Lateralization of the Humerus in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Can Preoperative Planning Software Predict Postoperative Lateralization and Does Lateralization Influence Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) can result in varying amounts of humeral medialization or lateralization. The amount of medial or lateral change-in-arm-position can be predicted using 3D CT planning software. It is not clear if the preoperatively-predicted change-in-arm-position correlates with the actual, radiographically-measured change-in-arm-position or if predicted or actual change-in-arm-position correlates with patient-reported outcomes or complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing RTSA underwent preoperative 3D CT planning to predict the postoperative medial-to-lateral change-in-arm-position (PCAP). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to calculate the actual medial-to-lateral change-in-arm-position using the measurement of the lateral edge of the greater tuberosity to the lateral edge of the acromion (RCAP-LHO). The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (WOOS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) were recorded at baseline, 1-year, and 2-years. Rates of complications were recorded. RESULTS: Two-hundred-and-fifty patients were eligible for this study including 189 patients reaching the one-year clinical follow-up point and 144 patients reaching the two-year clinical follow-up point. One-year and two-year follow-up rates were 89 percent and 91 percent, respectively. The mean PCAP was 3+5 mm and RCAP-LHO was 1+8 mm. There was moderate correlation between PCAP and RCAP-LHO. There was weak correlation between increased PCAP lateralization and higher WOOS and ASES at two years and improvement from baseline to 2 years in WOOS. There was very weak correlation between increased PCAP lateralization and improvement compared to baseline in 1 year SANE and improvement compared to baseline in 2 year SANE. There was weak correlation between lateralized RCAP-LHO and 2 year postoperative SANE. There was superior 2-year WOOS, ASES, and SANE, and improvement in SANE at 1-year compared to baseline in patients with a lateralized PCAP compared to a medialized or neutral PCAP. There was superior 2-year WOOS, improvement in WOOS from baseline to 2-year follow-up, and SANE at 2-years in patients with a lateralized RCAP-LHO compared to a medialized or neutral RCAP-LHO. Overall complication rates were similar between groups although the dislocation rate in shoulders with a lateralized change-in-arm-position was significantly less compared to shoulders with a medial or neutral change-in-arm-position. CONCLUSIONS: PCAP correlated with actual RCAP-LHO. Correlations exist with increased humeral lateralization and improved patient-determined outcomes. Patient-determined outcomes were the same or better in patients with a lateralized change-in-arm-position compared to those that were medialized or remained neutral. A lateralized change-in-arm-position did not result in increased overall complications and was protective against postoperative instability.

Patients who have intraoperative deviations in their preoperative plan have inferior clinical and radiographic outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Three-dimensional computed tomography preoperative planning has become adopted among shoulder arthroplasty surgeons. Prior studies have not examined outcomes in patients in whom the surgeon implanted prostheses that deviated from the preoperative plan compared with patients in whom the surgeon followed the preoperative plan. The hypothesis of this study was that clinical and radiographic outcomes would be equivalent between patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty that had a deviation in the components predicted in the preoperative plan and patients who did not have a change in the components predicted in the preoperative plan. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who had preoperative planning for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty from March 2017 through October 2022 was performed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: patients in whom the surgeon used components that deviated from those anticipated by the preoperative plan (changed group), and patients in whom the surgeon used all of the components anticipated by the preoperative plan (planned group). Patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Shoulder Activity Level were recorded preoperatively, at 1 year, and at 2 years. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. Radiographic parameters to assess restoration of proximal humeral anatomy included humeral head height, humeral neck angle, humeral centering on the glenoid, and postoperative restoration of the anatomic center of rotation. RESULTS: A total of 159 patients had intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan, and 136 patients underwent arthroplasty without changes to their preoperative plan. The planned group had higher scores than the group that had a deviation in the preoperative plan for every patient-determined outcome metric at every postoperative time point with statistically significant improvements found in the SST and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation at 1-year and the SST and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score at 2-year follow-up. No differences were found in range of motion metrics between the groups. Patients who did not have a deviation in their preoperative plan had more optimal restoration of their postoperative radiographic center of rotation than patients who did have a deviation in their preoperative plan. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have intraoperative changes to their preoperative plan have (1) inferior postoperative patient-determined outcome scores at 1 and 2 years after surgery and (2) a larger deviation in the postoperative radiographic restoration of the humeral center of rotation than patients who did not have intraoperative changes from the initial plan.

Is stemless total shoulder arthroplasty indicated in elderly patients?

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: Stemmed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has represented the gold standard for the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff for decades. To the author's knowledge, no study has specifically examined the outcomes of stemless, modular total shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients. The hypothesis of this study was that stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in elderly patients (age ≥70 years) would have equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with a younger population (age <70 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectively collected database of patients undergoing primary, modular, stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis was retrospectively reviewed. Patient-determined outcomes including the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Index (WOOS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, Simple Shoulder Test score, and Shoulder Activity Level score were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 year and 2 years. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative range of motion was recorded. Postoperative radiographs were examined to assess for radiographic evidence of complications. RESULTS: Stemless arthroplasty was planned in 116 patients. Seven patients underwent conversion intraoperatively to a stemmed prosthesis. There was no difference between patients aged <70 yr and those aged ≥70 years who required intraoperative deviation from the preoperative plan to a stemmed prosthesis (5.8% vs 6.4%, P = .90). At the time of stemless arthroplasty, 64 patients were aged <70 yr and 44 patients were aged ≥70 years. Between the 2 groups, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences in WOOS, ASES, and SANE scores at baseline, 1-year follow-up, or 2-year follow-up. The changes in all scores from baseline to 2 years were similar between the group aged <70 yr and the group aged ≥70 years. There was no difference in the percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference or substantial clinical benefit in either group after shoulder arthroplasty at 2-year follow-up. There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of final postoperative range of motion or change in range of motion for any metric examined. There was no evidence of radiographic complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Age ≥70 years does not appear to be a contraindication to stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Postoperative improvements in patient-determined outcome scores, the percentage of patients achieving clinically important outcomes for the ASES, SANE, and WOOS scores, and postoperative range of motion were similar between patients aged <70 yr and those aged ≥70 years. There was no difference between the groups regarding the patients who required intraoperative deviation from the preoperatively planned stemless prosthesis to a stemmed prosthesis. Neither age group demonstrated a radiographically apparent complication.

Accuracy of Blueprint software in predicting range of motion 1 year after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Blueprint 3-dimensional computed tomography software has a functionality that predicts impingement-free range of motion (ROM) with determination of the limits of ROM at which bone and/or prosthetic impingement occurs. To our knowledge, only 1 previously published study has assessed the ability of Blueprint software to predict actual postoperative ROM after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). The hypotheses of this study were that (1) mean Blueprint-predicted impingement-free ROM would be statistically similar to the mean actual ROM 1 year after RTSA and (2) there would be a correlation between Blueprint-predicted impingement-free ROM and the actual ROM 1 year after RTSA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent Blueprint planning prior to undergoing RTSA from March 2017 through May 2021 was performed. At 1-year follow-up, flexion, external rotation at the side, abduction, external rotation in the abducted position, internal rotation in the abducted position, and internal rotation behind the back were measured. The preoperatively predicted flexion, extension, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation were recorded using Blueprint software. The group 1 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of all 127 patients regardless of whether intraoperative component modifications were made. The group 2 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of only the patients who did not undergo intraoperative changes that would affect the preoperative ROM prediction (n = 97). The group 3 analysis examined the predicted vs. actual ROM of group 2 combined with the 30 patients who underwent post hoc Blueprint planning modifications to account for the changes made intraoperatively (combined sample size of 127). RESULTS: Of the 141 patients, 127 (90%) were available for 1-year follow-up. When the mean values of all 3 groups were examined, the actual ROM and predicted ROM were statistically significantly different (P < .0001) for flexion, external rotation, abduction, abduction-external rotation, and abduction-internal rotation. In group 1, a very weak or poor correlation was found between predicted internal rotation and actual abducted internal rotation (r = 0.19, P = .04). For all other ROM metrics in groups 1, 2, and 3, there were no correlations between predicted and actual ROM (P ≥ .07). CONCLUSIONS: In its current state, preoperative Blueprint 3-dimensional computed tomography planning software is unable to accurately predict ROM 1 year after RTSA.

Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation be used as a stand-alone subjective outcome instrument in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair?

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS: There is no consensus to which patient-determined shoulder outcome scores should be considered when analyzing patient outcomes. Use of multiple patient-determined outcomes may be redundant and cause increased responder burden. The Single Assessment Numeric (SANE) has not been widely accepted as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measure. The hypothesis was that SANE will correlate with and be comparable in responsiveness to other subjective outcome measures that have been used in a stand-alone fashion in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form [ASES], Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index [WORC], and the Simple Shoulder Test [SST]). In addition, the SANE will be more relevant to each patient compared to the ASES, further supporting its use as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcomes measure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a database of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair was reviewed where the SANE was recorded with the ASES, WORC, and/or SST. Correlations were determined using the Pearson coefficient. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if correlations differed in (1) preoperative and (2) postoperative outcome determinations. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean (SRM) and the effect size (ES) of all scores. Relevance and precision of the SANE and ASES were examined using 150 consecutive patients to determine the number of questions in each score that were not answered. RESULTS: Correlation was excellent for the SANE and the ASES (n = 1838, r = 0.81, P < .0001), the WORC (n = 1793, r = 0.82, P < .0001), and the SST (n = 1836, r = 0.76, P < .0001). Correlation of preoperative scores was moderate and postoperative scores were excellent when comparing the SANE with all 3 scores. All scores were highly responsive, with the SRM of the SANE = 2.1, ASES = 2.2, WORC = 2.4, and the SST = 1.8. The ES of the SANE = 2.4, ASES = 2.7, WORC = 3.0, and the SST = 2.1. One hundred percent of the SANE scores were answered completely compared with 57% (P < .0001) of the ASES, with significant variability found in the answers to the "work" and "score" questions. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing rotator cuff repair, the SANE highly correlated and has equivalent responsiveness with the WORC, ASES, and SST, which have been used as stand-alone shoulder-specific outcomes measures. The SANE may provide the same information as the WORC, ASES, and SST regarding outcome with significant reduction in responder burden. This study supports that the SANE can be used as a subjective, stand-alone instrument for patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.

Can the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) be used as a stand-alone outcome instrument in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: There is no consensus as to which patient-determined shoulder outcome scores should be considered when analyzing patient outcomes for either clinical or research purposes. Use of multiple patient-determined outcomes may be redundant and cause increased responder burden. To date, the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) has not been widely accepted as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measure. The hypothesis of this study was that the SANE would correlate with and be equal or superior in responsiveness to other outcome measures that have been used in a stand-alone fashion in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons [ASES], Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder [WOOS], and Simple Shoulder Test [SST] scores). In addition, it was hypothesized that the SANE would be more relevant to each patient than the ASES assessment, further supporting the use of the SANE as a stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measure. METHODS: A retrospective review of a database of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty was performed, in which the SANE score was recorded simultaneously with the ASES, WOOS, and/or SST score. Correlations were determined using the Pearson coefficient. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine whether correlations differed in (1) preoperative outcome and (2) postoperative outcome determinations. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean and the effect size of all scores. The relevance of the SANE and ASES assessments was examined using the scores of 150 consecutive patients to determine the number of questions on each assessment that were not answered. RESULTS: Correlation was excellent for the SANE score and the ASES score (n = 1447, r = 0.82, P < .0001), WOOS score (n = 1514, r = 0.83, P < .0001), and SST score (n = 1095, r = 0.81, P < .0001). The correlation of preoperative scores was moderate and that of postoperative scores was strong-moderate when the SANE score was compared with all 3 other scores. All scores were highly responsive, with standardized response mean values of 2.2 for the SANE score, 2.3 for the ASES score, 1.4 for the WOOS score, and 1.6 for the SST score. The effect size of the SANE score was 2.9; ASES score, 2.9; WOOS score, 2.9; and SST score, 2.3. One hundred percent of the SANE questions were answered completely compared with 61% of the ASES questions (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty, the SANE score highly correlated with the WOOS, ASES, and SST scores, which have been used as stand-alone shoulder-specific outcome measures. The SANE score may provide the same information as the WOOS, ASES, and SST score regarding outcomes with a significant reduction in responder burden. It is logical that the SANE can be used as a stand-alone instrument for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

Obesity and sex influence fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff: the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) and Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Fatty infiltration (FI) is one of the most important prognostic factors for outcomes after rotator cuff surgery. Established risk factors include advancing age, larger tear size, and increased tear chronicity. A growing body of evidence suggests that sex and obesity are associated with FI; however, data are limited. METHODS: We recruited 2 well-characterized multicenter cohorts of patients with rotator cuff tears (Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network [MOON] cohort [n = 80] and Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup [ROW] cohort [n = 158]). We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and the presence of FI while adjusting for the participant's age at magnetic resonance imaging, sex, and duration of shoulder symptoms, as well as the cross-sectional area of the tear. We analyzed the 2 cohorts separately and performed a meta-analysis to combine estimates. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (33.8%) in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort and 57 patients (36.1%) in the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) cohort had FI. When BMI < 25 kg/m2 was used as the reference category, being overweight was associated with a 2.37-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-7.29) increased odds of FI and being obese was associated with a 3.28-fold (95% CI, 1.16-9.25) increased odds of FI. Women were 4.9 times (95% CI, 2.06-11.69) as likely to have FI as men. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with rotator cuff tears, obese patients had a substantially higher likelihood of FI. Further research is needed to assess whether modifying BMI can alter FI in patients with rotator cuff tears. This may have significant clinical implications for presurgical surgical management of rotator cuff tears. Sex was also significantly associated with FI, with women having higher odds of FI than men. Higher odds of FI in female patients may also explain previously reported early suboptimal outcomes of rotator cuff surgery and higher pain levels in female patients as compared with male patients.

Male Sex, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index Score, and Sport as Predictors of Large Labral Tears of the Shoulder: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: To identify factors predictive of a large labral tear at the time of shoulder instability surgery. METHODS: As part of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort, patients undergoing open or arthroscopic shoulder instability surgery for a labral tear were evaluated. Patients with >270° tears were defined as having large labral tears. To build a predictive logistic regression model for large tears, the Feasible Solutions Algorithm was used to add significant interaction effects. RESULTS: After applying exclusion criteria, 1235 patients were available for analysis. There were 222 females (18.0%) and 1013 males (82.0%) in the cohort, with an average age of 24.7 years (range 12 to 66). The prevalence of large tears was 4.6% (n = 57), with the average tear size being 141.9°. Males accounted for significantly more of the large tears seen in the cohort (94.7%, P = .01). Racquet sports (P = .01), swimming (P = .02), softball (P = .05), skiing (P = .04), and golf (P = .04) were all associated with large labral tears, as was a higher Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI; P = .01). Age, race, history of dislocation, and injury during sport were not associated with having a larger tear. Using our predictive logistic regression model for large tears, patients with a larger body mass index (BMI) who played contact sports were also more likely to have large tears (P = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple factors were identified as being associated with large labral tears at the time of surgery, including male sex, preoperative WOSI score, and participation in certain sports including racquet sports, softball, skiing, swimming, and golf. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, prognostic study.

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score has excellent correlation with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis score.

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the correlation, responsiveness, and responder and administrator burden of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score with the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty. The goal was to determine whether one score was superior to the other to limit the use of multiple scoring measures when tracking patient outcomes. The hypothesis of this study was that for patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty, the WOOS score would have (1) a high level of correlation with the ASES score, (2) comparable responsiveness to the ASES score, and (3) a higher responder and administrator burden than the ASES score. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of a database of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty in which the ASES score was recorded with the WOOS score. Correlations were determined using the Pearson coefficient. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine whether correlations differed in (1) preoperative outcome and (2) postoperative outcome determinations and by type of arthroplasty (anatomic vs. reverse). Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean and the effect size of both scores. Responder and administrator burden was examined using 50 consecutive preoperative patients to determine the number of incorrectly completed WOOS and ASES scores. RESULTS: The correlation of the ASES and WOOS scores for all patients was excellent (n = 1218, r = 0.88, P < .0001). The correlation of the ASES and WOOS scores was excellent for patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 695, r = 0.71, P < .0001) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (n = 523, r = 0.88, P < .0001). The correlation of preoperative scores was strong-moderate (n = 606, r = 0.62, P < .0001), and that of postoperative scores was strong-moderate (n = 612, r = 0.69, P < .0001). The standardized response mean (WOOS score, 2.1; ASES score, 2.1) and the effect size (WOOS score, 3.0; ASES score, 3.0) demonstrated comparable responsiveness. Twenty-six percent of the WOOS scores were completed incorrectly and were invalid compared with 0% of the ASES scores (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: There is excellent correlation and comparable responsiveness between the ASES score and WOOS score. Including these scores simultaneously when tracking patient-determined outcomes appears to be redundant and therefore unnecessary. Because there is higher responder and administrative burden for the WOOS score, we recommend use of the ASES score over the WOOS score in patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty.

The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score highly correlates with the Simple Shoulder Test.

