Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Med J Aust ; 197(4): 226-9, 2012 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22900873

ABSTRACT

Appropriate assessment and management of diabetes-related foot ulcers (DRFUs) is essential to reduce amputation risk. Management requires debridement, wound dressing, pressure off-loading, good glycaemic control and potentially antibiotic therapy and vascular intervention. As a minimum, all DRFUs should be managed by a doctor and a podiatrist and/or wound care nurse. Health professionals unable to provide appropriate care for people with DRFUs should promptly refer individuals to professionals with the requisite knowledge and skills. Indicators for immediate referral to an emergency department or multidisciplinary foot care team (MFCT) include gangrene, limb-threatening ischaemia, deep ulcers (bone, joint or tendon in the wound base), ascending cellulitis, systemic symptoms of infection and abscesses. Referral to an MFCT should occur if there is lack of wound progress after 4 weeks of appropriate treatment.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Australia , Bandages , Debridement , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/etiology , Diabetic Foot/therapy , Humans , Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Osteomyelitis/complications , Osteomyelitis/diagnosis , Osteomyelitis/therapy , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/surgery , Soft Tissue Infections/complications , Soft Tissue Infections/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Infections/drug therapy
2.
ANZ J Surg ; 92(9): 2305-2311, 2022 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35674397

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Frailty predicts adverse perioperative outcomes and increased mortality in patients having vascular surgery. Frailty assessment is a potential tool to inform resource allocation, and shared decision-making about vascular surgery in the resource constrained COVID-19 pandemic environment. This cohort study describes the prevalence of frailty in patients having vascular surgery and the association between frailty, mortality and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: The COVID-19 Vascular Service in Australia (COVER-AU) prospective cohort study evaluates 30-day and six-month outcomes for consecutive patients having vascular surgery in 11 Australian vascular units, March-July 2020. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes procedure-related outcomes and hospital utilization. Frailty was assessed using the nine-point visual Clinical Frailty Score, scores of 5 or more considered frail. RESULTS: Of the 917 patients enrolled, 203 were frail (22.1%). The 30 day and 6 month mortality was 2.0% (n = 20) and 5.9% (n = 35) respectively with no significant difference between frail and non-frail patients (OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.79-3.54). However, frail patients stayed longer in hospital, had more perioperative complications, and were more likely to be readmitted or have a reoperation when compared to non-frail patients. At 6 months, frail patients had twice the odds of major amputation compared to non-frail patients, after adjustment (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.17-3.78), driven by a high rate of amputation during the period of reduced surgical activity. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight that older, frail patients, experience potentially preventable adverse outcomes and there is a need for targeted interventions to optimize care, especially in times of healthcare stress.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Frailty , Aged , Amputation, Surgical , Australia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Frail Elderly , Frailty/epidemiology , Geriatric Assessment , Humans , Length of Stay , Pandemics , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects
4.
J Foot Ankle Res ; 6(1): 6, 2013 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23442978

ABSTRACT

Trauma, in the form of pressure and/or friction from footwear, is a common cause of foot ulceration in people with diabetes. These practical recommendations regarding the provision of footwear for people with diabetes were agreed upon following review of existing position statements and clinical guidelines. The aim of this process was not to re-invent existing guidelines but to provide practical guidance for health professionals on how they can best deliver these recommendations within the Australian health system. Where information was lacking or inconsistent, a consensus was reached following discussion by all authors. Appropriately prescribed footwear, used alone or in conjunction with custom-made foot orthoses, can reduce pedal pressures and reduce the risk of foot ulceration. It is important for all health professionals involved in the care of people with diabetes to both assess and make recommendations on the footwear needs of their clients or to refer to health professionals with such skills and knowledge. Individuals with more complex footwear needs (for example those who require custom-made medical grade footwear and orthoses) should be referred to health professionals with experience in the prescription of these modalities and who are able to provide appropriate and timely follow-up. Where financial disadvantage is a barrier to individuals acquiring appropriate footwear, health care professionals should be aware of state and territory based equipment funding schemes that can provide financial assistance. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders and people living in rural and remote areas are likely to have limited access to a broad range of footwear. Provision of appropriate footwear to people with diabetes in these communities needs be addressed as part of a comprehensive national strategy to reduce the burden of diabetes and its complications on the health system.

5.
Diabetes Care ; 32(10): 1907-9, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19587371

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the microbiological profile of diabetes-related foot infections (DRFIs) and the impact of wound duration, inpatient treatment, and chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Postdebridement microbiological samples were collected from individuals presenting with DRFIs from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2007. RESULTS: A total of 653 specimens were collected from 379 individuals with 36% identifying only one isolate. Of the total isolates, 77% were gram-positive bacteria (staphylococci 43%, streptococci 13%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was isolated from 23%; risk factors for MRSA included prolonged wound duration (odds ratio 2.31), inpatient management (2.19), and CKD (OR 1.49). Gram-negative infections were more prevalent with inpatient management (P = 0.002) and prolonged wound duration (P < 0.001). Pseudomonal isolates were more common in chronic wounds (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DRFIs are predominantly due to gram-positive aerobes but are usually polymicrobial and increase in complexity with inpatient care and ulcer duration. In the presence of prolonged duration, inpatient management, or CKD, empiric MRSA antibiotic cover should be considered.


Subject(s)
Diabetic Foot/microbiology , Diabetic Foot/pathology , Hospitalization , Kidney Diseases/physiopathology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/physiology , Staphylococcal Infections/physiopathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Gram-Negative Bacteria/pathogenicity , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Middle Aged , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL