[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy?]. / Laparoszkópos vagy nyílt appendectomia?

UNLABELLED: Despite the fact that laparoscopic appendectomy was one of the first performed minimally invasive surgical procedures, the benefits and indications of its use are still controversial. METHODS: Data of patients with the diagnosis of appendicitis operated either with laparoscopic (LA) or open (OA) appendectomy were collected and analyzed. PATIENTS: This study involved 273 consecutive patients who had undergone appendectomy with the diagnosis of acute appendicitis at the Uzsoki Teaching Hospital, Department of Surgery between January 2005 and December 2007. 185 patients (68%) operated with the laparoscopic, 88 (32%) with the open technique, in the third year 89% of the cases underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. RESULTS: The conversion rate was 27%, the reason of the conversion was the progression of the disease in 35 patients (70%) and technical in 15 cases (30%). The wound infection rate was 8% in the LA and 18% in the OA group ( p = 0.022). No significant difference was found in the reoperation rate and in the hospital readmission rate between the two groups. There was one insufficiency which was treated with conservative therapy. The hospital stay was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group ( p = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that laparoscopic appendectomy has significant advantages over open appendectomy. In our practice, laparoscopic appendectomy is the first choice of procedure in acute appendicitis.

[Long-term follow-up of patients treated with radical surgery for rectal cancer]. / Radikálisan operált végbéldaganatos betegek hosszú távú követése.

In developed societies colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent malignant tumor which causes more than 5000 deaths yearly in Hungary. We have attempted to answer the question how to improve the above mentioned data by the long-term follow-up of patients operated upon for rectal cancer at our department. Of the patients operated on for rectal cancer at our department between March 1990 and April 2006, we have conducted regular follow-up of 297 patients according to a protocol developed by us. We have examined the length of time between the rectum operation and the diagnosis and the number of local recurrences, distant metastases, tumor progression in more than one organ as well as second tumors (independent of the rectal cancer). During this period we found 24 local recurrences, 32 distant metastases, 43 tumor progressions in more than one organ, and 21 second tumors. In two patients, in addition to distant metastases, we found a second CRC independent of the original rectal cancer, and in one patient with tumor progression in more than one organ we also detected breast cancer. In one patient we found 3 second tumors (CR, lung and urinary bladder) independent of the original rectal cancer. Altogether we found tumors in 117 out of 297 patients. During the same period, we performed 69/117 operations and 31/117 patients were alive at the end of our study with a median survival of 60.4 (3-184) months. In summary, we can state that this work is beneficial for curing the recurrence of rectal cancer, making the patients' life longer or making the quality of life better for the patients operated on for rectal cancer.