ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The necessity of performing a sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinically and radiologically node-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been questioned. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of nodal positivity in these patients and to identify clinicopathological features associated with lymph node metastasis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ypN+). METHODS: A retrospective multicentre study was performed. Patients with cT1-3 cN0 breast cancer who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy between 2016 and 2021 were included. Negative nodal status was defined as the absence of palpable lymph nodes, and the absence of suspicious nodes on axillary ultrasonography, or the absence of tumour cells on axillary nodal fine needle aspiration or core biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 371 patients were analysed. Overall, 47 patients (12.7%) had a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy. Nodal positivity was identified in 22 patients (29.0%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- tumours, 12 patients (13.8%) with hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, 3 patients (5.6%) with hormone receptor-/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+ tumours, and 10 patients (6.5%) with triple-negative breast cancer. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that multicentric disease was associated with a higher likelihood of ypN+ (OR 2.66, 95% c.i. 1.18 to 6.01; P = 0.018), whilst a radiological complete response in the breast was associated with a reduced likelihood of ypN+ (OR 0.10, 95% c.i. 0.02 to 0.42; P = 0.002), regardless of molecular subtype. Only 3% of patients who had a radiological complete response in the breast were ypN+. The majority of patients (85%) with a positive sentinel node proceeded to axillary lymph node dissection and 93% had N1 disease. CONCLUSION: The rate of sentinel lymph node positivity in patients who achieve a radiological complete response in the breast is exceptionally low for all molecular subtypes.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Node Excision , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Hormones/therapeutic use , Axilla/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Wire guided localization has been widely utilized as the standard method of pre-operative localization of breast lesions. Magnetic seeds were developed to counter some of the disadvantages associated with wires. This aim of this study was to assess outcomes following the introduction of magnetic seeds at a tertiary specialist breast centre. METHODS: A retrospective review of a prospective database of the first 100 patients who underwent magnetic seed (Magseed) guided breast surgery between November 2018 and November 2019. Data was collected from 17 wire guided cases completed during the trial phase for comparison. The primary outcome measures were successful excision of index lesion and retrieval of the magnetic seed. Secondary outcomes analyzed included time ready for theatre, post-operative complications and breast margin re-excision rate. RESULTS: Of these 100 cases, 85 patients underwent Magseed guided wide local excision for invasive or in-situ carcinoma and 15 underwent Magseed guided diagnostic excision. The primary lesion was excised, and Magseed was retrieved in all 100 cases. 54% of patients were ready to proceed as the first scheduled theatre case of the day, compared to 0% of wire-guided cases. Amongst therapeutic Magseed guided cases, the re-excision rate for margin clearance was 9.4%. CONCLUSION: Magseed guided breast excision is a new technology that has been implemented with relative ease in our unit. We have shown that magnetic seed guided surgery reliably localizes lesions, is associated with low re-excision rates without an increase in patient morbidity or mortality and results in improvements in theatre planning and efficiency.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Breast , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Magnetic Phenomena , Margins of Excision , Mastectomy , Mastectomy, Segmental/methods , Tertiary Care CentersABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Indications for nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) have broadened to include the risk reducing setting and locally advanced tumors, which resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of NSM. The Oncoplastic Breast Consortium consensus conference on NSM and immediate reconstruction was held to address a variety of questions in clinical practice and research based on published evidence and expert panel opinion. METHODS: The panel consisted of 44 breast surgeons from 14 countries across four continents with a background in gynecology, general or reconstructive surgery and a practice dedicated to breast cancer, as well as a patient advocate. Panelists presented evidence summaries relating to each topic for debate during the in-person consensus conference. The iterative process in question development, voting, and wording of the recommendations followed the modified Delphi methodology. RESULTS: Consensus recommendations were reached in 35, majority recommendations in 24, and no recommendations in the remaining 12 questions. The panel acknowledged the need for standardization of various aspects of NSM and immediate reconstruction. It endorsed several oncological contraindications to the preservation of the skin and nipple. Furthermore, it recommended inclusion of patients in prospective registries and routine assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Considerable heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice became obvious during the conference. CONCLUSIONS: In case of conflicting or missing evidence to guide treatment, the consensus conference revealed substantial disagreement in expert panel opinion, which, among others, supports the need for a randomized trial to evaluate the safest and most efficacious reconstruction techniques.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/methods , Consensus , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Subcutaneous/adverse effects , Necrosis , Nipples/pathology , Surgical Flaps/pathologySubject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative ComplicationsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Approximately 20 % of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer will have distant metastases at first presentation (stage IV disease). The effect of removing the primary tumor on survival for patients with stage IV disease with unresectable metastases remains unclear. To address this a meta-analysis of all studies comparing primary tumor resection with chemotherapy alone in cases of stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases was performed. METHODS: A comprehensive search for published studies examining the effect of primary tumor resection in the setting of colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases was performed. Each study was reviewed and data extracted. Random-effects methods were used to combine data. RESULTS: There were 21 studies including a total of 44,226 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Resection of the primary tumor in patients with unresectable metastases compared with chemotherapy alone was associated with a lower mortality risk (OR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.165-0.474; P < 0.001), translating into a difference in mean survival of 6.4 months in favor of resection (95 % CI 5.025-7.858, P < 0.001). Patients who underwent resection of the primary tumor were more likely to have liver metastasis only (OR 1.551; 95 % CI 1.247-1.929; P < 0.001), were less likely to have ≥2 metastasis (OR 0.653; 95 % CI 0.508-0.839; P = 0.001), and were less likely to have rectal cancer (OR 0.495; 95 % CI 0.390-0.629; P < 0.001). There was significant cross-study heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the primary tumor may confer a survival advantage in stage IV colorectal cancer with unresectable metastases but significant selection bias exists in current studies. Randomized controlled trials are essential to validate these findings.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Retrograde transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) can be performed under local anesthesia (LA) or general anesthesia (GA); however, a wide variation in practice exists. METHODS: PubMed was searched between 2009 and 2013. Data were extracted from eligible studies. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using DerSimonian Laird between-study variance. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference identified between groups based on age or EuroSCORE. There was no statistically significant difference seen in all-cause mortality, or complication rates between groups. Mean procedural duration was 36 minutes shorter in the LA group (p = 0.001). There was increased vasopressor use in the GA group (odds ratio 3.92; p = 0.017). Mean hospital stay was 3.41 days shorter in the LA group (p = 0.018). CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the use of LA for retrograde TAVI is feasible. There are several potential benefits associated, shorter procedural duration, and hospital stay with lower vasopressor requirements. Further studies and randomized trials are mandatory to confirm the presented findings and to identify those patients for whom LA would be appropriate.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General , Anesthesia, Local , Aortic Valve Stenosis/therapy , Aortic Valve/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, Local/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Odds Ratio , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vasoconstrictor Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Whole breast irradiation (WBI) over 5-7 weeks has long been considered standard adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery. Recently the concept of irradiating the whole breast has been challenged by accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), which exclusively targets the lumpectomy site plus margin. We review the evidence supporting APBI from modern clinical trials, the pros and cons of various APBI techniques, and the controversies regarding the applicability of APBI to specific patient groups.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma/pathology , Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Brachytherapy , Female , Humans , Intraoperative Care , Neoplasm Staging , Patient Selection , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Radiotherapy/methodsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The role of primary tumor excision in patients with stage IV breast cancer is unclear. Therefore, a meta-analysis of relevant studies was performed to determine whether surgical excision of the primary tumor enhances oncological outcome in the setting of stage IV breast cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive search for relevant published trials that evaluated outcomes following excision of the primary tumor in stage IV breast cancer was performed using MEDLINE and available data were cross-referenced. Data were extracted following review of appropriate studies by authors. The primary outcome was overall survival following surgical removal of the primary tumor. RESULTS: Data from ten studies included 28,693 patients with stage IV disease of whom 52.8% underwent excision of the primary carcinoma. Surgical excision of the primary tumor in the setting of stage IV breast cancer was associated with a superior survival at 3 years (40% (surgery) versus 22% (no surgery) (odds ratio 2.32, 95% confidence interval 2.08-2.6, p<0.01). Subgroup analyses for selection of patients for surgery or not, favored smaller primary tumors, less competing medical comorbidities and lower metastatic burden (p<0.01). There was no statistical difference between the two groups regarding location of metastatic disease, grade of tumor, or receptor status. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage IV disease undergoing surgical excision of the primary tumor achieve a superior survival rate then their nonsurgical counterparts. In the absence of robust evidence, this meta-analysis provides evidence base for primary resection in the setting of stage IV breast cancer for appropriately selected patients.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Female , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis , Review Literature as Topic , Survival RateABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recent results from the ACOSOG Z0011 trial question the use of intraoperative frozen section (FS) during sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and the role of axillary dissection (ALND) for SLN-positive breast cancer patients. Here we present a 10-year trend analysis of SLN-FS and ALND in our practice. METHODS: We reviewed our prospective SLN database over 10 years (1997-2006, 7509 SLN procedures) for time trends and variation between surgeons in the use of SLN-FS and ALND in patients with cN0 invasive breast cancer. RESULTS: Use of SLN-FS decreased from 100% to 62% (P < 0.0001) and varied widely by surgeon (66% to 95%). There were no statistically significant trends in the performance of ALND for patients with SLN metastases detected by FS (n = 1370, 99-99%) or routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (n = 333; 69-77%), but only for those detected by serial section H&E with or without immunohistochemistry (n = 438; 73-48%; P = 0.0054) or immunohistochemistry only (n = 294; 48-28%; P < 0.0001). These trends coincided with an increase in the proportion of completion versus immediate ALND (30-40%; P = 0.0710). CONCLUSIONS: Over 10 years, we have observed a diminishing rate of SLN-FS and, for patients with low-volume SLN metastases, fewer ALND, trends that suggest a more nuanced approach to axillary management. If the Z0011 selection criteria had been applied to our cohort, 66% of SLN-FS (4159 of 6327) and 48% of ALND (939 of 1953) would have been avoided, sparing 13% of all patients the morbidity of ALND.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Carcinoma, Lobular/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology , Child , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Frozen Sections , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: Demand for nipple- and skin- sparing mastectomy (NSM/SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (BR) has increased at the same time as indications for post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) have broadened. The aim of the Oncoplastic Breast Consortium initiative was to address relevant questions arising with this clinically challenging scenario. METHODS: A large global panel of oncologic, oncoplastic and reconstructive breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists developed recommendations for clinical practice in an iterative process based on the principles of Delphi methodology. RESULTS: The panel agreed that surgical technique for NSM/SSM should not be formally modified when PMRT is planned with preference for autologous over implant-based BR due to lower risk of long-term complications and support for immediate and delayed-immediate reconstructive approaches. Nevertheless, it was strongly believed that PMRT is not an absolute contraindication for implant-based or other types of BR, but no specific recommendations regarding implant positioning, use of mesh or timing were made due to absence of high-quality evidence. The panel endorsed use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. It was acknowledged that the shape and size of reconstructed breasts can hinder radiotherapy planning and attention to details of PMRT techniques is important in determining aesthetic outcomes after immediate BR. CONCLUSIONS: The panel endorsed the need for prospective, ideally randomised phase III studies and for surgical and radiation oncology teams to work together for determination of optimal sequencing and techniques for PMRT for each patient in the context of BR.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Mammaplasty , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Humans , Mammaplasty/methods , Mastectomy/methods , Nipples , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is associated with significant morbidity, whilst sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has the potential to minimize complications in the management of breast cancer. The aim of this study was to systematically appraise the outcome of SNB when compared to ALND. A comprehensive search for published trials examining outcomes after SNB for breast cancer was performed using medline and cross-referencing available data. Each study was reviewed and data extracted. Primary outcomes were nodal positivity and surgery-related morbidity. A total of 9,608 patients were identified from trials comparing ALND and SNB. The overall rate of axillary lymph node positivity for those with no clinically palpable nodes was 28.8% for ALND and 27.6% for SNB (OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.86-1.17, P = 0.956), though there was a trend for superior detection of metastatic disease with SNB when this was compared with ALND alone (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.95-1.57, P = 0.122). Patients who undergo SNB are significantly less likely to suffer post-operative morbidity relative to ALND: risk of infection (OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.42-0.80, P = 0.0011), seroma (OR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.31-0.51, P = 0.0071), arm swelling (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.14-0.66, P = 0.0028) and numbness (OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.1-0.59, P = 0.0018). SNB is at least equivalent to ALND in detecting metastatic disease in the axilla. SNB is the optimum approach in terms of morbidity for the assessment of axillary metastasis in clinically node negative breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision , Neoplasm Staging/methods , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Female , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are now regarded as the optimum hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive breast cancer. However, it is unclear which of the currently available AIs offers patients the most effective and the best-tolerated treatment strategy. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials that compared AIs (as first-line agents) with standard hormonal treatment in patients with breast cancer. The results suggest that letrozole offers a more favorable side-effect profile particularly in terms of musculoskeletal adverse events. However, the available data suggests a small survival benefit from the use of anastrozole although patients treated with anastrozole appear to have a more favorable disease profile at study entry. Examination of survival data on adjuvant tamoxifen therapy from these trials supports this observation.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Aged , Anastrozole , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Nitriles/adverse effects , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Postmenopause , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Registries , Survival Analysis , Survivors , Triazoles/adverse effects , Triazoles/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Triple negative breast cancers (TNBCs) represent a distinct subgroup of breast cancers with an immunohistochemical phenotype that is negative for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2). The aim of this article is to provide a broad overview of recent developments in the diagnosis and management of TNBC for surgical oncologists. This overview discusses the subtypes of TNBC and the relationship between this type of breast cancer and the BRCA1 gene. In addition, the article explores recent advances in the treatment of TNBC from a surgical, radiation, and medical oncology point of view. Lastly, evolving therapeutic strategies that have potential to enhance outcomes for patients with TNBC are also discussed.
Subject(s)
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Female , Humans , Prognosis , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Receptors, Progesterone/metabolism , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with poor survival. The two main valve delivery systems used to date differ significantly in both structure and deployment technique. The primary objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies identifying PVR in patients post-TAVI using Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) and Edward Sapien (ES) valves in order to identify whether a significant difference exists between valve types. The secondary objective was to identify additional factors predisposing to PVR to provide an overview of the other associated considerations. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature to identify PVR rate in patients with MCV and ES valves was performed. We also sought to examine other factors predisposing to PVR. RESULTS: A total of 5910 patients were identified from 9 studies. PVR rates for MCV and ES were analysed. MCV was associated with a higher PVR rate of 15.75% [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.48-19.32] compared with ES 3.93% [95% CI 1.05-8.38]. We separately reviewed predisposing factors associated with PVR. A formal comparison of the MCV and ES valve leakage rates by mixed-effects meta-regression with a fixed-effect moderator variable for valve type (MCV or ES) suggested a statistically significant difference in leakage rate between the two valve types (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Unfavourable anatomical and pathological factors as well as valve choice have an impact on rates of PVR. Additionally, certain anatomical features dictate valve choice. A direct comparison of all the predisposing factors at this time is not possible and will require prospective multivariate analysis. There is, however, a significant difference in the PVR rates between valves based on the published observational data available to date. The ES valve associated with a lower incidence of PVR overall; therefore, we conclude that valve choice is indeed a significant determinant of PVR post-TAVI.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methodsABSTRACT
Contralateral mastectomy, in the setting of unilateral breast cancer, may only offer a survival benefit in selected patients. In fact, most women with a unilateral breast cancer will never develop a contralateral breast cancer. Despite this, there is a rapidly increasing trend of patients undergoing contralateral prophylactic mastectomy. The Society of Surgical Oncology has provided relative clinical indications for this prophylactic procedure; however, there are other clinical and more important patient factors that are relevant to the decision. In this article, we discuss the indications for this controversial procedure and also explore the patient's motivation to undergo this preventative measure. Nevertheless, the decision to perform a contralateral mastectomy should include a multidisciplinary team approach in conjunction with a patient who has been appropriately informed regarding the risks, benefits and alternatives of this procedure.