Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 94
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Publication year range
1.
Blood ; 143(7): 597-603, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38048552

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: The role of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity as a biomarker to stop treatment is being investigated in transplant-eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Thus, it is important to identify risk factors of MRD resurgence and/or progressive disease (PD) among patients achieving undetectable MRD to avoid undertreating them. Here, we studied 267 newly diagnosed transplant-eligible patients with MM enrolled in the GEM2012MENOS65 and GEM2014MAIN clinical trials who achieved MRD negativity by next-generation flow cytometry. After a median follow-up of 73 months since the first MRD negative assessment, 111 of the 267 (42%) patients showed MRD resurgence and/or PD. The only prognostic factors at diagnosis that predicted MRD resurgence and/or PD were an International Staging System (ISS) 3 and the presence of ≥0.01% circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Failure to achieve MRD negativity after induction also predicted higher risk of MRD resurgence and/or PD. Patients having 0 vs 1 vs ≥2 risk factors (ISS 3, ≥0.01% CTCs, and late MRD negativity) showed 5-year rates of MRD resurgence and/or PD of 16%, 33%, and 57%, respectively (P < .001). Thus, these easily measurable risk factors could help refine the selection of patients for whom treatment cessation after MRD negativity is being investigated in clinical trials. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01916252 and NCT02406144.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Multiple Myeloma/therapy , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Risk Factors , Neoplasm, Residual/diagnosis
2.
Blood ; 142(18): 1518-1528, 2023 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37506339

ABSTRACT

From November 2014 to May 2017, 332 patients homogeneously treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction, autologous stem cell transplant, and VRD consolidation were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD; 161 patients) vs RD plus ixazomib (IRD; 171 patients). RD consisted of lenalidomide 15 mg/d from days 1 to 21 plus dexamethasone 20 mg/d on days 1 to 4 and 9 to 12 at 4-week intervals, whereas in the IRD arm, oral ixazomib at a dose of 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 was added. Therapy for patients with negative measurable residual disease (MRD) after 24 cycles was discontinued, whereas those who tested positive for MRD remained on maintenance with RD for 36 more cycles. After a median follow-up of 69 months from the initiation of maintenance, the progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in both arms, with a 6-year PFS rate of 61.3% and 55.6% for RD and IRD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.136; 95% confidence interval, 0.809-1.603). After 2 years of maintenance, treatment was discontinued in 163 patients with negative MRD, whereas 63 patients with positive MRD continued with RD therapy. Maintenance discontinuation in patients tested negative for MRD resulted in a low progression rate (17.2% at 4 years), even in patients with high-risk features. In summary, our results show the efficacy of RD maintenance and support the safety of maintenance therapy discontinuation in patients with negative MRD at 2 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02406144 and at EudraCT as 2014-00055410.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/therapy
3.
Haematologica ; 2024 Jul 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38988266

ABSTRACT

The value of quantitative immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry (QIP-MS) to identify the M-protein is being investigated in patients with monoclonal gammopathies but no data are yet available in high-risk smoldering myeloma (HRsMM). We have therefore investigated QIP-MS to monitor peripheral residual disease (PRD) in 62 HRsMM patients enrolled in the GEM-CESAR trial. After 24 cycles of maintenance, detecting the M-protein by MS or clonal plasma cells by NGF identified cases with a significantly shorter median PFS (mPFS; MS: not reached vs 1,4 years, p=0.001; NGF: not reached vs 2 years, p=0.0002) but reaching CR+sCR did not discriminate patients with different outcome. With NGF as a reference, the combined results of NGF and MS showed a high negative predictive value (NPV) of MS: 81% overall and 73% at treatment completion. When sequential results were considered, sustained negativity by MS or NGF was associated with a very favorable outcome with a mPFS not yet reached vs 1.66 years and 2.18 years in cases never attaining PRD or minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity, respectively. We can thus conclude that 1) the standard response categories of the IMWG do not seem to be useful for treatment monitoring in HRsMM patients, 2) MS could be used as a non-invasive, clinical valuable tool with the capacity of guiding timely bone marrow evaluations (based on its high NPV with NGF as a reference) and 3) similarly to NGF, sequential results of MS are able identify a subgroup of HRsMM patients with long-term disease control. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02415413).

4.
Blood ; 137(1): 49-60, 2021 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32693406

ABSTRACT

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying standard- or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) achieve similar complete response (CR) rates, but the later have inferior progression-free survival (PFS). This questions the legitimacy of CR as a treatment endpoint and represents a biological conundrum regarding the nature of tumor reservoirs that persist after therapy in high-risk MM. We used next-generation flow (NGF) cytometry to evaluate measurable residual disease (MRD) in MM patients with standard- vs high-risk CAs (n = 300 and 90, respectively) enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 trial, and to identify mechanisms that determine MRD resistance in both patient subgroups (n = 40). The 36-month PFS rates were higher than 90% in patients with standard- or high-risk CAs achieving undetectable MRD. Persistent MRD resulted in a median PFS of âˆ¼3 and 2 years in patients with standard- and high-risk CAs, respectively. Further use of NGF to isolate MRD, followed by whole-exome sequencing of paired diagnostic and MRD tumor cells, revealed greater clonal selection in patients with standard-risk CAs, higher genomic instability with acquisition of new mutations in high-risk MM, and no unifying genetic event driving MRD resistance. Conversely, RNA sequencing of diagnostic and MRD tumor cells uncovered the selection of MRD clones with singular transcriptional programs and reactive oxygen species-mediated MRD resistance in high-risk MM. Our study supports undetectable MRD as a treatment endpoint for patients with MM who have high-risk CAs and proposes characterizing MRD clones to understand and overcome MRD resistance. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01916252.


Subject(s)
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Boron Compounds/therapeutic use , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Chromosome Aberrations , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Female , Flow Cytometry , Glycine/analogs & derivatives , Glycine/therapeutic use , Humans , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Treatment Outcome
5.
Haematologica ; 108(10): 2753-2763, 2023 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37102598

ABSTRACT

In this randomized phase II study (GEM-KyCyDex, clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03336073), the combination of weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (KCd) was compared to carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after 1-3 prior lines (PL). One hundred and ninety-seven patients were included and randomized 1:1 to receive KCd (97 patients) or Kd (100 patients) in 28-day cycles until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Patient median age was 70 years, and the median number of PL was one (range, 1-3). More than 90% of patients had previously been exposed to proteasome inhibitors, approximetely 70% to immunomodulators, and approximetely 50% were refractory to their last line (mainly lenalidomide) in both groups. After a median follow-up of 37 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.1 and 16.6 months in KCd and Kd, respectively (P=0.577). Of note, in the post hoc analysis of the lenalidomide-refractory population, the addition of cyclophosphamide to Kd resulted in a significant benefit in terms of PFS: 18.4 versus 11.3 months (hazard ratio =1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-2.7; P=0.043). The overall response rate and the percentage of patients who achieved complete response was around 70% and 20% in both groups. The addition of cyclophosphamide to Kd did not result in any safety signal, except for severe infections (7% vs. 2%). In conclusion, the combination of cyclophosphamide with Kd 70 mg/m2 weekly does not improve outcomes as compared with Kd alone in RRMM after 1-3 PL, but a significant benefit in PFS was observed with the triplet combination in the lenalidomide-refractory population. The administration of weekly carfilzomib 70 mg/m2 was safe and convenient, and, overall, the toxicity was manageable in both arms.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma , Humans , Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Lenalidomide/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/adverse effects
6.
Haematologica ; 2023 Nov 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38031761

ABSTRACT

Immunoparesis (IP) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients can be measured by classic assessment of immunoglobulin (Ig) levels or by analysis of the uninvolved heavy/light chain pair of the same immunoglobulin (uHLC) by the Hevylite® assay. In this study we evaluate the prognostic value of recovery from IP measured by classic total Ig and uHLC assessment in newly diagnosed MM transplant-eligible (NDMM-TE) patients with intensive treatment and its association with Minimal Residual Disease (MRD). Patients were enrolled and treated in the PETHEMA/GEM2012MENOS65 trial and continued in the PETHEMA/GEM2014MAIN trial. Total Ig (IgG, IgA and IgM) and uHLC were analyzed in a central laboratory at diagnosis, after consolidation treatment and after the first year of maintenance. MRD was analyzed by next generation flow cytometry after consolidation (sensitivity level 2x10-6). We found no differences in progression free survival (PFS) between patients who recovered and patients who didn't recover from IP after consolidation when examining classic total Ig and uHLC. However, after the first year of maintenance, in contrast to patients with classic IP, patients with recovery from uHLC IP had longer PFS than patients without recovery, with hazard ratio of 0.42 (CI95% 0.21-0.81; p=0.008). Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional-hazards regression models confirmed recovery from uHLC IP after the first year of maintenance as an independent prognostic factor for PFS, with an increase in C-statistic of 0.05 (-0.04-0.14; p<0.001) when adding uHLC IP recovery. Moreover, we observed that MRD status and uHLC IP recovery affords complementary information for risk stratification. In conclusion, recovery from uHLC IP after one year of maintenance is an independent prognostic factor for PFS in NDMM-TE patients who receive intensive treatment. Immune reconstitution, measured as recovery from uHLC IP, provides complementary prognostic information to MRD assessment.

7.
Blood ; 136(2): 199-209, 2020 07 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325491

ABSTRACT

Granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (G-MDSCs) promote tumor growth and immunosuppression in multiple myeloma (MM). However, their phenotype is not well established for accurate monitoring or clinical translation. We aimed to provide the phenotypic profile of G-MDSCs based on their prognostic significance in MM, immunosuppressive potential, and molecular program. The preestablished phenotype of G-MDSCs was evaluated in bone marrow samples from controls and MM patients using multidimensional flow cytometry; surprisingly, we found that CD11b+CD14-CD15+CD33+HLADR- cells overlapped with common eosinophils and neutrophils, which were not expanded in MM patients. Therefore, we relied on automated clustering to unbiasedly identify all granulocytic subsets in the tumor microenvironment: basophils, eosinophils, and immature, intermediate, and mature neutrophils. In a series of 267 newly diagnosed MM patients (GEM2012MENOS65 trial), only the frequency of mature neutrophils at diagnosis was significantly associated with patient outcome, and a high mature neutrophil/T-cell ratio resulted in inferior progression-free survival (P < .001). Upon fluorescence-activated cell sorting of each neutrophil subset, T-cell proliferation decreased in the presence of mature neutrophils (0.5-fold; P = .016), and the cytotoxic potential of T cells engaged by a BCMA×CD3-bispecific antibody increased notably with the depletion of mature neutrophils (fourfold; P = .0007). Most interestingly, RNA sequencing of the 3 subsets revealed that G-MDSC-related genes were specifically upregulated in mature neutrophils from MM patients vs controls because of differential chromatin accessibility. Taken together, our results establish a correlation between the clinical significance, immunosuppressive potential, and transcriptional network of well-defined neutrophil subsets, providing for the first time a set of optimal markers (CD11b/CD13/CD16) for accurate monitoring of G-MDSCs in MM.


Subject(s)
Antigens, CD , Multiple Myeloma , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells , Neoplasm Proteins , Antigens, CD/blood , Antigens, CD/genetics , Antigens, CD/immunology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphocyte Count , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Multiple Myeloma/genetics , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/immunology , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/metabolism , Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells/pathology , Neoplasm Proteins/blood , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Neoplasm Proteins/immunology , Neutrophils/immunology , Neutrophils/metabolism , Neutrophils/pathology , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , T-Lymphocytes/pathology , Transcription, Genetic/immunology
8.
Eur J Haematol ; 109(6): 755-764, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36063368

ABSTRACT

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a complex disease, and its treatment needs to be adjusted to the risk, which is conferred by cytogenetics and molecular markers. Cytarabine is the main drug to treat AML, and it has been suggested that the genotype of cytarabine metabolizing enzymes may have a prognostic relevance in AML. Here we report the association between the 5'-nucleotidase, cytosolic II (NT5C2) rs10883841, cytidine deaminase (CDA) rs2072671 and rs532545 genotypes and the clinical outcome of 477 intermediate-risk cytogenetic AML patients receiving cytarabine-based chemotherapy. Patients younger than 50 years old with the NT5C2 rs10883841 AA genotype had lower overall survival (OS) (p: .003; HR 2.16, 95% CI 1.29-3.61) and lower disease-free survival (DFS) (p: .002; HR 2.45, 95% CI 1.41-4.27), associated to a higher relapse incidence (p: .010; HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.21-4.12). Interestingly, subgroup analysis showed that the negative effect of the NT5C2 rs10883841 AA genotype was detected in all subgroups except in patients with nucleophosmin mutation without high ratio FLT-3 internal tandem duplication. CDA polymorphisms were associated with the complete remission rate after induction chemotherapy, without influencing OS. Further studies are warranted to determine whether this pharmacogenomic approach may be helpful to individualize AML treatment.


Subject(s)
5'-Nucleotidase , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Middle Aged , 5'-Nucleotidase/genetics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Cytarabine , Cytogenetic Analysis , Genotype , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Cytidine Deaminase/genetics
9.
Blood ; 133(25): 2664-2668, 2019 06 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31010846

ABSTRACT

Response criteria for multiple myeloma (MM) require monoclonal protein (M-protein)-negative status on both serum immunofixation electrophoresis (sIFE) and urine (uIFE) immunofixation electrophoresis for classification of complete response (CR). However, uIFE is not always performed for sIFE-negative patients. We analyzed M-protein evaluations from 384 MM patients (excluding those with light-chain-only disease) treated in the GEM2012MENOS65 (NCT01916252) trial to determine the uIFE-positive rate in patients who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and evaluate rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status and progression-free survival (PFS) among patients achieving CR, CR but without uIFE available (uncertain CR; uCR), or very good partial response (VGPR). Among 107 patients with M-protein exclusively in serum at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment and who had uIFE available, the uIFE-positive rate was 0%. Among 161 patients with M-protein in both serum and urine at diagnosis who became sIFE-negative posttreatment, 3 (1.8%) were uIFE positive. Among patients achieving CR vs uCR, there were no significant differences in postconsolidation MRD-negative (<10-6; 76% vs 75%; P = .9) and 2-year PFS (85% vs 88%; P = .4) rates; rates were significantly lower among patients achieving VGPR. Our results suggest that uIFE is not necessary for defining CR in MM patients other than those with light-chain-only disease.


Subject(s)
Multiple Myeloma/urine , Myeloma Proteins/urine , Treatment Outcome , Adult , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Electrophoresis/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
10.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ; 26(8): 1534-1542, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32068094

ABSTRACT

Clinical trials have shown that nivolumab has remarkable activity against relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). However, the role of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) as consolidation therapy in these patients remains controversial. We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 74 patients treated with nivolumab. The overall response rate was 58% (including 30.6% with complete responses). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 56.8% of patients (grade ≥3 in 9.4%). The main reasons for nivolumab discontinuation were referral for transplantation (41.7% patients) and disease progression (37.5%). The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 52% for the entire series. Ultimately, 39 patients underwent allo-HSCT. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease was 33.3% (grade III-IV in 2 patients). The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 13.2%. Among the patients who responded to nivolumab, the 2-year OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were higher in patients who underwent consolidation with allo-HSCT (77.5% versus 42.6% [P = .126] and 73.9% versus 27.2% [P = .025], respectively). Thus, the efficacy and safety of nivolumab were comparable to values reported in previous clinical trials. The percentage of patients who bridged to transplantation was high, indicating a preference for Spanish physicians. These results suggest that consolidation allo-HSCT increases OS and PFS.


Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hodgkin Disease , Disease-Free Survival , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Spain
11.
Blood ; 132(1): 49-58, 2018 07 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29666118

ABSTRACT

In follicular lymphoma (FL), no prognostic index has been built based solely on a cohort of patients treated with initial immunochemotherapy. There is currently a need to define parsimonious clinical models for trial stratification and to add on biomolecular factors. Here, we confirmed the validity of both the follicular lymphoma international prognostic index (FLIPI) and the FLIPI2 in the large prospective PRIMA trial cohort of 1135 patients treated with initial R-chemotherapy ± R maintenance. Furthermore, we developed a new prognostic tool comprising only 2 simple parameters (bone marrow involvement and ß2-microglobulin [ß2m]) to predict progression-free survival (PFS). The final simplified score, called the PRIMA-PI (PRIMA-prognostic index), comprised 3 risk categories: high (ß2m > 3 mg/L), low (ß2m ≤ 3 mg/L without bone marrow involvement), and intermediate (ß2m ≤ 3 mg/L with bone marrow involvement). Five-year PFS rates were 69%, 55%, and 37% in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .0001). In addition, achieving event-free survival (EFS) or not at 24 months (EFS24) was a strong posttreatment prognostic parameter for subsequent overall survival, and the PRIMA-PI was correlated with EFS24. The results were confirmed in a pooled external validation cohort of 479 patients from the FL2000 LYSA trial and the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence Molecular Epidemiology Resource. Five-year EFS in the validation cohort was 77%, 57%, and 44% in the PRIMA-PI low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively (P < .0001). The PRIMA-PI is a novel and easy-to-compute prognostic index for patients initially treated with immunochemotherapy. This could serve as a basis for building more sophisticated and integrated biomolecular scores.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Immunotherapy , Lymphoma, Follicular , Aged , Bone Marrow/metabolism , Bone Marrow/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphoma, Follicular/metabolism , Lymphoma, Follicular/mortality , Lymphoma, Follicular/pathology , Lymphoma, Follicular/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Survival Rate , beta 2-Microglobulin/metabolism
12.
Br J Haematol ; 181(3): 350-359, 2018 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29611196

ABSTRACT

Treatment with azacitidine (AZA) has been suggested to be of benefit for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities (Abn 7). This retrospective study of 235 HR-MDS patients with Abn 7 treated with AZA (n = 115) versus best supportive care (BSC; n = 120), assessed AZA treatment as a time-varying variable in multivariable analysis. A Cox Regression model with time-interaction terms of overall survival (OS) at different time points confirmed that, while chromosome 7 cytogenetic categories (complex karyotype [CK] versus non-CK) and International Prognostic Scoring System risk (high versus intermediate-2) retained poor prognosis over time, AZA treatment had a favourable impact on OS during the first 3 years of treatment compared to BSC (Hazard ratio [HR] 0·5 P < 0·001 at 1 year, 0·7 P = 0·019 at 2 years; 0·73 P = 0·029 at 3 years). This benefit was present in all chromosome 7 categories, but tended to be greater in patients with CK (risk reduction of 82%, 68% and 53% at 1, 3 and 6 months in CK patients; 79% at 1 month in non-CK patients, P < 0·05 for all). AZA also significantly improved progression-free survival (P < 0·01). This study confirms a time-dependent benefit of AZA on outcome in patients with HR-MDS and cytogenetic abnormalities involving chromosome 7, especially for those with CK.


Subject(s)
Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Chromosomes, Human, Pair 7/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes , Registries , Aged , Chromosome Aberrations , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate
13.
Blood ; 127(9): 1151-62, 2016 Mar 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26668134

ABSTRACT

There is significant interest in immunotherapy for the treatment of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM), but no available data on the immune status of this particular disease stage. Such information is important to understand the interplay between immunosurveillance and disease transformation, but also to define whether patients with high-risk SMM might benefit from immunotherapy. Here, we have characterized T lymphocytes (including CD4, CD8, T-cell receptor γδ, and regulatory T cells), natural killer (NK) cells, and dendritic cells from 31 high-risk SMM patients included in the treatment arm of the QUIREDEX trial, and with longitudinal peripheral blood samples at baseline and after 3 and 9 cycles of lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (LenDex). High-risk SMM patients showed at baseline decreased expression of activation-(CD25/CD28/CD54), type 1 T helper-(CD195/interferon-γ/tumor necrosis factor-α/interleukin-2), and proliferation-related markers (CD119/CD120b) as compared with age-matched healthy individuals. However, LenDex was able to restore the normal expression levels for those markers and induced a marked shift in T-lymphocyte and NK-cell phenotype. Accordingly, high-risk SMM patients treated with LenDex showed higher numbers of functionally active T lymphocytes. Together, our results indicate that high-risk SMM patients have an impaired immune system that could be reactivated by the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide, even when combined with low-dose dexamethasone, and support the value of therapeutic immunomodulation to delay the progression to multiple myeloma. The QUIREDEX trial was registered to www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00480363.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/immunology , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Cell Proliferation/drug effects , Demography , Dexamethasone/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Immunophenotyping , Induction Chemotherapy , Killer Cells, Natural/drug effects , Killer Cells, Natural/immunology , Lenalidomide , Longitudinal Studies , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Thalidomide/pharmacology , Thalidomide/therapeutic use
15.
Blood ; 127(4): 420-5, 2016 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26500339

ABSTRACT

Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) and lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone (Rd) are 2 standards of care for elderly untreated multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We planned to use VMP and Rd for 18 cycles in a sequential or alternating scheme. Patients (233) with untreated MM, >65 years, were randomized to receive 9 cycles of VMP followed by 9 cycles of Rd (sequential scheme; n = 118) vs 1 cycle of VMP followed by 1 cycle of Rd, and so on, up to 18 cycles (alternating scheme; n = 115). VMP consisted of one 6-week cycle of bortezomib using a biweekly schedule, followed by eight 5-week cycles of once-weekly VMP. Rd included nine 4-week cycles of Rd. The primary end points were 18-month progression free survival (PFS) and safety profile of both schemes. The 18-month PFS was 74% and 80% in the sequential and alternating arms, respectively (P = .21). The sequential and alternating groups exhibited similar hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. Both arms yielded similar complete response rate (42% and 40%), median PFS (32 months vs 34 months, P = .65), and 3-year overall survival (72% vs 74%, P = .63). The benefit of both schemes was remarkable in patients aged 65 to 75 years. In addition, achieving complete and immunophenotypic response was associated with better outcome. The present approach, based on VMP and Rd, is associated with high efficacy and acceptable toxicity profile with no differences between the sequential and alternating regimens. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00443235.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Bortezomib/administration & dosage , Bortezomib/adverse effects , Bortezomib/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Melphalan/adverse effects , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/adverse effects , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Thalidomide/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
16.
Blood ; 127(25): 3165-74, 2016 06 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27118453

ABSTRACT

The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) in multiple myeloma (MM) has been more frequently investigated in transplant-eligible patients than in elderly patients. Because an optimal balance between treatment efficacy and toxicity is of utmost importance in patients with elderly MM, sensitive MRD monitoring might be particularly valuable in this patient population. Here, we used second-generation 8-color multiparameter-flow cytometry (MFC) to monitor MRD in 162 transplant-ineligible MM patients enrolled in the PETHEMA/GEM2010MAS65 study. The transition from first- to second-generation MFC resulted in increased sensitivity and allowed us to identify 3 patient groups according to MRD levels: MRD negative (<10(-5); n = 54, 34%), MRD positive (between <10(-4) and ≥10(-5); n = 20, 12%), and MRD positive (≥10(-4); n = 88, 54%). MRD status was an independent prognostic factor for time to progression (TTP) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; P = .007) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 3.1; P = .04), with significant benefit for MRD-negative patients (median TTP not reached, 70% OS at 3 years), and similar poorer outcomes for cases with MRD levels between <10(-4) and ≥10(-5) vs ≥10(-4) (both with a median TTP of 15 months; 63% and 55% OS at 3 years, respectively). Furthermore, MRD negativity significantly improved TTP of patients >75 years (HR, 4.8; P < .001), as well as those with high-risk cytogenetics (HR, 12.6; P = .01). Using second-generation MFC, immune profiling concomitant to MRD monitoring also contributed to identify patients with poor, intermediate, and favorable outcomes (25%, 61%, and 100% OS at 3 years, respectively; P = .01), the later patients being characterized by an increased compartment of mature B cells. Our results show that similarly to transplant candidates, MRD monitoring is one of the most relevant prognostic factors in elderly MM patients, irrespectively of age or cytogenetic risk. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01237249.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Immunity/drug effects , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Multiple Myeloma/diagnosis , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Pharmacological/blood , Biomarkers, Tumor/blood , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Female , Humans , Immunity/physiology , Lenalidomide , Male , Melphalan/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Neoplasm, Residual , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Prognosis , Survival Analysis , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Vincristine/therapeutic use
17.
Support Care Cancer ; 26(4): 1253-1264, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29116407

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe perceptions of fatigue in anemic patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: This is an observational multicenter study in a prospective cohort of lymphoma and MM patients with hemoglobin ≤ 11 g/dl managed under clinical practice. Fatigue was assessed at baseline and after 3 months using the PERFORM questionnaire, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue, the linear analogue self-assessment, and visual analogue scale (VAS) scales. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty patients (125 with lymphoma, 125 with MM) were included. Only 59.2 and 56.0% of patients received treatment for anemia, respectively. After 3 months, the hemoglobin levels increased significantly compared to baseline from 10.0 ± 1.2 to 11.5 ± 1.8 in the lymphoma group and from 9.9 ± 0.9 to 10.9 ± 1.5 g/dl, in the MM group (P < 0.001, both comparisons). At baseline, 87.2 and 84.8% of patients had fatigue (median intensity (VAS) 60 and 50). The overall PERFORM score decreased from 35.2 ± 15.2 to 32.0 ± 14.6 (P = 0.048), without differences between groups. No statistically significant changes were observed in the other scales. After multivariable adjustment, the only common independent factor associated to improvements in fatigue and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) was an increase in hemoglobin levels. The administration of curative intention treatment was also associated with HRQoL improvements. The psychometric properties of the PERFORM questionnaire in MM patients were good (Cronbach's alpha 0.87-0.98; intraclass correlation coefficients 0.84-0.89; effect sizes 0.59-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Almost all patients with lymphoma or MM diagnosed with anemia suffered from fatigue of moderate to severe intensity. Despite similar anemia supportive treatment, better correction of fatigue scores was observed in lymphoma patients after 3 months. Increases in hemoglobin were significantly associated to improvements in fatigue and HRQoL.


Subject(s)
Anemia/etiology , Fatigue/etiology , Lymphoma/complications , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Aged , Anemia/blood , Cohort Studies , Fatigue/blood , Female , Hemoglobins/metabolism , Humans , Lymphoma/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Int J Mol Sci ; 18(4)2017 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28420120

ABSTRACT

Acute erythroleukemia (AEL) is a rare disease typically associated with a poor prognosis. The median survival ranges between 3-9 months from initial diagnosis. Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have been shown to prolong survival in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and AML, but there is limited data of their efficacy in AEL. We collected data from 210 AEL patients treated at 28 international sites. Overall survival (OS) and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for subgroup comparisons. Survival between treatment groups was compared using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Eighty-eight patients were treated with HMAs, 44 front line, and 122 with intensive chemotherapy (ICT). ICT led to a higher overall response rate (complete or partial) compared to first-line HMA (72% vs. 46.2%, respectively; p ≤ 0.001), but similar progression-free survival (8.0 vs. 9.4 months; p = 0.342). Overall survival was similar for ICT vs. HMAs (10.5 vs. 13.7 months; p = 0.564), but patients with high-risk cytogenetics treated with HMA first-line lived longer (7.5 for ICT vs. 13.3 months; p = 0.039). Our results support the therapeutic value of HMA in AEL.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/mortality , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Azacitidine/analogs & derivatives , Biomarkers , Bone Marrow/pathology , Cytogenetic Analysis , Decitabine , Female , Humans , Leukemia, Erythroblastic, Acute/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
19.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer ; 55(4): 322-7, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26690722

ABSTRACT

Chromosomal translocations are rare in the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). With the exception of t(3q), translocations are not explicitly considered in the cytogenetic classification of the IPSS-R and their impact on disease progression and patient survival is unknown. The present study was aimed at determining the prognostic impact of translocations in the context of the cytogenetic classification of the IPSS-R. We evaluated 1,653 patients from the Spanish Registry of MDS diagnosed with MDS or CMML and an abnormal karyotype by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Translocations were identified in 168 patients (T group). Compared with the 1,485 patients with abnormal karyotype without translocations (non-T group), the T group had a larger proportion of patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts and higher scores in both the cytogenetic and global IPSS-R. Translocations were associated with a significantly shorter survival and higher incidence of transformation into AML at univariate analysis but both features disappeared after multivariate adjustment for the IPSS-R cytogenetic category. Patients with single or double translocations other than t(3q) had an outcome similar to those in the non-T group in the intermediate cytogenetic risk category of the IPSS-R. In conclusion, the presence of translocations identifies a subgroup of MDS/CMML patients with a more aggressive clinical presentation that can be explained by a higher incidence of complex karyotypes. Single or double translocations other than t(3q) should be explicitly considered into the intermediate risk category of cytogenetic IPSS-R classification.


Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic/genetics , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/genetics , Translocation, Genetic , Aged , Female , Humans , Karyotyping , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Spain , Survival Rate
20.
Lancet Oncol ; 17(8): 1127-1136, 2016 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27402145

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for smouldering multiple myeloma is observation. We did the QuiRedex study to compare early treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone with observation in patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma. Here we report the long-term follow-up results of the trial. METHODS: We did this open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 19 centres in Spain and three centres in Portugal. Patients aged 18 years or older with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma were randomly assigned (1:1), via a computerised random number generator, to receive either early treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone or observation, with dynamic balancing to maintain treatment balance within the two groups. Randomisation was stratified by time from diagnosis of smouldering multiple myeloma to study enrolment (≤6 months vs >6 months). Patients in the treatment group received nine 4-week induction cycles (lenalidomide 25 mg per day on days 1-21, plus dexamethasone 20 mg per day on days-1-4 and days 12-15), followed by maintenance therapy (lenalidomide 10 mg per day on days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle) up to 2 years. Group allocation was not masked from study investigators or patients. The primary endpoint was time from randomisation to progression to symptomatic myeloma. The primary analysis was based on the per-protocol population, restricted to patients who fulfilled the protocol in terms of eligibility. Safety assessments were based on the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00480363. FINDINGS: Between Nov 8, 2007, and June 9, 2010, 125 patients were enrolled and underwent randomisation. 119 patients comprised the per-protocol population and were randomly assigned to receive either lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (n=57) or observation (n=62). The cutoff date for this update was June 30, 2015. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 75 months (IQR 67-85). Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone continued to provide a benefit on time to progression compared with observation (median time to progression not reached [95% CI 47 months-not reached] vs 23 months [16-31]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·24 [95% CI 0·14-0·41]; p<0·0001). Progression to multiple myeloma occurred in 53 (86%) of 62 patients in the observation group compared with 22 (39%) of 57 patients in the treatment group. At data cutoff, ten (18%) patients had died in the treatment group and 22 (36%) patients had died in the observation group; median overall survival from the time of study entry had not been reached in either group (95% CI 65 months-not reached vs 53 months-not reached; HR 0·43 [95% CI 0·21-0·92], p=0·024). Survival in patients who had received subsequent treatments at the time of progression to active disease did not differ between groups (HR 1·34 [95% CI 0·54-3·30]; p=0·50). The most frequently reported grade 3 adverse events in patients given lenalidomide plus dexamethasone were infection (four [6%]), asthenia (four [6%]), neutropenia (three [5%]), and skin rash (two [3%]); these events all occurred during induction therapy. No grade 4 adverse events occurred, but one (2%) patient in the lenalidomide plus dexamethasone group died from a respiratory infection during induction therapy The frequency of second primary malignancies was higher in patients in the treatment group than in those in the observation group (six [10%] of 62 patients vs one [2%] of 63 patients), but the cumulative risk of development did not differ significantly between the groups (p=0·070). INTERPRETATION: This study is, to our knowledge, the first randomised trial in which early treatment has been assessed in selected patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma. Positive results from ongoing trials would support the use of early treatment for patients with high-risk disease in the near future. FUNDING: Pethema (Spanish Program for the Treatment of Hematologic Diseases).


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lenalidomide , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Risk Factors , Survival Rate , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL