ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to examine on the CT basis the inter-application displacement of the positions D0.1cc, D1cc and D2cc of the brachytherapy dose applied to the bladder and rectum of the patients with inoperable cervical cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 30 patients with cervical cancer who were treated by concomitant chemo-radiotherapy. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy was made by the applicators type Fletcher tandem and ovoids. For each brachytherapy application the position D0.1cc was determined of the bladder and rectum that receive a brachytherapty dose. Then, based on the X, Y, and Z axis displacement, inter-application mean X, Y, and Z axis displacements were calculated as well as their displacement vectors (R). It has been analyzed whether there is statistically significant difference in inter-application displacement of the position of the brachytherapy dose D0.1cc, D1cc and D2cc of the bladder and rectum. The ANOVA test and post-hoc analysis by Tukey method were used for testing statistical importance of differences among the groups analyzed. The difference among the groups analyzed was considered significant if p < 0.05. RESULTS: There are significant inter-application displacements of the position of the brachytherapy dose D0,1cc, D1cc and D2cc of the bladder and rectum. CONCLUSIONS: When we calculate the cumulative brachytherapy dose by summing up D0,1cc, D1cc and D2cc of the organs at risk for all the applications, we must bear in mind their inter-application displacement, and the fact that it is less likely that the worst scenario would indeed happen.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A few radiographic techniques have been proposed to evaluate ankle syndesmosis reduction. The purpose of this study was to analyze post-operatively with CT-scanning the quality of ankle syndesmotic reduction. Moreover, to assess the impact of quality of syndesmotic reduction to functional outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study focused on patients older than 17 years with lateral and medial malleolar fracture with verified syndesmotic disruption. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: open fracture, concomitant injury, surgery delayed for more than 24 hours, additional posterior malleolar fracture, ASA score of ≥ 3, complication requiring revision surgery, articular step or gap of ≥ 2mm on the postoperative CT scans. RESULTS: Out of 41 patients, 34 participants completed the follow-up. There was a male predominance (20 patients - 58.82%) and the mean age was 48.46±16.1 years (range (20-72 years). 22 patients (64.71%) have sustained type B fracture, while in 12 patients (35.29%) the fracture was of a type C. The reduction was classified as anatomical in 26 patients (76.50%), while in 8 patients (23.50%) the reduction of the syndesmosis was non-anatomical. In those 26 patients in whom the reduction was anatomical, 17 (65.39%) were males and there were 18 (66.67%) type B fractures. In the patients with non-anatomical reduction, 3 patients (37.5%) were of a male gender and there was the equal number of type B and C fractures. The statistical analysis showed significantly favorable scores for both AOFAS score and VAS scale for the patients with anatomical reduction. CONCLUSION: Functional analysis showed a strong association with the CT observed reduction quality and both the AOFAS score and VAS scale. Further studies are desirable to provide further evidence in relation to the findings of this study.
Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures , Ankle Injuries , Joint Instability , Adult , Aged , Ankle Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Fractures/surgery , Ankle Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Injuries/surgery , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Ankle Joint/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Humans , Joint Instability/diagnostic imaging , Joint Instability/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a new virus that has never been identified in humans before. COVID-19 caused at the time of writing of this article, 2.5 million cases of infections in 193 countries with 165,000 deaths, including two-third in Europe. In this context, Oncology Departments of the affected countries had to adapt quickly their health system care and establish new organizations and priorities. Thus, numerous recommendations and therapeutic options have been reported to optimize therapy delivery to patients with chronic disease and cancer. Obviously, while these cancer care recommendations are immediately applicable in Europe, they may not be applicable in certain emerging and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this review, we aimed to summarize these international guidelines in accordance with cancer types, making a synthesis for daily practice to protect patients, staff and tailor anti-cancer therapy delivery taking into account patients/tumour criteria and tools availability. Thus, we will discuss their applicability in the LMICs with different organizations, limited means and different constraints.
Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Infection Control/organization & administration , Medical Oncology/organization & administration , Neoplasms/therapy , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/transmission , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Developing Countries/economics , Global Burden of Disease , Humans , Infection Control/economics , Infection Control/standards , Medical Oncology/economics , Medical Oncology/standards , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/transmission , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Poverty , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Its incidence is still increasing, particularly in developing countries. Recent progresses further strengthen the differences between low/middle and high-income countries. This situation calls for joint action to reduce inequities in cancer outcomes among the patients. The Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean Area (AROME) and the European School of Oncology (ESO), have initiated joint conferences devoted to access to innovations in oncology in the Mediterranean area. The heterogeneity of the economic, political and cultural situations of the different participating countries, offers the opportunity to develop consensus conference. METHODS: Cancer prevention and treatment strategies were discussed according to existing international guidelines. The Scientific committee prepared 111 questions with an objective to prioritize the access to treatments and innovations in low/middle-income Mediterranean countries. The results from the votes of 65 oncology experts, coming from 16 countries and 33 institutions have been analysed and access priorities classified accordingly. RESULTS: Ninety six percent of the proposed general recommendations concerning national health care strategies, oncology education, and treatment organization were considered to be high priorities. Regarding access to systemic treatments, 41% of the drugs without validated predictive markers and 53% of those with validated predictive markers were considered to be 1st level priority. Only 4 biological tests were considered to be 1st level priority to access to innovation. CONCLUSIONS: AROME-ESO consensus offers to cancer specialists from developing countries a basis for discussion with health authorities and payers on the prioritization of access to innovations in cancer care.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/trends , Medical Oncology/trends , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , ParisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In the past distal tibia fractures, including intraarticular fractures, frequently led to poor functional outcomes. The Ruedi-Allgower four steps open method, and later the Patterson and Sirkin recommendations for delayed operative treatment has made a drastic advancement in the treatment of these fractures. The two-stage minimally-invasive protocol using locking plate fixation proved a historical turning point, improving functional results to the highest levels compared to all other methods. AIM: To present the superior results of the two-stage minimally-invasive method using locking plate fixation, making this a historic step forward in treating distal tibia fractures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study, collecting data from Traumatology-Clinic in the 2014-2016 periods, available for nine-month follow-up. Twenty-three patients were finally included in the study. RESULTS: In analysing the data collected, we focused our attention on the final functional outcomes as indicated by dorsiflexion nine months after injury and also according to the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Scale. Results were excellent with no or minimal consequences. Where complications were present, these were benign and did not require further surgery. CONCLUSION: We believe this modern method for the treatment of distal tibia fractures should be applied routinely and considered as the gold standard in this domain.
ABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to compare findings from clinical examinations, MRI scans and arthroscopy in ACL injury of the knee in order to assess the diagnostic significance of both examination findings. This study was conducted to manage the reliability of clinical diagnosis in ACL tear injuries. All patients attending our clinic with knee pain from 2009 to 2013 underwent systematic and thorough clinical assessment. Of 103 patients with knee problems arthroscopy ACL tears was diagnosed in 73. All these patients underwent therapeutic arthroscopic knee surgery. The clinical diagnosis was evaluated and confirmed during this procedure. The accuracy, sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on these arthroscopic findings. The MRI accuracy of clinical diagnosis in our study was 82.5% for ACL tears. Accuracy for two of three clinical examination tests of clinical diagnosis in our study was 96% and 94% for ACL tears. According to our obtained correlation between clinical examinations, MRI scan and arthroscopy for ACL injuries, we concluded that carefully performed clinical examination can give equal or better diagnosis of ACL injuries in comparison with MRI scan. Our study revealed MRI scan high sensitivity and specificity and not so high accuracy for ACL injuries of the knee joint in comparison with arthroscopy. MRI is an appropriate screening tool for therapeutic arthroscopy, making diagnostic arthroscopy unnecessary in most patients. According to our findings we can conclude that a positive anterior drawer test and a positive Lachman clinical examination test is more accurate for predicting, i.e. diagnosis of ACL tear. On the ither hand, MRI scan findings showed less accuracy for predicting, i.e. diagnosis of ACL tear. According to many studies of clinical examination tests compared (correlated) with arthroscopy, the accuracy of predicting ACL tears depends on the level of the skilled orthopaedic or trauma surgeon's hands. Based on these findings, we feel that MRI, except in certain circumstances, is an expensive and unnecessary diagnostic test in patients with suspected meniscal and ACL pathology.
Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries , Arthroscopy/methods , Knee Injuries/diagnosis , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Rupture , Tibial Meniscus Injuries , Young AdultABSTRACT
Between the different anticancer treatments, radiation therapy, chemotherapies and some target therapies could have cardiac toxicity. This toxicity could be a clinical cardiac insufficiency reducing the global benefit of these treatments. Between the different anticancer drugs the more cardiotoxic and frequently used are anthracyclines. The combination of anthracyclines with other agents like trastuzumab or paclitaxel could improve the treatment results, but with an increasing risk of cardiac toxicity. Different strategies have been developed and evaluated concerning the prevention of cardiac toxicity induced by anthracyclines. They are: using of potentially less cardiotoxic anthracyclines but with no direct comparison in adjuvant trials; modification of anthracycline infusion not so used because of technical problems; developing therapeutic strategies who could offer the opportunity to optimize the combination of different treatment with no increasing of cardiac toxicity. Use of a cardioprotecting agent before anthracycline infusion (as dexrazoxane is) is possible. However, the indication is not well defined despite existence of efficacy results.