Population pharmacokinetics of anidulafungin in ICU patients assessing inter- and intrasubject variability.

AIMS: The population pharmacokinetics (PK) of anidulafungin in critically ill patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) was explored with the intention of evaluating and optimizing dosing regimens. METHODS: A PK study was conducted in a cohort of 13 patients treated with anidulafungin using intensive sampling during multiple periods per patient and the high-performance liquid chromatography method for drug quantification. A population PK model was developed to describe the concentration-time course of anidulafungin and the inter-individual (IIV) and interoccasion variability (IOV) of the PK parameters. Model-based PK simulations have been performed to estimate the probability of target attainment (PTA), given the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of free 24-hour area under the free drug concentration-time curve over minimum inhibitory concentration for several dosing regimens. RESULTS: A two-compartment PK model, with first-order elimination, best described the data with population clearance (CL) and central/peripheral volume of distribution (V1/V2) of 0.778 L/h and 10.2/21.1 L, respectively, and a mean ± s.d. AUC0-24 of 119.97 ± 46.23 mg·h/L. Pronounced IIV and IOV variability was found for CL (38% and 31%) and V1 (47% and 30%), respectively. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Body Mass Index (BMI) were found to be covariates on CL and V1, respectively. Low PTA values were calculated for borderline Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-susceptible Candida strains. CONCLUSIONS: Although anidulafungin exposure was found comparable to that in healthy volunteers, elevated interindividual and significant interoccasion variability was found in critically ill ICU patients, which resulted in reduced PTA values in these patients.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of the three echinocandins in ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective study in ICU patients of two tertiary hospitals in order to determine basic pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, associated variation and target attainment rates for anidulafungin, micafungin and caspofungin. METHODS: Serum samples from patients treated for 7 days with the standard doses of anidulafungin (N = 13), micafungin (N = 14) or caspofungin (N = 7) were analysed by validated chromatographic methods. PK parameters determined with non-compartmental analysis were correlated with demographic, laboratory and disease severity characteristics. The percentages of patients attaining drug exposures described in the summary of product characteristics (SmPC) documents and preclinical PK/PD targets for stasis were estimated. RESULTS: The median (range) AUC24 was 101.46 (54.95-274.15) mg·h/L for anidulafungin, 79.35 (28.00-149.30) mg·h/L for micafungin and 48.46 (19.44-103.69) mg·h/L for caspofungin. The interindividual variability of anidulafungin, micafungin and caspofungin AUC24 was 46%-58%, attributed mainly to variability in volume of distribution (V), clearance (CL) and in both V and CL, respectively. Significant correlations were found between anidulafungin AUC24 and BMI (rs = -0.670, P = 0.012) and liver enzymes (rs = 0.572-0.665, P = 0.013-0.041) and between caspofungin Cmin and transaminase levels (rs = -0.775 to -0.786, P = 0.036-0.041). Less than 50% of our patients attained the corresponding SmPC median AUC24s and none of the patients attained the PK/PD targets for Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. CONCLUSIONS: Anidulafungin exposure in ICU patients was comparable with that reported in non-ICU patients and in healthy volunteers. Micafungin exposure was comparable to that of other patients but ∼30% lower than that in healthy volunteers, whereas caspofungin exposure was rather low (∼50% lower than in healthy volunteers). Larger interindividual variability (50%-60%) was recorded in ICU patients compared with other groups for all three echinocandins.

A Severe COVID-19 Case Complicated by Right Atrium Thrombus.

BACKGROUND Recent studies demonstrated evidence of coagulation dysfunction in hospitalized patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to excessive inflammation, hypoxia, platelet activation, endothelial dysfunction, and stasis. Effective anticoagulation therapy may play a dominant role in the management of severe COVID-19 cases. CASE REPORT A 73-year-old man with a 6-day history of fever up to 38.5°C, dyspnea, cough, and fatigue was diagnosed with COVID-19. He had a past medical history significant for hypertension and coronary artery bypass grafting. Two days after hospital admission, the patient developed acute respiratory failure, requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, and transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU). He received treatment including antibiotics, hydroxychloroquine, tocilizumab, vasopressors, prone positioning, and anticoagulation with enoxaparin at a prophylactic dose. After a 15-day ICU stay, the patient was hemodynamically stable but still hypoxemic; a transthoracic echocardiogram at that time, followed by a transesophageal echocardiogram for better evaluation, revealed the presence of a right atrium thrombus without signs of acute right ventricular dilatation and impaired systolic function. Since the patient was hemodynamically stable, we decided to treat him with conventional anticoagulation under close monitoring for signs of hemodynamic deterioration; thus, the prophylactic dose of enoxaparin was replaced by therapeutic dosing, which was a key component of the patient's successful outcome. Over the next few days he showed significant clinical improvement. The follow-up transesophageal echocardiogram 3 weeks after effective therapeutic anticoagulation revealed no signs of right heart thrombus. CONCLUSIONS The presented COVID-19 case, one of the first reported cases with evidence of right heart thrombus by transesophageal echocardiography, highlights the central role of diagnostic imaging strategies and the importance of adequate anticoagulation therapy in the management of severe COVID-19 cases in the ICU.

Population pharmacokinetics of micafungin over repeated doses in critically ill patients: a need for a loading dose?

OBJECTIVES: To study the population pharmacokinetics of micafungin in critically ill patients, evaluate and optimize dosage regimens. METHODS: An HPLC-fluorescence bioassay for micafungin was developed, fully validated and applied to a pharmacokinetic study conducted in 14 ICU patients. Dense blood sampling was performed from days 1 to 7. A population pharmacokinetic model accounting for interindividual (IIV) and interoccasion variability (IOV) of the PK parameters was developed. Simulations were performed to estimate the probability of target attainment (PTA) for several dosing regimens. KEY FINDINGS: A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described the data, with population clearance CL = 1.31 L/h and central volume V1 = 14.2 L. The relatively high IOV observed (45% for CL, 27% for V1) sets limits for the dose individualization in this population. The low PTA on the first day of treatment suggests the need of a loading dose. PTA and CFR estimates show that the current micafungin dosage may be insufficient for the treatment of borderline susceptible Candida strains. CONCLUSIONS: A loading dose of up to 300 mg of micafungin is needed for the treatment of invasive candidiasis in ICU patients while a maintenance dose of up to 200 mg can be considered in empirical antifungal treatment.