Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Afr Health Sci ; 23(3): 400-405, 2023 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357173

ABSTRACT

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 is an extremely contagious and acute viral disease mainly affecting humans. Objective: To estimate seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) for illegible armed force individuals living in Rabat, Morocco. Method: A convenience sample (N = 2662) was conducted from May 2020 to February 2021. We used the standard neutralization assay to quantify the NAbs titers. A serum was positive when the titer was 1:4. High positive NAbs titers were defined when ≥ 1:32. Results: Demographic and socioeconomic status did not affect seroprevalence data. An overall seroprevalence of 24,9% was found. Sera from blood donors, young recruits and auto-immune population had lower NAbs titers. However, titers were above 1:16 in 9% of the population with high risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure. Seropositivity increased over time with values reaching peaks after the epidemic waves (2.4% in May 2020; 16.2% in August 2020; 22.7% in December 2020 and 37% in February 2021). Conclusion: And increase of NAbs was observed over time and correlated with the post-epidemic waves of COVID-19 in Morocco.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Morocco/epidemiology , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Antibodies, Neutralizing , Antibodies, Viral
2.
Appl Biosaf ; 25(2): 96-103, 2020 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36035083

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the difference in biosafety behaviors among nurses working in a levels 2 and 3 hospital unit in Morocco and the need for additional biosafety training before working in a high-containment facility. Methods: A prospective cross-sectional and observational study was conducted among new and experienced nurses in the Center of Virology and Tropical Infectious Diseases of the Military Teaching Hospital Mohammed V of Rabat, Morocco, between December 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018 (3 months). We compared behaviors in biosafety practices (donning gloves, handwashing, etc) between the 2 groups, and data were collected by observing workers directly or via camera. Results: A total of 31 nurses, 14 newly graduated nurses (45.2%) and 17 experienced and trained (54.8%) nurses, were observed during 89 entries into high-containment hospital rooms. Among the behaviors observed, only donning an inner pair of gloves was observed consistently between the 2 groups. Experienced and trained nurses washed their hands (100%) and observed the antiseptic contact time (71%), whereas recently graduated nurses ignored these activities significantly (79% and 32%, respectively). During handling of the patient, the trained and experienced nurses were significantly better than the new ones in the practices of biosafety and personal protection. Gaps in biosafety were observed more frequently among newly graduated workers, especially donning outer gloves before patient contact, nurses touching their faces, and the act of wearing jewelry while working. Conclusion: Safety training should begin early in the training curriculum with theoretical and practical courses. It must be introduced into the general biosafety policy as part of a safety and standard working culture. It is recommended that personnel be required to pass a proficiency exam in critical biosafety tasks before working with high-risk patients.

3.
Appl Biosaf ; 24(1): 46-54, 2019 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36034632

ABSTRACT

Introduction: This study was conducted to assess the biosafety knowledge among laboratory staff working in Morocco. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among all laboratory staff in public and private clinical diagnostic and research laboratories between December 5, 2018, and January 5, 2018. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire distributed via Google Form. Results: A total of 235 participants completed the study questionnaire with an estimated response rate of 19%. Overall, 79% of respondents had a high or intermediate level of knowledge. Only 17.4% had participated in prior formal biosafety training courses. The level of knowledge did not differ significantly with gender or activity sector, but it increased with work experience. Knowledge was generally intermediate for signage and principles of biosafety levels (42.1%), low for distinction between technical operations that could pose a risk by generating aerosols (30.2%), and high for wearing personal protective equipment and its components (92.8%). There was a very high level of knowledge on proper waste sorting (100%). Conclusion: These findings underline the need for establishing a biosafety policy and strengthening biosafety training programs in laboratories in Morocco.

4.
Lancet Respir Med ; 2(5): 395-404, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24815805

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neuraminidase inhibitors were widely used during the 2009-10 influenza A H1N1 pandemic, but evidence for their effectiveness in reducing mortality is uncertain. We did a meta-analysis of individual participant data to investigate the association between use of neuraminidase inhibitors and mortality in patients admitted to hospital with pandemic influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection. METHODS: We assembled data for patients (all ages) admitted to hospital worldwide with laboratory confirmed or clinically diagnosed pandemic influenza A H1N1pdm09 virus infection. We identified potential data contributors from an earlier systematic review of reported studies addressing the same research question. In our systematic review, eligible studies were done between March 1, 2009 (Mexico), or April 1, 2009 (rest of the world), until the WHO declaration of the end of the pandemic (Aug 10, 2010); however, we continued to receive data up to March 14, 2011, from ongoing studies. We did a meta-analysis of individual participant data to assess the association between neuraminidase inhibitor treatment and mortality (primary outcome), adjusting for both treatment propensity and potential confounders, using generalised linear mixed modelling. We assessed the association with time to treatment using time-dependent Cox regression shared frailty modelling. FINDINGS: We included data for 29,234 patients from 78 studies of patients admitted to hospital between Jan 2, 2009, and March 14, 2011. Compared with no treatment, neuraminidase inhibitor treatment (irrespective of timing) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·81; 95% CI 0·70-0·93; p=0·0024). Compared with later treatment, early treatment (within 2 days of symptom onset) was associated with a reduction in mortality risk (adjusted OR 0·48; 95% CI 0·41-0·56; p<0·0001). Early treatment versus no treatment was also associated with a reduction in mortality (adjusted OR 0·50; 95% CI 0·37-0·67; p<0·0001). These associations with reduced mortality risk were less pronounced and not significant in children. There was an increase in the mortality hazard rate with each day's delay in initiation of treatment up to day 5 as compared with treatment initiated within 2 days of symptom onset (adjusted hazard ratio [HR 1·23] [95% CI 1·18-1·28]; p<0·0001 for the increasing HR with each day's delay). INTERPRETATION: We advocate early instigation of neuraminidase inhibitor treatment in adults admitted to hospital with suspected or proven influenza infection. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Enzyme Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Influenza, Human/drug therapy , Neuraminidase/antagonists & inhibitors , Oseltamivir/therapeutic use , Pandemics , Zanamivir/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza, Human/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL