitalization and death were 9.36% and 0% for patients treated with cladribine, 14.98% and 2.66% for pwMS under other treatments. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that pwMS treated with cladribine are not at a greater risk of developing a severe form of COVID-19. REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42022329464).


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Cladribine/therapeutic use , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis/chemically induced , Pandemics , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use
4.
Front Neurol ; 13: 851413, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35493841

ABSTRACT

Pregnancy-related issues in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) have been receiving increasing attention, with particular interest for the use of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) before conception, during pregnancy, and postpartum, including breastfeeding. The risk of relapse is higher in the early postpartum period, especially in cases of significant disease activity prior to pregnancy, and thus treatment resumption and/or switching strategies might be necessary. Moreover, breastfeeding provides unmatched health benefits for babies and mothers, and is recommended as the best source of nutrition for infants. Furthermore, a protective role of breastfeeding on MS disease course has not been fully demonstrated and it remains debatable. At the same time, a source of concern is the potential transfer of DMTs into breastmilk and the resulting infant exposure. The use of most DMTs is unlicensed during breastfeeding mainly due to the limited data available on the excretion in human milk and on the effects on infants' exposure. Consequently, women have to face the difficult challenge of choosing between breastfeeding and DMT resumption. The present narrative review summarizes and discusses the available evidence on the safety of DMTs during breastfeeding and the relative approved labels. At the time of diagnosis of MS, specific counseling should be offered to women of childbearing age, making them aware of the possible therapeutic options and their impact on pregnancy and breastfeeding. Women can be encouraged to breastfeed, if clinically feasible, following a review of their medications and clinical status, with a personalized approach.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL