Myelotoxicity of oral topotecan in relation to treatment duration and dosage: a phase I study.

Oral topotecan has been recently brought into clinical practice at a dose of 2.3 mg/m(2) for 5 days, every 3 weeks. Published data show quite high myelotoxicity. The aim of this trial was to define the daily dose and treatment duration, which permits safe toxicity. The study was designed to begin at a low daily dosage of 1.5 mg/m(2) and was escalated by increasing the topotecan dose and the day-treatment duration. The plan was to end up with 2.3 mg/m(2) daily for 5 days. In cases of tolerability with the last dosage given, we would then continue testing a higher daily dosage. Treatment repetition was planned to be every 21 days. Dosage levels were 1.5, 2.0 and 2.3 mg/m(2) for 3 days, 2.0 and 2.3 mg/m(2) for 4 days, and 2.3 mg/m(2) for 5 days. Toxicity was scored according to the Common Toxicity Criteria. Thirty-two patients (27 male, five female, median age 60 years, range 46-77 years) with small-cell lung cancer were included. The patients on 1.5 and 2 mg/m(2) for 3 days showed no myelotoxicity. Four (25%) patients on 2.3 mg/m(2) 3-day treatment developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Three of five patients (60%) treated for 4 days at a dose of 2.3 mg/m(2) developed grade 3-4 neutropenia and less than half (two of five, 40%) of these patients had thrombocytopenia. Eight patients (66.7%) on the 5-day treatment presented with serious grade 3-4 myelotoxicity. Two treatment-related deaths were observed in the 5-day group and one in the 4-day group. Granulocyte growth factor was applied in over 60% of the patients. In conclusion, a dose of 2.3 mg/m(2) for 5 days was intolerable. Dose-limiting toxicity was 2.3 mg/m(2) for 4 days without prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration. The safe duration of oral topotecan treatment and the maximum tolerated dose seem to be not longer than 3 days at a dose of 2.3 mg/m(2).

Comparison of cisplatin-paclitaxel combination versus cisplatin-etoposide in patients with small-cell lung cancer: a Phase III study.

Cisplatin-paclitaxel and cisplatin-etoposide combination therapies were compared in limited and extensive disease in patients with small-cell lung cancer. The primary objectives were to determine median and overall survival, time to tumor progression and tolerance and the secondary objective, the response rate. From January 2003 till July 2007, 108 patients were enrolled in the study. All patients had histologically- or cytologically-confirmed small-cell lung cancer. All patients were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive. The patients were designated to receive six cycles: in the investigational Arm A, cisplatin, 80 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) were infused on day 1 (1 cycle) and repeated every 3 weeks. In the control Arm B, cisplatin, 80 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1 and etoposide, 120 mg/m(2) per day was given on days 1-3 (1 cycle), every 3 weeks. In Arm A, 6 (11.3%) patients achieved a complete response and 32 (58.1%), a partial response; in Arm B, 7 (12.7%) patients achieved a complete response and 32 (58.2%) a partial response. The median survival time in Arm A patients was 12 months and in Arm B, 13 months, p=0.354. The time to tumor progression (TTP) was 8 and 6 months for Arms A and B, respectively (p=0.060). Toxicity, although common in both Arms, was acceptable. Neutropenia, anemia and diarrhea were higher in the control Arm. The cisplatin-paclitaxel combination is not superior to cisplatin-etoposide with respect to survival, TTP, toxicity and response rate. The former combination could be applied as an alternative chemotherapy regimen for patients with limited or advanced small-cell lung cancer.

Predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels in response and progressive disease in patients with lung cancer.

Patients with cancer may present with one or more circulatory markers of haemostatic activation which may be associated with tumor growth and cancer cell dissemination. In our clinical practice we observed haemostatic abnormalities with or without thrombotic episodes in cancer patients. The aim of the present study was to detect the D-dimer plasma levels in advanced-stage lung cancer patients before, during and after chemotherapy, and to determine whether there is a correlation with response rate, disease recurrence and survival, in order to estimate the possible predictive value of D-dimer plasma levels. Forty-seven/52 patients were evaluable and analysed; 38 patients had non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 9 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and all were at an advanced stage or inoperable. Two (4.3%) achieved complete response (CR), 17 (36.2%) partial response (PR), and 16 (34%) had progressive disease (PD). We found that 14/19 (73.7%) patients with CR or PR showed a reduction in D-dimer plasma values and 11/16 (68.8%) with PD showed increased values; also, in patients with recurrent disease (12/13, 92.3%), D-dimer plasma levels were increased. All of the above values were statistically significant. D-Dimer plasma levels decrease or increase after response and progressive disease, respectively, and can act as a predictive factor of the evolution of the disease.

