Anti-IL-4R versus anti-IL-5/5R after anti-IL-5/5R failure in asthma: An emulated target trial.

BACKGROUND: Switching biologics is now common practice in severe eosinophilic asthma. After insufficient response to anti-IL-5 or 5 receptor (anti-IL-5/5R), the optimal switch between an anti-IL-4R mAb (interclass) or another anti-IL-5/5R drug (intraclass) remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the effectiveness of these 2 strategies in asthma control in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. METHODS: We emulated a target randomized trial using observational data from the Recherche sur les AsthMes SEvèreS (RAMSES) cohort. Eligible patients were switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb or another anti-IL-5/5R drug after insufficient response to an anti-IL-5/5R mAb. The primary outcome was the change in Asthma Control Test score at 6 months. RESULTS: Among the 2046 patients in the cohort, 151 were included in the study: 103 switched to an anti-IL-4R mAb and 48 to another anti-IL-5/5R. At 6 months, the difference in Asthma Control Test score improvement was not statistically significant (mean difference groups, 0.82 [-0.47 to 2.10], P = .213). The interclass group exhibited greater cumulative reduction in oral corticosteroid dose (Pinter-intra, -1.05 g [-1.76 to -0.34], P = .041). The interclass group had a better effect, although not significantly, on reducing exacerbations (Δinter-intra, -0.37 [-0.77 to 0.02], P = .124) and increasing lung function (FEV1) (126.8 mL [-12.7 to 266.4], P = .124). CONCLUSIONS: After anti-IL-5/5R mAb insufficient response, switching to dupilumab demonstrated similar improvement in Asthma Control Test scores compared with intraclass switching. However, it appeared more effective in reducing oral corticosteroid use. Larger studies are warranted to confirm these results.

Risk stratification refinements with inclusion of haemodynamic variables at follow-up in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Haemodynamic variables are prognostic factors in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, right heart catheterization (RHC) is not systematically recommended to assess the risk-status during follow-up. This study aimed to assess the added value of haemodynamic variables in prevalent patients to predict the risk of death or lung transplantation according to their risk status assessed by the non-invasive 4 strata model as recommended by the European guidelines. METHODS: We evaluated incident patients with PAH enrolled in the French PAH Registry between 2009 and 2020 who had a first follow-up RHC. Cox regression identified, in each follow-up risk status, haemodynamic variables significantly associated with transplant-free survival (TFS). Optimal thresholds were determined by time-dependent Receiver-Operating Characteristics. Several multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the haemodynamic variables improving the non-invasive risk stratification model. RESULTS: We analysed 1240 incident patients reassessed within a year by RHC. None of haemodynamic variable were significantly associated with TFS among low-risk (n=386) or high-risk (n=71) patients. Among patients at intermediate (-low, n=483, -high, n=300) risk at first follow-up, multivariable models including either stroke volume index (SVi) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) were the best. The prognostic performance of refined 6 strata risk stratification model including the non-invasive 4 strata model and SVi>37 mL·m-2 and/or SvO2>65% for patients at intermediate-risk (Area Under the Curve 0.81, c-index 0.74), was better than that of 4 strata model (0.79, p=0.009; c-index 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics may improve risk stratification at follow-up in patients at intermediate-risk.

Exercise Hemodynamics Predict Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in BMPR2 Mutation Carriers.

BACKGROUND: Exercise hemodynamics are recommended for early detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and have been suggested to be predictive of future development of PAH in high-risk populations such as BMPR2 mutation carriers. However, the optimal exercise hemodynamic screening parameter remains to be determined. Recent data suggest that pulmonary vascular distensibility coefficient (α) may serve as a useful parameter for early detection of PAH. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the value of exercise hemodynamics, including α, for predicting the occurrence of PAH during long-term follow-up in BMPR2 mutation carriers? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-two asymptomatic BMPR2 mutation carriers who underwent symptom-limited exercise hemodynamic assessment were followed up for a median of 10 years. The impact of hemodynamics at rest and exercise, presence of exercise pulmonary hypertension, and α on occurrence of PAH during long-term follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: During long-term follow-up, five patients demonstrated PAH. Patients who demonstrated PAH showed a significantly lower α (0.8 ± 0.4%/mm Hg) than patients without PAH (1.8 ± 0.8%/mm Hg; P = .008). The only hemodynamic parameter that predicted the occurrence of PAH during long-term follow-up at regression analysis was α. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that α ≤ 1.5%/mm Hg predicted PAH occurrence with a specificity of 75% and sensitivity of 100%. INTERPRETATION: Before development of PAH in BMPR2 mutation carriers, α is reduced markedly and may serve as a useful parameter in the setting of early disease detection. Given the low event rate, caution is warranted in interpreting these results, highlighting the need for validation studies.

Outcomes and risk assessment in pulmonary veno-occlusive disease.

Introduction: Pulmonary veno-occlusive disease (PVOD) is a rare and severe subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Although European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) guidelines advise assessing PAH severity at baseline and during follow-up, no existing risk assessment methods have been validated for PVOD. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors, examine the impact of treatment strategies and evaluate risk assessment methods for PVOD patients. Methods: The study analysed all incident PVOD patients included in the French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry between 2006 and 2021. Survival was assessed based on initial treatment strategy and risk status and compared to a matched (age, sex, pulmonary vascular resistance) PAH group. Six risk assessment methods (number of four low-risk and three noninvasive low-risk variables, ESC/ERS guidelines three-strata and four-strata models, REVEAL 2.0 and Lite 2) were applied at baseline and early follow-up, and their accuracy was compared using Harrell's c-statistic. Results: Among the 327 included PVOD patients, survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 86%, 50% and 27%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that only 6-min walk distance was associated with survival, with no significant difference based on initial treatment strategy. All six risk assessment methods could discriminate mortality risk, and the ESC/ERS four-strata model was the most accurate at both baseline and follow-up (C-index 0.64 and 0.74). PVOD survival rates were consistently lower than PAH when comparing baseline risk status using the ESC/ERS four-strata model. Conclusion: PVOD is associated with poor outcomes, and initial treatment strategies do not significantly affect survival. Risk assessment methods can be useful in predicting survival for PVOD patients.

Characterisation of airway disease associated with Sjögren disease.

OBJECTIVE: Although airway disease associated with Sjögren's disease (Sjo-AD) is common, it is poorly studied compared with interstitial lung disease (ILD). In this study, we aimed to assess factors associated with Sjo-AD, the characteristics and prognosis of this manifestation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective multicentric study involving nine centres. We included Sjo-AD patients confirmed by at least one clinician and one CT scan report. Clinical and biological data, pulmonary function test (PFT), and CT scans were collected. A single radiologist specialist in thoracic diseases reviewed CT scans. Sjo-AD patients were compared with Sjo controls without pulmonary involvement, randomly selected after matching for age and disease duration. RESULTS: We included 31 Sjo-AD and 62 Sjo controls without pulmonary history. Sjo-AD had a higher disease activity (ESSDAI) compared with controls, even when excluding the pulmonary domain of the score (7 vs 3.8, p<0.05), mainly due to the biological activity. Sjo-AD was multilobar (72%) and associated with signs of both bronchiectasis and bronchiolitis (60%). Obstructive lung disease occurred in 32% at the time of Sjo-AD diagnosis. Overall, PFT was stable after 8.7±7 years follow-up but repeated CT scans showed extended lesions in 41% of cases within 6±3.2 years. No patient developed Sjo-ILD. Sjo-AD progression was independent of the global disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Sjo-AD preferentially affects Sjo patients with higher biological activity. It is often characterised as a diffuse disease, affecting both proximal and distal airways, with a slow evolution over time and no progression to Sjo-ILD.

Severe asthma care trajectories: the French RAMSES cohort.

Background: The French RAMSES study is an observational prospective multicentre real-life cohort including severe asthmatic subjects. The objective of the study was to compare the characteristics of patients, in terms of phenotype and asthma care trajectories, between those managed by tertiary referral centres (TRCs) or secondary care centres (SCCs). Methods: Patients were prospectively recruited and enrolled for a 5-year follow-up. Patients' characteristics were analysed at inclusion and compared between TRCs and SCCs. Results: 52 centres (24 TRCs and 28 SCCs) included 2046 patients: 1502 (73.4%) were included by a TRC and 544 (26.6%) by a SCC. Patients were mainly women (62%), 53±15 years old, 67% with Asthma Control Test <20; at inclusion, 14% received oral corticosteroids (OCS) and 66% biologics. Compared with the SCC group, the TRC group had more frequent comorbidities and lower blood eosinophil counts (262 versus 340 mm-3; p=0.0036). OCS and biologics use did not differ between groups, but patients in the TRC group benefited more frequently from an educational programme (26% versus 18%; p=0.0008) and received more frequently two or more sequential lines of biologics (33% versus 24%; p=0.0105). In-depth investigations were more frequently performed in the TRC group (allergy tests: 74% versus 62%; p<0.0001; exhaled nitric oxide fraction: 56% versus 21%; p<0.0001; induced sputum: 6% versus 3%; p=0.0390). Conclusions: Phenotypes and care trajectories differed in the RAMSES cohort between SCCs and TRCs, probably related to different levels of asthma severity and differences in medical resources and practices among centres. This highlights the need for standardisation of severe asthma care.

Four- and sixteen-month clinical status of a cohort of patients following hospitalization for COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although many symptoms of post-COVID syndrome have been described, a comprehensive evaluation of their prevalence is lacking. We aimed to describe symptoms at 16 months from hospitalization for COVID-19. METHODS: A telephone assessment was performed one year later in a cohort of COVID-19 survivors hospitalized between March and May 2020 and already evaluated four months after discharge. Patients with relevant symptoms at 16 months, patients who presented symptoms at four months, and all intensive care unit patients were invited for assessment at an outpatient facility. At telephone consultation, respiratory, cognitive, and functional symptoms were assessed. Patients underwent pulmonary function tests, lung CT scans, and psychometric and cognitive tests at the outpatient facility. RESULTS: Among 478 patients evaluated four months after discharge, 317 (67 %) were assessed at telephone consultation and 124 at ambulatory assessment. At telephone assessment, ≥1 new symptom was reported by 216 patients (68 %), mainly fatigue (53 %), dyspnea (37 %), and memory difficulties (24 %). Seventy-nine patients (25 %) were asymptomatic at four months but declared ≥1 symptom one year later. In patients evaluated twice, the prevalence of cognitive impairment was 45 % at four months and 40 % at 16 months. Depression and post-traumatic symptoms prevalence remained stable, and the prevalence of anxiety significantly decreased. Dysfunctional breathing was detected in 32 % of patients. At 16 months after discharge, lung CT-scan exhibited abnormalities in 30/80 patients (38 %), compared to 52/85 patients (61 %) at four months. CONCLUSION: At 16 months after hospitalization for COVID-19, 68 % of patients declared symptoms, including patients whose symptoms appeared between 4 and 16 months. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04704388.