ABSTRACT
The therapeutic armamentarium of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has dramatically improved after small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting BCR::ABL1 became available, with a life expectancy now close to that of the general population. Although highly effective, these drugs also have a toxicity profile that is often mild to moderate, but sometimes severe. Indeed, long-term treatment with TKIs can lead to chronic adverse events that can negatively affect patients' quality of life and can promote significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in the case of second- or third-generation TKIs. Treatment discontinuation has therefore become an emerging goal for CML patients and numerous studies have evaluated in off-TKI subjects what requirements are appropriate for an attempt at treatment-free remission (TFR). TFR eligibility is currently limited to a small population of subjects with both deep and sustained molecular responses to TKIs. For those attempting TFR, average success rates are promising, with 25%-30% of patients experiencing prolonged TFR. In case of failure to maintain sustained TFR, safety results to date are reassuring, with almost all patients responding successfully to resumption of TKIs, and advanced-phase disease progression representing a very rare event. The purpose of this review is to discuss guidelines for TKI discontinuation, clinical advances from clinical trials and real-life experiences, and describe areas of research, particularly regarding the biological factors capable of predicting the success of TFR.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Remission Induction , Humans , Leukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL Positive/drug therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Disease ManagementABSTRACT
We evaluated RDW in a single-center series of 61 consecutive patients with primary and secondary MF at diagnosis and during treatment with ruxolitinib (RUX) and examined any possible prognostic impact. Elevated RDW values were present in all but 4 patients at diagnosis with a median RDW of 18.9%. RDW was higher in subjects with palpable splenomegaly (p = 0.02), higher ferritin, as well as among those cases who did not receive any cytoreduction before RUX (p = 0.04). Interestingly, higher RDW at diagnosis also correlated with a shorter time from MF diagnosis to RUX start (-4.1 months per one RDW unit; p = 0.03). We observed a modest increase (< 1%) in RDW during the first 6 months of RUX treatment. In a multivariable random-intercept model that considered all time points and contained the covariates time and RUX dose, we also observed a clear decrease in RDW with increasing hemoglobin (Hb) during RUX (slope: -0.4% per g/dL of Hb; p < 0.001). The median RDW at diagnosis of 18.9% was used as a cut-off to identify two subgroups of patients [Group 1: RDW 19.0-25.7%; Group 2: RDW 13.1-18.7%], showing a difference in mortality [Group 1 vs. 2: crude HR 2.88; p = 0.01]. Using continuous RDW at diagnosis, the crude HR was 1.21 per RDW unit (p = 0.002). In a Cox model adjusted for gender, age and Hb at diagnosis, the HR was 1.13 per RDW unit (p = 0.07). RDW may have prognostic significance at MF diagnosis and during RUX, helping in the rapid detection of patients with poor prognosis.
Subject(s)
Erythrocyte Indices , Nitriles , Primary Myelofibrosis , Pyrazoles , Pyrimidines , Humans , Nitriles/therapeutic use , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Male , Female , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Primary Myelofibrosis/drug therapy , Primary Myelofibrosis/blood , Primary Myelofibrosis/mortality , Aged , Prognosis , Aged, 80 and over , AdultABSTRACT
Here, we reviewed clinical-morphological data and investigated mutational profiles by NGS in a single-center series of 58 consecutive MPN-SVT patients admitted to our hospital between January 1979 and November 2021. We identified 15.5% of PV, 13.8% of ET, 34.5% of PMF, 8.6% of SMF and 27.6% of MPN-U. Most cases (84.5%) carried JAK2V617F mutation, while seven patients were characterized by other molecular markers, namely MPL in four and CALR mutations in three cases. NGS was performed in 54 (93.1%) cases: the most frequent additional mutations were found in TET2 (27.8%) and DNMT3A (16.7%) genes, whereas 25 (46.3%) patients had no additional mutation. Cases with JAK2V617F homozygosity had a higher median number of additional mutations than those with low allele burden. More importantly, all cases of leukemic evolution were characterized by a higher median number of co-mutations, and a co-mutational pattern of high-risk lesions, such as truncating mutations of ASXL1, bi-allelic TP53 loss, and CSMD1 mutations. Nevertheless, no difference was found between cases with and without additional somatic mutations regarding fibrotic progression, SVT recurrence, other thrombo-hemorrhagic complications, or death. After a median follow-up of 7.1 years, ten deaths were recorded; fibrotic progression/leukemic evolution was ascertained in one (1.7%) and six (10.3%) patients, respectively, while 22 (37.9%) patients suffered from recurrent thrombosis. In conclusion, our data underline the importance of using NGS analysis in the management of MPN-related SVT as it can support the MPN diagnosis, particularly in "triple-negative" cases, and provide additional information with potential consequences on prognosis and therapeutic strategies.
Subject(s)
Myeloproliferative Disorders , Neoplasms , Venous Thrombosis , Humans , Myeloproliferative Disorders/genetics , Venous Thrombosis/genetics , Mutation , Genomics , Janus Kinase 2/genetics , Calreticulin/geneticsABSTRACT
Although the quantity of gluten that a well-instructed coeliac patient can involuntarily ingest is <10 mg of gluten/d which cannot induce significant villous damage, coeliac patients often attribute the origin of symptoms to the involuntary ingestion of trace quantities of gluten, either certain or hypothetical. Our aim was to evaluate whether the occurrence of symptoms in coeliac patients who histologically responded to a strict gluten-free diet was related to the involuntary consumption of minimal quantities of gluten. A case-control study to assess the association between gluten exposure and the occurrence of symptoms was designed. Between January 2017 and May 2018, coeliac patients attending our outpatient clinic were interviewed to detect the presence of symptoms. Based on a specifically designed form, patients were also divided into different risk groups of gluten exposure. A total of ninety-five coeliac patients on a strict gluten-free diet and with known histological recovery were enroled. Of them, fifty-two of them reported symptoms and they were enroled as cases; the remaining forty-three patients denied symptoms and were enroled as controls. Although this was not statistically significant, gluten exposure was more frequent in controls (Fisher's exact test, P=0·07). Our results show no relationship between exposure to minimal quantities of gluten and onset of symptoms in coeliac patients. Symptoms are more frequent in patients who have no risk of gluten exposure. It is possible that the presence of these symptoms leads the patients to avoid situations that may place them at risk of gluten exposure.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myelofibrosis (MF) includes prefibrotic primary MF (pre-PMF), overt-PMF and secondary MF (SMF). Median overall survival (OS) of pre-PMF, overt-PMF and SMF patients is around 14 years, seven and nine years, respectively. Main causes of mortality are non-clonal progression and transformation into blast phase. RECENT FINDINGS: Discoveries on the impact of the biological architecture on OS have led to the design of integrated scores to predict survival in PMF. For SMF, OS estimates should be calculated by the specific MYSEC-PM (MYelofibrosis SECondary-prognostic model). Information on the prognostic role of the molecular landscape in SMF is accumulating. Crucial treatment decisions for MF patients could be now supported by multivariable predictive algorithms. OS should become a relevant endpoint of clinical trials. Prognostic models guide prediction of OS and treatment planning in MF, therefore, their timely application is critical in the personalized approach of MF patients.
Subject(s)
Primary Myelofibrosis , Humans , Primary Myelofibrosis/mortality , Primary Myelofibrosis/diagnosis , Primary Myelofibrosis/therapy , Prognosis , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
Here, we reviewed clinical-morphological data and investigated mutational profiles by NGS in a single-center series of 28 consecutive patients admitted to our hospital between September 2011 and November 2021 for idiopathic hypereosinophilia (HE).Bone marrow (BM) morphology was evaluated in 22 patients: while in six subjects BM was unremarkable, in the remaining cases an increase in BM eosinophils was observed, together with a slight increase in BM fibrosis (MF-1) in 5/22 patients.A total of 4/28 patients had at least one genetic lesion by targeted NGS. In particular, the genes involved were: two each of TET2 and DNMT3A; and one each of JAK2V617F, ASXL1, PPM1D, and ZBTB33. Notably, JAK2V617F and TET2 mutations co-occurred, with the JAK2V617F-mutated sample also carrying TET2 lesions. Median VAF was 21%, with the exception of the oncodriver JAK2V617F, which showed a VAF > 50% in the reported case. Of note, of the four cases bearing lesions, 2/4 had multiple hits in different genes.While in recent years mutational analysis using NGS has proven to be able to differentiate clonal hematopoietic neoplasms from reactive processes in diagnostically difficult cases, we found somatic mutations in only 14.3% of patients who acceded to our hospital for idiopathic HE. More importantly, excluding the JAK2V617F-mutated case with an underlying MPN-Eo diagnosis, NGS was able to identify somatic mutations in only three cases, all older than 70 years. Consequently, the detection of these mutations in idiopathic HE patients should be interpreted with caution and only in the context of other supportive clinical-pathological findings.
Subject(s)
High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Mutation , Humans , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Female , Adult , Aged , Dioxygenases/genetics , Janus Kinase 2/genetics , Bone Marrow/pathology , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , DNA-Binding Proteins/genetics , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/genetics , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , DNA Methyltransferase 3A , Aged, 80 and over , DNA Mutational Analysis/methods , Young Adult , Repressor ProteinsABSTRACT
Lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) is a benign condition, listed among primary cutaneous CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders. Its typical picture consists of relapsing-remitting papular lesions and it can be encountered in the course of a hematologic disease, at times representing its first manifestation. Hypereosinophilic syndromes are a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by persistent peripheral blood hypereosinophilia that may lead to life-threatening organ damage. Among eosinophilic disorders, the subtype identified as myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions has aroused particular interest due to its excellent response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Here, we described the case of two 33-year-old men presenting with LyP and myeloid neoplasm with eosinophilia and FIP1L1::PDGFRA rearrangement who achieved complete clinical and molecular remission of both conditions a few months after starting imatinib.