Response to radiotherapy in brain metastases and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

The present study involves non-small cell lung (NSCLC) cancer patients with brain metastases, who were treated with radiation therapy, and our aim was to determine response rate and survival. A total of 167 patients were recruited, 155 (125 male, 30 female) of whom were evaluable. Performance status was 0-2 and histology or cytology included 66 (42.58%) adenocarcinomas, 62 (40.00%) undifferentiated and 27 (17.42%) squamous cell carcinomas. The stage of disease at diagnosis was IIIA-B in 92 (59.35%) patients and IV in 63 (40.65%). All patients had whole brain irradiation (3 Gy x 5 days/week for 2 weeks to a total dose of 30 Gy), which was performed by a linear accelerator and a 6-MV photon beam. Objective response was observed in 59/155 (38.06%) patients with 17 (10.97%) complete and 42 (27.09%) partial responses, and median survival of 5 months for all patients [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.9-6.1]. Responders had statistically significant longer survival than non-responders. Although responders represented less than half of our patients with NSCLC and brain metastases, they had significantly longer survival.

Phase II study of cisplatin-combined schedules as second-line chemotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of cisplatin- (CDDP) combined chemotherapy in non-cisplatin pretreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The second cytotoxic drug administered was either etoposide or gemcitabine. First-line treatment was based on paclitaxel combined with either carboplatin or vinorelbine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-eight patients with histologically- or cytologically- confirmed NSCLC, having failed front-line treatment, were enrolled. All patients received 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin as second-line treatment, on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks; in 48 patients the second agent was etoposide (120 mg/m2) on days 1, 2 and 3, repeated every 3 weeks and in 30 patients 1 g/m2 of gemcitabine on day 1, repeated every 3 weeks. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No complete responses were observed. Thirteen (16.67%) patients achieved partial response, 42 (53.85%) stable disease and 23 (29.49%) had disease progression. The median duration of response was 4 months (range 2-8+ months), median time to tumor progression (TTP) 5 months (range 2-9 months) and median survival time after starting second-line chemotherapy, 6 months (range 2-9+ months). Toxicity was acceptable: 9 patients presented with nephrotoxicity (11.54%) and 13 (16.67%) with grade 3-4 neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The cisplatin combination as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC exhibited a notable degree of activity and tumor growth control was evidenced by the 16.67% partial response and 53.85% disease stability.

Mesothelioma: treatment and survival of a patient population and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to evaluate the survival of patients with pleural and intraperitoneal malignant mesothelioma and, particularly, to estimate the efficacy of chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy and surgery. A review of the literature with respect to these parameters is included. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients with malignant mesothelioma (28 with pleural and 7 with intraperitoneal) were enrolled. Twenty-eight patients underwent chemotherapy, 7/35 radiation and 9/35 surgery (2 with pleural and 7 with abdominal disease). Combination chemotherapy included cisplatin-gemcitabine, cisplatin (or carboplatin) with premetrexed and doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide. RESULTS: In 2/28 patients with pleural mesothelioma the tumor was excised and in 7 with intraperitoneal disease, surgical therapy was palliative and there was survival prolongation. Radiotherapy was only palliative. Chemotherapy produced a very low response: 2/28 (7.14%) patients achieved a partial response. The median survival was 17 months, 4-year survival, 24.4% and 5-year survival, 12.12%. No serious toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION: Malignant mesothelioma of the pleura and intraperitoneum is a slow-growing disease which is indicated by the long survival, despite the failure of chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery.

Role of quantitative CT in predicting postoperative FEV1 and chronic dyspnea in patients undergoing lung resection.

Lung resection is the mainstay of treatment in patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer. However, lung cancer patients often suffer from comorbidities and the respiratory reserve should be carefully evaluated preoperatively in order to avoid postoperative complications. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) is considered to be an index that depicts the patient's respiratory efficacy and its prediction has a key role in the preoperative evaluation of lung cancer patients with impaired lung function. Prediction of postoperative FEV1 is currently possible with the use of perfusion radionuclide lung scanning.Quantitative CT is the analysis of data acquired during normal chest CT scan using the system's software. By applying a dual threshold of -500 to -910 Hounsfield Units, functional lung volumes are estimated and postoperative FEV1 can be predicted by reducing the preoperative measurement by the fraction of the part to be resected.Studies have shown that preoperative predictions correlate well with the actual postoperative measurements. Additionally, quantitative CT results are in good agreement with perfusion scintigraphy predictions. Newer radiological techniques such as perfusion MRI and co-registered SPECT/CT have also been used in the preoperative evaluation with similar results.In conclusion, chest CT which is obligatory for staging, can be used for quantitative analysis of the already available data. It is technically simple, providing an accurate prediction of postoperative FEV1. Thus, quantitative CT appears to be a useful tool in the preoperative evaluation of lung cancer patients undergoing lung resection.