Safety-net hospitals versus non-safety centers and clinical outcomes after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare post-procedural outcomes of trans-catheter valve replacement (TAVR) among safety-net (SNH) and non-safety net hospitals (non-SNH). BACKGROUND: SNH treat a large population of un-insured and low income patients; prior studies report worse outcome at these centers. Results of TAVR at these centers is limited. METHODS: Adults undergoing TAVR at hospitals in the US participating in the National In-patient sample (NIS) database from January 2014 to December 2015 were included. A 1:1 propensity-matched cohort of patients operated at SNH and non-SNH institutions was analyzed, on the basis of 16 demographic and clinical co-variates. Main outcome was all-cause post-procedural mortality. Secondary outcomes included stroke, acute kidney injury and length of post-operative stay. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2015, 41,410 patients (mean age 80 ± 0.11 years, 46% female) underwent TAVR at 731 centers; 6,996 (16.80%) procedures were performed at SNH comprising 135/731 (18.4%) of all centers performing TAVR. SNH patients were more likely to be female (49% vs. 46%, p < .001); admitted emergently (31% vs. 21%; p < .001; at the lowest quartile for household income (25% % vs. 20%; p < .001) and from minorities (Blacks 5.9% vs. 3.9%; Hispanic 7.2% vs. 3.2%).Adjusted logistic regression was performed on 6,995 propensity-matched patient pairs. Post-procedural mortality [OR 0.99(0.98-1.007); p = .43], stroke [OR 1.009(0.99-1.02); p = .08], acute kidney injury [OR 0.99(0.96-1.01); p = .5] and overall length of stay (6.9 ± 0.1 vs. 7.1 ± 0.2 days; p = .57) were comparable in both cohorts. CONCLUSION: Post-procedural outcomes after TAVR at SNH are comparable to national outcomes and wider adoption of TAVR at SNH may not adversely influence outcomes.

Giant right coronary artery aneurysm in the setting of the acute coronary syndrome: A case report.

Giant right coronary artery (RCA) aneurysm is a rare coronary artery pathology. We describe a 45-year-old gentleman who presented with unstable angina of recent onset. Diagnostic workup including chest computed tomography angiography and left heart catheterization demonstrated three-vessel coronary artery disease with giant proximal RCA aneurysm. In the view of the severity of the coronary artery disease and the risk of rupture associated with the giant RCA aneurysm and the clinical presentation, the patient was successfully treated by coronary artery bypass surgery. During this procedure, the RCA aneurysm was ligated at both inflow and outflow. The patient recovered well and was discharged home.

Risk Calculator to Predict 30-Day Readmission After Coronary Artery Bypass: A Strategic Decision Support Tool.

BACKGROUND: Re-admission is an important source of patient dissatisfaction and increased hospital costs. A simple calculator to determine the probability of re-admission may help guide patient dismissal planning. METHODS: Using the national readmissions database (NRD), we identified admissions for isolated primary coronary artery bypass (CABG) and stratified them according to 30-day readmission. Including pre, intra and postoperative variables, we prepared a logistic regression model to determine the probability for re-admission. The model was tested for reliability with boot-strapping and 10-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: From 135,699 procedures, 19,355 were readmitted at least once within 30days of dismissal. Patients who were readmitted were older (67±10 vs 65 ± 10 years, p<0.01), females (32% vs 24%; p<0.01) and had a higher Elixhauser comorbidity score (1.5±1.4 vs 1.1±1.2; p<0.01). Our final model (c- statistic=0.65) consisted of 16 pre and three postoperative factors. End-stage renal disease (OR 1.79 [1.57-2.04]) and length of stay>9days (OR 1.60 [1.52-1.68]) were most prominent indicators for readmission. Compared to Medicaid beneficiaries, those with private insurance (OR 0.62 [0.57-0.68]) and Medicare (OR 0.85 [0.79-0.92]) coverage were less likely to be readmitted. CONCLUSIONS: Our simple 30-days CABG readmission calculator can be used as a strategic tool to help reduce readmissions after coronary artery bypass surgery.