Subject(s)
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome , Lymphomatoid Papulosis , Male , Humans , Imatinib Mesylate/therapeutic use , Lymphomatoid Papulosis/diagnosis , Lymphomatoid Papulosis/drug therapy , Lymphomatoid Papulosis/genetics , Receptor, Platelet-Derived Growth Factor alpha/genetics , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/diagnosis , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/drug therapy , Hypereosinophilic Syndrome/genetics , Transcription Factors , Oncogene Proteins, Fusion/geneticsABSTRACT
The spectrum of TKI-related adverse events (AEs) is variable. Pleural effusion (PE) is a frequent AE attributable to dasatinib treatment, while it is only rarely associated with nilotinib. The pathogenetic mechanism leading to PE during nilotinib therapy is still unknown and its management has not yet been defined. To the best of our knowledge, only a limited number of similar case reports have already been reported in the literature so far. Here, we describe the case of a 41-year-old CML patient who developed PE during first-line nilotinib, successfully treated with steroids and nilotinib permanent discontinuation. We highlight the differences among our patient and the others, proposing therapeutic strategies to solve this rare but still possible AE, of which physicians should be aware.
ABSTRACT
The complex pathophysiologic interplay between SARS-CoV-2 infection and complement activation is the subject of active investigation. It is clinically mirrored by the occurrence of exacerbations of complement mediated diseases during COVID-19 infection. These include complement-mediated hemolytic anemias such as paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), particularly cold agglutinin disease (CAD), and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS). All these conditions may benefit from complement inhibitors that are also under study for COVID-19 disease. Hemolytic exacerbations in these conditions may occur upon several triggers including infections and vaccines and may require transfusions, treatment with complement inhibitors and/or immunosuppressors (i.e., steroids and rituximab for AIHA), and result in thrombotic complications. In this manuscript we describe four patients (2 with PNH and 2 with CAD) who experienced hemolytic flares after either COVID-19 infection or SARS-Cov2 vaccine and provide a review of the most recent literature. We report that most episodes occurred within the first 10 days after COVID-19 infection/vaccination and suggest laboratory monitoring (Hb and LDH levels) in that period. Moreover, in our experience and in the literature, hemolytic exacerbations occurring during COVID-19 infection were more severe, required greater therapeutic intervention, and carried more complications including fatalities, as compared to those developing after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, suggesting the importance of vaccinating this patient population. Patient education remains pivotal to promptly recognize signs/symptoms of hemolytic flares and to refer to medical attention. Treatment choice should be based on the severity of the hemolytic exacerbation as well as of that of COVID-19 infection. Therapies include transfusions, complement inhibitor initiation/additional dose in the case of PNH, steroids/rituximab in patients with CAD and warm type AIHA, plasma exchange, hemodialysis and complement inhibitor in the case of atypical HUS. Finally, anti-thrombotic prophylaxis should be always considered in these settings, provided safe platelet counts.
Subject(s)
Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , Complement System Proteins/immunology , Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal/immunology , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anemia, Hemolytic, Autoimmune/therapy , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , Complement Activation/drug effects , Complement Activation/immunology , Complement Inactivating Agents/therapeutic use , Female , Hemoglobinuria, Paroxysmal/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/physiologyABSTRACT
Large granular lymphocytes (LGL) are lymphoid cells characterized by either a T-cell or a natural killer phenotype whose expansion may be reactive to toxic, infectious, and neoplastic conditions, or result from clonal selection. Recently, the higher attention to LGL clones led to their detection in many clinical conditions including myeloid neoplasms and bone marrow failures. In these contexts, it is still unclear whether LGL cells actively contribute to anti-stem cell autoimmunity or are only a reaction to dysplastic/leukemic myelopoiesis. Moreover, some evidence exists about a common clonal origin of LGL and myeloid clones, including the detection of STAT3 mutations, typical of LGL, in myeloid precursors from myelodysplastic patients. In this article we reviewed available literature regarding the association of LGL clones with myeloid neoplasms (myelodysplastic syndromes, myeloproliferative neoplasms, and acute myeloid leukemias) and bone marrow failures (aplastic anemia and pure red cell aplasia, PRCA) focusing on evidence of pathogenic, clinical, and prognostic relevance. It emerged that LGL clones may be found in up to one third of patients, particularly those with PRCA, and are associated with a more cytopenic phenotype and good response to immunosuppression. Pathogenically, LGL clones seem to expand after myeloid therapies, whilst immunosuppression leading to LGL depletion may favor leukemic escape and thus requires caution.