Do resected colorectal cancer patients need early chest imaging? Impact of clinicopathologic characteristics on time to development of pulmonary metastases.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), the lung is the most common extra-abdominal site of distant metastasis. However, practices for chest imaging after colorectal resection vary widely. We aimed to identify characteristics that may indicate a need for early follow-up imaging. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts of patients who underwent CRC resection, collecting clinicopathologic details and oncologic outcomes. Patients were grouped by timing of pulmonary metastases (PM) development. Analyses were performed to investigate odds ratio (OR) of PM diagnosis within 3 months of CRC resection. RESULTS: Of 1600 patients with resected CRC, 233 (14.6%) developed PM, at a median of 15.4 months following CRC resection. Univariable analyses revealed age, receipt of systemic therapy, lymph node ratio (LNR), lymphovascular and perineural invasion, and KRAS mutation as risk factors for PM. Furthermore, multivariable regression showed neoadjuvant therapy (OR: 2.99, p < 0.001), adjuvant therapy (OR: 6.28, p < 0.001), LNR (OR: 28.91, p < 0.001), and KRAS alteration (OR: 5.19, p < 0.001) to predict PM within 3 months post-resection. CONCLUSIONS: We identified clinicopathologic characteristics that predict development of PM within 3 months after primary CRC resection. Early surveillance in such patients should be emphasized to ensure timely identification and treatment of PM.

High-Risk Features of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation: Patients for Whom Surgery Should Not Be Delayed.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical predictors of pathological complete response have not reliably identified patients for whom an organ-sparing approach following neoadjuvant chemoradiation be undertaken for esophageal cancer patients. We sought to identify high-risk predictors of residual carcinoma that may preclude patients from a selective surgical approach. BACKGROUND: Patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma were identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Correlation between clinical and pathologic complete responses were examined. Regression models and recursive partitioning were utilized to identify features associated with residual carcinoma. External validation of these high-risk factors was performed on a data set from an independent institution. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were identified, in whom clinical complete response was noted in 104/326 (32%). Pathologic complete response was noted in only 33/104 (32%) of these clinical complete responders. Multivariable analysis identified that the presence of stricture ( P =0.011), positive biopsy ( P =0.010), and signet ring cell histology ( P =0.019) were associated with residual cancer. Recursive partitioning corroborated a 94% probability of residual disease, or greater, for each of these features. The positive predictive value was >90% for these characteristics. A SUV max >5.4 at the esophageal primary in the absence of esophagitis was also a high-risk factor for residual carcinoma. External validation confirmed these high-risk factors to be implicated in the finding of residual carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical parameters of response are poor predictors of complete pathologic response leading to challenges in selecting candidates for active surveillance. However, we characterize several high-risk features for residual carcinoma which indicate that esophagectomy should not be delayed.

Lung surveillance following colorectal cancer pulmonary metastasectomy: Utilization of clinicopathologic risk factors to guide strategy.

BACKGROUND: Appropriately selected patients clearly benefit from resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) pulmonary metastases (PMs). However, there remains equipoise surrounding optimal chest surveillance strategies following pulmonary metastasectomy. We aimed to identify risk factors that may inform chest surveillance in this population. METHODS: Patients who underwent CRC pulmonary metastasectomy were identified from a single institution's prospectively maintained surgical database. Clinicopathologic and genomic characteristics were collected. Patients were stratified by diagnosis of subsequent PM within 6 months of the index lung resection. Multivariate modeling was used to evaluate risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 197 patients met the study's inclusion criteria, of whom 52.3% (n = 103) developed subsequent PM, at a median of 9.51 months following the index metastasectomy. Patients with KRAS alterations (odds ratio [OR], 3.073; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.363-6.926; P = .007), TP53 alterations (OR, 3.109; 95% CI, 1.318-7.341; P = .010) were found to be at risk of PM diagnosis within 6 months of the index metastasectomy, while those with an APC alteration (OR, .218; 95% CI, 0.080-0.598; P = .003) were protected. Moreover, patients who received systemic therapy within 3 months of the initial PM diagnosis also were more likely to develop early lung recurrence (OR, 2.105; 95% CI, 0.971-4.563; P = .059). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with KRAS alterations, TP53 alterations, and no APC alterations developed early recurrence in the lung following pulmonary metastasectomy, as did those who received chemotherapy after their initial PM diagnosis. As such, these groups benefit from early lung imaging after metastasectomy, as chest surveillance protocols should be based on patient-centered clinicopathologic and genomic risk factors.

Gastric Extent of Tumor Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis in Siewert II Adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Whereas current guidelines recommend staging laparoscopy for most patients with potentially resectable gastric cancer, such a recommendation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (AEG) is lacking. This study sought to identify baseline clinicopathologic characteristics associated with peritoneal metastasis (PM) among patients with Siewert II AEG. METHODS: Trimodality therapy-eligible patients with Siewert II AEG (2000-2015, single institution) were retrospectively identified. A composite PM outcome was defined as follows: (1) PM at staging laparoscopy; (2) PM diagnosed during neoadjuvant chemoradiation; or (3) PM ≤6 months postoperatively. Logistic regression was used to identify features associated with PM; bootstrapped analysis (Youden J) identified the distal tumor extension that best discriminated the composite outcome. RESULTS: Of 188 patients, a composite PM outcome was observed in 26 of 188 (13.8%); 12 of 26 had positive staging laparoscopy, 10 of 26 experienced PM during chemoradiation, and 4 of 26 had PM ≤6 months postoperatively. Tumor extension below the GEJ was greater in patients with PM (median, 4.0 cm [interquartile range, 3.0-5.0] vs 3.0 cm [interquartile range, 2.0-3.0]; P < .001). All patients with PM had cT3 to cT4 tumors. Among patients with cT3 to cT4 tumors (n = 168 of 188; 89.4%), distal tumor extent (odds ratio, 1.67/cm; 95% CI, 1.23-2.28; P = .001) was independently associated with increased odds of PM. Gastric tumor extension ≥4 cm remained independently associated with PM (OR, 5.14; 95% CI, 2.11-12.53; P < .001) after adjustment for signet ring cell status. CONCLUSIONS: Distal tumor extent beyond the GEJ is independently associated with increased odds of PM in patients with Siewert II AEG. Patients with extensive gastric involvement should therefore be considered for staging laparoscopy before trimodality therapy.

Barriers to Parental Leave During Training: Time for Change.

BACKGROUND: Standardized parental leave policies for medical trainees are lacking, and barriers may differ among specialties. We aimed to characterize experiences of physicians who became parents during training and to identify particular issues for surgical trainees compared to their non-surgical peers. METHODS: We distributed an electronic survey to physician parents via social media platforms from 10/2019 to 02/2020. Inclusion required becoming a parent during training. Responses were collected and standard descriptive and comparative analyses were performed. RESULTS: Surveys were received from 64 physicians representing diverse specialties: 48 (74%) non-surgical respondents (NSR) and 16 (26%) surgical respondents (SR). Among all respondents, 25 (39%) reported a formal institutional policy for parental leave and 49 (76%) wished for more time off. Overall, respondents took a mean of 7.5 ± 5.2 (range 0-14) weeks of parental leave. However, NSR took 8.7 ± 5.8 weeks, while SR took 4.7 ± 2.7 (P = .006). Reported barriers to parental leave across specialties included graduation requirements (NSR 58% vs. SR 68% P = .46), peer pressure/perception (NSR 59% vs. SR 58% P = .97), and pressure from institutional leadership (NSR 31% vs. SR 35% P = .77). A substantial portion (28, 43%) of respondents had additional children during training, taking less time off for the second child (5.1 ± 7.4 weeks; 0-12). CONCLUSION: A minority of respondents reported formal institutional parental leave policies, while an overwhelming majority felt that their time off was inadequate. Surgical trainees took shorter parental leaves than their non-surgical counterparts. Cultural and professional changes are crucial in promoting wellness and healthy transitions into parenthood.

Traits of the current traditional pathway cardiothoracic surgery training pool: Results of a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: As new paradigms for cardiothoracic surgery training emerged in recent years, the traditional 2- or 3-year pathway has persisted as an option for trainees completing general surgery residencies. Although the applicant pool for 6-year integrated cardiothoracic surgery training programs has been superficially explored, little data exist characterizing those applicants to the traditional cardiothoracic surgery training pathway and the influence of 6-year integrated expansion on the traditional applicant pool. METHODS: We reviewed materials from candidates applying to a single 2-year cardiothoracic surgery training program between 2015 and 2020. Descriptive and comparative analyses of multiple characteristics were performed over the years of the study. RESULTS: During the years 2015 through 2020, we received 571 applications, accounting for 72% of the total National Residency Matching Program applicant pool. We saw no significant trends in numbers of peer-reviewed publications or presentations. There was a minimal year-to-year increase in number of first-authored posters, 2.04 in 2015 to 2.13 in 2020 (P = .008). Online publications, book chapters, and other publications were stable throughout the study period. Applicants consistently provided an average of 3.6 letters of recommendation, 1.9 from cardiothoracic surgery faculty. Mean in-service score percentiles were stable at the 54th percentile, whereas US Medical Licensing Examination scores increased. CONCLUSIONS: Despite expansion of the 6-year integrated pathway to cardiothoracic surgery, we have seen no substantial year-to-year changes in attributes of traditional applicants. Our findings suggest that the cardiothoracic surgery applicant pool continues to be composed of a stable group of highly productive trainees. Future initiatives in candidate selection should emphasize interview strategies to highlight aspects of grit, emotional intelligence, and team dynamics.

Can Clinical Response Predict Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Esophageal Cancer?

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 20-40% of patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer will achieve a pathologic complete response (ypCR) following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). Predicting ypCR based on a clinical complete response (ycCR) has been a challenge. This study assessed the correlation between ycCR and ypCR, as determined from esophagectomy specimens. METHODS: Patients undergoing esophagectomy following nCRT at three major institutions between 2005 and 2018 were reviewed. Restaging, including PET/CT, endoscopy with biopsy, and esophageal ultrasound (EUS), was performed to determine ycCR. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty patients were included, with 93.3% with esophageal adenocarcinoma histology. Six hundred fifty-eight of these patients underwent PET, 304 EUS, and 584 underwent a biopsy. Following nCRT, 148 (22.4%) were found to have a ypCR. Only 12/32 (37.5%) determined to have a ycCR were found to have a ypCR, while 136/628 (21.6%) with a non-ycCR were found to have a ypCR (p 0.075). Individual modality PPV was 28% for PET, 54% for EUS, and 26% for biopsy. When PET was combined with EUS, 168 reports were concordant and the PPV of ypCR was 50%, though the number of patients was low (1/2). With all 3 re-staging modalities combined, the PPV and NPV both rose to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Current restaging tools cannot reliably predict ypCR after nCRT. While multimodal restaging appears to be a more accurate predictor of ypCR than any testing modality alone, patients cannot reliably be advised to avoid an esophagectomy on the assumption that ycCR predicts ypCR at this time.

Modern Perioperative Practices May Mitigate Effects of Continued Smoking Among Lung Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although smokers are at an increased risk for postoperative pulmonary complications after thoracic surgery, the relationship between cessation timing and postoperative pulmonary complications has not been explored in an era of enhanced recovery protocols and active tobacco cessation programs. Because a strong preference exists among thoracic surgeons to delay surgery to continued smokers, we sought to evaluate this relationship in a modern era. METHODS: Patients undergoing lung resection for a diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer from 2012 to 2017 were identified. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate preoperative tobacco cessation timing to determine the impact on postoperative pulmonary complications. RESULTS: In all, 1038 ever smokers were identified. Patients were current smokers in 30 (3%) instances, and among former smokers, the preoperative cessation interval was 0 to 14 days in 10% (104), more than 14 days to 1 month in 6% (62), more than 1 month to 1 year in 18% (189), more than 1 to 5 years in 10% (107), and more than 5 years in 53% (546). Pulmonary complications occurred in 269 patients (26%). Multivariable analysis revealed that no group of recent or long-term quitters had superior outcomes in terms of pulmonary complications when evaluating various periods of abstinence in comparison with continued smokers and active quitters. CONCLUSIONS: In an era of enhanced recovery protocols, minimally invasive surgery, and active tobacco cessation programs that may help patients to cut back, our data do not support the practice of delaying or denying surgery to patients who have difficulty quitting completely. Perioperative cessation counseling should be aimed at long-term benefits, including reduction of disease recurrence and secondary malignancies.

Salvage Esophagectomy Definition Influences Comparative Outcomes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancers.

BACKGROUND: In retrospective studies the definition of salvage esophagectomy has been inconsistent and is a source of bias. We sought to describe how variability in the definition of salvage affects comparative outcomes of trimodality therapy (TMT) and bimodality therapy (BMT). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who completed chemoradiation therapy (CRT) from 2002 to 2017 were identified. TMT included patients who had a planned esophagectomy after CRT. BMT included patients treated with CRT only plus salvage esophagectomy, variably defined as an esophagectomy occurring (A) 3 months after CRT; (B) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed recovery; (C) 3 months after CRT, excluding delayed workup; or (D) 6 months after CRT. Long-term survival outcomes between the TMT and BMT groups were compared for each definition of salvage esophagectomy. Time to surgery was included a priori in a multivariable model for overall survival. RESULTS: Of 143 patients, 90 (63%) underwent esophagectomy and 53 (37%) received CRT only. Although the total patients remained the same, the composition of the TMT and BMT groups varied by salvage definitions A through D. Various definitions resulted in different 5-year survival rates for TMT vs BMT groups: (A) 56% vs 39%, (B) 61% vs 34%, (C) 50% vs 42%, and (D) 51% vs 39%. In a Cox multivariable analysis age and proximal/middle esophageal tumors were associated with worse postoperative survival, but time to surgery was not. CONCLUSIONS: Slight variations in the definition of salvage esophagectomy can influence the interpretation of TMT and BMT outcomes. Future studies should consistently define treatment groups.