Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 22(1): 7-15, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22753079

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the validity of health plan and birth certificate data for pregnancy research. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using administrative and claims data from 11 U.S. health plans and corresponding birth certificate data from state health departments. Diagnoses, drug dispensings, and procedure codes were used to identify infant outcomes (cardiac defects, anencephaly, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care unit [NICU] admission) and maternal diagnoses (asthma and systemic lupus erythematosus [SLE]) recorded in the health plan data for live born deliveries between January 2001 and December 2007. A random sample of medical charts (n = 802) was abstracted for infants and mothers identified with the specified outcomes. Information on newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics (gestational age at birth, birth weight, previous pregnancies and live births, race/ethnicity) was also abstracted and compared to birth certificate data. Positive predictive values (PPVs) were calculated with documentation in the medical chart serving as the gold standard. RESULTS: PPVs were 71% for cardiac defects, 37% for anencephaly, 87% for preterm birth, and 92% for NICU admission. PPVs for algorithms to identify maternal diagnoses of asthma and SLE were ≥ 93%. Our findings indicated considerable agreement (PPVs > 90%) between birth certificate and medical record data for measures related to birth weight, gestational age, prior obstetrical history, and race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Health plan and birth certificate data can be useful to accurately identify some infant outcomes, maternal diagnoses, and newborn, maternal, and paternal characteristics. Other outcomes and variables may require medical record review for validation.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Research/methods , Birth Certificates , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Predictive Value of Tests , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies , United States
2.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 22(7): 776-82, 2013 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23596095

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Research on medication safety in pregnancy often utilizes health plan and birth certificate records. This study discusses methods used to link mothers with infants, a crucial step in such research. METHODS: We describe how eight sites participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program created linkages between deliveries, infants and birth certificates for the 2001-2007 birth cohorts. We describe linkage rates across sites, and for two sites, we compare the characteristics of populations linked using different methods. RESULTS: Of 299,260 deliveries, 256,563 (86%; range by site, 74-99%) could be linked to infants using a deterministic algorithm. At two sites, using birth certificate data to augment mother-infant linkage increased the representation of mothers who were Hispanic or non-White, younger, Medicaid recipients, or had low educational level. A total of 236,460 (92%; range by site, 82-100%) deliveries could be linked to a birth certificate. CONCLUSIONS: Tailored approaches enabled linking most deliveries to infants and to birth certificates, even when data systems differed. The methods used may affect the composition of the population identified. Linkages established with such methods can support sound pharmacoepidemiology studies of maternal drug exposure outside the context of a formal registry.


Subject(s)
Databases, Factual , Medical Record Linkage , Medical Records Systems, Computerized , Perinatal Care , Pregnancy Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems , Algorithms , Birth Certificates , Chi-Square Distribution , Data Mining , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions , Drug Utilization Review , Ethnicity , Female , Health Services Research , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medical Records Systems, Computerized/statistics & numerical data , Perinatal Care/economics , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/economics , Pregnancy Outcome/ethnology , Racial Groups , Socioeconomic Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 16(7): 1349-54, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22002179

ABSTRACT

To describe a program to study medication safety in pregnancy, the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program (MEPREP). MEPREP is a multi-site collaborative research program developed to enable the conduct of studies of medication use and outcomes in pregnancy. Collaborators include the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and researchers at the HMO Research Network, Kaiser Permanente Northern and Southern California, and Vanderbilt University. Datasets have been created at each site linking healthcare data for women delivering an infant between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2008 and infants born to these women. Standardized data files include maternal and infant characteristics, medication use, and medical care at 11 health plans within 9 states; birth certificate data were obtained from the state departments of public health. MEPREP currently involves more than 20 medication safety researchers and includes data for 1,221,156 children delivered to 933,917 mothers. Current studies include evaluations of the prevalence and patterns of use of specific medications and a validation study of data elements in the administrative and birth certificate data files. MEPREP can support multiple studies by providing information on a large, ethnically and geographically diverse population. This partnership combines clinical and research expertise and data resources to enable the evaluation of outcomes associated with medication use during pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Pharmaceutical Preparations/administration & dosage , Pharmacoepidemiology/methods , Pregnancy Outcome , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Birth Certificates , Cooperative Behavior , Data Collection/methods , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Medical Record Linkage/methods , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
4.
J Clin Epidemiol ; 61(6): 617-21, 2008 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18471667

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of health plan administrative data for identifying patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: In this retrospective study of 442 medical records of patients in nine U.S. health plans, five sets of criteria that used administrative data were used to identify potential IBS patients. Physician reviewers provided an assessment of the likelihood of the diagnosis of IBS being present. IBS was considered to be present if the physician reviewer categorized the case as definite, probable, or possible based on medical record review. Analyses were also performed with cases categorized as possible placed in an "IBS not present" category. RESULTS: The positive predictive value (PPV) for the five sets of criteria ranged from 63% to 83% with the highest PPV found with one of the most restrictive criteria. When cases characterized as possible were included in the "IBS not present" category, the PPV for each of the five sets of criteria decreased substantially, ranging from 33% to 63%. CONCLUSION: The PPV of different criteria used to identify patients with IBS from administrative data varies substantially based on the criteria that are used. Use of criteria with a higher PPV may come at the expense of generalizability.


Subject(s)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/epidemiology , Male , Medical Records , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
5.
Diabetes Care ; 27(3): 694-8, 2004 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14988287

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the adequacy of glycemic, lipid, and blood pressure (BP) management for diabetic patients in a managed care organization (MCO). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients aged > or =18 years with diabetes (n=7,114) were retrospectively identified over a 2-year period from the MCO's administrative database based on the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 2000 selection criteria using pharmacy, laboratory, and encounter data. Analyses examined demographics and percentages of patients tested and meeting American Diabetes Association goals for HbA1c, lipids, and BP, both overall and for those receiving medication treatment versus no treatment. RESULTS: Testing rates for A1C, LDL cholesterol, and BP were 77, 54, and 95%, respectively. The percentage of patients tested who were at goal were 37% for A1C, 23% for LDL cholesterol, and 41% for systolic BP. Of the patients in our sample, 72% were treated for glycemic control, 64% were treated for BP control, and only 28% were treated for lipid control. Of the patients who received medication treatment, less than one-third were at goal for A1C (29%) and LDL cholesterol (32%), whereas 40% were at goal for systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: We found that although a large percentage of diabetic patients were tested for A1C, LDL cholesterol, and systolic BP, a much smaller percentage had reached their respective goals. More aggressive glycemic, lipid, and BP management appears to be needed to improve care for these patients.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Blood Pressure/physiology , Lipids/blood , Managed Care Programs/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ethnicity , Female , Glycated Hemoglobin/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , New Mexico , Systole/physiology
6.
Dis Manag ; 6(2): 83-91, 2003.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14577902

ABSTRACT

This study describes the pattern of evaluation and management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older following an osteoporosis-related fracture, conducted as a retrospective cohort study using the administrative claims database of a managed care organization. Subjects were women, aged 50 years and older, with at least one osteoporosis-related fracture in the years 1996-1998 who were continuously enrolled in the system's health plan for at least 6 months prior to and post-fracture. Bone mineral density (BMD) testing, diagnosis of osteoporosis, and treatment with any Food and Drug Administration-approved medication for osteoporosis were identified using CPT, ICD-9, and National Drug Codes for the 6-month post-fracture period. There were 658 women with an osteoporosis-related fracture: 189 (29%) hip fractures, 226 (34%) wrist fractures, 127 (19%) vertebral fractures, and 116 (18%) rib fractures. In the post-fracture period, 46 (7%) underwent BMD testing, 153 (23%) had a diagnosis of osteoporosis, and 220 (31%) were treated with a medication approved for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis. Of the 220 women with medication claims, 124 (56%) were for estrogen, and 96 (44%) were for other antiresorptive agents. Of the 507 women who did not have medication claims during the 6 months prior to the fracture, only 17% had new fills after the fracture. Management of osteoporosis in women aged 50 and older with fractures was inadequate, despite the high risk of subsequent fractures and recommendations that osteoporosis be the presumptive diagnosis. Significant opportunity exists for improvement in assuring post-fracture followup care.


Subject(s)
Disease Management , Fractures, Bone/etiology , Managed Care Programs , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/diagnosis , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/therapy , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/complications , Retrospective Studies , Southwestern United States
7.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 23(11): 904-11, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25330378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To describe trends in labor induction, including elective induction, from 2001 to 2007 for six U.S. health plans and to examine the validity of induction measures derived from birth certificate and health plan data. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 339,123 deliveries at 35 weeks' gestation or greater. Linked health plan and birth certificate data provided information about induction, maternal medical conditions, and pregnancy complications. Induction was defined from diagnosis and procedure codes and birth certificate data and considered elective if no accepted indication was coded. We calculated induction prevalence across health plans and years. At four health plans, we reviewed medical records to validate induction measures. RESULTS: Based on electronic data, induction prevalence rose from 28% in 2001 to 32% in 2005, then declined to 29% in 2007. The trend was driven by changes in the prevalence of apparent elective induction, which rose from 11% in 2001 to 14% in 2005 and then declined to 11% in 2007. The trend was similar for subgroups by parity and gestational age. Elective induction prevalence varied considerably across plans. On review of 86 records, 36% of apparent elective inductions identified from electronic data were confirmed as valid. CONCLUSIONS: Elective induction appeared to peak in 2005 and then decline. The decrease may reflect quality improvement initiatives or changes in policies, patient or provider attitudes, or coding practices. The low validation rate for measures of elective induction defined from electronic data has important implications for existing quality measures and for research studies examining induction's outcomes.


