Differentiation between benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures using qualitative and quantitative analysis of a single fast spin echo T2-weighted Dixon sequence.

OBJECTIVES: To determine and compare the qualitative and quantitative diagnostic performance of a single sagittal fast spin echo (FSE) T2-weighted Dixon sequence in differentiating benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCF), using multiple readers and different quantitative methods. METHODS: From July 2014 to June 2020, 95 consecutive patients with spine MRI performed prior to cementoplasty for acute VCFs were retrospectively included. VCFs were categorized as benign (n = 63, mean age = 76 ± 12 years) or malignant (n = 32, mean age = 63 ± 12 years) with a best valuable comparator as a reference. Qualitative analysis was independently performed by four radiologists by categorizing each VCF as either benign or malignant using only the image sets provided by FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequences. Quantitative analysis was performed using two different regions of interest (ROI1-2) and three methods (signal drop, fat fraction (FF) from ROIs, FF maps). Diagnostic performance was compared using ROC curves analyses. Interobserver agreement was assessed using kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: The qualitative diagnostic performance ranged from area under the curve (AUC) = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.00) to AUC = 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95-1.0). The quantitative diagnostic performance ranged from AUC = 0.82 (95% CI: 0.73-0.89) to AUC = 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-0.99). Pairwise comparisons showed no statistical difference in diagnostic performance (all p > 0.0013, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.0011). All five cases with disagreement among the readers were correctly diagnosed at quantitative analysis using ROI2. Interobserver agreement was excellent for both qualitative and quantitative analyses. CONCLUSIONS: A single FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence can be used to differentiate benign and malignant VCF with high diagnostic performance using both qualitative and quantitative analyses, which can provide complementary information. KEY POINTS: • Qualitative analysis of a single FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence yields high diagnostic performance and excellent observer agreement for differentiating benign and malignant compression fractures. • The same FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence allows quantitative assessment with high diagnostic performance. • Quantitative data can readily be extracted from the FSE T2-weighted Dixon sequence and may provide complementary information to the qualitative analysis, which may be useful in doubtful cases.

Necrotizing pneumonia in children: Chest computed tomography vs. lung ultrasound.

Background: The utilization of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest for the diagnosis of necrotizing pneumonia (NP), a complication of community-acquired pneumonia, is controversial because of the inherent ionizing radiation involved. Over the past few years, the growing availability of bedside Lung Ultrasound (LUS) devices has led to increased use of this nonionizing imaging method for diagnosing thoracic pathology, including pneumonia. Objective: The objectives of this study were as follows: first, to compare the performance of LUS vs. CT in the identification of certain radiological signs of NP, and second, to determine whether LUS could replace CT in the diagnosis of NP. Materials and methods: We compared retrospectively the CT and LUS images of 41 patients between 2005 and 2018 in whom at least one contrast-injected chest CT scan and one LUS had been undertaken fewer than 7 days apart. Results: Pleural effusions were demonstrated almost systematically (100% on CT vs. 95.8% on LUS). Visualization of septations in pleural effusions was clearly superior on LUS (20.4% on CT vs 62.5% on LUS). Concerning the detection of necrosis, we observed a strong correlation between LUS and the gold-standard CT (95.8% on LUS vs. 93.7% on CT). Parenchymal cavities were more easily detected on CT than on LUS (79.1 vs. 35.4%). Conclusion: LUS has shown to be as effective as CT in the diagnosis of NP. The use of CT in patients with NP could be limited to the detection of complications such as bronchopleural fistulae in unfavorably evolving diseases.