Prevalence of non-communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis: A systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of non-communicable diseases among household contacts of people with tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. We searched Medline, Embase and the Global Index Medicus from inception to 16 May 2023. We included studies that assessed for at least one non-communicable disease among household contacts of people with clinical tuberculosis. We estimated the non-communicable disease prevalence through mixed effects logistic regression for studies providing individual participant data, and compared it with estimates from aggregated data meta-analyses. Furthermore, we compared age and sex-standardised non-communicable disease prevalence with national-level estimates standardised for age and sex. RESULTS: We identified 39 eligible studies, of which 14 provided individual participant data (29,194 contacts). Of the remaining 25 studies, 18 studies reported aggregated data suitable for aggregated data meta-analysis. In individual participant data analysis, the pooled prevalence of diabetes in studies that undertook biochemical testing was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.1%-14.9%, four studies). Age-and sex-standardised prevalence was higher in two studies (10.4% vs. 6.9% and 11.5% vs. 8.4%) than the corresponding national estimates and similar in two studies. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus based on self-report or medical records was 3.4% (95% CI 2.6%-4.6%, 14 studies). Prevalence did not significantly differ compared to estimates from aggregated data meta-analysis. There were limited data for other non-communicable diseases. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus among household contacts was high while that of known diabetes was substantially lower, suggesting the underdiagnosis. tuberculosis household contact investigation offers opportunities to deliver multifaceted interventions to identify tuberculosis infection and disease, screen for non-communicable diseases and address shared risk factors.

Global tuberculosis disease and infection in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the most common infections among systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients. We aimed to evaluate the global prevalence of TB infection and disease, its type, and medication risk factors in SLE patients. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Science Direct, EBSCO, and Web of Science databases from inception to April 30, 2023, and included studies assessing TB among SLE patients. We estimated the prevalence of TB disease (including type of TB disease), TB infection, and SLE medication as TB risk factors. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 14.2 and Review Manager 5.3. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies met the eligibility criteria. The global prevalence of TB disease was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3-4%, n = 25) and TB infection was 18% (95% CI: 10-26%, n = 3). The pooled prevalence of pulmonary TB, extrapulmonary TB, and disseminated TB were 2% (95% CI: 2-3%, n = 20), 1% (95% CI: 1-2%, n = 17), and 1% (95% CI: 0-1%, n = 6), respectively. The 1-year cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dose in SLE patients contracting TB was higher than in those without TB, having a mean difference of 2.56 (95% CI: 0.22-4.91, p < .00001, n = 3). The odd ratio of TB was 2.11 (95% CI: 1.01-4.41, p = .05, n = 3) in SLE patients receiving methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy as compared to those without MP pulse therapy. Other immunosuppressive agents were not significantly associated with TB. CONCLUSION: TB prevalence in SLE was relatively high and associated with GC. Awareness of TB and lowering GC dose are warranted to alleviate the TB burden in SLE.

Pharmacokinetics of standard versus high-dose rifampin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: A sub-study of the 2R2 randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic data of rifampin, when used for tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) are not available. We aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of rifampin used for TPT, at standard and higher doses, and to assess predictors of rifampin exposure. METHODS: A pharmacokinetic sub-study was performed in Bandung, Indonesia among participants in the 2R2 randomized trial, which compared TPT regimens of 2 months of high-dose rifampin at 20 mg/kg/day (2R20) and 30 mg/kg/day (2R30), with 4 months of standard-dose rifampin at 10 mg/kg/day (4R10) in adolescents and adults. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling was performed after 2-8 weeks of treatment. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed non-compartmentally. Total exposure (AUC0-24) and peak concentration (Cmax) between arms were compared using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc tests. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to assess predictors of AUC0-24 and Cmax. RESULTS: We enrolled 51 participants in this study. In the 4R10, 2R20, and 2R30 arms, the geometric mean AUC0-24 was 68.0, 186.8, and 289.9 h⋅mg/L, and Cmax was 18.4, 36.7, and 54.4 mg/L, respectively; high interindividual variabilities were observed. Compared with the 4R10 arm, AUC0-24 and Cmax were significantly higher in the 2R20 and 2R30 arms (P < 0.001). Drug doses, body weight, and female sex were predictors of higher rifampin AUC0-24 and Cmax (P < 0.05). AUC0-24 and Cmax values were much higher than those previously reported in persons with TB disease. CONCLUSIONS: Doubling and tripling the rifampin dose led to three- and four-fold higher exposure compared to standard dose. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling and simulations are warranted to support trials of shortening the duration of TPT regimens with high-dose rifampin.

Tuberculin skin test and Interferon-gamma release assay agreement, and associated factors with latent tuberculosis infection, in medical and nursing students in Bandung, Indonesia.

BACKGROUND: No gold standard diagnostic test exists for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). The intra-dermal tuberculin skin test (TST) has known limitations and Interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) have been developed as an alternative. We aimed to assess agreement between IGRA and TST, and risk factors for test positivity, in Indonesian healthcare students. METHODS: Medical and nursing students starting their clinical training were screened using IGRA and TST. Agreement between the two tests was measured using Cohen's Kappa coefficient. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with test positivity. RESULTS: Of 266 students, 43 (16.2%) were IGRA positive and 85 (31.9%) TST positive. Agreement between the two tests was 74.7% (kappa 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.45, P<0.0001). Students who had direct contact with family or friends with TB were less likely to be test positive using IGRA (AOR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.64) and using TST (AOR 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99). CONCLUSION: Test positivity for LTBI was lower when measured by IGRA than by TST, with poor agreement between the two tests. Known close TB contact was unexpectedly negatively associated with positivity by either test. Longitudinal studies may be required to help determine the best test for LTBI in healthcare students in Indonesia.

High-dose, short-duration versus standard rifampicin for tuberculosis preventive treatment: a partially blinded, three-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis preventive treatment (TPT) is a key component of tuberculosis elimination. To improve completion and reduce the burden for people and health systems, short, safe, and effective TPT regimens are needed. We aimed to compare safety and treatment completion of various doses and durations of rifampicin in people who were recommended to receive TPT. METHODS: This partially blinded, parallel-arm, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, phase 2b trial was done at seven university-affiliated clinics in Canada, Indonesia, and Viet Nam. Participants aged 10 years or older were included if they had an indication for TPT according to WHO guidelines for Indonesia and Viet Nam, or Canadian guidelines for Canadian sites, and a positive tuberculin skin test or interferon-γ release assay. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive oral rifampicin at 10 mg/kg once daily for 4 months (standard-dose group), 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months (20 mg/kg group), or 30 mg/kg daily for 2 months (30 mg/kg group). The randomisation sequence was computer generated with blocks of variable size (three, six, and nine) and stratified by country for Indonesia and Viet Nam, and by city within Canada. Participants and investigators were masked to dose in high-dose groups, but unmasked to duration in all groups. The two co-primary outcomes were safety (in the safety population, in which participants received at least one dose of the study drug) and treatment completion (in the modified intention-to-treat [mITT] population, excluding those ineligible after randomisation). Protocol-defined adverse events were defined as grade 3 or worse, or rash or allergy of any grade, judged by an independent and masked panel as possibly or probably related to the study. A margin of 4% was used to assess non-inferiority. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03988933 (active). FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2019, and Sept 30, 2022, 1692 people were assessed for eligibility, 1376 were randomly assigned, and eight were excluded after randomisation. 1368 participants were included in the mITT population (454 in the standard group, 461 in the 20 mg/kg group, and 453 in the 30 mg/kg group). 589 (43%) participants were male and 779 (57%) were female. 372 (82%) in the standard-dose group, 329 (71%) in the 20 mg/kg group, and 293 (65%) in the 30 mg/kg group completed treatment. No participants in the standard-dose group, one (<1%) of 441 participants in the 20 mg/kg group, and four (1%) of 423 in the 30 mg/kg group developed grade 3 hepatotoxicity. Risk of protocol-defined adverse events was higher in the 30 mg/kg group than in the standard-dose group (adjusted risk difference 4·6% [95% CI 1·8 to 7·4]) or the 20 mg/kg group (5·1% [2·3 to 7·8]). There was no difference in the risk of adverse events between the 20 mg/kg and standard-dose groups (-0·5% [95% CI -2·4 to 1·5]; non-inferiority met). Completion was lower in the 20 mg/kg group (-7·8% [95% CI -13·6 to -2·0]) and the 30 mg/kg group (-15·4% [-21·4 to -9·4]) than in the standard-dose group. INTERPRETATION: In this trial, 2 months of 30 mg/kg daily rifampicin had significantly worse safety and completion than 4 months of 10 mg/kg daily and 2 months of 20 mg/kg daily (the latter, a fully blinded comparison); we do not consider 30 mg/kg to be a good option for TPT. Rifampicin at 20 mg/kg daily for 2 months was as safe as standard treatment, but with lower completion. This difference remains unexplained. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.