Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Journal subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 18(2): 151-156, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38172007

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Although diabetes management decisions in primary care are typically based largely on HbA1c, mismatches between HbA1c and other measures of glycemia that are increasingly more available present challenges to optimal management. This study aimed to assess a systematic approach to identify the frequency of mismatches of potential clinical significance amongst various measures of glycemia in a primary care setting. METHODS: Following screening to exclude conditions known to affect HbA1c interpretation, HbA1c, and fructosamine were obtained and repeated after ∼90 days on 53 adults with prediabetes or type 2 diabetes. A subset of 13 participants with repeat labs wore continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 10 days. RESULTS: As expected, HbA1c and fructosamine only modestly correlated (initial R2 = 0.768/repeat R2 = 0.655). The HbA1c/fructosamine mismatch frequency of ± 0.5% (using the following regression HbA1c = 0.015 *fructosamine + 2.994 calculated from the initial sample) was 27.0%. Of the 13 participants with CGM data, HbA1c and CGM-based Glucose Management Indicator correlated at R2 = 0.786 with a mismatch frequency of ± 0.5% at 46.2% compared to a HbA1c/fructosamine mismatch frequency of ± 0.5% at 30.8%. CONCLUSIONS: HbA1c is frequently mismatched with fructosamine and CGM data. As each of the measures has strengths and weaknesses, the utilization of multiple different measures of glycemia may be informative for diabetes assessment in the clinical setting.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Adult , Humans , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Glycated Hemoglobin , Blood Glucose , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Fructosamine , Primary Health Care
2.
Cureus ; 13(9): e18174, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34703699

ABSTRACT

Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) is an uncommon cause of hypercalcemia in HIV-infected patients recently started on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). It is hypothesized that increased granulomatous formation due to IRIS leads to an overproduction of calcitriol. High levels of calcitriol, then, can lead to significant hypercalcemia. We present the case of a 63-year-old male with HIV off HAART presented to the emergency room for confusion, frequent falls, and cough. His CD-4 count was noted to be below 35 cells/µL (255-2,496). Over the course of the hospitalization, the patient was found to have disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection and was initiated on HAART. Initiation of HAART was followed by an increase in calcium up to 14.1 mg/dL. The hypercalcemia did not respond to either Calcitonin or Pamidronate. Consideration was then given to IRIS in the setting of MAC infection leading to increased granulomatous formation. Calcium levels normalized within three days of therapy after initiation of prednisone for the treatment of IRIS.  It is thought that an increase in CD-4 counts leads to the recovery of an immune response. This can lead to granulomatous inflammation. An increase in granuloma formation can cause hypercalcemia due to overproduction of calcitriol via increased 1𝛼-hydroxylase activity from macrophages. Our case report describes IRIS-mediated hypercalcemia in an HIV-infected individual with MAC infection. This unusual cause of severe hypercalcemia should be considered in differential diagnoses for immunocompromised patients in the appropriate setting. Prompt treatment of IRIS with glucocorticoids can lead to the resolution of hypercalcemia.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL