Validity and Reliability of Handheld Dynamometry to Assess Isometric Hamstrings and Quadriceps Strength at Varying Muscle Lengths.

CONTEXT: The hamstrings are the most commonly injured muscle in sports and are especially injury prone in lengthened positions. Measuring knee muscle strength in such positions could be relevant to establish injury risk. Handheld dynamometry has been shown to be a valid, reliable, and practical tool to measure isometric muscle strength clinically. The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the assessment of isometric knee muscle strength with a handheld dynamometer (HHD) at various muscle lengths, by modifying the hip and knee angles during testing. DESIGN: Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability. METHODS: Thirty young healthy participants were recruited. Hamstring and quadriceps isometric strength was measured with a HHD and with an isokinetic dynamometer, over 2 testing sessions, in a randomized order. Isometric strength was measured on the right lower limb in 6 different positions, with the hip at either 0° or 80° of flexion and the knee at either 30°, 60°, or 90° of flexion. Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to assess the validity, and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to establish the test-retest reliability of the HHD. RESULTS: Good to excellent reliability and moderate to high validity were found in all the tested muscle length positions, except for the hamstrings in a seated position with the knee extended at 30°. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a HHD is supported in the clinical setting to measure knee muscle strength at varying muscle lengths in healthy adults, but not for the hamstrings in a lengthened position (hip flexed and knee extended). These results will have to be confirmed in sport-specific populations.

MRI signal and morphological alterations of the suprapatellar fat pad in asymptomatic subjects: are these normal variants?

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of suprapatellar fat pad (SPFP) MR alterations in asymptomatic subjects, in relation to a wide range of clinical/imaging parameters, including muscle performance tests and physical activity data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 110 asymptomatic subjects as part of a cohort study. Inclusion criteria were no knee pain in the last year. Exclusion criteria were any medical/surgical history of a knee disorder. Subjects underwent knee and low-dose posture radiographs [EOS®], 3 T MRI, clinical examination including muscle performance tests, and physical activity monitoring. The presence/absence of SPFP alterations (hyperintensity and mass effect) were assessed through consensus reading on fluid-sensitive sequences. Differences between groups of knees with SPFP alterations and controls were tested for a total of 55 categorical/continuous clinical/imaging parameters, including SPFP relative-T2-signal, trochlear/patellar/lower-limb morphologic measurements. Wilcoxon-rank-sum and chi-square tests were used to compare groups of patients. The histological correlation was obtained in a cadaveric specimen. RESULTS: SPFP alterations were common in asymptomatic subjects: hyperintensity 57% (63/110) and mass effect 37% (41/110), with 27% (30/110) showing both. Among the 55 imaging, clinical, or activity parameters tested, only increased patellar tilt angle (p = 0.02) and TT-TG distance (p = 0.03) were statistically different between groups of SPFP alterations and controls. The histological correlation showed more abundant connective tissue in SPFP compared to the prefemoral fat pad. CONCLUSIONS: SPFP hyperintensity and mass effect are common MRI findings in asymptomatic knees, and they are not related to most imaging, clinical, and activity parameters. Care should be taken not to overcall them pathological findings as they most likely represent normal variants.