Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 31(3): 243-249.e2, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38171478

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is part of the primary treatment for early-stage cervical cancer and high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial cancer. Pelvic lymphocele is a postoperative complication of PLND, and when symptomatic, lymphoceles necessitate treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors of symptomatic lymphocele after robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND in cervical and endometrial cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with cervical cancer and 129 patients with endometrial cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Pelvic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors retrospectively included all patients with early-stage cervical cancer and high-intermediate risk or high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy by robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery between 2008 and 2022. Medical records were reviewed for the occurrence of a symptomatic lymphocele. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for developing a symptomatic lymphocele. In total, 387 patients, 258 with cervical cancer and 129 with endometrial cancer, were included in the study. The overall incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles was 9.6% with a median follow-up of 47 months [interquartile range 23-61]. For the entire cohort, smoking was the only significant risk factor for symptomatic lymphoceles identified in univariate (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.19-5.11) and multivariate analysis (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.16-5.07). For cervical cancer, body mass index (BMI) (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.00-1.17) and prior abdominal surgery (OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.22-6.17) were also identified as significant independent risk factors. For endometrial cancer, age was identified as a significant independent risk factor (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97). CONCLUSION: This single-center cohort study demonstrated an incidence of almost 10% of symptomatic lymphoceles after robot-assisted laparoscopic PLND for cervical cancer and endometrial cancer, with a higher risk observed among patients who smoke at the time of diagnosis. Furthermore, risk factors differ between the 2 populations, necessitating further studies to establish risk models.


Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Lymphocele , Robotics , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Lymphocele/epidemiology , Lymphocele/etiology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/complications , Cohort Studies , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Endometrial Neoplasms/complications , Pelvis/surgery
2.
Gynecol Oncol ; 178: 153-160, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37865051

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on patient outcomes when introducing a novice robotic surgeon, trained in accordance with a structured learning curriculum, to an experienced robotic surgery team treating cervical cancer patients. METHODS: Patients with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary robot-assisted surgery between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively included. In addition to the 165 patients included in a former analysis, we included a further 61 consecutively treated patients and divided all 226 patients over three groups: early learning phase of 61 procedures without structured training (group 1), experienced phase of 104 procedures (group 2), and the 61 procedures during introduction of a novice with structured training (group 3). Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was performed to assess the learning curve effect. Patient outcomes between the groups were compared. RESULTS: Based on RA-CUSUM analysis, no learning curve effect was observed for group 3. Regarding surgical outcomes, mean operation time in group 3 was significantly shorter than group 1 (p < 0.001) and similar to group 2 (p = 0.96). Proportions of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events in group 3 were not significantly different from the experienced group (group 2). Regarding oncological outcomes, the 5-year disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival in group 3 were not significantly different from the experienced group. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing a novice robotic surgeon, who was trained in accordance with a structured learning curriculum, resulted in similar patient outcomes as by experienced surgeons suggesting novices can progress through a learning phase without compromising outcomes of cervical cancer patients.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Surgeons , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Retrospective Studies , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/etiology , Cohort Studies , Learning Curve , Curriculum , Laparoscopy/methods
3.
Expert Rev Med Devices ; 20(7): 589-596, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37278067

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether a learning curve affects the bilateral sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: All patients with FIGO (2018) stage IA1-IB2 or IIA1 cervical cancer who had undergone robot-assisted SLN mapping performed with a combination of preoperative technetium-99m nanocolloids (including preoperative imaging) and intraoperative blue dye were retrospectively included. Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was used to determine if a learning curve based on bilateral SLN detection existed in this cohort. RESULTS: A total of 227 cervical cancer patients were included. In 98.2% of patients (223/227) at least one SLN was detected. The bilateral SLN detection rate was 87.2% (198/227). Except for age (OR 1.06 per year, 95%CI 1.02-1.09), no significant risk factors for non-bilateral SLN detection were found (e.g., prior conization, BMI or FIGO stage). The RA-CUSUM analysis showed no clear learning phase during the first procedures and cumulative bilateral detection rate remained at least 80% during the entire inclusion period. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-institution experience, we observed no learning curve affecting robot-assisted SLN mapping using a radiotracer and blue dye in early-stage cervical cancer patients, with stable bilateral detection rates of at least 80% when adhering to a standardized methodology.