Tissue valves are preferable for patients with end-stage renal disease: an aggregate meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Valve selection in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare clinical outcome in ESRD patients undergoing valve replacement. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple databases (2000-October 2015) to identify original studies comparing adverse events between mechanical and biological valve replacement in ESRD patients. End-points studied were: postoperative mortality, bleeding events, need for re-operation, and late survival. A random-effect inverse-variance weighted analysis was performed; event rates are compared as odds ratio (OR and 95% confidence interval) and hazard ratios (HR) for time-to-event data. Mechanical valve and tissue valve replacement were considered as study and control cohorts, respectively. RESULTS: Fifteen retrospective studies (5523 mechanical and 1600 tissue valve) were included in our meta-analysis. Early mortality was comparable (OR 1.15 [0.77; 1.72]; p = 0.49). The mean follow-up among studies ranged from 1.6-15 years. Bleeding was significantly higher after mechanical valve replacement (OR 2.55 [1.53; 4.26]; p = 0.0003). Structural valve degeneration was present in only 0.6% patients after a tissue valve replacement. Overall survival after valve replacement was poor (median 2.61 years); valve choice did not influence this outcome (pooled HR 0.87 [0.73; 1.04]; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: Operative mortality in ESRD patients is comparable between mechanical and tissue valve replacement. Major bleeding episodes are significantly higher after mechanical valve replacement but structural degeneration in tissue valves during the follow-up period is low. Based on the findings from this meta-analysis, we would recommend using tissue valves in patients with ESRD.

Hawthorn Herb Increases the Risk of Bleeding after Cardiac Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach.

OBJECTIVES: Hawthorn extract consumption is becoming more widespread among the Jordanian population with cardiovascular disorders. We conducted this prospective observational longitudinal study to determine the impact of hawthorn extract on bleeding risk in patients who undergo cardiac surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was performed on 116 patients who underwent cardiac surgery in the period between June 2014 and May 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (patients recently consumed hawthorn extract) and Group II (patients never consumed hawthorn extract). Endpoint measures included the rates of reopening to control bleeding, early mortality, duration of intensive care unit stay, total in-hospital stay period, and duration and amount of chest tube drainage. RESULTS: Hawthorn patients had a significantly higher rate of postoperative bleeding necessitating take back to the operating room compared to the control group (10% versus 1%; P = .03) respectively. The overall mortality rate for group I and II was 4% and 0% respectively; P = .17. Chest tubes were kept in for longer times in group I compared to group II (54 ± 14.6 versus 49 ± 14.7 hours respectively; P = .01). Group I stayed longer in the intensive care unit compared to group II (24 versus 22 hours respectively; P = .01). The total in-hospital stay period was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Hawthorn extract consumption does increase the potential for bleeding and the amount of chest tube output after cardiac surgery.

N-Acetyl Cysteine Therapy Does Not Prevent Renal Failure in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction is a common complication after cardiovascular surgery. Controversial issues have been discussed regarding the role of N-acetyl cysteine in the prevention of postoperative renal dysfunction. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to assess whether N-acetyl cysteine offers any protection against the development of acute renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for randomized trials comparing the role of N-acetyl cysteine and placebo in human patients undergoing cardiac surgery. End-points studied were: the incidence of acute renal failure, hemodialysis, early mortality, duration of hospital stay, and maximal change in creatinine values. Dichotomous variables were compared using the risk difference (RD) calculated with inverse weighting; continuous data was pooled as (standardized) mean difference. Results are presented with 95% confidence interval (P < .05 is significant); results are presented within 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized trials (713 and 707 patients in the N-acetyl cysteine and control groups, respectively) were included in the present analysis; nine dealing with patients at high-risk for acute renal failure. The incidence of postoperative acute renal dysfunction was 23% and 36% in the N-acetyl cysteine and control cohorts, respectively. N-acetyl cysteine therapy did not reduce acute renal dysfunction in the high-risk cohort [RD -0.03 (-0.09 to 0.02); P = .22; I2 = 24%]. Maximal change in creatinine levels after surgery was also comparable [standardized mean difference 0.07 (-0.23, 0.09); P = .39]. Early mortality was 2.9% and 3.7% in the N-acetyl cysteine and control cohorts respectively; [RD 0 (-0.03 to 0.02); P = .63; I2 = 20%]. Hospital stay (mean length of stay 10.4 and 10.1 days in the N-acetyl cysteine and control cohorts, respectively) was also similar in both cohorts [WMD 0.17 (-0.02 to 0.37) days; P = .81]. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic N-acetyl cysteine therapy does not reduce the incidence of renal dysfunction in high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Conventional versus minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: pooled analysis of propensity-matched data.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (mAVR) is increasingly preferred over conventional AVR (cAVR). However, data comparing these procedures present conflicting results. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical results in these cohorts. METHOD: Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) and propensity-matched observational studies (POS) (1998-2013) comparing clinical outcome of patients subjected to mAVR or cAVR were pooled. Continuous data was compared using mean/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) while categorical results were pooled to obtain an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: A total of 18 studies (6 RCT and 12 POS) (1973 mAVR patients; 2697 cAVR patients) were analyzed. The mean ischemic time was significantly longer with mAVR (MD 9.42 minutes [4.25-14.59]; p < 0.01). However, early mortality (mAVR [1.8%] and cAVR [3%]) was comparable (OR 0.70 [0.46-1.06]; p = 0.09). Postoperative ventilation time was slightly shorter after mAVR (7.5 vs 11.1 hours; p = 0.07), and hospital discharge was earlier after mAVR (MD -1.05 [-1.64 to -0.46]; p < 0.01). However, mAVR failed to reduce transfusion requirement (OR 0.77 [0.51-1.14]; p = 0.19) or pain scores (SMD -0.25 [-0.65 to 0.13]; p = 0.20). Postoperative atrial fibrillation (p = 0.67) and stroke (p = 0.79) rates were comparable. Pooled rate of conversion to full sternotomy was 2.5%. Cosmetic satisfaction could not be pooled due to reporting heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement can be performed safely despite the longer ischemic time. While minimally invasive surgery does demonstrate some advantages in postoperative recovery, we failed to find any other substantial improvement in outcome over conventional aortic valve replacement.

Levosimendan Reduces Mortality in Adults with Left Ventricular Dysfunction Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Levosimendan is implemented in patients with low cardiac output after cardiac surgery. However, the strength of evidence is limited by randomized controlled trials enrolling a small number of patients. Hence we have conducted a systematic review to determine the role of levosimendan in adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: PUBMED, WoS, Cochrane database, and SCOPUS were systematically queried to identify original English language peer-reviewed literature (inception-October 2014) comparing clinical results of adult cardiac surgery between levosimendan and control. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was calculated using the Peto method; p < 0.05 is significant; results are presented within 95% confidence intervals. Continuous data was compared using standardized mean difference/mean difference. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included in the analysis. Levosimendan reduced early mortality in patients with reduced ejection fraction (5.5% vs. 9.1%) (OR 0.48 [0.23-0.76]; p = 0.004). This result was confirmed using sensitivity analysis. Postoperative acute renal failure was lower with levosimendan therapy (7.4% vs. 11.5%). Intensive care unit stay was shorter in the levosimendan cohort comparable in both groups (standardized mean difference -0.31 [-0.53, -0.09]; p = 0.006; I(2) = 33.6%). Levosimendan-treated patients stayed 1.01 (1.61-0.42) days shorter when compared to control (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis demonstrates that Levosimendan improves clinical outcomes in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing cardiac surgery. Results of the ongoing multicenter randomized controlled trial are awaited to provide more conclusive evidence regarding the benefit of this drug.

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass confer any advantage in patients with end-stage renal failure? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are often excluded from trials comparing off and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Thus data in this cohort is limited to small retrospective studies. Hence we compared the adverse clinical events and outcome in patients with ESRD undergoing off (OPCABG) and on-pump surgery (ONCABG). METHODS: Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science were searched (inception - June 2013) to identify studies comparing clinical results of OPCABG and ONCABG in dialysis dependent patients. A random effect inverse variance weighted meta-analysis was conducted. Results are presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals; p<0.05 is significant. RESULT: Ten retrospective studies (2762 OPCABG and 11310 ONCABG) fulfilled criteria and were pooled. Patients undergoing off-pump surgery were less than 100 in most of the articles. Early mortality [OPCABG (8.4%); ONCABG (10.4%)] was comparable [RR 0.80(0.51-1.17); p=0.35; I(2)=30%]. Re-exploration for bleeding [RR 0.81(0.47-1.39); p=0.44] and blood transfusion [RR 0.79(0.57-1.08); p=0.14] were also comparable. While patients undergoing off-pump surgery were extubated earlier (p<0.01), other post-operative events like stroke (p=0.34) and atrial fibrillation (p=0.10) were similar. Mid-term survival (three to five years) was also comparable. CONCLUSION: Patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting demonstrate comparable results irrespective of method. While available data is limited to retrospective studies, we failed to demonstrate any significant advantage for performing OPCABG in this group of patients.

Statin therapy improves long-term survival in non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a pooled analysis of 4500 patients.

Statin therapy has demonstrated a beneficial effect in patients with chronic heart failure. While the majority of patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy are prescribed these drugs, studies have demonstrated that less than one fifth of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy are on regular statin therapy. We have performed a meta-analysis of 4500 patients from six studies (four randomised controlled trials). Our results demonstrate that statin therapy significantly improves long-term survival in patients with non-ischaemic heart failure {Hazard ratio for mortality 0.45 (0.33-0.62); p<0.0001; I(2)=41%; p-value for heterogeneity=0.13}.

Drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multi-vessel disease: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data comparing long-term results after percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents (DES/PCI) and coronary artery grafting (CABG) in diabetic patients (pts) with multi-vessel disease is conflicting. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to help answer this issue. METHODS: MEDLINE, WoS, and Scopus were systematically analysed to yield observational studies (OBS) or randomised controlled trials (RCT) fulfilling search criteria. Odds ratio (OR) for studied end-points were obtained with inverse variance random effects analysis. Results are presented with 95% confidence intervals with significance at p<0.05. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies (5 RCT; 9 OBS) including more than 5000 pts were selected for review. Early/30-day was lower in the DES/PCI cohort [OR 0.49(0.27, 0.88); p=0.02; I(2)=0%]. Post-procedural stroke was higher in the CABG (1.8%) cohort compared to DES/PCI (0.17%; p<0.01). A pooled analysis of RCT demonstrated that stroke rate was similar in both cohorts at the end of one year [OR 0.84(0.19, 3.74); p=0.82; I(2) =67%]. During a follow-up of three to five years, repeat intervention was much higher in the DES/PCI cohort [OR 3.02(2.13, 4.28; p<0.01]. The odds of suffering an adverse cardiovascular /cerebrovascular event were 1.71 (1.27, 2.3) times higher in the DES/PCI cohort compared to CABG. CONCLUSION: In diabetic patients with multivessel disease, early mortality is lower in the DES/PCI cohort. While peri-procedural stroke rates are lower with PCI, they are, however, comparable at the end of one year. Use of drug-eluting stents leads to a higher rate of re-intervention and major cardiovascular/cerebrovascular events at three to five years.

Cardiac transplantation after bridged therapy with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac transplantation is an effective surgical therapy for end-stage heart failure. Patients (pts) may need to be bridged with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) while on the transplant list as logistic factors like organ availability are unknown. Cardiac transplantation post-LVAD can be a surgically challenging procedure and outcome in these pts is perceived to be poorer based on experience with earlier generation pulsatile flow pumps. Data from a single institution comparing these pts with those undergoing direct transplantation in the present era of continuous flow device therapy are limited. AIM: Evaluate results of cardiac transplantation in pts bridged with a CF-LVAD (BTx) and compare outcomes with pts undergoing direct transplantation (Tx) in a single institution. RESULTS: From June 2007 till January 2012, 106 pts underwent cardiac transplantation. Among these, 37 (35%) pts (51±11 years; 85% male) were bridged with a CF-LVAD (BTx), while 70 (65%) comprised the Tx group (53±12 years; 72% males). The median duration of LVAD support was 227 (153,327) days. During the period of LVAD support, 10/37 (27%) pts were upgraded to status 1A and all were successfully transplanted. Median hospital stay in the BTx (14 days) was slightly longer than the Tx group (12 days) but not statistically significant (p=0.21). In-hospital mortality in the BTx (5%) and Tx (1%) were comparable (p=0.25). Estimated late survival in the BTx cohort was 94±7, 90±10 and 83±16% at the end of one, two and three years, respectively which was comparable to 97±4%, 93±6% and 89±9% for the Tx group (p=0.50). CONCLUSION: Cardiac transplantation after LVAD implant can be performed with excellent results. Patients can be supported on the left ventricular assist device even for periods close to a year with good outcome after cardiac transplantation.