BACKGROUND/HYPOTHESIS: There is no consensus to which patient-determined shoulder outcome scores should be considered when analyzing patient outcomes for either clinical or research purposes. The use of multiple outcome scores may be redundant and cause increased responder burden. The hypothesis of this study is that the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES) will highly correlate with the Simple Shoulder Test (SST) for rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty and have comparable responsiveness. If determined to be highly correlated, the use of these scores simultaneously may be redundant and one score may be eliminated. METHODS: A retrospective review of the senior author's database of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty was reviewed in which the ASES was recorded simultaneously with the SST. Correlations were determined using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.7 excellent; r = 0.61-0.7 strong-moderate; r = 0.31-0.6 moderate; r = 0.2-0.3 poor) for all interactions between the 2 scores. Subgroup analysis was performed to determine if correlations differed in (1) preoperative outcome and (2) postoperative outcome determinations. Responsiveness was determined by calculating the standardized response mean and the effect size of both scores. RESULTS: There were a total of 1810 simultaneous measurements (both rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty) of the ASES and SST. The correlation was excellent for the ASES and SST for all patients (n = 1810; r = 0.81; P < .0001). The correlation of preoperative scores was strong-moderate (n = 1191; r = 0.60; P < .0001), and the correlation of postoperative scores was excellent (n = 619; r = 0.78; P < .0001). Both scores were determined to be highly responsive, but both the standardized response mean (2.8 vs. 2.1) and the effect size (2.2 vs. 1.8) of the ASES were greater than those of the SST. CONCLUSION: In general, there was an excellent correlation between the ASES and the SST for all patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty. Because there is an excellent correlation between the 2 scores, including these 2 scores simultaneously in tracking patient-determined outcomes appears to be redundant and therefore unnecessary. Because there is superior responsiveness of the ASES score compared with the SST, the authors recommend utilization of the ASES over the SST in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair and total shoulder arthroplasty.

The 'Bench Rite' Orthosis Decreases Cervical Muscle Activation During the Bench Press.

BACKGROUND: There is little data available that examines the activation of the cervical paraspinal muscles that occurs during the bench press. It is intuitive that activation of these muscles may lead to increased loads across the cervical spine and may increase the risk of injury to the intervertebral disks of the cervical spine. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis of this study is that by supporting the cervical spine with the "Bench Rite" cervical spine orthosis, there will be less muscular activation of the cervical paraspinal muscles as determined by electromyography when performing the bench press. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative electromyographic study - Level of evidence III (case-control study). METHODS: Fifteen healthy subjects performed two sets (with and without the cervical orthosis) of five repetitions of a 60 percent maximum repetition on the bench press for each muscle group tested (pectoralis major, deltoid, C5 paraspinal, trapezius). Electromyography was used to determine the maximum isometric contraction and concentric contraction of each muscle with and without the cervical orthosis. The concentric contraction of each muscle group was reported as a percentage of maximum voluntary isometric contraction. RESULTS: The use of the "Bench Rite" cervical spine orthosis resulted in a statistically significant decrease in muscle activation in the C5 paraspinal (37 percent; p=0.0001) and deltoid muscles (9.8 percent; p=0.001) and a significant increase in trapezius muscle activation (9.3 percent; p=0.03). No differences were found in muscle activation of the pectoralis major with or without the use of the cervical spine orthosis (0.8 percent; p=0.90). CONCLUSIONS: Weightlifters may consider utilizing the "Bench Rite" cervical orthosis while performing the bench press to decrease cervical paraspinal muscle activation without impacting the muscle activation of the pectoralis major.

The Acute Effects of Ischemic Preconditioning on Power and Sprint Performance.

INTRODUCTION: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC) has been shown to induce positive effects on skeletal muscle resulting in enhanced physical performance. Data display that IPC positively impacts both aerobic and anaerobic performance. However, there is inconclusive data exemplifying IPC's effects on power and sprint performance. We hypothesized 15 minutes of bilateral lower limb IPC, applied 25-45 minutes prior to power and sprint activity, would enhance power and sprint performance. METHODS: Using a randomized crossover design, 14 NCAA Division II athletes received IPC (100 percent occlusion) and sham (50 mmHg) treatments followed by either a 0 minute or a 20 minute rest. A Delfi Personalized Tourniquet System (PTS) for blood flow restriction with an internal doppler radar was used to occlude blood flow to the lower extremities. Followed by IPC treatment, power and sprint performance was assessed using a vertical jump, reactive strength index (RSI), broad jump, flying 10m dash, and pro-agility. Each of the fourteen subjects in the experimental group received all four protocols. RESULTS: Using an ANOVA, no statistical significance was found between the type of treatment (i.e., sham 0 min, sham 20 min, IPC 0 min, IPC 20 min) and the performance tests: vertical jump (p=0.97), RSI (p=0.73), broad jump (p=0.98), flying 10m dash (p=0.99), and pro-agility (p=0.90). In addition, no statistical significance was found between the order of treatments and the performance tests (p=0.97). CONCLUSION: Despite previous research suggesting IPC enhances anaerobic and anaerobic performance, the current results indicate IPC doesn't significantly enhance power and sprint performance in highly trained athletes.

Do patients who smoke tobacco have success with primary arthroscopic rotator cuff repair? A comparison with nonsmokers.

BACKGROUND: It is recommended that patients cease smoking before rotator cuff repair. However, not all patients want to or are able to successfully cease smoking. This raises the question if these patients should be advised to pursue surgical intervention or if surgery should be contraindicated until patients successfully cease smoking. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing rotator cuff repair was performed to examine the effects of smoking tobacco on patient-determined outcomes (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index [WORC], American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score [ASES], Simple Shoulder Test [SST], and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation [SANE]). Patients who smoked tobacco at the time of surgery were compared with patients who were not smoking to determine if differences in (1) severity of preoperative and postoperative symptoms and (2) the postoperative improvements were statistically significant. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were smokers and 205 were nonsmokers. Preoperative scores were worse for smokers compared with nonsmokers: WORC (32 vs. 43; P = .0002), ASES (32 vs. 43; P = .001), SST (3.5 vs. 4.6; P = .04), and SANE (34 vs. 38; P = .35). Postoperative scores were worse for smokers compared with nonsmokers: WORC (79 vs. 89; P = .001), ASES (82 vs. 89; P = .04), SST (9.0 vs. 10.2; P = .02), and SANE (84 vs. 89; P = .09). There were no significant differences in change in scores over time or percentage of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference of the score between groups. CONCLUSIONS: From examining the patients' subjective patient-determined outcome scores, it does not appear that rotator cuff repair should be strictly contraindicated in active smokers. Postoperative improvements in smokers were similar to nonsmokers. Smokers have lower baseline preoperative and postoperative outcome scores compared with nonsmokers.

Which Is the Best Outcome Measure for Rotator Cuff Tears?

BACKGROUND: The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Form (ASES), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and the shortened Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (quickDASH) are patient-reported upper extremity-specific outcome scales currently used to evaluate patients with rotator cuff tears. This heterogeneity does not allow for a uniform metric for research and patient care. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Our objective was to determine psychometric properties (reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and responsiveness) of five commonly used outcome instruments (the ASES, the SPADI, the quickDASH, the SF-12, and the EuroQol-5D) in a longitudinal study of patients undergoing treatment for rotator cuff tears. METHODS: From February 2011 through June 2015, 120 patients completed a standardized history, the five outcome scales under study, a physical examination, and an MRI. Of these, 47 (39%) were lost to followup before 18 months, and another 24 (20%) were accounted for at 18 months but had missing data at one or more of the earlier prespecified followup intervals (3, 6, or 12 months). Reliability (the reproducibility of an outcome instrument between subjects; tested by Cronbach's alpha), convergent and discriminant validity (determining which outcome measures correlate most strongly with others; tested by Spearman's correlation coefficients), and responsiveness (the change in outcome scales over time based on percent improvement in shoulder functionality using the minimal clinically important difference [MCID] and the subjective shoulder value) were calculated. RESULTS: All outcomes measures had a Cronbach's alpha above 0.70 (range, 0.74-0.94) and therefore were considered reliable. Convergent validity was demonstrated as the upper extremity-specific measures (SPADI, ASES, and quickDASH) were more strongly correlated with each other (rho = 0.74-0.81; p < 0.001) than with any of the other measures. Discriminant validity was demonstrated because the Spearman's correlation coefficients were stronger for the relationships between upper extremity measures compared with the correlations between upper extremity measures and general health measures for 53 of the 54 correlations that were compared. Both internal and external responsiveness of the measures was supported. Patients who achieved the MCID and at least a 30% change on the subjective shoulder value had more positive change in scores over time compared with those who did not. Mixed model linear regressions revealed that all three upper extremity-specific measures had a group by time interaction for the MCID, indicating that patients who achieved the MCID had greater change over time compared with those who did not achieve the MCID. Results showed that the measure with the best discrimination between groups, or best internal responsiveness, was the ASES (beta = -8.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], -11.39 to -5.14; p < 0.001; η = 0.089) followed by the SPADI (beta = 6.88, 95% CI, 3.78-9.97; p < 0.001; η = 0.088) then the quickDASH (beta = 3.43, 95% CI, 0.86-6.01; p = 0.009, η = 0.027). Measures with the best external responsiveness followed the same pattern of results. CONCLUSIONS: All the upper extremity-specific scales had acceptable psychometric properties. Correlations were high and thus only one upper extremity-specific instrument is needed for outcome assessment. Given the overall psychometric assessment, we recommend SPADI be the shoulder-specific instrument used to assess outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Patient-determined outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without biceps tenodesis utilizing the PITT technique.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: The percutaneous intra-articular transtendon technique (PITT) is a simple, rapid, and low-cost method of performing a biceps tenodesis. Few studies exist that examine the patient-determined outcomes of this technique in general or in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR) with and without biceps tenodesis. We hypothesized that patients undergoing an isolated arthroscopic RCR would have equivalent outcomes to those undergoing RCRs with PITT biceps tenodesis. METHODS: We compared preoperative, patient-determined outcomes scores on patients undergoing primary arthroscopic RCR with and without a PITT biceps tenodesis with postoperative scores at a minimum of 2 years. These scores included the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff score (WORC), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Shoulder Activity Level (SAL). Indication for a concomitant biceps tenodesis was a partial long head biceps tendon tear or biceps instability/subluxation. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients underwent an isolated RCR and 131 patients underwent RCR with biceps tenodesis (RCRBT). Both groups had improvements in WORC, ASES, SANE, and SST (P < .0001) and deteriorations in the SAL (P ≤ .005). There was no difference in the change in outcome scores between the groups (RCRBT vs. RCR, respectively) for WORC (46 vs. 47; P = .85), ASES (46 vs. 47; P = .82), SANE (53 vs. 51; P = .35), SST (5.8 vs. 5.8; P = .93), and SAL (-0.9 vs. -1.4; P = .46). There was no difference between the groups in complications that required revision surgery (1.5% vs. 1.3%; P = .91). CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic PITT RCRBT is safe and effective with equivalent patient-determined outcomes compared with patients undergoing RCR without biceps tenodesis.

A prospective study assessing the political advocacy of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons members.

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the current political standings and active political engagement of American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) members along with the political process as it relates to health care policy. METHODS: This survey study involved 552 ASES members. The survey was open for 2 weeks. Responses were received from 254 of the 552 members (46%), and their answers were analyzed. RESULTS: Six (2%) of the responding members were solo practitioners, 100 (39%) belonged to a private practice, 106 (42%) were providers at academic institutions or residency training programs, 25 (10%) were employed by a hospital, and 17 (7%) categorized themselves as other. Email was the preferred method of communication. Of all responding members, 110 (43%) stated they had contributed to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery Political Advocacy Committee in the last 12 months. Four (10%) of the responding members have a relationship with an elected official, and 220 (87%) would be willing to become a key contact and reach out to a legislator. CONCLUSION: Moving forward, this survey can be used to better shape the political advocacy efforts of the ASES and potentially other subspecialty societies. The response that "a high percentage of members would like to be more involved" suggests the need for a program to help further educate and facilitate the membership on political advocacy.

Physical therapy versus natural history in outcomes of rotator cuff tears: the Rotator Cuff Outcomes Workgroup (ROW) cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of patients who performed physical therapy versus those who did not in a longitudinal cohort of patients undergoing nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff tears. We also assessed whether there was a dose effect in which the pain and functional outcomes in patients performing physical therapy plateaued. METHODS: From February 2011 to June 2015, a multicenter cohort of patients with rotator cuff tears undergoing nonoperative treatment completed a detailed health and demographic questionnaire and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) at baseline and 3, 6, 12, and 18 months. Longitudinal mixed models were used to assess whether physical therapy in the first 3 months predicted SPADI scores and dose effect. RESULTS: Among the 55 patients in our cohort, the performance of physical therapy within the first 3 months predicted better SPADI scores versus nonperformance of physical therapy at 3 months (P = .02). Scores were similar between groups at 6, 12, and 18 months. A threshold of 16 physical therapy sessions was observed for pain and functional improvement during follow-up, after which significant improvement was not seen. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who performed physical therapy within the first 3 months had statistically significant improvements in pain and function as measured by the SPADI score at 3 months compared with patients who did not report performing physical therapy. Depending on the minimal clinically important difference used for the SPADI score, our results could be interpreted as meeting the minimal clinically important difference threshold or not. Improvement in outcomes was observed up to 16 sessions of physical therapy, after which outcomes plateaued.

Sex-related differences in patients undergoing surgery for shoulder instability: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort study.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Male sex has been identified as a risk factor for both primary shoulder dislocation and recurrent instability, and male patients more often undergo surgery for instability. Despite published discrepancies between sexes regarding the incidence and surgical rates of shoulder instability, there is little detail on the differences in presentation, mechanism of injury, and intraoperative findings. The purpose of this study was to explore these differences. METHODS: Prospective baseline data from 1010 patients in the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Shoulder Instability cohort were analyzed for sex-related differences using demographic characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, radiographic findings, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures performed. Two-tailed t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the continuous and categorical data, respectively. Patients were categorized using the Frequency, Etiology, Direction, Severity (FEDS) classification system. RESULTS: Male patients comprised 81.3% of the cohort. Male patients had a significantly higher rate of traumatic instability and rate of initial instability while playing sports, as well as significantly higher activity scores. Female patients had significantly lower preoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, 36-Item Health Survey, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. No difference in the number of dislocations was found between male and female patients. Intraoperatively, male patients had higher rates of labral pathology and bone loss whereas female patients had higher rates of capsular laxity. These differences resulted in more Latarjet procedures for male patients and more soft-tissue procedures for female patients. CONCLUSION: There are differences between male and female patients in the etiology of their instability, baseline patient-reported outcomes, and associated shoulder pathology, likely reflecting intrinsic and activity-related variation. These differences may influence clinical decision making and patient outcomes.

The influence of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using a subscapularis tenotomy on shoulder strength.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: There is limited evidence describing the influence of total shoulder arthroplasty on strength. The hypothesis was that after total shoulder arthroplasty, strength would improve compared with the preoperative state but remain inferior to that of the nonoperative shoulder. An additional aim was to determine whether strength improvement was associated with improvements in outcome scores and motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, with 31 patients (86%) having 1 year of follow-up for all outcomes. Patient-determined outcomes (Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation rating; and shoulder activity level), range of motion, and strength were assessed. Isometric strength was determined for scaption and external rotation, as well as the liftoff test, belly-press test, and bear-hug test. RESULTS: All strength measures improved, with significant increases in external rotation, the liftoff test, and the bear-hug test, but remained inferior to the nonoperative-side strength. Improved strength in the belly-press test was associated with greater improvement in Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores. Improvements in scaption and belly-press testing were associated with improvements in active flexion. Strength improvements in the liftoff test were associated with improved internal rotation in 90° of abduction. Patients with improvements in strength had improvements in their shoulder activity level from baseline to final follow-up, whereas patients without improved strength test findings did not have improved shoulder activity levels. CONCLUSIONS: Total shoulder arthroplasty improved external rotation, liftoff, and bear-hug strength testing. Operative shoulder strength remained inferior to strength of the nonoperative shoulder. Patients with improvements in strength were more likely to have greater improvements in outcome scores and range of motion. Improvements in the shoulder activity level after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty may be dependent on improvements in strength.

The position of sling immobilization influences the outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a randomized, single-blind, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To date, no studies have been published that have assessed the optimal position of sling immobilization after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. METHODS: Thirty-six patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were randomized to a neutral rotation sling versus an internal rotation sling. The primary outcomes assessed included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score; Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder score; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score; visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain and satisfaction; compliance ratings; and radiographic and range-of-motion measurements. Primary outcomes were assessed at baseline and postoperatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year. RESULTS: All patient-determined outcome scores for both groups revealed statistically significant improvements (P < .0001) from enrollment to final follow-up. There were statistically significant advantages to the neutral rotation sling group compared with the internal rotation sling group when we evaluated the improvements in (1) active external rotation (42° vs 25°, P = .03), (2) passive external rotation (44° vs 26°, P = .02), (3) passive horizontal adduction (7.7 cm vs 3.7 cm, P = .05), and (4) pain relief with passive adduction (VAS score, 6.2 cm vs 3.5 cm; P = .002). There was a trend toward greater improvements in the neutral rotation sling group when we measured (1) active horizontal adduction (8.3 cm vs 2.9 cm, P = .06) and (2) active internal rotation behind the back (18 cm vs 11.1 cm, P = .09). At 2 weeks, the neutral rotation sling group had significantly less night pain than the internal rotation sling group (mean VAS score, 18 mm vs 34 mm; P = .047). CONCLUSIONS: Neutral rotation sling use after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty resulted in statistically significant improvements in external rotation and adduction, as well as decreased night pain, compared with an internal rotation sling.