Subject(s)
Robotics , Sentinel Lymph Node , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology
4.
EJNMMI Res ; 12(1): 36, 2022 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35723832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive radioguided sentinel lymph node (SLN) procedures, increasingly performed with robot-assisted laparoscopy, can benefit from using a drop-in γ-probe instead of the conventional rigid laparoscopic γ-probe. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of a tethered drop-in γ-probe system for SLN detection in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. METHODS: Ten patients with FIGO stage IA - IB2 or IIA1 cervical cancer scheduled for robot-assisted laparoscopic SLN procedure were included. All patients underwent preoperative 240 MBq technetium-99m nanocolloid (99mTc) injection and SPECT/CT imaging. Intraoperatively the tethered drop-in γ-probe SENSEI® (Lightpoint Medical Ltd, Chesham, UK) was used for probe guided SLN detection, subsequently confirmed by the standard rigid laparoscopic γ-probe. Sentinel lymph node detection rates and anatomical SLN location were assessed. Surgeon questionnaires were used to assess usability. RESULTS: In all patients at least one SLN was successfully resected under guidance of the drop-in γ-probe (overall detection rate: 100%). Bilateral SLN detection rate with the drop-in γ-probe was 80%. Of the two patients with unilateral SLN detection only, one presented with an atypical SLN location at the aortic bifurcation that was detected only on SPECT/CT. The other patient had failed unilateral 99mTc uptake. Combined use of preoperative SPECT/CT and drop-in γ-probe resulted in a bilateral detection rate of 90%. Similar to the drop-in γ-probe, overall and bilateral SLN detection rate of the rigid γ-probe was 100% and 80%, respectively. No significant discrepancy existed between the count rate of the drop-in and rigid laparoscopic γ-probe (p = 0.69). In total 21 SLN's were detected with the drop-in γ-probes including all three tumor positive nodes. Because of wristed articulation of the robotic tissue grasper and possibility of autonomous probe control by the surgeon, maneuverability and control with the drop-in γ-probe were highly rated in surgeon questionnaires. No adverse events related to the intervention occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel lymph node detection with a drop-in γ-probe is safe and feasible in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Use of the drop-in γ-probe enhances maneuverability and surgical autonomy during robot-assisted SLN detection. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Registry, NL9358. Registered 23 March 2021, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/9358 .

5.
Cancer Rep (Hoboken) ; 5(1): e1401, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33973745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early-stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotracer and blue dye, no consensus has been reached. AIMS: We aimed to assess the differences in overall and bilateral SLN detection rates with ICG versus the combined approach, the radiotracer technetium-99m (99m Tc) with blue dye. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 1, 2020 and included studies reporting on a comparison of SLN detection with ICG versus 99m Tc with blue dye in early-stage cervical cancer. The overall and bilateral detection rates were pooled with random-effects meta-analyses. From 118 studies retrieved seven studies (one cross-sectional; six retrospective cohorts) were included, encompassing 589 patients. No significant differences were found in the pooled overall SLN detection rate of ICG versus 99m Tc with blue dye. Meta-analyses of all studies showed ICG to result in a higher bilateral SLN detection rate than 99m Tc with blue dye; 90.3% (95%CI, 79.8-100.0%) with ICG versus 73.5% (95%CI, 66.4-80.6%) with 99mTc with blue dye. This resulted in a significant and clinically relevant risk difference of 16.6% (95%CI, 5.3-28.0%). With sensitivity analysis, the risk difference of the bilateral detection rate maintained in favor of ICG but was no longer significant (13.2%, 95%CI -0.8-27.3%). CONCLUSION: ICG appears to provide higher bilateral SLN detection rates compared to 99m Tc with blue dye in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. However, in adherence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, the quality of evidence is too low to provide strong recommendations and directly omit the combined approach of 99m Tc with blue dye.


Subject(s)
Indocyanine Green/administration & dosage , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Technetium/administration & dosage , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Indocyanine Green/adverse effects , Predictive Value of Tests , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Technetium/adverse effects
6.
BMJ Open ; 12(9): e061829, 2022 09 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36100304

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays, two predominant methods for detecting sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in cervical cancer are in use. The most conventional method is a combination of a radiotracer, technetium-99m (99mTc) and blue dye. More recently, another method for SLN mapping using indocyanine green (ICG) is becoming widely accepted. ICG is a fluorescent dye, visualised intraoperatively with near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging, providing real-time visual navigation. The presumed advantages of ICG over 99mTc, that is, being cheaper, non-radioactive and logistically more attractive, are only valuable if its detection rate proves to be at least non-inferior. Before omitting the well-functioning and evidence-based combined approach of 99mTc and blue dye, we aim to provide prospective evidence on the non-inferiority of ICG with NIR fluorescence imaging. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We initiated a prospective non-inferiority study with a paired comparison of both SLN methods in a single sample of 101 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA-IB2 or IIA1 cervical cancer receiving primary surgical treatment. All patients undergo SLN mapping with ICG and NIR fluorescence imaging in adjunct to mapping with 99mTc (including single photon emission computed tomography with X-ray computed tomography (SPECT/CT)) and blue dye. Surgeons start SLN detection with ICG while being blinded for the preoperative outcome of SPECT/CT to avoid biased detection with ICG. Primary endpoint of this study is bilateral SLN detection rate of both methods (ie, detection of at least one SLN in each hemipelvis). Since we compare strategies for SLN mapping that are already applied in current daily practice for different types of cancer, no additional risks or burdens are expected from these study procedures. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The current study is approved by the Medical Ethics Research Committee Utrecht (reference number 21-014). Findings arising from this study will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, academic conferences and through patient organisations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL9011 and EudraCT 2020-005134-15.


Subject(s)
Lymphadenopathy , Sentinel Lymph Node , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms , Coloring Agents , Female , Humans , Indocyanine Green , Prospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Technetium , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL