Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors as maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

Aim: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) improved progression-free survival among patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. This meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of PARPIs as maintenance strategy for newly diagnosed patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer with or without mutations. Materials & methods: Using defined selection criteria, a literature search identified four eligible randomized clinical trials involving 2386 patients. Results: Compared with placebo maintenance, PARPIs achieved a 46% reduction in the risk of progression or death as compared with placebo (hazard ratio: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.39-0.73; p < 0.0001). That benefit was shown in all clinical subgroups: among those with BRCA mutation, with negative/unknown BRCA mutation, and in those with homologous recombination deficient tumors. Data about the effect on overall survival are still premature. Conclusion: In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer, PARPIs maintenance after standard therapy achieved a significant improvement in progression-free survival as compared with placebo, overall and in all subgroups.

Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity in adult Saudi patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) has been described in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients treated with bleomycin-containing chemotherapy regimens. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed the records of 164 consecutive HL patients. RESULTS: BPT was observed in 24 of 164 patients (15%). Older age and history of concomitant lung disease were significantly associated with approximately threefold (odds ratio: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.25-9.13; p = 0.02) and sevenfold (odds ratio: 7.19; 95% CI: 2.64-19.54; p < 0.0001) increase in BPT risk, respectively. The actuarial 5-year progression-free and overall survival for BPT and non-BPT groups, were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: In Saudi Arabian HL patients, the risk of BPT and its effect on survival outcome were comparable to that reported from developed countries.

Sunitinib adverse events in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sunitinib, a multi-targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has demonstrated survival benefit in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC); however, significant adverse events (AEs) have been associated with its use. The significant variation in the reported incidences of AEs has prompted this meta-analysis to quantify the risk and explore associated predictors. METHODS: According to predefined selection criteria, a literature search identified 12 studies that were included in the analyses. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 5,658 patients; 66 % patients had prior systemic therapy whereas the remaining patients (34 %) received sunitinib in the first-line setting. For any grade toxicity, skin rash, fatigue, diarrhea, and mucositis were the most frequently encountered events (81, 52, 45, and 33 %, respectively). Anemia, neutropenia, or thrombocytopenia of any grade occurred in more than one-third of patients, although grades 3 or 4 were less common. Any grade raised by liver enzymes or serum creatinine occurred in 40 and 44 % of patients, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed that study size was inversely related to the risk of experiencing fatigue, diarrhea, mucositis, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. In particular, the incidence of AEs was higher when sunitinib was used in pretreated versus naive patients; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups concerning the incidence of laboratory abnormalities. We addressed the limitations of reporting AEs in clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: The present meta-analysis quantified sunitinib-associated AEs. The derived estimates would be similar to that to be expected from the use of sunitinib in community practice in unselected patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Increased risk of second lung cancer in Hodgkin's lymphoma survivors: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) have a higher risk of developing second lung cancer (SLC) compared with the general population. The aim of this meta-analysis was to quantify such risk and to analyze contributing risk factors in HL survivors. METHODS: According to predefined selection criteria, a literature search identified 21 studies that were included in the analysis. RESULTS: After eliminating overlapping or duplicate data, 793 (76 % males) incidences of SLC were encountered in 74,831 patients (58 % males) with HL over a median follow-up of 11.5 years. The median age at HL diagnosis and the median age at SLC diagnosis were 33.0 and 45.9, respectively. The mean latency between treatment of HL and development of SLC was 11.5 years. The pooled relative risk (RR) of SLC was 4.62 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 3.18-6.70], I (2) = 98 %), with a median absolute excess rate of 10.4 per 10,000 person-years. RR was positively related to study size, male-to-female ratio, institutional versus population-based data sets, and the use of any radiotherapy (RT) or combined modality therapy (CMT), while age at diagnosis of HL was not significant. The highest risk was shown among patients aged 15-24 years (RR = 8.76 [95 % CI, 4.55-16.89]), while the lowest risk occurred in patients ≥55 years at primary treatment (RR = 2.88 [95 % CI, 2.33-3.56]). RR increased by increasing duration of follow-up, reaching the highest value at 10-14 years (RR = 4.17 [95 % CI, 3.62-8.81]), but did not increase after ≥15 years (RR = 4.01 [95 % CI, 2.68-5.98]). RT only, CMT, or chemotherapy only was associated with RR (95 % CI) of 4.88 (3.14-7.60), 5.15 (4.08-6.50), and 2.39 (1.60-3.55), respectively. Patients with SLC demonstrated poor prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis provided a detailed estimate of the risk of SLC among HL survivors. The obtained results may provide guidelines concerning lung cancer screening for this population.

Combination of palbociclib with adjuvant endocrine therapy for treatment of hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: An experience at two cancer centers in Saudi Arabia.

The addition of palbociclib (a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) to endocrine therapy (ET) has been shown to significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) advanced breast cancer. The current study presents the local experience of using palbociclib at two cancer centers in Saudi Arabia. Electronic data of patients with metastatic HR+ and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer who progressed after prior ET and received at least one cycle of palbociclib plus ET, were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 97 patients were identified, and their data were included in the analysis. The median age of the patients was 55 years. Patients were heavily pretreated in the metastatic setting (55% received systemic chemotherapy and 49% received two or more lines of prior ET). In total, 29 (30%) and 50 (52%) patients achieved an objective response and clinical benefit, respectively. The median follow-up time was 31.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.9-44.9] and the median PFS time was 16.3 months (95% CI, 11.4-21.2), with 58% of patients remaining progression-free at 12 months. Upon multivariate regression analysis, liver involvement was the only significant independent variable that predicted a greater risk of progression or death (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.22-4.40; P=0.010). The median OS time was 19.6 months (95% CI, 18.1-20.9), with 12- and 24-month OS rates of 75 and 30%, respectively. Overall, real-world data showed that administration of palbociclib in combination with ET in patients with advanced HR+ breast cancer achieved a favorable outcome that was comparable to that reported in clinical trials.

Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: a meta-analysis of published randomized trials.

Adjuvant endocrine therapy for 5 years is the standard adjuvant treatment for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer while the benefits of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (EAET) beyond 5 years are still controversial. That controversy prompted this meta-analysis to compare 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy only versus EAET. Eligible 11 randomized, controlled trials comprising 29,000 women were included. EAET showed no advantage in overall survival (OS) from all causes mortality (odds ratio [OR] = 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.09); P = 0.67). On the other hand, compared with standard therapy, the pooled effects showed that EAET was associated with improvement in breast cancer-specific survival (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.79-0.96; P = 0.004), disease-free survival (DFS) (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.75-0.99; P = 0.002), disease recurrence (OR = 0.76; 95% CI 0.64-0.90; P = 0.001), and contralateral breast recurrence (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.93; P = 0.008). Improvement in DFS or disease recurrence was not shown in studies that compared 5 years of tamoxifen versus tamoxifen beyond 5 years. Subgroup analysis showed that EAET conferred more benefit for patients with positive lymph nodes. Rates of positive lymph nodes, the study size, and the median duration of follow-up were identified as variables that explained most of the demonstrated data heterogeneity. EAET should be considered as a preferred strategy for high-risk hormone-positive early breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes; however, the benefit on OS could not be demonstrated.