Blepharocheilodontic syndrome is a CDH1 pathway-related disorder due to mutations in CDH1 and CTNND1.

PURPOSE: Blepharocheilodontic (BCD) syndrome is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by eyelid malformations, cleft lip/palate, and ectodermal dysplasia. The molecular basis of BCD syndrome remains unknown. METHODS: We recruited 11 patients from 8 families and performed exome sequencing for 5 families with de novo BCD syndrome cases and targeted Sanger sequencing in the 3 remaining families. RESULTS: We identified five CDH1 heterozygous missense mutations and three CTNND1 heterozygous truncating mutations leading to loss-of-function or haploinsufficiency. Establishment of detailed genotype-phenotype correlations was not possible because of the size of the cohort; however, the phenotype seems to appear more severe in case of CDH1 mutations. Functional analysis of CDH1 mutations confirmed their deleterious impact and suggested accelerated E-cadherin degradation. CONCLUSION: Mutations in CDH1 encoding the E-cadherin were previously reported in hereditary diffuse gastric cancer as well as in nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate. Mutations in CTNND1 have never been reported before. The encoded protein, p120ctn, prevents E-cadherin endocytosis and stabilizes its localization at the cell surface. Conditional deletion of Cdh1 and Ctnnd1 in various animal models induces features reminiscent of BCD syndrome and underlines critical role of the E-cadherin-p120ctn interaction in eyelid, craniofacial, and tooth development. Our data assert BCD syndrome as a CDH1 pathway-related disorder due to mutations in CDH1 and CTNND1 and widen the phenotypic spectrum of E-cadherin anomalies.Genet Med advance online publication 09 March 2017.

Clinical and molecular characterization of the 20q11.2 microdeletion syndrome: six new patients.

Interstitial microdeletions of 20q chromosome are rare, only 17 patients have been reported in the literature to date. Among them, only six carried a proximal 20q11.21-q11.23 deletion, with a size ranging from 2.6 to 6.8 Mb. The existence of a 20q11.2 microdeletion syndrome has been proposed, based on five previously reported cases that displayed anomalies of the extremities, intellectual disability, feeding difficulties, craniofacial dysmorphism and variable malformations. To further characterize this syndrome, we report on six new patients with 20q11.2 microdeletions diagnosed by whole-genome array-based comparative genomic hybridization. These patient reports more precisely refined the phenotype and narrowed the minimal critical region involved in this syndrome. Careful clinical assessment confirms the distinctive clinical phenotype. The craniofacial dysmorphism consists of high forehead, frontal bossing, enophthalmos, and midface hypoplasia. We have identified a 1.62 megabase minimal critical region involved in this syndrome encompassing three genes­GDF5, EPB41L1, andSAMHD1­which are strong candidates for different aspects of the phenotype. These results support that 20q11.2 microdeletion syndrome is a new contiguous gene deletion syndrome with a recognizable phenotype.

Maternal uniparental disomy 14 revealed by alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency.

UNLABELLED: Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is an autosomal co-dominant disease linked to a mutation of the SERPINA1 gene localized to chromosome 14q32. Uniparental disomy (UPD) is known to be a genetic mechanism that causes various syndromes. Maternal UPD14 presents with a Prader-Willi syndrome-like phenotype. No publications to date have dealt with the association of these two syndromes. In this article, we report on two cases of AATD (from different families), which lead to the diagnosis of maternal UPD14. AATD was diagnosed early in both children. Their clinical presentations were typical (chronic cytolysis in patient 1 and neonatal cholestasis in patient 2); serum alpha 1 antitrypsin levels were low (P1 0.33g/L and P2 0.35g/L), and both patients had a Z phenotype. A pedigree study of both families showed that the father had an M phenotype and the mother an MZ phenotype, which was unexpected. On the other hand, both children were born before term and presented with symmetrical growth retardation, early eating difficulties, moderate hypotonia, understated dysmorphic features and moderate psychomotor retardation, suggestive of a Prader-Willi syndrome-like phenotype. Genotyping was performed to explain gene transmission inconsistencies, and highlighted maternal UPD 14 in both families. CONCLUSION: Logically, maternal UPD 14 can induce AATD. In light of these observations, it seems appropriate to search for AATD in patients with maternal UPD 14 in order to prevent a progression of the disease. These cases also underline the significance of maternal UPD 14, which should be suspected in AATD in view of the discordance with Mendel's allelic transmission law.