A randomised, open label, controlled trial on the effect of interferon plus amantadine compared with interferon alone for treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND: Combination of the antiviral drug amantadine with interferon (IFN) may be more effective than IFN monotherapy for treatment of chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: We randomised 93 patients with chronic hepatitis C to IFNIFN 6 MU 3 times/week for 24 weeks, followed by IFN 3 MU 3 times/week for further 24 weeks given in combination with amantadine 100 mg t.i.d. (regimen A, n=48) or as monotherapy (regimen B, n=45). Control liver biopsies were obtained 6 months post treatment. RESULTS: At the end of the trial a similar proportion of patients had normal serum ALT levels (35% for regimen A, and 44% for regimen B) as measured by intention to treat criteria. Sustained biochemical response at 6 months post treatment was 15 and 20%, and sustained virological response was 10 and 20% for regimen A and B, respectively. The effect on liver histology was also similar: the inflammatory components of the Knodell score decreased by 1.3+/-0.6 points for regimen A and by 1.6+/-0.6 for regimen B, and score for fibrosis remained unchanged with both regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Combination of IFN therapy with amantadine does not enhance the effect of IFN as shown by biochemical, virological and histological criteria.

Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with interferon-alfa plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a single-center study in relapsers and nonresponders to previous treatment with high-dose interferon-alfa monotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, interferon (IFN) monotherapy usually is carried out at doses of 3 to 6 million units (MU) 3 times per week, but treatment efficacy is low. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of IFN-alfa2b in combination with ribavirin in relapsers and nonresponders to high-dose IFN treatment (5 to 6 MU 3 times per week). We measured the biochemical and virologic responses to treatment and the risk for relapse during the 24 weeks following the end of treatment. METHODS: Patients with chronic HCV infection (relapsers and nonresponders to a previous treatment with high-dose IFN) received IFN-alfa2b, 3 MU 3 times per week, and ribavirin, 1000 or 1200 mg/d for 24 or 48 weeks. The patients were then followed up for an additional 24 weeks. Sustained response was defined as normal serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level and undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment was stopped. RESULTS: Forty-three patients (32 men, 11 women; mean [SD] age, 45 [2] years; 10 relapsers, 33 nonresponders) were included in the study. Four patients were withdrawn from the study at week 4 of treatment because of treatment-related adverse events, and 1 dropped out. At the end of the treatment period, normalization of serum ALT levels and undetectable HCV RNA levels were seen in 58.1% and 30.2% of patients, respectively. No significant difference in virologic response at the end of treatment was found between nonresponders (10/33 [30.3%]) to previous IFN therapy and relapsers (3/10 [30.0%]). At the end of follow-up, 3 (7.0%) treated patients had sustained response (2 nonresponders to the first IFN course and 1 relapser). All of the patients with sustained response were treated for 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of our study, combination therapy with IFN-alfa and ribavirin may be of value in a limited number of patients with chronic HCV infection who do not respond to, or relapse after, a first course of treatment with high-dose IFN monotherapy.

Increased serum gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase concentration is associated with nonalcoholic steatosis and not with cholestasis in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Increased pretreatment gamma-glutamyl-transpeptidase (gammaGT) is common in patients with chronic hepatitis C and with little or no alcohol consumption. The mechanism involved in this phenomenon is unclear, and the aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with increased gammaGT levels, specifically looking at the role of cholestasis that frequently accompanies hepatitis C. METHODS: Fifty patients with chronic hepatitis C enrolled in two trials of antiviral treatment, 25 with normal and 25 with elevated pretreatment gammaGT levels, were retrospectively selected. In addition to the common liver function and virological tests, other values measured were serum bile acid concentration and composition by gas-chromatography as a sensitive index of cholestasis, and liver biopsy scores for cholestasis and steatosis in addition to siderosis, fibrosis and inflammation. RESULTS: Total mean serum bile acid concentration was 11.6 +/- 1.4 micromol/L and 8.5 +/- 1.2 micromol/L (not significant) in patients with elevated and with normal gammaGT, respectively, and individual bile acid composition was similar in the two groups. By univariate analysis, serum gammaGT level was linearly related to total serum bile acid (P < 0.05) and to cholestasis score (P < 0.001) among other variables, but steatosis score (P < 0.001) and Knodell score (P < 0.04) were the only variables independently associated with elevated serum gammaGT level by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum gammaGT level in patients with chronic hepatitis C is associated with liver steatosis and fibrosis, and indicates more advanced liver disease rather than reflecting the cholestasis that often accompanies this condition.

Ursodeoxycholic acid does not affect ethinylestradiol bioavailability in women taking oral contraceptives.

OBJECTIVE: Contraception is recommended for female patients during ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment for the potential teratogenic effect of this bile acid, and the aim of our study was to determine whether this treatment affects the bioavailability of ethinylestradiol (EE2). METHODS: In this double-blind, randomised study, we measured EE2 pharmacokinetics in eight healthy volunteers randomly allocated to receive oral contraceptive (30 microg EE2 and 75 microg gestodene) plus either UDCA (8-10 mg/kg per day) or placebo for 21 days during the first of three consecutive menstrual cycles. After a washout period during the second cycle, the subjects received the alternative treatment during the third menstrual cycle. Serum EE2 and UDCA were measured using radioimmunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, respectively. RESULTS: The profile for serum EE2 concentration was similar during UDCA (mean maximum serum concentration 177 pg/ml, SEM 59) and during placebo treatment (153 pg/ml, SEM 62), and mean area under the curve (AUC) was 1374 pg/h per ml (SEM 580) and 1320 pg/h per ml (SEM 551) during the two regimens, respectively. The point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of UDCA/placebo ratios for EE2 AUC and for maximum serum concentration were 1.1 (0.8-1.5) and 1.2 (1.0-1.4), respectively. Mean serum triglycerides concentration increased from 58.3 mg/dl (SEM 6.8) at enrolment to 91.4 mg/dl (SEM 10.7) during placebo (P < 0.01) and to 88.6 mg/dl (SEM 13.7) during UDCA treatment (P < 0.05). During UDCA treatment, serum enrichment with this bile acid and with the metabolite iso-UDCA was 29% (16%) and 3% (2%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Co-administration with UDCA does not affect the bioavailability of EE2 in healthy volunteers, indicating that contraceptive efficacy is not affected.