Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 82
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Prostate ; 84(3): 285-291, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37961000

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The urinary microbiota of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has been associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), however, little is known about urinary microbiota correlations with clinicopathological parameters associated with BPH. Here, we investigate associations between the urinary microbiota and clinical parameters of patients with BPH undergoing surgery. METHODS: Forty-one patients with BPH undergoing surgery were recruited from two medical centers. Catheterized urine specimens were collected and the microbiota was characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Patients were segregated into two groups according to each clinical parameter and differences in urinary microbiota diversity and composition were evaluated. RESULTS: Higher prostate weight and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were associated with higher alpha diversity in the urinary microbiota of BPH patients. At the specific microbe level, we found that the greater the prostatic weight, the lower the relative abundance of Streptococcus, while the greater the PSA levels, the higher the abundance of Lactobacillus. Treatment with 5-α-reductase inhibitor was associated with overall urinary microbiota composition, in part due to a higher abundance of Corynebacterium and Anaerococcus in this group. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the urinary microbiota of BPH patients is associated with clinicopathological features, paving the way for larger studies in which causality between urinary microbiota and BPH can be appropriately explored.


Subject(s)
Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms , Prostatic Hyperplasia , Male , Humans , Prostatic Hyperplasia/drug therapy , Prostate-Specific Antigen/therapeutic use , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Prostate , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/etiology
2.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 73(6): 106, 2024 Apr 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38634928

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed previous treatment paradigm of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC). The ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) aimed to assess the real-world effectiveness of pembrolizumab in patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical records of patients with documented metastatic UC treated by pembrolizumab as second-line therapy were retrospectively collected from 88 institutions in 23 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR). Cox proportional hazards models were adopted to explore the presence of prognostic factors. RESULTS: In total, 836 patients were included: 544 patients (65%) received pembrolizumab after progression to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in the metastatic setting (cohort A) and 292 (35%) after recurring within < 12 months since the completion of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (cohort B). The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median OS and the ORR were 10.5 months and 31% in the overall study population, 9.1 months and 29% in cohort A and 14.6 months and 37% in cohort B. At multivariate analysis, ECOG-PS ≥ 2, bone metastases, liver metastases and pembrolizumab setting (cohort A vs B) proved to be significantly associated with worst OS and PFS. Stratified by the presence of 0, 1-2 or 3-4 prognostic factors, the median OS was 29.4, 12.5 and 4.1 months (p < 0.001), while the median PFS was 12.2, 6.4 and 2.8 months, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that pembrolizumab is effective in the advanced UC real-world context, showing outcome differences between patients recurred or progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Platinum , Retrospective Studies
3.
J Urol ; 212(1): 32-40, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38723593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Limited high-quality studies have compared robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) vs open retropubic radical prostatectomy. We sought to compare their postoperative outcomes in a randomized setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single center, 354 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer were assessed for eligibility; 342 were randomized (1:1). The primary outcome was 90-day complication rates. Functional outcomes and quality of life were assessed over 18 months, and oncological outcomes, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and additional treatment over 36 months. RESULTS: From 2014 to 18, 327 patients underwent surgery (retropubic radical prostatectomy = 156, RALP = 171). Complications occurred in 27 (17.3%) vs 19 (11.1%; P = .107). Patients undergoing RALP experienced lower median bleeding (250.0 vs 719.5 mL; P < .001) and shorter hospitalization time. Urinary EPIC (Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite) median scores were better for RALP over 18 months, with higher continence rate at 3 months (80.5% vs 64.7%; P = .002), 6 months (90.1% vs 81.6%; P = .036) and 18 months (95.4% vs 78.8%; P < .001). Sexual EPIC and Sexual Health Inventory for Men median scores were higher with RALP up to 12 months, while the potency rate was superior at 3 months (23.9% vs 5.3%; P = .001) and 6 months (30.6% vs 6.9%; P < .001). Quality of life over the 18 months and oncological outcomes over 36 months were not significantly different between arms. CONCLUSIONS: Complications at 90 days were similar. RALP showed superior sexual outcomes at 1 year, improved urinary outcomes at 18 months, and comparable oncological outcomes at 36 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospective Analysis of Robot-Assisted Surgery; NCT02292914. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02292914?cond=NCT02292914&draw=2&rank=1.


Subject(s)
Laparoscopy , Postoperative Complications , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Male , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Aged , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Treatment Outcome
4.
Cancer Immunol Immunother ; 72(11): 3665-3682, 2023 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37676282

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Concomitant medications may potentially affect the outcome of cancer patients. In this sub-analysis of the ARON-2 real-world study (NCT05290038), we aimed to assess the impact of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI), statins, or metformin on outcome of patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) receiving second-line pembrolizumab. METHODS: We collected data from the hospital medical records of patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab as second-line therapy at 87 institutions from 22 countries. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate. We carried out a survival analysis by a Cox regression model. RESULTS: A total of 802 patients were eligible for this retrospective study; the median follow-up time was 15.3 months. PPI users compared to non-users showed inferior PFS (4.5 vs. 7.2 months, p = 0.002) and OS (8.7 vs. 14.1 months, p < 0.001). Concomitant PPI use remained a significant predictor of PFS and OS after multivariate Cox analysis. The use of statins or metformin was not associated with response or survival. CONCLUSIONS: Our study results suggest a significant prognostic impact of concomitant PPI use in mUC patients receiving pembrolizumab in the real-world context. The mechanism of this interaction warrants further elucidation.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Transitional Cell , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors , Metformin , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Proton Pump Inhibitors , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Metformin/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
5.
Gut ; 71(8): 1577-1587, 2022 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34697034

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Although gut dysbiosis is increasingly recognised as a pathophysiological component of metabolic syndrome (MetS), the role and mode of action of specific gut microbes in metabolic health remain elusive. Previously, we identified the commensal butyrogenic Anaerobutyricum soehngenii to be associated with improved insulin sensitivity in subjects with MetS. In this proof-of-concept study, we investigated the potential therapeutic effects of A. soehngenii L2-7 on systemic metabolic responses and duodenal transcriptome profiles in individuals with MetS. DESIGN: In this randomised double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study, 12 male subjects with MetS received duodenal infusions of A. soehngenii/ placebo and underwent duodenal biopsies, mixed meal tests (6 hours postinfusion) and 24-hour continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: A. soehngenii treatment provoked a markedly increased postprandial excursion of the insulinotropic hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and an elevation of plasma secondary bile acids, which were positively associated with GLP-1 levels. Moreover, A. soehngenii treatment robustly shaped the duodenal expression of 73 genes, with the highest fold induction in the expression of regenerating islet-protein 1B (REG1B)-encoding gene. Strikingly, duodenal REG1B expression positively correlated with GLP-1 levels and negatively correlated with peripheral glucose variability, which was significantly diminished in the 24 hours following A. soehngenii intake. Mechanistically, Reg1B expression is induced upon sensing butyrate or bacterial peptidoglycan. Importantly, A. soehngenii duodenal administration was safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of A. soehngenii improves peripheral glycaemic control within 24 hours; it specifically stimulates intestinal GLP-1 production and REG1B expression. Further studies are needed to delineate the specific pathways involved in REG1B induction and function in insulin sensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR-NL6630.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Insulin Resistance , Metabolic Syndrome , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring , Clostridiales , Cross-Over Studies , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Double-Blind Method , Glucagon-Like Peptide 1/metabolism , Glycemic Control , Humans , Insulin/metabolism , Male , Metabolic Syndrome/genetics , Transcriptome
6.
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol ; 19(4): 228-240, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33989272

ABSTRACT

The androgen signaling axis has been the main therapeutic target in the management of advanced prostate cancer for several decades. Over the past years, significant advances have been made in terms of a better understanding the androgen receptor (AR) pathway and mechanisms of castration resistance, along with the development of more potent AR-targeted therapies. New drugs, such as abiraterone, enzalutamide, apalutamide, and darolutamide, have been approved for castration-resistant prostate cancer and also have demonstrated an overall survival benefit in the castration-sensitive state. Despite these major advances, the majority of patients eventually present with disease progression and a rise in prostate-specific antigen, reflecting a continuous dependence of disease on the AR pathway. In this setting, a number of AR-related mechanisms of resistance have been described, and novel strategies to overcome them are an important unmet need. In this manuscript, we review the most promising strategies to target the AR pathway in prostate cancer, including bromodomain and extraterminal (BET)/bromodomain inhibitors, CREB-binding protein/p300 inhibitors, N-terminal domain inhibitors, proteolysis-targeting chimeras, and AR-targeting vaccines. Another interesting and disruptive approach to targeting the AR and potentially reversing resistance to second-generation AR antagonists is the cyclic administration of high-dose testosterone, known as bipolar androgen therapy, which is currently being explored in multiple ongoing trials.


Subject(s)
Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Receptors, Androgen/metabolism , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Humans , Male , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/metabolism , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Testosterone/pharmacology , Testosterone/therapeutic use
7.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 34(7): 265-269, 2020 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32674214

ABSTRACT

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has rapidly spread all over the world in the past several months. No effective treatment for COVID-19 has been established. High transmissibility and considerable mortality rates have forced many national governments to implement quarantine measures. Many patients with cancer rely on clinical trials to receive their oncologic care, but the routine conduct of clinical trials has substantially changed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The oncology research community should implement formal policies based on the guidance given from regulatory agencies, with the goal of minimizing the risks of COVID-19 infection while maintaining appropriate oncologic treatments for patients during this pandemic.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections , Infection Control/organization & administration , Medical Oncology , Neoplasms/therapy , Organizational Innovation , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Change Management , Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Clinical Trials as Topic/organization & administration , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/trends , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management
8.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 34(9): 370-376, 2020 09 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32965669

ABSTRACT

In an asymptomatic 77-yearold woman, former 55 packyears smoker, a routine X-ray showed a 45-mm superior left lobe lesion. A chest CT scan confirmed a 36-mm superior left lobe lesion and an aortic-pulmonary lymph node enlargement measuring 42 mm, suspicious for neoplasia. A PET-CT scan showed an elevated uptake in the primary lesion, in the aortic-pulmonary lymph node, and in the left hilar lymph node with a standardized uptake value - 40 and 4.3, respectively. CT-guided lung biopsy showed a lung squamous cell carcinoma. An endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lymph-node staging was negative for lymph node spread. Brain MRI was negative. Final staging was determined to be a IIIA (T2bN2) squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia/diagnosis , Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Chemoradiotherapy , Consolidation Chemotherapy , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Lung Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Paclitaxel/administration & dosage , Pandemics , Pneumonia/chemically induced , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Radiographics ; 40(5): 1412-1430, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762625

ABSTRACT

Therapy response assessment is a critical step in cancer management, leading clinicians to optimize the use of therapeutic options during the course of the disease. Imaging is a pivotal biomarker for therapy response evaluation in oncology and has gained wider use through the development of reproducible data-based guidelines, of which the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors is the most successful example. Disease-specific criteria have also been proposed, and the Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria are the mainstay for prostate cancer (PC). However, conventional imaging evaluation in metastatic PC has several limitations, including (a) the inability to detect small-volume disease, (b) the high prevalence of bone (nonmeasurable) lesions at imaging, and (c) the established role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels as the biomarker of choice for response assessment and disease progression. In addition, there are an increasing number of newer treatment options with various effects on imaging features. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET has improved patient selection for newer treatments, such as metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) or radionuclide therapy. The role of PSMA PET in response assessment for many metastatic PC therapeutic options (MDT, androgen deprivation therapy, chemotherapy, radionuclide therapy, and immunotherapy) is an evolving issue, with emerging data showing good correlation with PSA levels and clinical outcome. However, there are specific implications of each therapy (especially androgen deprivation therapy and immunotherapy) on PSMA expression by PC cells, leading to potential pitfalls and inaccuracies that must be known by radiologists. Despite some limitations, PSMA PET is addressing gaps left by conventional imaging methods (eg, CT and bone scanning) and nonimaging biomarkers (PSA levels) in metastatic PC therapy response assessment, a role that can be improved with advances like refinement of interpretation criteria and whole-body tumor burden quantification.© RSNA, 2020See discussion on this article by Barwick and Castellucci.


Subject(s)
Positron-Emission Tomography , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Biomarkers, Tumor , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Patient Selection , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiopharmaceuticals , Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
10.
Int Braz J Urol ; 45(3): 449-458, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31038861

ABSTRACT

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer and the fi fth leading cause of cancer deaths. In Brazil, it is likewise the second most common cancer among men, second only to non-melanoma skin cancers. The aim of this consensus is to align different opinions and interpretations of the medical literature in a practical and patient-oriented approach. The fi rst Brazilian Consensus on the Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer was published in 2017, with the goal of reducing the heterogeneity of therapeutic conduct in Brazilian patients with metastatic prostate cancer. We acknowledge that in Brazil the incorporation of different technologies is a big challenge, especially in the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), which allows for the disparity in the options available to patients treated in different institutions. In order to update the recommendations and to make them objective and easily accessible, once more a panel of specialists was formed in order to discuss and elaborate a new Brazilian Consensus on Advanced Prostate Cancer. This Consensus was written through a joint initiative of the Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology (SBOC) and the Brazilian Society of Urology (SBU) to support the clinical decisions of physicians and other health professionals involved in the care of patients with prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , Clinical Decision-Making , Humans , Male , Neoplasm Metastasis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Societies, Medical
11.
Int Braz J Urol ; 44(5): 892-899, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30088720

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical impact of 68Ga-PSMA PET / CT in the setting of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 125 prostate cancer patients submitted to the 68Ga-PSMA PET / CT due to biochemical recurrence. The parameters age, Gleason score, PSA levels, and the highest SUVmax were correlated to potential treatment changes. The highest SUVmax values were correlated with age and Gleason score. The median follow-up time was 24 months. RESULTS: 68Ga-PSMA PET / CT led to a treatment change in 66 / 104 (63.4%) patients (twenty-one patients were lost to follow-up). There was a significant change of treatment plan in patients with a higher Gleason score (P = 0.0233), higher SUVmax (p = 0.0306) and higher PSA levels (P < 0.0001; median PSA = 2.55 ng / mL). CONCLUSION: 68Ga-PSMA PET / CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence has a high impact in patient management.


Subject(s)
Edetic Acid/analogs & derivatives , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Oligopeptides , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Follow-Up Studies , Gallium Isotopes , Gallium Radioisotopes , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Int Braz J Urol ; 43(3): 407-415, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28199075

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer still represents a major cause of morbidity, and still about 20% of men with the disease are diagnosed or will progress to the advanced stage without the possibility of curative treatment. Despite the recent advances in scientific and technological knowledge and the availability of new therapies, there is still considerable heterogeneity in the therapeutic approaches for metastatic prostate cancer. OBJECTIVES: This article presents a summary of the I Brazilian Consensus on Advanced Prostate Cancer, conducted by the Brazilian Society of Urology and Brazilian Society of Clinical Oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experts were selected by the medical societies involved. Forty issues regarding controversial issues in advanced disease were previously elaborated. The panel met for consensus, with a threshold established for 2/3 of the participants. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of advanced prostate cancer is complex, due to the existence of a large number of therapies, with different response profiles and toxicities. The panel addressed recommendations on preferred choice of therapies, indicators that would justify their change, and indicated some strategies for better sequencing of treatment in order to maximize the potential for disease control with the available therapeutic arsenal. The lack of consensus on some topics clearly indicates the absence of strong evidence for some decisions.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Brazil , Humans , Male , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis
13.
Curr Opin Oncol ; 26(3): 284-93, 2014 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24670607

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To discuss the current role and future perspectives of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) in the management of advanced germ cell tumors (GCTs). RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of HDCT, consisting of carboplatin and etoposide followed by stem cell reinfusion, for the salvage treatment of GCTs. However, three randomized trials showed no benefit for HDCT over conventional dose chemotherapy in the first-line setting. Similarly, adding a third drug to etoposide with carboplatin does not seem to substantially improve treatment efficacy and may increase toxicity and mortality. Recent retrospective data from single centers and a large international collaboration demonstrated better outcomes with use of HDCT in the initial (rather than later) salvage setting as well as with sequential rather than single cycle regimens. However, randomized data are lacking. Prognostic factors for outcome to salvage HDCT were recently established and enhanced supportive measures such as growth factors and antibiotic prophylaxis have resulted in a dramatic decrease in morbidity and mortality. SUMMARY: HDCT plays an integral role in the salvage treatment of patients with advanced GCTs. However, optimal timing (initial vs. later salvage), dosing, number of high-dose cycles, and patient selection remain to be defined.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Etoposide/administration & dosage , Humans , Ifosfamide/administration & dosage , Prognosis , Salvage Therapy/methods
14.
Oncology (Williston Park) ; 28(8): 693-9, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25140626

ABSTRACT

The treatment landscape of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) has been dramatically changed over the past years with the approval of several new drugs for clinical use. These include androgen axis-targeted therapy and novel drugs with different mechanisms of action, including immunotherapy (sipuleucel-T), radiopharmaceuticals (radium-223), and chemotherapy (cabazitaxel). Based on the growing knowledge that the main driver for patients progressing on standard androgen deprivation therapy is persistent activation of the androgen receptor (AR) signaling axis, new drugs were developed and demonstrated significant efficacy in recent clinical trials, leading to the approval of abiraterone and enzalutamide in several countries. In this article, we review the most recent advances in AR-directed therapies for CRPC, promising new agents under development, cross-resistance, and mechanisms of resistance for the new-generation AR-targeted agents.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant/drug therapy , Receptors, Androgen/physiology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Humans , Male , Signal Transduction/physiology
15.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 22(3): 102088, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38718699

ABSTRACT

Several phase II trials have investigated neoadjuvant novel androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) in combination with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) followed by radical prostatectomy (RP) in prostate cancer (PC) patients. However, data regarding complications of intense hormone therapy and surgical complications are scarce. Our objective was to evaluate the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) and thromboembolic (TE) adverse events (AE) in patients with localized PC who have received intense neoadjuvant ADT followed by prostatectomy. A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and conference abstracts was performed. The strategies were developed and applied for each electronic database on March 7th, 2023. Eligible studies included randomized and single-arm trials testing ARSIs prior to prostatectomy that adequately reported safety data regarding CV and TE AE, peri-operative complications, and mortality during therapy. Pooled incidence (PI) of AE with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was estimated using a random effects model. Quality assessment and reporting followed Cochrane Collaboration Handbook and PRISMA guidelines. PROSPERO: CRD42022344104. Nine randomized controlled trials and three single-arm phase II trials were included, comprising 702 patients (702 patients for CV AE and 522 for perioperative complications). The neoadjuvant regimen was classified as monotherapy with ARSI (100 patients), combination therapy with ADT + ARSI (383 patients), or ADT + ARSI + ARSI (219 patients). The PI of TE within the perioperative interval was 4.2% (95% CI = 2.6%-6.6%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .65), and the PI for CV AE was 4.6% (95% CI = 3.1%-6.7%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .71). Seven deaths were reported, resulting in a PI of 2.2% (95% CI = 1.3%-3.8%, I2 = 0.0%, P = .99), of which two were considered treatment-related and occurred within the perioperative period. The PI of hypertension grade 3-5 was 7.3% (95% CI = 4.8%-11.0%, I2 = 38.8%, P = .04). CV and TE AE associated with intense neoadjuvant hormone therapy in patients with localized PC can occur in up to 4.6% of cases. Our data warns for further assessment of thrombotic risk and prophylactic anticoagulation in this setting.


Subject(s)
Androgen Antagonists , Cardiovascular Diseases , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Thromboembolism , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thromboembolism/chemically induced , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgen Antagonists/therapeutic use , Androgen Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/chemically induced , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology
16.
Urol Oncol ; 42(1): 22.e13-22.e21, 2024 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38030469

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Bladder microbiota dysbiosis has been associated with several urological disorders. However, dysbiosis markers in bladder cancer have not been identified and little is known about the effect of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) intravesical therapy on the bladder microbiota. In this study, we compared the bladder microbiota of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) undergoing BCG therapy to nononcological controls. We also longitudinally analyzed the impact of BCG therapy on the bladder microbiota of NMIBC patients and addressed whether bladder microbiota is associated with BCG efficacy. METHODS: We collected catheterized urine samples from males with intermediate/high-risk NMIBC (cancer group, n = 32) or benign prostatic hyperplasia (control group, n = 41). The cancer group also provided urine samples during and after BCG induction. We used 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the bladder microbiota. Bladder microbiota parameters, such as diversity and taxonomic composition, were compared between groups and associated with clinicopathological data and BCG efficacy. RESULTS: We observed no significant differences between the bladder microbiota of NMIBC patients and controls. BCG intravesical instillations did not significantly alter the bladder microbiota of NMIBC patients, and BCG was rarely detected in the bladder during and after BCG therapy. Microbiota diversity and overall composition before BCG induction did not influence disease persistence at 3 months. However, higher abundance of Lactobacillus, Streptococcus, and Cutibacterium in the pre-BCG bladder microbiota was associated with BCG effectiveness. CONCLUSION: We were unable to identify markers of bladder microbiota dysbiosis among male NMIBC patients. Moreover, we demonstrated for the first time using longitudinally collected samples that BCG cannot persist in the bladder microbiota nor significantly alter its diversity and composition. The associations found between bladder microbes and BCG efficacy highlight the potential of microbial-based therapeutic and risk-stratification strategies in the intermediate/high-risk NMIBC setting.


Subject(s)
Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Neoplasms , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Urinary Bladder/pathology , BCG Vaccine/therapeutic use , Dysbiosis/drug therapy , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Administration, Intravesical , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
17.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(4): 183, 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38594593

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Renal cell carcinoma is an aggressive disease with a high mortality rate. Management has drastically changed with the new era of immunotherapy, and novel strategies are being developed; however, identifying systemic treatments is still challenging. This paper presents an update of the expert panel consensus from the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group on advanced renal cell carcinoma management in Brazil. METHODS: A panel of 34 oncologists and experts in renal cell carcinoma discussed and voted on the best options for managing advanced disease in Brazil, including systemic treatment of early and metastatic renal cell carcinoma as well as nonclear cell tumours. The results were compared with the literature and graded according to the level of evidence. RESULTS: Adjuvant treatments benefit patients with a high risk of recurrence after surgery, and the agents used are pembrolizumab and sunitinib, with a preference for pembrolizumab. Neoadjuvant treatment is exceptional, even in initially unresectable cases. First-line treatment is mainly based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs); the choice of treatment is based on the International Metastatic Database Consortium (IMCD) risk score. Patients at favourable risk receive ICIs in combination with TKIs. Patients classified as intermediate or poor risk receive ICIs, without preference for ICI + ICIs or ICI + TKIs. Data on nonclear cell renal cancer treatment are limited. Active surveillance has a place in treating favourable-risk patients. Either denosumab or zoledronic acid can be used for treating metastatic bone disease. CONCLUSION: Immunotherapy and targeted therapy are the standards of care for advanced disease. The utilization and sequencing of these therapeutic agents hinge upon individual risk scores and responses to previous treatments. This consensus reflects a commitment to informed decision-making, drawn from professional expertise and evidence in the medical literature.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Latin America , Consensus , Sunitinib
18.
Biomedicines ; 11(7)2023 Jul 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37509723

ABSTRACT

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains the cornerstone of advanced prostate cancer treatment. However, the progression towards castration-resistant prostate cancer is inevitable, as the cancer cells reactivate androgen receptor signaling and adapt to the castrate state through autoregulation of the androgen receptor. Additionally, the upfront use of novel hormonal agents such as enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate may result in long-term toxicities and may trigger the selection of AR-independent cells through "Darwinian" treatment-induced pressure. Therefore, it is crucial to develop new strategies to overcome these challenges. Bipolar androgen therapy (BAT) is one such approach that has been devised based on studies demonstrating the paradoxical inhibitory effects of supraphysiologic testosterone on prostate cancer growth, achieved through a variety of mechanisms acting in concert. BAT involves rapidly alternating testosterone levels between supraphysiological and near-castrate levels over a period of a month, achieved through monthly intramuscular injections of testosterone plus concurrent ADT. BAT is effective and well-tolerated, improving quality of life and potentially re-sensitizing patients to previous hormonal therapies after progression. By exploring the mechanisms and clinical evidence for BAT, this review seeks to shed light on its potential as a promising new approach to prostate cancer treatment.

19.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(1): 43-54, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36428171

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies about intense neoadjuvant therapy followed by Radical Prostatectomy (RP) lack standardized criteria regarding surgical complications and comparison to a group of patients who underwent RP without the use of neoadjuvant therapy. The aim of this study is to describe and compare the perioperative complication rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, single-center phase II trial in patients with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPCa). The control group included HRPCa patients who underwent RP outside the clinical trial during the same study recruitment period. The interventional group was randomized (1:1) to receive neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy plus abiraterone with or without apalutamide followed by RP. Complications observed up to 30 days of surgery were classified based on the Clavien-Dindo classification. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to assess predictive factors associated with perioperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 124 patients with HRPCa were underwent to RP between May 27, 2019 and August 6, 2021, including 61 patients in the intervention group and 63 patients in the control group. The general and major complications in the intervention group reached 29.6% and 6.6%, respectively, and 39.7% and 7.9% in the control group, respectively. There was no significant difference between groups. We observed 4.9% of thromboembolic event in the neoadjuvant group. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant increase in morbidity rate in RP after intense neoadjuvant therapy. The association of intense androgen deprivation neoadjuvant therapy with RP and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy may increase the risk of a perioperative thromboembolic events.


Subject(s)
Neoadjuvant Therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Androgen Antagonists/adverse effects , Androgens , Control Groups , Morbidity , Neoadjuvant Therapy/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Prostate-Specific Antigen , Prostatectomy/adverse effects , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Treatment Outcome
20.
Clin Genitourin Cancer ; 21(3): e104-e113, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36509612

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Germ-cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common malignancy in young men. There is a paucity of data on GCTs in developing countries. LACOG 0515 study aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with GCTs from Brazilian cancer centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating male patients diagnosed with GCTs from 2000 to 2018 in 13 Brazilian hospitals. We described baseline characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 1232 patients were included, with a median age of 30 years. Histology was seminoma in 47.1% and non-seminoma GCT (NSGCT) in 52.9%. The primary tumor site was testis in 96.5%. At diagnosis, clinical stage I was present in 68.1% and 34.7% and clinical stages IS/II/III in 31.9% and 65.2% of patients with seminoma and NSCGT, respectively. Following orchiectomy, 55.2% of patients with clinical stage I were managed with surveillance. The 5-year disease-free survival rates among patients with stage I were 98.0% in seminoma and 92.3% in NSGCT, with 5-year OS of 99.6% and 97.6%, respectively. Among patients with advanced disease (IS, II, and III), the 5-year PFS were 88.7% in seminoma and 68.7% in NSGCT, with 5y-OS of 97.6% and 82.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This is the largest Brazilian cohort of GCTs. Our results show a high rate of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinical stage I. Although our data demonstrate slightly inferior PFS compared with the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group and other contemporary series, the OS rates were similar.


Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal , Seminoma , Testicular Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Latin America/epidemiology , Testicular Neoplasms/drug therapy , Testicular Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal/drug therapy , Seminoma/drug therapy , Registries
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL