ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare clinical assessment findings between elite athletic populations with and without a clinical diagnosis of posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS). DESIGN: Cross-sectional case-control study. SETTING: Elite ballet and sport. PARTICIPANTS: Ten male and female professional ballet dancers and athletes with a clinical diagnosis of PAIS and were matched for age, sex, and activity to 10 professional ballet dancers and athletes without PAIS. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Posterior ankle pain on body chart and a positive ankle plantarflexion pain provocation test. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Single-leg heel raise (SLHR) endurance test, range of motion testing for weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion, passive ankle plantarflexion, and first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsiflexion, and Beighton score for generalized joint hypermobility. Participants also completed the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) questionnaire. RESULTS: The group with PAIS achieved significantly fewer repetitions on SLHR capacity testing ( P = 0.02) and were more symptomatic for perceived ankle instability according to CAIT scores ( P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Single-leg heel raise endurance capacity was lower, and perceived ankle instability was greater in participants with PAIS. The management of this presentation in elite dancers and athletes should include the assessment and management of functional deficits.
Subject(s)
Ankle Joint , Dancing , Joint Instability , Range of Motion, Articular , Humans , Male , Dancing/physiology , Female , Joint Instability/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Case-Control Studies , Ankle Joint/physiopathology , Young Adult , Adult , Heel/physiopathology , Athletes , Ankle Injuries/physiopathology , Physical Endurance/physiology , AdolescentABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS) is a common and debilitating condition, commonly affecting people who participate in activities that involve repetitive ankle plantarflexion. The relationship between clinical and imaging findings in PAIS has not been established. PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between clinical and imaging features in PAIS by reviewing the literature comparing symptomatic patients to asymptomatic controls. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify all English-language articles that compared imaging features in patients diagnosed with PAIS to imaging in an asymptomatic control group. RESULTS: A total of 8394 articles were evaluated by title and abstract, and 156 articles were read in full text. No articles compared imaging findings to an asymptomatic control group, thus no articles met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: This systematic review found no published research that compared the imaging findings of people diagnosed with PAIS to asymptomatic people. Until this information is available, imaging features in people with posterior ankle impingement should be interpreted with caution.
Subject(s)
Ankle , Joint Diseases , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Arthroscopy/methods , Humans , Joint Diseases/diagnostic imaging , SyndromeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess the association between clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS) and to compare the prevalence of imaging findings between participants with and without a clinical diagnosis of PAIS. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Elite ballet and sport. PARTICIPANTS: Eighty-two male (54%) and female participants comprising ballet dancers (n = 43), cricket fast bowlers (n = 24), and football (soccer) players (n = 15). INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Clinical: posterior ankle pain on body chart, passive plantarflexion pain provocation test. Patient-reported outcome measures: Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center Overuse Injury Questionnaire, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports subscale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Imaging findings including posterior ankle bone marrow edema, os trigonum (± bone marrow edema, and increased signal at synchondrosis), Stieda process (± bone marrow edema), talocrural and subtalar joint effusion-synovitis size, flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy, and tenosynovitis identified as present or absent on 3.0-Tesla MRI. RESULTS: Imaging findings were not associated with posterior ankle pain or a positive ankle plantarflexion pain provocation test. Imaging findings were not associated with patient-reported outcome measures. Imaging findings did not differ between PAIS-positive and PAIS-negative groups. Os trigonum and Stieda process were prevalent despite clinical status. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of association between imaging findings and clinical features questions the role of imaging in PAIS. Clinicians should rely primarily on clinical assessment in the diagnosis and management of patients with PAIS.
Subject(s)
Dancing , Humans , Male , Female , Dancing/injuries , Ankle , Case-Control Studies , Ankle Joint/diagnostic imaging , Syndrome , Pain , Edema/diagnostic imaging , AthletesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To report the prevalence of MRI features commonly associated with posterior ankle impingement syndrome in elite ballet dancers and athletes and to compare findings between groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight professional ballet dancers (47.4% women) were age- and sex-matched to 38 elite soccer or cricket fast bowler athletes. All participants were training, playing, and performing at full workload and underwent 3.0-T standardised magnetic resonance imaging of one ankle. De-identified images were assessed by one senior musculoskeletal radiologist for findings associated with posterior ankle impingement syndrome (os trigonum, Stieda process, posterior talocrural and subtalar joint effusion-synovitis, flexor hallucis longus tendon pathology and tenosynovitis, and posterior ankle bone marrow oedema). Imaging scoring reliability testing was performed. RESULTS: Posterior talocrural effusion-synovitis (90.8%) and subtalar joint effusion-synovitis (93.4%) were common in both groups, as well as the presence of either an os trigonum or Stieda process (61.8%). Athletes had a higher prevalence of either os trigonum or Stieda process than dancers (74%, 50% respectively, P = 0.03). Male athletes had a higher prevalence of either os trigonum or Stieda process than male dancers (90%, 50% respectively, P = 0.01), or female athletes (56%, P = 0.02). Posterior subtalar joint effusion-synovitis size was larger in dancers than athletes (P = 0.02). Male and female dancers had similar imaging findings. There was at least moderate interobserver and intraobserver agreement for most MRI findings. CONCLUSION: Imaging features associated with posterior impingement were prevalent in all groups. The high prevalence of os trigonum or Stieda process in male athletes suggests that this is a typical finding in this population.