Two Cases of Serotonin Syndrome After Bupropion Overdose Treated With Cyproheptadine.

BACKGROUND: Bupropion is not known to have direct serotonin agonism or inhibit serotonin reuptake. In spite of this, it has been implicated as a causative agent of serotonin syndrome. We highlight two cases of single-agent bupropion overdose that subsequently met the diagnosis of serotonin syndrome by the Hunter criteria, despite the absence of direct serotonergic agents. CASE 1: A 14-year-old boy intentionally ingested an estimated 30 bupropion 75-mg immediate-release tablets. He presented in status epilepticus, was intubated, and was placed on midazolam and fentanyl infusions. He developed tremor, ankle clonus, and agitation. He was administered cyproheptadine for presumed serotonin syndrome with temporal improvement in his symptoms. CASE 2: A 19-year-old woman intentionally ingested an estimated 53 bupropion 150-mg extended-release tablets. She had a seizure and required sedation and intubation. During her course, she developed hyperthermia, inducible clonus, and hyperreflexia. She was treated with cyproheptadine without temporal improvement of symptoms but improved the following day. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Although bupropion is not known to be directly serotonergic, it has been implicated as the single causative agent after overdose. This may be due to an indirect increase in activity of serotonergic cells. In these cases, bupropion overdose resulted in a clinical presentation consistent with serotonin syndrome, with the first having a temporal improvement after treatment with cyproheptadine. Physicians need to be aware of the potential serotonergic activity of bupropion for accurate assessment and treatment of this dangerous condition.

Topical amiodarone during cardiac surgery: Does epicardial application of amiodarone prevent postoperative atrial fibrillation?

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication after cardiac surgery. Topical amiodarone on the epicardium may help prevent postoperative AF while avoiding the side effects of its systemic administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the all-comer strategy of epicardial amiodarone application for the prevention of postoperative AF. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed that evaluated the incidence of new-onset AF in a consecutive series of cardiac surgery patients who were treated with either no amiodarone (historical control, n = 100), epicardial application of amiodarone mixed in a topical hydrogel (n = 50), or epicardial application of an amiodarone-soaked sealant patch (n = 50). Perioperative data were compared between the 3 groups, with all patients receiving continuous postoperative telemetry to monitor for new-onset AF. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 200 cardiac surgery patients (coronary bypass 82%, valve surgery 24%) who had no history of AF (mean age 71.0 years, 28% female). Among the 3 groups, the incidence of postoperative AF did not significantly differ, with 29 of 100 (29%) patients in the historical control group having new AF, compared with 18 of 50 (36%) in the amiodarone-hydrogel group, and 18 of 50 (36%) in the amiodarone-patch group (P = .56). The results did not differ when the analysis was restricted to coronary bypass patients only (n = 142, 27% vs 38% vs 32%, no-amiodarone vs amiodarone-hydrogel vs amiodarone-patch, respectively, P = .56). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, only older age (P = .001) was significantly associated with new-onset AF, but the use of topical amiodarone was not. CONCLUSIONS: Routine epicardial application of topical amiodarone was not associated with a reduction in the incidence of new-onset postoperative AF in this observational study of older patients, leading us to question its role in contemporary cardiac surgical practice.