A clinically compatible in vitro drug-screening platform identifies therapeutic vulnerabilities in primary cultures of brain metastases.

PURPOSE: Brain metastases represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults and are associated with a poor prognosis. We used a personalized in vitro drug screening approach to characterize individual therapeutic vulnerabilities in brain metastases. METHODS: Short-term cultures of cancer cells isolated from brain metastasis patients were molecularly characterized using next-generation sequencing and functionally evaluated using high-throughput in vitro drug screening to characterize pharmacological treatment sensitivities. RESULTS: Next-generation sequencing identified matched genetic alterations in brain metastasis tissue samples and corresponding short-term cultures, suggesting that short-term cultures of brain metastases are suitable models for recapitulating the genetic profile of brain metastases that may determine their sensitivity to anti-cancer drugs. Employing a high-throughput in vitro drug screening platform, we successfully screened the cultures of five brain metastases for response to 267 anticancer compounds and related drug response to genetic data. Among others, we found that targeted treatment with JAK3, HER2, or FGFR3 inhibitors showed anti-cancer effects in individual brain metastasis cultures. CONCLUSION: Our preclinical study provides a proof-of-concept for combining molecular profiling with in vitro drug screening for predictive evaluation of therapeutic vulnerabilities in brain metastasis patients. This approach could advance the use of patient-derived cancer cells in clinical practice and might eventually facilitate decision-making for personalized drug treatment.

Cranial Repair in Children: Techniques, Materials, and Peculiar Issues.

Cranial repair in children deserves particular attention since many issues are still controversial. Furthermore, literature data offer a confused picture of outcome of cranioplasty, in terms of results and complication rates, with studies showing inadequate follow-up and including populations that are not homogeneous by age of the patients, etiology, and size of the bone defect.Indeed, age has merged in the last years as a risk factor for resorption of autologous bone flap that is still the most frequent complication in cranial repair after decompressive craniectomy.Age-related factors play a role also when alloplastic materials are used. In fact, the implantation of alloplastic materials is limited by skull growth under 7 years of age and is contraindicated in the first years if life. Thus, the absence of an ideal material for cranioplasty is even more evident in children with a steady risk of complications through the entire life of the patient that is usually much longer than surgical follow-up.As a result, specific techniques should be adopted according to the age of the patient and etiology of the defect, aiming to repair the skull and respect its residual growth.Thus, autologous bone still represents the best option for cranial repair, though limitations exist. As an alternative, biomimetic materials should ideally warrant the possibility to overcome the limits of other inert alloplastic materials by favoring osteointegration or osteoinduction or both.On these grounds, this paper aims to offer a thorough overview of techniques, materials, and peculiar issues of cranial repair in children.

Combined use of 3D printing and mixed reality technology for neurosurgical training: getting ready for brain surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Learning surgical skills is an essential part of neurosurgical training. Ideally, these skills are acquired to a sufficient extent in an ex vivo setting. The authors previously described an in vitro brain tumor model, consisting of a cadaveric animal brain injected with fluorescent agar-agar, for acquiring a wide range of basic neuro-oncological skills. This model focused on haptic skills such as safe tissue ablation technique and the training of fluorescence-based resection. As important didactical technologies such as mixed reality and 3D printing become more readily available, the authors developed a readily available training model that integrates the haptic aspects into a mixed reality setup. METHODS: The anatomical structures of a brain tumor patient were segmented from medical imaging data to create a digital twin of the case. Bony structures were 3D printed and combined with the in vitro brain tumor model. The segmented structures were visualized in mixed reality headsets, and the congruence of the printed and the virtual objects allowed them to be spatially superimposed. In this way, users of the system were able to train on the entire treatment process from surgery planning to instrument preparation and execution of the surgery. RESULTS: Mixed reality visualization in the joint model facilitated model (patient) positioning as well as craniotomy and the extent of resection planning respecting case-dependent specifications. The advanced physical model allowed brain tumor surgery training including skin incision; craniotomy; dural opening; fluorescence-guided tumor resection; and dura, bone, and skin closure. CONCLUSIONS: Combining mixed reality visualization with the corresponding 3D printed physical hands-on model allowed advanced training of sequential brain tumor resection skills. Three-dimensional printing technology facilitates the production of a precise, reproducible, and worldwide accessible brain tumor surgery model. The described model for brain tumor resection advanced regarding important aspects of skills training for neurosurgical residents (e.g., locating the lesion, head position planning, skull trepanation, dura opening, tissue ablation techniques, fluorescence-guided resection, and closure). Mixed reality enriches the model with important structures that are difficult to model (e.g., vessels and fiber tracts) and advanced interaction concepts (e.g., craniotomy simulations). Finally, this concept demonstrates a bridging technology toward intraoperative application of mixed reality.