ABSTRACT
Islatravir (ISL) is a deoxyadenosine analog that inhibits HIV-1 reverse transcription by multiple mechanisms. Lenacapavir (LEN) is a novel capsid inhibitor that inhibits HIV-1 at multiple stages throughout the viral life cycle. ISL and LEN are being investigated as once-weekly combination oral therapy for the treatment of HIV-1. Here, we characterized ISL and LEN in vitro to assess combinatorial antiviral activity, cytotoxicity, and the potential for interactions between the two compounds. Bliss analysis revealed ISL with LEN demonstrated additive inhibition of HIV-1 replication, with no evidence of antagonism across the range of concentrations tested. ISL exhibited potent antiviral activity against variants encoding known LEN resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) with or without the presence of M184V, an ISL RAM in reverse transcriptase (RT) . Static resistance selection experiments were conducted with ISL and LEN alone and in combination, initiating with either wild-type virus or virus containing the M184I RAM in RT to further assess their barrier to the emergence of resistance. The combination of ISL with LEN more effectively suppressed viral breakthrough at lower multiples of the compounds' IC50 (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) values and fewer mutations emerged with the combination compared to either compound on its own. The known pathways for development of resistance with ISL and LEN were not altered, and no novel single mutations emerged that substantially reduced susceptibility to either compound. The lack of antagonism and cross-resistance between ISL and LEN support the ongoing evaluation of the combination for treatment of HIV-1.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , Drug Resistance, Viral , HIV-1 , Virus Replication , HIV-1/drug effects , HIV-1/genetics , Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Humans , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Virus Replication/drug effects , Deoxyadenosines/pharmacology , Mutation , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Cell Line , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Infections/virologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection after successful treatment may reduce the benefits of cure among people who inject drugs. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of HCV reinfection for 3 years after successful treatment among people receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT). DESIGN: A 3-year, long-term, extension study of persons enrolled in the CO-STAR (Hepatitis C Patients on Opioid Substitution Therapy Antiviral Response) study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02105688). SETTING: 55 clinical trial sites in 13 countries. PATIENTS: Aged 18 years and older with chronic HCV infection with genotypes 1, 4, or 6 receiving stable OAT. INTERVENTION: No treatments were administered. MEASUREMENTS: Serum samples were assessed for HCV reinfection. Urine drug screening was performed. RESULTS: Among 296 participants who received treatment, 286 were evaluable for reinfection and 199 were enrolled in the long-term extension study. The rate of HCV reinfection was 1.7 [95% CI, 0.8 to 3.0] per 100 person-years; 604 person-years of follow-up). A higher rate of reinfection was seen among people with recent injecting drug use (1.9 [95% CI, 0.5 to 4.8] per 100 person-years; 212 person-years). Ongoing drug use and injecting drug use were reported by 59% and 21% of participants, respectively, at the 6-month follow-up visit and remained stable during 3 years of follow-up. LIMITATIONS: Participants were required to be 80% adherent to OAT at baseline and may represent a population with higher stability and lower risk for HCV reinfection. Rate of reinfection may be underestimated because all participants did not continue in the long-term extension study; whether participants who discontinued were at higher risk for reinfection is unknown. CONCLUSION: Reinfection with HCV was low but was highest in the first 24 weeks after treatment completion and among people with ongoing injecting drug use and needle-syringe sharing. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Reinfection , Risk-Taking , Adolescent , Adult , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Reinfection/epidemiology , Substance Abuse, Intravenous/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Islatravir (ISL) is a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI) that inhibits human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reverse transcription by blocking reverse transcriptase (RT) translocation on the primer:template. ISL is being developed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. To expand our knowledge of viral variants that may confer reduced susceptibility to ISL, resistance selection studies were conducted with wild-type (WT) subtype A, B, and C viruses. RT mutations encoding M184I and M184V were the most frequently observed changes. Selection studies were also initiated with virus containing a single known resistance-associated mutation in RT (K65R, L74I, V90I, M184I, or M184V), and no additional mutations were observed. Antiviral activity assays were performed on variants that emerged in selection studies to determine their impact. M184I and M184V were the only single-codon substitutions that reduced susceptibility >2-fold compared to WT. A114S was an emergent substitution that when combined with other substitutions further reduced susceptibility >2-fold. Viruses containing A114S in combination with M184V did not replicate in primary blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), consistent with the rare occurrence of the combination in clinical samples. While A114S conferred reduced susceptibility to ISL, it increased susceptibility to approved nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). This differential impact of A114S on ISL, an NRTTI, compared to NRTIs likely results from the different mechanisms of action. Altogether, the results demonstrate that ISL has a high barrier to resistance and a differentiated mechanism compared to approved NRTIs.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Deoxyadenosines , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Nucleosides , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Doravirine (DOR), a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), was approved for treatment of HIV-1 infection in 2018. In the pivotal phase 3 trials, DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD, 7 out of 747 (0.9%) treatment-naive participants treated with DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) met protocol-defined virologic failure criteria and showed phenotypic resistance to DOR at week 48. The most common DOR resistance-associated mutation (RAM) detected in 5 of the 7 resistant isolates was F227C. Six isolates bearing NRTI RAMs (M184V and/or K65R) were resistant to lamivudine (3TC) and emtricitabine (FTC) but not to other approved NRTIs. All DOR-resistant isolates were susceptible or hypersusceptible (fold change of <0.25) to islatravir (ISL), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor (NRTTI). Isolate hypersusceptibility to ISL required F227C, in contrast to zidovudine, an NRTI, which required M184V. Based on the frequent emergence of F227C, we hypothesized that DOR and ISL would create a combination (DOR/ISL) with a high barrier to resistance. In de novo resistance selection studies in MT4-GFP cells (MT4 cells engineered to express green fluorescent protein), DOR/ISL synergistically prevented viral breakthrough at a threshold of 2× the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50). DOR/ISL exhibited a higher barrier to resistance than DOR/3TC and dolutegravir (DTG)/3TC. Resistance analysis showed no emergence of substitutions at F227, an observation consistent with its ability to confer hypersusceptibility to ISL. Overall, the data demonstrate that DOR/ISL creates a 2-drug combination with a higher barrier to resistance, consistent with the reported clinical activity.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Deoxyadenosines , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Emtricitabine/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Lamivudine/pharmacology , Lamivudine/therapeutic use , Mutation , Pyridones , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , TriazolesABSTRACT
Clinical management of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection may be negatively impacted by either acquired or transmitted drug resistance. Here, we aim to extend our understanding of the impact of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the susceptibility of clinical isolates to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) doravirine. Clinical isolates from people living with HIV-1 undergoing routine testing for susceptibility to doravirine and other approved NNRTIs (etravirine, rilpivirine, efavirenz, and nevirapine) were collected from August 2018 to August 2019. Susceptibility in the presence/absence of NNRTI and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations was determined using cutoffs for relative fold change in inhibition (ratio of the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC50] of patient virus compared with the IC50 of a wild-type reference strain). Biological cutoffs of 3- to 15-fold change were investigated for doravirine, with preestablished cutoffs used for the other NNRTIs. Of 4,070 clinical isolates, 42.9% had ≥1 NNRTI RAM. More isolates were susceptible to doravirine (92.5-96.7%) than to etravirine (91.5%), rilpivirine (89.5%), efavirenz (81.5%), or nevirapine (77.5%). Based on a 3-fold cutoff, doravirine susceptibility was retained in 44.7-65.8% of isolates resistant to another NNRTI and 28.5% of isolates resistant to all other tested NNRTIs. The presence of NRTI RAMs, including thymidine analog mutations, was associated with doravirine hypersusceptibility in some isolates, particularly in the absence of NNRTI RAMs. These results support the favorable resistance profile of doravirine and are of particular importance given the challenge posed by both acquired and transmitted resistance.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents , HIV Infections , HIV-1 , Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HIV-1/genetics , Humans , Mutation , Pyridones , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , TriazolesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 4 infection is prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East, particularly in Egypt. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir administered for 8 and 12 weeks in participants with HCV GT4 infection. METHODS: In this partially randomized, open-label multicentre study conducted in France (NCT03111108; Protocol MK5172-096), treatment-naive participants with GT4 infection and F0-F2 fibrosis were randomized 2:1 to elbasvir (50 mg)/grazoprevir (100 mg) for 8 or 12 weeks. Treatment-naive participants with F3-F4 fibrosis and all treatment-experienced participants (F0-F4) were assigned to elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and seventeen participants were enrolled. Among treatment-naive participants with F0-F2 fibrosis, SVR was achieved by 94% (50/53) and 96% (26/27) of those receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir for 8 or 12 weeks, respectively, and four participants relapsed. In the 12-week arm, 95% (35/37) achieved SVR and two participants relapsed. NS5A resistance-associated substitutions were present at baseline and virologic failure in five of the participants with relapse. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 42% (n = 22) and 50% (n = 32) of participants receiving 8 and 12 weeks of treatment, respectively. No participant discontinued treatment owing to an adverse event. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir administered for 12 weeks in treatment-experienced individuals with HCV GT4 infection and those with advanced fibrosis. Treatment-naive individuals with mild fibrosis can be treated effectively with an 8-week regimen.
Subject(s)
Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C, Chronic , Amides/therapeutic use , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Benzofurans , Carbamates/therapeutic use , Cyclopropanes/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Egypt , France , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Humans , Imidazoles , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 2 represents approximately 9% of all viral infections globally. While treatment outcomes for GT2-infected patients have improved substantially with direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) compared to interferon-α, the presence of polymorphisms in NS5A can impact efficacy of NS5A inhibitor-containing regimens. Thus, pathways of NS5A resistance were explored in GT2 subtypes using elbasvir, an NS5A inhibitor with broad genotype activity. Resistance selection studies, resistance analysis in NS5A-inhibitor treated virologic failures, antiviral activities in replicons bearing a panel of GT2 subtype sequences and amino acid substitutions introduced by site-directed mutagenesis were performed to define determinants of inhibitor susceptibility. Elbasvir showed differential antiviral activity in replicons bearing GT2 sequences. The EC50 values for replicons bearing reference NS5A sequences for GT2a and GT2b were 0.003 and 3.4 nanomolar (nM) respectively. Studies with recombinant replicons demonstrated crosstalk between amino acid positions 28 and 31. The combination of phenylalanine and methionine at positions 28 and 31 respectively, conferred the highest potency reduction for elbasvir in GT2a and GT2b. This combination was observed in failures from the C-SCAPE trial. Addition of grazoprevir, an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, to elbasvir more effectively suppressed the emergence of resistance in GT2 at modest inhibitor concentrations (3X EC90). Ruzasvir, a potent, pan-genotype NS5A inhibitor successfully inhibited replicons bearing GT2 resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) at positions 28 and 31. The studies demonstrate crosstalk between amino acids at positions 28 and 31 in NS5A modulate inhibitor potency and may impact treatment outcomes in some HCV GT2-infected patients.
ABSTRACT
In clinical trials, the three-drug regimen of ruzasvir (RZR) 60 mg, uprifosbuvir (UPR) 450 mg and grazoprevir 100 mg, with or without ribavirin, has demonstrated promising efficacy and excellent tolerability across a wide range of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected individuals. The present study assessed the efficacy and safety of the two-drug combination of RZR 60 mg plus UPR 450 mg administered for 12 weeks in participants with HCV genotype (GT) 1-6 infection. In this open-label clinical trial, treatment-naive or -experienced and cirrhotic or noncirrhotic participants with chronic HCV GT1-6 infection received RZR 60 mg plus UPR 450 mg orally once daily for 12 weeks (NCT02759315/protocol PN035). The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12). One hundred and sixty participants were enrolled. SVR12 rates were 96% (52 of 54) in participants with GT1a infection; 100% (15 of 15) in those with GT1b infection; 97% (28 of 29) in those with GT2 infection; 77% (30 of 39) in those with GT3 infection; 90% (18 of 20) in those with GT4 infection; and 67% (2 of 3) in those with GT6 infection. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) reported by >5% of participants were fatigue (n = 10, 6.3%) and diarrhoea (n = 9, 5.6%). Five participants reported a total of 11 serious AEs, none considered drug-related. One participant experienced on-treatment alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase elevations that resolved without intervention. Data from the present study indicate that the combination of RZR 60 mg plus UPR 450 mg once daily for 12 weeks was well tolerated overall but was effective only for certain genotypes.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/administration & dosage , Pyrrolidines/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Uridine/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pyrrolidines/therapeutic use , Sustained Virologic Response , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Uridine/administration & dosage , Uridine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Many direct-acting antiviral regimens have reduced activity in people with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 3 infection and cirrhosis. The C-ISLE study assessed the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV) in compensated cirrhotic participants with GT3 infection. This was a phase 2, randomized, open-label study. Treatment-naive participants received EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV for 8 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 12 weeks, and peginterferon/RBV treatment-experienced participants received EBR/GZR + SOF ± RBV for 12 weeks or EBR/GZR + SOF for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was HCV RNA <15 IU/mL 12 weeks after the end of treatment (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks [SVR12]). Among treatment-naive participants, SVR12 was 91% (21/23) in those treated with RBV for 8 weeks and 96% (23/24) in those treated for 12 weeks. Among treatment-experienced participants, SVR12 was 94% (17/18) and 100% (17/17) in the 12-week arm, with and without RBV, respectively, and 94% (17/18) in the 16-week arm. Five participants failed to achieve SVR: 2 relapsed (both in the 8-week arm), 1 discontinued due to vomiting/cellulitis (16-week arm), and 2 discontinued (consent withdrawn/lost to follow-up). SVR12 was not affected by the presence of resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). There was no consistent change in insulin resistance, and 5 participants reported serious adverse events (pneumonia, chest pain, opiate overdose, cellulitis, decreased creatinine). High efficacy was demonstrated in participants with HCV GT3 infection and cirrhosis. Treatment beyond 12 weeks was not required, and efficacy was maintained regardless of baseline RASs. CONCLUSION: Data from this study support the use of EBR/GZR plus SOF for 12 weeks without RBV for treatment-naive and peginterferon/RBV-experienced people with GT3 infection and cirrhosis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02601573). (Hepatology 2018;67:2113-2126).
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzofurans/therapeutic use , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Sofosbuvir/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Drug Combinations , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/complications , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Liver Cirrhosis/complications , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
A series of novel tetracyclic core-containing HCV NS5A inhibitors has been discovered. Incorporation of tetrahydropyran-substituted amino acid moiety improved their potency and yielded HCV NS5A inhibitors with a minimum potency shift from the GT1a strain compared to other genotypes and mutants. Compounds 53 and 54 showed the best potency profile and had reasonable half-times in rat PK studies. However, further optimization of their oral bioavailability is still needed in order to advance them for further development. [BMCL ABSTRACT] ©2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Drug Discovery , Genotype , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Half-Life , RatsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Estimates suggest that in Asia, more than 31 million individuals have hepatitis C virus infection. The present analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir in Asian participants enrolled in the elbasvir/grazoprevir phase 2/3 clinical trials. METHODS: This is an integrated analysis of data from 12 international phase 2/3 clinical trials. Asian participants with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4 infection who received elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg once daily for 12 weeks or elbasvir/grazoprevir plus ribavirin for 16 weeks were included in this analysis. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12). RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty Asian participants from 15 countries were included in this analysis. SVR12 was achieved by 756/780 (96.9%) of all participants, including 748/772 (96.9%) of those who received elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks and 8/8 (100%) of those who received elbasvir/grazoprevir plus ribavirin for 16 weeks. In the genotype 1b-infected population, the SVR12 rate was 691/709 (97.5%), and there was no impact of age, high baseline viral load, or presence of cirrhosis. The most frequently reported adverse events were nasopharyngitis (8.0%), upper respiratory tract infection (5.4%), and diarrhea (5.2%). Twenty participants receiving elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks reported a total of 25 serious adverse events, and 7 (0.9%) discontinued treatment because of an adverse event. CONCLUSION: Elbasvir/grazoprevir administered for 12 weeks is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment option for Asian individuals with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzofurans/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Asia/epidemiology , Benzofurans/adverse effects , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Drug Combinations , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Sustained Virologic Response , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Viral LoadABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although treatment with direct-acting antivirals has dramatically improved morbidity and mortality attributable to chronic hepatitis C virus infection, universal access to these medicines has been slow in the Asia-Pacific region and Russia. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of elbasvir/grazoprevir in participants with hepatitis C virus infection from Asia-Pacific countries and Russia (C-CORAL). METHODS: C-CORAL was a phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled study (NCT02251990). Treatment-naive, HIV-negative, cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic participants with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1, 4, or 6 infection were randomized to elbasvir 50 mg/grazoprevir 100 mg once daily for 12 weeks (immediate-treatment group) or placebo followed by deferred treatment with elbasvir/grazoprevir (deferred-treatment group). The primary efficacy outcome was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks, and the primary safety outcome was a comparison between the immediate-treatment group and placebo phase of the deferred-treatment group. RESULTS: A total of 489 participants were randomized (immediate-treatment group, n = 366; deferred-treatment group, n = 123). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks in the combined immediate/deferred-treatment groups was 94.4% (459/486; 95% confidence interval = 92.4-96.5%). Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks was 98.2% in participants with genotype 1b, 91.9% with genotype 1a, and 66.7% with genotype 6 infection. Similar rates of adverse events and drug-related adverse events were seen in the immediate-treatment group versus placebo phase of the deferred-treatment group (51.0% vs 50.4% and 21.4% vs 21.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks represents an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for treatment-naive people with genotype 1 infection from Asia-Pacific countries and Russia.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Benzofurans/therapeutic use , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Imidazoles/therapeutic use , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Adult , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Australia , Benzofurans/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , Asia, Eastern , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/enzymology , Humans , Imidazoles/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Quinoxalines/adverse effects , Russia , Sustained Virologic Response , Thailand , Vietnam , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/metabolism , Young AdultABSTRACT
Grazoprevir is a potent pan-genotype and macrocyclic inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A protease and was developed for treating chronic HCV infection. In HCV genotype (GT) 1a, grazoprevir maintains potent activity against a majority of NS3 resistance-associated amino acid substitutions, including the highly prevalent and naturally occurring Q80K polymorphism that impacts simeprevir, another NS3/4A protease inhibitor. The basis for an unexpected difference in the clinical impact of some NS3 substitutions was investigated. Phenotypic analysis of resistance-associated substitutions identified in NS3 from GT1a-infected patients who failed therapy with grazoprevir (in combination with elbasvir, an inhibitor of HCV NS5A protein) showed that positions 56, 156, and 168 in NS3 were most impactful because they diminished protein-inhibitor interactions. Although an amino acid substitution from aspartic acid to alanine at position 168 (D168A) reduced the potency of grazoprevir, its combination with R155K unexpectedly nullified this effect. Molecular dynamics and free-energy surface studies indicated that Asp-168 is important in anchoring Arg-155 for ligand binding but is not critical for Lys-155 because of the inherent flexibility of its side chain. Moreover, modeling studies supported a strong direct cation-heterocycle interaction between the Lys-155 side chain of the double substitution, R155K/D168A, and the lone pair on the quinoxaline in grazoprevir. This unique interaction provides a structural basis for grazoprevir's higher potency than simeprevir, an inhibitor to which the double substitution confers a significant reduction in potency. Our findings are consistent with the detection of R155K/D168A in NS3 from virologic failures treated with simeprevir but not grazoprevir.
Subject(s)
Hepacivirus/enzymology , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Mutation, Missense , Quinoxalines/chemistry , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/chemistry , Amides , Amino Acid Substitution , Carbamates , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclopropanes , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepatitis C/drug therapy , Hepatitis C/enzymology , Hepatitis C/genetics , Humans , Quinoxalines/therapeutic use , Simeprevir/chemistry , Simeprevir/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/genetics , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Inhibition of NS5A has emerged as an attractive strategy to intervene in hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication. Ruzasvir (formerly MK-8408) was developed as a novel NS5A inhibitor to improve upon the potency and barrier to resistance of early compounds. Ruzasvir inhibited HCV RNA replication with 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) of 1 to 4 pM in Huh7 or Huh7.5 cells bearing replicons for HCV genotype 1 (GT1) to GT7. The antiviral activity was modestly (10-fold) reduced in the presence of 40% normal human serum. The picomolar potency in replicon cells extended to sequences of clinical isolates available in public databases that were synthesized and tested as replicons. In GT1a, ruzasvir inhibited common NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs), with the exception of M28G. De novo resistance selection studies identified pathways with certain amino acid substitutions at residues 28, 30, 31, and 93 across genotypes. Substitutions at position 93 were more common in GT1 to -4, while changes at position 31 emerged frequently in GT5 and -6. With the exception of GT4, the reintroduction of selected RASs conferred a ≥100-fold potency reduction in the antiviral activity of ruzasvir. Common RASs from other classes of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) did not confer cross-resistance to ruzasvir. The interaction of ruzasvir with an NS3/4A protease inhibitor (grazoprevir) and an NS5B polymerase prodrug (uprifosbuvir) was additive to synergistic, with no evidence of antagonism or cytotoxicity. The antiviral profile of ruzasvir supported its further evaluation in human trials in combination with grazoprevir and uprifosbuvir.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/pharmacology , Pyrrolidines/pharmacology , Thiazoles/pharmacology , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Amides , Carbamates , Cell Line, Tumor , Cyclopropanes , Drug Resistance, Viral/drug effects , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Genotype , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Hepatitis C, Chronic/virology , Humans , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Quinoxalines/pharmacology , Replicon/drug effects , Sulfonamides , Uridine/analogs & derivatives , Uridine/pharmacologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The increasing prevalence of mutations in HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) that confer resistance to existing NRTIs and NNRTIs underscores the need to develop RT inhibitors with novel mode-of-inhibition and distinct resistance profiles. METHODS: Biochemical assays were employed to identify inhibitors of RT activity and characterize their mode of inhibition. The antiviral activity of the inhibitors was assessed by cell-based assays using laboratory HIV-1 isolates and MT4 cells. RT variants were purified via avidin affinity columns. RESULTS: Compound A displayed equal or greater potency against many common NNRTI-resistant RTs (K103N and Y181C RTs) relative to WT RT. Despite possessing certain NNRTI-like properties, such as being unable to inhibit an engineered variant of RT lacking an NNRTI-binding pocket, we found that compound A was dependent on Mg2+ for binding to RT. Optimization of compound A led to more potent analogues, which retained similar activities against WT and K103N mutant viruses with submicromolar potency in a cell-based assay. One of the analogues, compound G, was crystallized in complex with RT and the structure was determined at 2.6 Å resolution. The structure indicated that compound G simultaneously interacts with the active site (Asp186), the highly conserved primer grip region (Leu234 and Trp229) and the NNRTI-binding pocket (Tyr188). CONCLUSIONS: These findings reveal a novel class of RT bifunctional inhibitors that are not sensitive to the most common RT mutations, which can be further developed to address the deficiency of current RT inhibitors.
Subject(s)
Anti-HIV Agents/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Viral/genetics , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/antagonists & inhibitors , HIV-1/drug effects , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Binding Sites/genetics , Catalytic Domain/drug effects , HIV Reverse Transcriptase/genetics , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The aim of this integrated analysis was to assess the efficacy of the once-daily combination of elbasvir 50 mg and grazoprevir 100 mg, with and without ribavirin in HCV genotype 4 (GT4)-infected participants enrolled in the Phase 2/3 clinical programme with elbasvir/grazoprevir. METHODS: Treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced participants 18 years of age or older with chronic HCV GT4 infection and baseline HCV RNA ≥10 000 IU/mL were included in the analysis. The analysis population was the full analysis set (FAS; all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication) and a total of 155 HCV GT4 participants were evaluated. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12; HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantitation at 12 weeks after the completion of study therapy). RESULTS: Overall, among GT4-infected participants treated with 12 or 16 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir ± ribavirin, the SVR12 efficacy rates were 96.4% (107/111) in treatment-naïve participants and 88.6% (39/44) in treatment-experienced participants. The SVR12 rates were 96.0% (97/101) in treatment-naïve participants treated with 12 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir and 100% (8/8) in treatment-experienced participants treated with 16 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir plus ribavirin. Efficacy was not impacted by GT4 subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The regimens of 12 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir without ribavirin, and 16 weeks of elbasvir/grazoprevir plus ribavirin, were efficacious in HCV GT4-infected treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced participants respectively. Baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions did not impact the efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir in GT4-infected participants.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Benzofurans/administration & dosage , Hepatitis C, Chronic/drug therapy , Imidazoles/administration & dosage , Quinoxalines/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Amides , Carbamates , Cyclopropanes , Drug Resistance, Viral , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Genotype , Hepacivirus/genetics , Humans , Internationality , Liver Cirrhosis/virology , Male , Middle Aged , Ribavirin/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides , Sustained Virologic Response , Young AdultABSTRACT
HCV NS5A inhibitors have shown impressive in vitro potency profiles in HCV replicon assays thus making them attractive components for inclusion in an all oral fixed dose combination regimen. Herein, we describe the discovery and characterization of silyl proline-containing HCV NS5A inhibitor MK-8325 with good pan-genotype activity and acceptable pharmacokinetic properties.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/chemistry , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/chemistry , Proline/chemistry , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Animals , Antiviral Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System/metabolism , Dogs , Genotype , Half-Life , Haplorhini , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Hepacivirus/physiology , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/pharmacokinetics , Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings/pharmacology , Humans , Rats , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/metabolism , Virus Replication/drug effectsABSTRACT
Although genotype 4 (GT4)-infected patients represent a minor overall percentage of the global hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected population, the high prevalence of the genotype in specific geographic regions coupled with substantial sequence diversity makes it an important genotype to study for antiviral drug discovery and development. We evaluated two direct-acting antiviral agents-grazoprevir, an HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and elbasvir, an HCV NS5A inhibitor-in GT4 replicons prior to clinical studies in this genotype. Following a bioinformatics analysis of available GT4 sequences, a set of replicons bearing representative GT4 clinical isolates was generated. For grazoprevir, the 50% effective concentration (EC50) against the replicon bearing the reference GT4a (ED43) NS3 protease and NS4A was 0.7 nM. The median EC50 for grazoprevir against chimeric replicons encoding NS3/4A sequences from GT4 clinical isolates was 0.2 nM (range, 0.11 to 0.33 nM; n = 5). The difficulty in establishing replicons bearing NS3/4A resistance-associated substitutions was substantially overcome with the identification of a G162R adaptive substitution in NS3. Single NS3 substitutions D168A/V identified from de novo resistance selection studies reduced grazoprevir antiviral activity by 137- and 47-fold, respectively, in the background of the G162R replicon. For elbasvir, the EC50 against the replicon bearing the reference full-length GT4a (ED43) NS5A gene was 0.0002 nM. The median EC50 for elbasvir against chimeric replicons bearing clinical isolates from GT4 was 0.0007 nM (range, 0.0002 to 34 nM; n = 14). De novo resistance selection studies in GT4 demonstrated a high propensity to suppress the emergence of amino acid substitutions that confer high-potency reductions to elbasvir. Phenotypic characterization of the NS5A amino acid substitutions identified (L30F, L30S, M31V, and Y93H) indicated that they conferred 15-, 4-, 2.5-, and 7.5-fold potency losses, respectively, to elbasvir. The activity profiles of grazoprevir and elbasvir supported the testing of the direct-acting antivirals in clinical studies.
Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Benzofurans/pharmacology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/enzymology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Protease Inhibitors/pharmacology , Quinoxalines/pharmacology , Viral Nonstructural Proteins/antagonists & inhibitors , Amides , Carbamates , Cyclopropanes , Genotype , Hepacivirus/drug effects , Hepacivirus/genetics , Replicon/genetics , Serine Proteases , SulfonamidesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Direct-acting antiviral agents have improved treatment outcomes for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; however, head-to-head comparisons are limited. The C-EDGE Head-2-Head Study compared the safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) with sofosbuvir plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SOF/PR) in patients with HCV infection. METHODS: This was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial. Two hundred fifty-seven patients with HCV genotype (GT)1 or 4 infection and baseline viral load >10,000IU/ml were randomized to receive 12weeks of EBR/GZR 50mg/100mg once daily (n=129) or sofosbuvir (400mg once daily) plus PR (n=128). Primary efficacy objective was sustained virologic response 12weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12, HCV RNA <15IU/ml). The primary safety objective was the proportion of patients experiencing a tier 1 safety event. RESULTS: The majority of patients were non-cirrhotic (83.1%), treatment-naïve (74.9%) and had HCV GT1b infection (82.0%). SVR12 rates were 99.2% (128/129) and 90.5% (114/126) in the EBR/GZR and SOF/PR groups, respectively. The estimated adjusted difference in SVR12 was 8.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.6-15.3%). Because the lower bound of the 1-sided 1-sample exact test was greater than -10% and greater than zero, both non-inferiority and superiority of EBR/GZR vs. SOF/PR were established. The frequency of tier 1 safety events was lower among patients receiving EBR/GZR than SOF/PR (0.8% vs. 27.8%, between group difference, 27.0% [95% CI, -35.5% to -19.6%; p<0.001]). CONCLUSIONS: EBR/GZR has a superior efficacy and safety profile in patients with HCV GT1 or 4 infection compared with SOF/PR. LAY SUMMARY: The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12weeks was highly effective in treating patients with chronic hepatitis C, genotypes 1 or 4 infection. This regimen was more effective than sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin for 12weeks, and was notably superior in patients regarded as difficult to treat, including those with previous treatment failure, cirrhosis, or a high baseline viral load. The combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir also demonstrated a superior safety and tolerability profile based on fewer serious adverse events, no serious drug-related adverse events, and no treatment discontinuations. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials.gov Identifier: NCT02358044.
Subject(s)
Hepatitis C, Chronic , Antiviral Agents , Benzofurans , Drug Therapy, Combination , Genotype , Hepacivirus , Humans , Imidazoles , Interferons , Quinoxalines , RNA, Viral , Ribavirin , SofosbuvirABSTRACT
The selection of resistance-associated variants (RAVs) against single agents administered to patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) necessitates that direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) targeting multiple viral proteins be developed to overcome failure resulting from emergence of resistance. The combination of grazoprevir (formerly MK-5172), an NS3/4A protease inhibitor, and elbasvir (formerly MK-8742), an NS5A inhibitor, was therefore studied in genotype 1a (GT1a) replicon cells. Both compounds were independently highly potent in GT1a wild-type replicon cells, with 90% effective concentration (EC90) values of 0.9 nM and 0.006 nM for grazoprevir and elbasvir, respectively. No cross-resistance was observed when clinically relevant NS5A and NS3 RAVs were profiled against grazoprevir and elbasvir, respectively. Kinetic analyses of HCV RNA reduction over 14 days showed that grazoprevir and elbasvir inhibited prototypic NS5A Y93H and NS3 R155K RAVs, respectively, with kinetics comparable to those for the wild-type GT1a replicon. In combination, grazoprevir and elbasvir interacted additively in GT1a replicon cells. Colony formation assays with a 10-fold multiple of the EC90 values of the grazoprevir-elbasvir inhibitor combination suppressed emergence of resistant colonies, compared to a 100-fold multiple for the independent agents. The selected resistant colonies with the combination harbored RAVs that required two or more nucleotide changes in the codons. Mutations in the cognate gene caused greater potency losses for elbasvir than for grazoprevir. Replicons bearing RAVs identified from resistant colonies showed reduced fitness for several cell lines and may contribute to the activity of the combination. These studies demonstrate that the combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir exerts a potent effect on HCV RNA replication and presents a high genetic barrier to resistance. The combination of grazoprevir and elbasvir is currently approved for chronic HCV infection.