Hepatic and renal function with successful long-term support on a continuous flow left ventricular assist device.

INTRODUCTION: Data regarding the long-term clinical effects of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) on hepato-renal function is limited. Hence our aim was to assess changes in hepato-renal function over a one-year period in patients supported on a CF-LVAD. METHODS: During the study period 126 patients underwent CF-LVAD implant. Changes in hepato-renal laboratory parameters were studied in 61/126 patients successfully supported on a CF-LVAD for period of one year. A separate cohort of a high-risk group (HCrB) of patients (56/126) with a serum creat>1.9 mg/dL (168 µmol/L) (75th percentile) or a serum bil>1.5 mg/dL (25.65 µmol/L) (75th percentile) was created. Changes in serum creatinine and bilirubin were analysed at regular intervals for this group along with the need for renal replacement therapy. RESULTS: Baseline creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) for the entire cohort was 1.4[1.2,1.9 mg/dL] [123.7(106,168) µmol/L) and 27[20,39.5 mg/dL] [9.6(7.1,14.1) mmol/L] respectively. After an initial reduction at the end of one month [1(0.8,1.2) mg/dL; 88(70,105) µmol/L] (p<0.0001), a gradual increase was noted over the study period to reach (1.25[1.1,1.5] mg/dL; 106(97.2,132.6) µmol/L] (p=0.0003). The serum bilirubin normalised from a [1(0.7,1.55) mg/dL] [17(18.8,25.7) µmol/L) to 0.9(0.6,1.2)mg/dL [15.4(10.2,20.5) µmol/L] (p=0.0005) and continued to decline over one year. Improvement in the synthetic function of the liver was demonstrated by a rise in the serum albumin levels to reach 4.3[4.1,4.5] [43(41,45) gm/L] at the end of one year (p<0.0001). The baseline serum creatinine and bilirubin for the high-risk cohort (HCrB) was 1.9(1.3,2.4) mg/dL [168(115,212) µmol/L] and 1.7(1.00,2.4) mg/dL [29(17.1,68.4) µmol/L] respectively. The high-risk cohort (HCrB) demonstrated a trend towards higher 30-day mortality (p=0.06). While the need for temporary renal replacement therapy was higher in this cohort (16% vs. 4%; p=0.03), only 3% need it permanently. A significant reduction in creatinine was apparent at the end of one month [1.1(0.8,1.4) mg/dL; 97(70.7,123.7) µmol/L] (p<0.0001) and then remained stable at [1.3(1.1,1.5) mg/dL; 115(97,132.6) µmol/L]. Bilirubin demonstrated a 30% decline over one month and then remained low at [0.7(0.5,0.8) mg/dL; 62(44,70) µmol/L] p=0.0005 compared to the pre-operative baseline. CONCLUSION: Hepato-renal function demonstrates early improvement and then remains stable in the majority of patients on continuous flow left ventricular assist device support for one year. High-risk patients demonstrate a higher 30-day mortality and temporary need for renal replacement therapy. Yet even in this cohort, improvement is present over a period of one year on the device, with a minimal need for permanent haemodialysis.

Adult Congenital Heart Disease Transplantation: Does Univentricle Physiology Impact Early Mortality?

BACKGROUND: With congenital heart disease patients increasingly living into adulthood, there is a growing population of adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients suffering from heart failure. Limited data exist evaluating heart transplant in this population. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of ACHD patients undergoing heart transplantation 11/1990-1/2023. Kaplan-Meier, cumulative incidence accounting for competing risk of death, and subgroup analyses comparing those with biventricular (BiV) and univentricular (UniV) physiology were performed. Data are presented as median (interquartile range) or counts (%). RESULTS: 77 patients with a median age of 36 years (27, 45) were identified, including 57 (74%) BiV and 20 (26%) UniV. Preoperatively, UniV patients were more likely to have cirrhosis (9/20 [45.0%] vs 4/57 [7.0%], p<0.001) and protein losing enteropathy (4/20 [20.0%] vs 1/57 [1.8%], p=0.015). Multiorgan transplantation was performed in 23 patients (30%) and more frequently in UniV patients (10 [50%] vs. 13[23%], p=0.04). Operative mortality was 6.5%, 2/20 (10%) among UniV and 2/57 (4%) among BiV patients, p=0.276. Median clinical follow-up was 6.0 (1.4, 13.1) years. Survival tended to be lower among UniV patients compared to BiV patients, particularly within the first year (p=0.09), but was similar for survivors beyond one year. At 5 years, incidence of rejection was 28% (17%, 38%) and coronary allograft vasculopathy was 16% (7%, 24%). CONCLUSIONS: Underlying liver disease and need for heart/liver transplantation were significantly higher among UniV patients. Survival tended to be lower among UniV, particularly within the first year, but was similar for survivors beyond one year.

Dual anti-platelet therapy after coronary artery bypass grafting: is there any benefit? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anti-platelet therapy is an important component of medical therapy post coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). While aspirin administration is a Class I indication after CABG, the benefit of concomitant clopidogrel is a controversial issue. METHODS: We searched OVID Medline, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE for randomized control trials and observational studies comparing aspirin ± placebo to aspirin + clopidogrel after CABG. RESULTS: Eleven articles (five randomized control trials and six observational studies) including 25,728 patients met inclusion criteria. Early saphenous vein graft occlusion was reduced with the use of dual anti-platelet therapy (risk ratio (RR) = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.82, p = 0.02). In-hospital or 30-day mortality was lower with aspirin + clopidogrel (0.8%) compared to aspirin alone (1.9%) (p < 0.0001), while risk of angina or perioperative myocardial infarction was comparable (RR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.31-1.14, p = 0.12). Patients treated with aspirin + clopidogrel demonstrated a trend towards a higher incidence of major bleeding episodes as compared to patients treated with aspirin alone (RR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.00-1.37, p = 0.05). In a pooled analysis of studies involving off-pump CABG compared to aspirin alone, dual anti-platelet therapy reduced the risk of perioperative myocardial infarction and saphenous graft occlusion by 68% (47% to 71%) and 55% (2% to 79%) respectively. CONCLUSION: Dual anti-platelet therapy after CABG improved early saphenous vein graft patency, but may increase the risk of bleeding. The use of dual anti-platelet therapy appears to be most beneficial in patients undergoing off-pump CABG. Prospective randomized studies are necessary to determine whether this beneficial effect of dual therapy is also achieved in patients undergoing on pump CABG.

Trends in Cardiovascular Disease Mortality by County-Level Social Vulnerability Index in the United States.

Background Although cardiovascular mortality (CVM) rates in the United States have been declining overall, our study evaluated whether this holds true for areas with increased social deprivation. Methods and Results We used county-level cross-sectional age-adjusted CVM rates (aa-CVM) (2000-2019) linked to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI-2010). We grouped counties as per SVI (Groups I 0-0.2, II 0.21-0.4, III 0.41-0.6, IV 0.61-0.8, and V 0.81-1) and calculated the relative change in the aa-CVM between 2000 to 2003 and 2016 to 2019. We used adjusted linear regression analyses to explore the association between a higher SVI and temporal aa-CVM improvement; we studied this temporal change in aa-CVM across subgroups of race, sex, and location. The median aa-CVM rate (per 100 000) was 272.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 237.5-311.7). The aa-CVM was higher in men (315.6 [IQR: 273.4-363.9]) than women (221.3 [IQR: 189.6-256.7]), and in Black residents (347.2 [IQR: 301.1-391.1]; P<0.001) than White residents (258.9 [IQR: 226-299.1]; P<0.001). The aa-CVM for SVI I (233.6 [IQR: 214.8-257.0]) was significantly lower than that of group V (323.6 [IQR: 277.2-359.2]; P<0.001). The relative reduction in CVM was significantly higher for SVI group I (32.2% [IQR: 24.2-38.4]) than group V (27.2% [IQR: 19-34.1]) counties. After multivariable adjustment, a higher SVI index was associated with lower relative improvement in the age-adjusted CVM (model coefficient -3.11 [95% CI, -5.66 to -1.22]; P<0.001). Conclusions Socially deprived counties in the United States had higher aa-CVM rates, and the improvement in aa-CVM over the past 20 years was lower in these counties.

Left atrial dissection after mitral valve replacement can mimic periprosthetic regurgitation.

Left atrial dissection is defined as a gap from the mitral or tricuspid annular area into the interatrial septum. It is most commonly occurs as a complication of mitral valve surgery. Herein, a patient is described who developed a left atrial dissection subsequent to multiple mitral valve procedures. The clinical presentation and surgical therapy for this condition is described with the aid of intraoperative photographic images. A brief discussion of this rare condition is also included, and the principles of surgical repair are elucidated.

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair or replacement during left ventricular assist device implant demonstrates comparable outcomes in the long term.

INTRODUCTION: Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is present in nearly half the patients undergoing implant of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and its correction confers better long-term outcome. AIM: To compare the early and late results of tricuspid valve repair (TVrpr) or replacement (TVR) with LVAD implant. PATIENT AND METHODS: Sixty-four from a cohort of 126 patients had a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure; 48 (75%) underwent a TVrpr whereas 16 (25%) had TVR. All preoperative hemodynamic parameters including the mean TR grade (TVrpr; 3.6 vs. TVR; 3.7) were comparable (p = 0.7). The mean TR grade was 1.6 ± 1.5 for the remaining 62 patients who did not have a concomitant tricuspid valve procedure, with 4/62 (6%) having severe TR (p < 0.0001). RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time was longer for patients undergoing TVR (p = 0.01). There was a significant reduction in right atrial pressure for the entire cohort (p < 0.01) and the postoperative right atrial pressure was not statistically different between TVrpr (13.6 ± 4.6) and TVR (11.6 ± 4.3; p = 0.6. Postoperative intensive care unit stay was comparable as was the duration of inotropic support (p = 0.5) or need for temporary right ventricular mechanical support. In-hospital mortality (12%) was not different between groups. The mean time for LVAD support was 12.3 ± 9.71 months and the last transthoracic echocardiographic examination was performed at mean intervals of 13.8 ± 10.8 months (TVrpr) and 11.8 ± 7.6 months (TVR; p = 0.47). Reduction in TR grade was similar between groups (p = 0.27). Late mortality (p = 1.00) was comparable in both groups. Using log-rank analysis, there was no significant difference in the estimated survival between TVrpr and TVR (p = 0.88). CONCLUSION: TVrpr repair at the time of LVAD implant is effective in correcting TR even at the end of one year of follow-up. The choice to repair or replace does not affect the clinical outcome.

Revascularization in ischaemic heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: Despite the common occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), there is limited evidence to guide revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated the long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with HF and significant CAD across the spectrum of ejection fraction, using a large national cohort of patients from the Veteran Affairs (VA) Medical Centers in the US. Patients with HF were stratified into groups, HFpEF, HF with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compared to patients with no preoperative HF. We analysed 10 396 patients. Despite an increased hazard in the first year following revascularization, the long-term survival (median follow-up 6.6 years; interquartile range 3.7-10.1) of HFpEF post-CABG was similar to controls (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.06), but survival progressively declined with HFmrEF and HFrEF. Similar trends were seen with recurrent HF hospitalization with lower risk with baseline HFpEF (43.9 ± 6.9/100 patient-years) compared to HFmrEF (65.9 ± 3.8/100 patient-years) and HFrEF (93.4 ± 4.8/100 patient-years). Although HFpEF patients had lower mortality and HF hospitalization post-CABG compared to patients with a lower ejection fraction, they experienced the highest rates of future myocardial infarction. CONCLUSION: Although HFpEF patients with CAD have greater short-term risk post-CABG, their long-term survival is comparable to controls. However, they are at increased risk for HF hospitalizations and myocardial infarction. These data support the safety of CABG in HFpEF patients and suggest continuum of mortality risk for ischaemic HF when stratified by baseline ejection fraction before revascularization.