Subject(s)
Insurance Coverage/trends , Labor, Induced/trends , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Women's Health/trends , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Insurance Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Labor, Induced/statistics & numerical data , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , Quality Improvement , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
8.
Obstet Gynecol ; 121(1): 106-14, 2013 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23262934

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prevalence, trends, and patterns in use of antidiabetic medications to treat hyperglycemia and insulin resistance before and during pregnancy in a large U.S. cohort of insured pregnant women. METHODS: Pregnancies resulting in live births were identified (N=437,950) from 2001 to 2007 among 372,543 females 12-50 years of age at delivery from 10 health maintenance organizations participating in the Medication Exposure in Pregnancy Risk Evaluation Program. Information for these descriptive analyses, including all antidiabetic medications dispensed during this period, was extracted from electronic health records and newborn birth certificates. RESULTS: A little more than 1% (1.21%) of deliveries were to women dispensed antidiabetic medication in the 120 days before pregnancy. Use of antidiabetic medications before pregnancy increased from 0.66% of deliveries in 2001 to 1.66% of deliveries in 2007 (P<.001) because of an increase in metformin use. Most women using metformin before pregnancy had a diagnosis code for polycystic ovaries or female infertility (67.2%), whereas only 13.6% had a diagnosis code for diabetes. The use of antidiabetic medications during the second or third trimester of pregnancy increased from 2.8% of deliveries in 2001 to 3.6% in 2007 (P<.001). Approximately two thirds (68%) of women using metformin before pregnancy did not use any antidiabetic medications during pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Antidiabetic medication use before and during pregnancy increased from 2001 to 2007, possibly because of increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus, type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and other conditions associated with insulin resistance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.


Subject(s)
Diabetes, Gestational/drug therapy , Hyperglycemia/drug therapy , Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage , Insulin Resistance , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infertility, Female/diagnosis , Metformin/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/diagnosis , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Pregnancy Trimester, Third , Prevalence , United States , Young Adult
9.
Popul Health Manag ; 15(1): 52-7, 2012 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22204312

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to use retrospective data, including citations for driving while intoxicated (DWI), to assess the long-term effectiveness of a program consisting of Screening and Brief Intervention (SBI) for at-risk alcohol users and its impact on traffic safety. A second objective was to study ethnic differences in response to SBI. During the time period of 1998-1999, LCF Research, together with the Lovelace Health System, participated in the Cutting Back SBI study for at-risk drinkers. A total of 426 subjects exhibiting at-risk drinking behaviors from the New Mexico cohort were examined for the study, including 211 subjects who received a brief counseling intervention and 215 in the no intervention control group. This study examined DWI citations for all 426 subjects during the 5 years following the Cutting Back study. The brief interventions were shown to have had a significant impact on reducing DWI citations for at-risk drinkers, with the added benefit lasting for the 5-year duration of the study. The SBI was found to be most effective at reducing DWI citations for Hispanic at-risk drinkers. Evidence is presented to show that screening to identify at-risk drinkers followed by a brief intervention has a statistically significant lasting impact on improving traffic safety.


Subject(s)
Alcoholic Intoxication/prevention & control , Automobile Driving , Safety Management/methods , Adult , Alcoholic Intoxication/ethnology , Counseling , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , New Mexico , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
10.
Pharmacotherapy ; 30(9): 879-87, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20795843

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine the role of concurrent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin) use and postmenopausal hormone therapy on osteoporosis-related fractures. DESIGN: Case-control study. Data Source. Large integrated health plan in New Mexico. Patients. Case patients were 1001 women with incident fractures of the hip, wrist, forearm, or spine that occurred between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005, and controls were 2607 women without fractures during the same time frame; both groups were selected from the same population of women aged 50 years or older who utilized health plan services during the study time frame. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Postmenopausal hormone therapy use was classified as "current" (12 mo before index date) or "never or past." The risk of fractures was ascertained among continuous (> or = 80% medication possession ratio during 12 mo before the index date) and current (3 mo before index date) statin users relative to patients without hyperlipidemia who did not use lipid-lowering drugs. The interaction between statins and hormone therapy was examined in multivariable logistic regression. The association between statin use and fractures was examined separately among current and never or past hormone therapy users after controlling for other risk factors. Nineteen percent of the study participants were current hormone therapy users; 9.5% were current and 4.8% were continuous statin users. No association between continuous statin use and fractures was observed among never or past hormone therapy users (odds ratio [OR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-1.22). In contrast, a strong protective effect (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04-0.87) was observed among women who concurrently used statins and hormone therapy for 1 year, independent of age; corticosteroid, bisphosphonate, thiazide diuretic, calcitonin, methotrexate, or antiepileptic drug use; chronic kidney disease; and Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSION: Concurrent statin use and hormone therapy may have a synergistic protective effect on skeletal fractures beyond the additive effect of each individual therapy.


Subject(s)
Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Fractures, Bone/prevention & control , Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Comorbidity , Drug Synergism , Female , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/epidemiology , Hip Fractures/prevention & control , Humans , Hyperlipidemias/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Risk Factors
11.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 31(6): 549-57, 2010 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20713181

ABSTRACT

Recruitment methods heavily impact budget and outcomes in clinical trials. We conducted a post-hoc examination of the efficiency and cost of three different recruitment methods used in Journey for Control of Diabetes: the IDEA Study, a randomized controlled trial evaluating outcomes of group and individual diabetes education in New Mexico and Minnesota. Electronic databases were used to identify health plan members with diabetes and then one of the following three methods was used to recruit study participants: 1. Minnesota Method 1--Mail only (first half of recruitment period). Mailed invitations with return-response forms. 2. Minnesota Method 2--Mail and selective phone calls (second half of recruitment period). Mailed invitations with return-response forms and subsequent phone calls to nonresponders. 3. New Mexico Method 3--Mail and non-selective phone calls (full recruitment period): Mailed invitations with subsequent phone calls to all. The combined methods succeeded in meeting the recruitment goal of 623 subjects. There were 147 subjects recruited using Minnesota's Method 1, 190 using Minnesota's Method 2, and 286 using New Mexico's Method 3. Efficiency rates (percentage of invited patients who enrolled) were 4.2% for Method 1, 8.4% for Method 2, and 7.9% for Method 3. Calculated costs per enrolled subject were $71.58 (Method 1), $85.47 (Method 2), and $92.09 (Method 3). A mail-only method to assess study interest was relatively inexpensive but not efficient enough to sustain recruitment targets. Phone call follow-up after mailed invitations added to recruitment efficiency. Use of return-response forms with selective phone follow-up to non-responders was cost effective.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Patient Education as Topic , Patient Selection , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Humans , Minnesota/epidemiology , New Mexico/epidemiology , Postal Service , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Telephone
12.
Popul Health Manag ; 12(4): 177-83, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19663619

ABSTRACT

Cardiometabolic risk (CMR) is a specific set of risk factors that are associated with an increased chance of developing diabetes and cardiovascular disease. We conducted a retrospective study of female members of a health maintenance organization in the southwestern United States to: determine the prevalence of CMR for 4 different groupings of CMR factors, identify differences between Hispanics and non-Hispanics, and quantify differences in 2-year health care utilization and costs of CMR. Subjects were females who had bone mineral density tests during 2003-2004, and thus a measure of height and weight, allowing body mass index (BMI) calculation (n = 2578; 27.6% Hispanic). Risk factors used to define CMR groupings were: obesity (BMI), triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting glucose. Results showed that Hispanics had higher prevalence rates than non-Hispanics (65.8% versus 52.3%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Adjusting for age and ethnicity, total costs for CMR patients in the groupings that required the presence of diabetes were twice the costs of those without CMR (approximately $11,500 versus $5500, respectively; P < 0.0001). In all other groupings, costs for patients with and without CMR were approximately $7000 versus $5500, respectively (P < 0.0001). Non-Hispanics had significantly higher visit costs than Hispanics. There were no differences in pharmacy costs. Higher utilization and costs associated with CMR suggest the need to identify and monitor patients with CMR. Our findings suggest diabetes prevention could yield substantial cost savings. Higher costs for non-Hispanics, despite higher prevalence among Hispanics, may indicate underutilization of health care resources by Hispanics. Future research in CMR should explore ethnic differences in access to care and disease management programs.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus/etiology , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hispanic or Latino , Metabolic Syndrome/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiovascular Diseases/ethnology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/ethnology , Female , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/ethnology , Middle Aged , Odds Ratio , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Southwestern United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL