Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
Add more filters

Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Environ Res ; 251(Pt 2): 118629, 2024 Jun 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490626

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A knowledge gap exists regarding longitudinal assessment of personal radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposures globally. It is unclear how the change in telecommunication technology over the years translates to change in RF-EMF exposure. This study aims to evaluate longitudinal trends of micro-environmental personal RF-EMF exposures in Australia. METHODS: The study utilised baseline (2015-16) and follow-up (2022) data on personal RF-EMF exposure (88 MHz-6 GHz) measured across 18 micro-environments in Melbourne. Simultaneous quantile regression analysis was conducted to compare exposure data distribution percentiles, particularly median (P50), upper extreme value (P99) and overall exposure trends. RF-EMF exposures were compared across six exposure source types: mobile downlink, mobile uplink, broadcast, 5G-New Radio, Others and Total (of the aforementioned sources). Frequency-specific exposures measured at baseline and follow-up were compared. Total exposure across different groups of micro-environment types were also compared. RESULTS: For all micro-environmental data, total (median and P99) exposure levels did not significantly change at follow-up. Overall exposure trend of total exposure increased at follow-up. Mobile downlink contributed the highest exposure among all sources showing an increase in median exposure and overall exposure trend. Of seven micro-environment types, five of them showed total exposure levels (median and P99) and overall exposure trend increased at follow-up.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Radio Waves , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Radio Waves/adverse effects , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Victoria , Australia
2.
Environ Res ; 260: 119524, 2024 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972338

ABSTRACT

This review offers a detailed examination of the current landscape of radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field (EMF) assessment tools, ranging from spectrum analyzers and broadband field meters to area monitors and custom-built devices. The discussion encompasses both standardized and non-standardized measurement protocols, shedding light on the various methods employed in this domain. Furthermore, the review highlights the prevalent use of mobile apps for characterizing 5G NR radio network data. A growing need for low-cost measurement devices is observed, commonly referred to as "sensors" or "sensor nodes", that are capable of enduring diverse environmental conditions. These sensors play a crucial role in both microenvironmental surveys and individual exposures, enabling stationary, mobile, and personal exposure assessments based on body-worn sensors, across wider geographical areas. This review revealed a notable need for cost-effective and long-lasting sensors, whether for individual exposure assessments, mobile (vehicle-integrated) measurements, or incorporation into distributed sensor networks. However, there is a lack of comprehensive information on existing custom-developed RF-EMF measurement tools, especially in terms of measuring uncertainty. Additionally, there is a need for real-time, fast-sampling solutions to understand the highly irregular temporal variations EMF distribution in next-generation networks. Given the diversity of tools and methods, a comprehensive comparison is crucial to determine the necessary statistical tools for aggregating the available measurement data.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Radio Waves , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Humans , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiation Monitoring/instrumentation
3.
Environ Res ; 170: 493-499, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30690250

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exposure to far-field radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF) has raised public concerns in recent decades. However, it is not known if individuals' perception towards the health risks of RF-EMF is dependent on their knowledge of the objectively measured personal RF-EMF exposure levels. OBJECTIVES: This pilot study aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of objectively measuring personal RF-EMF exposure from mobile phone base stations (MPBS) and to determine if the risk perception of people to the potential health risk of exposure to RF-EMF from MPBS is dependent on their knowledge of personal RF-EMF exposure levels. DESIGN: An experimental study was conducted in 383 adults, recruited in Melbourne, Australia. Participants were randomized to one of the three groups: 1) basic information group who were provided with basic information about RF-EMF to read prior to completing a risk perception assessment questionnaire; 2) precautionary group who were provided with an information pack which included precautionary messages; and 3) personal exposure measurement group who were provided with a summary of their quantitative RF-EMF exposure from MPBS. The same basic information about RF-EMF was also given to the precautionary and personal exposure measurement groups. RESULTS: Participants had a mean (±â€¯SD) age of 36.9 ±â€¯12.5 years; 66.7% were women. Overall, 44.1% had noticed an MPBS in their neighbourhood. The mean (SD) values (from 1 to 7) for risk perceptions to RF-EMF from MPBS were 4.02 (1.67) for basic information, 3.82 (1.62) for precautionary messages, and 3.97 (1.72) for the personal exposure measurement groups. These differences were not statistically significant. Nevertheless, the personal exposure measurement group were more confident that they could protect themselves from RF-EMF than the precautionary or basic information groups. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that providing people with personal RF-EMF exposure measurements may not affect their perceived risk from MPBS, but increase their confidence in protecting themselves.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Australia , Female , Humans , Male , Perception , Pilot Projects , Radio Waves
4.
Environ Res ; 162: 81-96, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29289859

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to: i) investigate the repeatability and representativeness of personal radio frequency-electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) exposure measurements, across different microenvironments, ii) perform simultaneous evaluations of personal RF-EMF exposures for the whole body and the head, iii) validate the data obtained with a head-worn personal distributed exposimeter (PDE) against those obtained with an on-body worn personal exposimeter (PEM). Data on personal and head RF-EMF exposures were collected by performing measurements across 15 microenvironments in Melbourne, Australia. A body-worn PEM and a head-worn PDE were used for measuring body and head exposures, respectively. The summary statistics obtained for total RF-EMF exposure showed a high representativeness (r2 > 0.66 for two paths in the same area) and a high repeatability over time (r2 > 0.87 for repetitions of the same path). The median head exposure in the 900MHz downlink band ranged between 0.06V/m and 0.31V/m. The results obtained during simultaneous measurements using the two devices showed high correlations (0.42 < r2 < 0.94). The highest mean total RF-EMF exposure was measured in Melbourne's central business district (0.89V/m), whereas the lowest mean total exposure was measured in a suburban residential area (0.05V/m). This study shows that personal RF-EMF microenvironmental measurements in multiple microenvironments have high representativeness and repeatability over time. The personal RF-EMF exposure levels (i.e. body and head exposures) demonstrated moderate to high correlations.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Environmental Monitoring , Australia , Housing , Radio Waves , Reproducibility of Results
5.
Environ Health ; 16(1): 62, 2017 06 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28629417

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Some previous studies have suggested an association between children's use of mobile phones (MPs)/cordless phones (CPs) and development of cognitive function. We evaluated possible longitudinal associations between the use of MPs and CPs in a cohort of primary school children and effects on their cognitive function. METHODS: Data on children's socio-demographics, use of MPs and CPs, and cognitive function were collected at baseline (2010-2012) and follow-up (2012-2013). Cognitive outcomes were evaluated with the CogHealth™ test battery and Stroop Color-Word test. The change in the number of MP/CP voice calls weekly from baseline to follow-up was dichotomized: "an increase in calls" or a "decrease/no change in calls". Multiple linear regression analyses, adjusting for confounders and clustering by school, were performed to evaluate the associations between the change in cognitive outcomes and change in MP and CP exposures. RESULTS: Of 412 children, a larger proportion of them used a CP (76% at baseline and follow-up), compared to a MP (31% at baseline and 43% at follow-up). Of 26 comparisons of changes in cognitive outcomes, four demonstrated significant associations. The increase in MP usage was associated with larger reduction in response time for response inhibition, smaller reduction in the number of total errors for spatial problem solving and larger increase in response time for a Stroop interference task. Except for the smaller reduction in detection task accuracy, the increase in CP usage had no effect on the changes in cognitive outcomes. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that a larger proportion of children used CPs compared to MPs. We found limited evidence that change in the use of MPs or CPs in primary school children was associated with change in cognitive function.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Cognition , Australia/epidemiology , Child , Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Female , Humans , Male , Neuropsychological Tests , Prospective Studies
6.
Environ Res ; 151: 547-563, 2016 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27588949

ABSTRACT

The purposes of this study were: i) to demonstrate the assessment of personal exposure from various RF-EMF sources across different microenvironments in Australia and Belgium, with two on-body calibrated exposimeters, in contrast to earlier studies which employed single, non-on-body calibrated exposimeters; ii) to systematically evaluate the performance of the exposimeters using (on-body) calibration and cross-talk measurements; and iii) to compare the exposure levels measured for one site in each of several selected microenvironments in the two countries. A human subject took part in an on-body calibration of the exposimeter in an anechoic chamber. The same subject collected data on personal exposures across 38 microenvironments (19 in each country) situated in urban, suburban and rural regions. Median personal RF-EMF exposures were estimated: i) of all microenvironments, and ii) across each microenvironment, in two countries. The exposures were then compared across similar microenvironments in two countries (17 in each country). The three highest median total exposure levels were: city center (4.33V/m), residential outdoor (urban) (0.75V/m), and a park (0.75V/m) [Australia]; and a tram station (1.95V/m), city center (0.95V/m), and a park (0.90V/m) [Belgium]. The exposures across nine microenvironments in Melbourne, Australia were lower than the exposures across corresponding microenvironments in Ghent, Belgium (p<0.05). The personal exposures across urban microenvironments were higher than those for rural or suburban microenvironments. Similarly, the exposure levels across outdoor microenvironments were higher than those for indoor microenvironments.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Radio Waves , Australia , Belgium , Humans
7.
Environ Evid ; 12(1): 9, 2023 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294811

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Exposure to radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields (EMF), particularly from telecommunications sources, is one of the most common and fastest growing anthropogenic factors on the environment. In many countries, humans are protected from harmful RF EMF exposure by safety standards that are based on guidelines by the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). The ICNIRP guidelines are based on knowledge of how RF EMF affects the human body, however, there are currently no recognised international guidelines to specifically protect animals and plants. Whether the ICNIRP guidelines for humans are adequate to provide protection to the environment is a subject of active debate. There is some public concern that new telecommunications technologies, like the 5G mobile phone network may affect the natural environment. This systematic map presents a searchable database of all the available evidence on whether anthropogenic RF EMF has an effect on plants and animals in the environment. The map also identifies gaps in knowledge, recommends future research and informs environmental and radiation protection authorities. METHODS: The method used was published in an a priori protocol. Searches included peer-reviewed and grey literature published in English with no time and geographic restrictions. The EMF-Portal, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched, and the resulting articles were screened in three stages: title, abstract and full text. Studies were included with a subject population of all animals and plants, with exposures to anthropogenic RF EMF (frequency range 100 kHz-300 GHz) compared to no or lower-level exposure, and for any outcomes related to the studied populations. For each included study, metadata were extracted on key variables of interest that were used to represent the distribution of available evidence. REVIEW FINDINGS: The initial search, search update and supplementary searches produced 24,432 articles and of those 334 articles (237 on fauna and 97 on flora) that were relevant were included in the systematic map. The vast majority of studies were experiments conducted in a laboratory rather than observational studies of animals and plants in the natural environment. The majority of the studies investigated exposures with frequencies between 300 and 3000 MHz, and although the exposure level varied, it was mainly low and below the ICNIRP limits. Most of the animal studies investigated insects and birds, whereas grains and legumes were the most investigated plants. Reproduction, development and behaviour were the most investigated effects for animals, and germination and growth for plants. The vast majority of the studies employed poor quality methods. CONCLUSION: There are distinct evidence clusters: for fauna, on insect and bird reproduction, development and behaviour; and for flora, grain and legume germination and growth that would benefit from specific systematic reviews. The systematic map also highlights the clear need for investigating the effects of RF EMF on more species and more types of effects, and for an improvement in the quality of all studies.

8.
J Environ Monit ; 14(1): 193-201, 2012 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22105600

ABSTRACT

The present study was done in the Fen Complex, a Norwegian area rich in naturally occurring radionuclides, especially in thorium ((232)Th). Measurement of radioactivity levels was conducted at the decommissioned iron (Fe) and niobium (Nb) mining sites (TENORM) as well as at the undisturbed wooded sites (NORM), all open for free public access. The soil activity concentrations of (232)Th (3280-8395 Bq kg(-1)) were significantly higher than the world and the Norwegian average values and exceeded the Norwegian screening level (1000 Bq kg(-1)) for radioactive waste, while radium ((226)Ra) was present at slightly elevated levels (89-171 Bq kg(-1)). Terrestrial gamma dose rates were also elevated, ranging 2.6-4.4 µGy h(-1). Based on long-term surveys, the air concentrations of thoron ((220)Rn) and radon ((222)Rn) reached 1786 and 82 Bq m(-3), respectively. Seasonal variation in the outdoor gamma dose rates and Rn concentrations was confirmed. Correlation analyses showed a linear relationship between air radiation levels and the abundance of (232)Th in soil. The annual outdoor effective radiation doses for humans (occupancy 5 h day(-1)) were estimated to be in the range of 3.0-7.7 mSv, comparable or higher than the total average (summarized indoor and outdoor) exposure dose for the Norwegian population (2.9 mSv year(-1)). On the basis of all obtained results, this Norwegian area should be considered as enhanced natural radiation area (ENRA).


Subject(s)
Gamma Rays , Radiation Monitoring , Radon/analysis , Soil Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Air Pollutants, Radioactive/analysis , Humans , Mining , Norway , Radiation Dosage , Seasons , Soil/chemistry , Thorium/analysis
9.
Phys Eng Sci Med ; 45(3): 687-704, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35737222

ABSTRACT

Modern human populations are exposed to anthropogenic sources of radiofrequency-electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs), primarily to telecommunication and broadcasting technologies. As a result, ongoing concerns from some members of the public have arisen regarding potential health effects following RF-EMF exposures. In order to monitor human RF-EMF exposures and investigate potential health effects, an objective assessment of RF-EMF exposures is necessary. Accurate dosimetry is essential for any investigation of potential associations between RF-EMF exposure and health effects in human populations. This review updates state-of-the-art knowledge of currently available RF-EMF exposure assessment tools applicable in human epidemiological studies. These tools cater for assessing RF-EMF exposures in human environments; through mobile phone-based tools or other standalone tools. RF-EMF exposure assessment has been significantly improved through the application of some of these tools in recent years.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Humans , Radio Waves
10.
PLoS One ; 17(6): e0269457, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35671286

ABSTRACT

Little was known about the relationship between carrying mobile phone handsets by men and their risk perception of radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure due to carrying handsets close to the body. This study aimed to determine where men usually carried their handsets and to assess the relationship to risk perception of RF-EMF. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire about mobile phone use, handset carrying locations, and levels of risk perception to RF-EMF. Data were analysed using linear regression models to examine if risk perception differed by mobile phone carrying location. The participants were 356 men, aged 18-72 years. They owned a mobile phone for 2-29 years, with over three quarters (78.7%) having a mobile phone for over 20 years. The most common locations that men kept their handsets when they were 'indoors' were: on a table/desk (54.0%) or in close contact with the body (34.7%). When outside, 54.0% of men kept the handset in the front trouser pocket. While making or receiving calls, 85.0% of men held their mobile phone handset against the head and 15.0% either used earphones or loudspeaker. Men who carried their handset in close contact with the body perceived higher risks from RF-EMF exposure compared to those who kept it away from the body (p<0.01). A substantial proportion of men carried their mobile phone handsets in close proximity to reproductive organs i.e. front pocket of trousers (46.5%). Men who kept their handset with the hand (p < .05), and those who placed it in the T-shirt pocket (p < .05), while the phone was not in use, were more likely to perceive health risks from their behaviour, compared to those who kept it away from the body. However, whether this indicates a causal relationship, remains open.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Cross-Sectional Studies , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Humans , Male , Perception , Radio Waves/adverse effects
11.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 47(11): 2781-2787, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34364721

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines (ATA15) consider hemithyroidectomy (HT) a viable treatment option for low-risk papillary thyroid cancers (PTCs) between 1 and 4 cm. We aimed to examine the impact of ATA15 in a high-volume Australian endocrine surgery unit. METHODS: A retrospective study of all patients undergoing thyroidectomy from January 2010 to December 2019. INCLUSION CRITERIA: PTC histopathology, Bethesda V-VI, size 1-4 cm, and absence of clinical evidence of lymph node or distant metastases pre-operatively. Primary outcome was rate of HT before and after ATA15. RESULTS: Of 5408 thyroidectomy patients, 339 (6.3%) met the inclusion criteria - 186 (54.9%) pre-ATA15 (2010-2015) and 153 (45.1%) post-ATA15 (2016-2019). The patient groups were similar; there were no significant differences between groups in age, sex, tumour size, proportion with Bethesda VI cytology, compressive symptoms, or thyrotoxicosis. Post-ATA15, there was a significant increase in HT rate from 5.4% to 19.6% (P = 0.0001). However, there was no corresponding increase in completion thyroidectomy (CT) rate (50.0% versus 27.6%, P = 0.2). The proportion managed with prophylactic central neck dissection (pCND) fell from 80.5% to 10.8% (P < 0.0001). Pre-ATA15, the only factor significantly associated with HT was Bethesda V. In contrast, post-ATA15, HT was more likely in patients with younger age, smaller tumours, and Bethesda V. CONCLUSION: After the release of 2015 ATA guidelines, we observed a significant increase in HT rate and a significant decrease in pCND rate for low-risk PTCs in our specialised thyroid cancer unit. This reflects a growing clinician uptake of a more conservative approach as recommended by ATA15.


Subject(s)
Practice Guidelines as Topic , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/surgery , Thyroidectomy/methods , Australia , Female , Hospitals, High-Volume , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Cancer, Papillary/pathology
12.
Eur J Surg Oncol ; 46(2): 252-257, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31648951

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid nodules are increasingly common. Despite being an essential pre-operative diagnostic tool, up to 30% of fine needle aspirate cytology (FNAC) yields a non-definitive diagnosis. This study aimed to quantify differences in surgical management of patients with definitive and indeterminate thyroid nodule cytology, and determine if clinical factors can improve cytological diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent thyroidectomy for nodules from 2001 to 2015 were recruited. Those with benign and malignant preoperative cytology were included in the "definitive diagnosis" (DC) group; patients with all other preoperative cytology results were included in the "indeterminate diagnosis" (IC) group. We compared demographics and procedures between these groups. Clinical factors and demographics were also compared between patients with benign and malignant histology in the IC group. RESULTS: A total of 3821 cases were included. A significantly larger proportion of the IC patients had a hemithyroidectomy (IC 69% vs. DC 39%, p < 0.001) initially, and also had a significantly higher rate of two-stage surgery compared to the DC group (IC 17% vs. DC 11%, p < 0.001). Patients in the DC group were twice as likely to undergo concurrent central lymph node dissection for papillary and medullary cancers than the IC group (p < 0.001). Overall, up to 60% of IC patients had been over- or under-treated at initial surgery. The clinical factors examined were not significantly associated with higher risk of malignancy in IC patients. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential for improved preoperative diagnosis to streamline decision making for surgical management of patients with thyroid nodules.


Subject(s)
Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/surgery , Thyroidectomy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Female , Humans , Lymph Node Excision , Male , Middle Aged , Thyroidectomy/adverse effects , Young Adult
13.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 41(4): 985-991, 2018 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30338493

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to evaluate the weekly and annual cumulative radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure attributed to mobile phone (MP) use, and assess whether a novel app (Quanta Monitor™) could be employed in a small human sample to characterise the RF-EMF exposures associated with the use of MPs. Ten participants provided their two months' daily objective data on their MP exposures (i.e. transmitted and received power densities) attributed to different modes of MP usage such as cellular calls, cellular data and Wi-Fi. The results demonstrated that total transmitted power density (cellular phone calls, data and Wi-Fi surfing) could be many orders of magnitude higher than that from the total received power density. Of the total transmitted power density, cellular data use contributed the largest portion. Our study showed that Quanta Monitor™ could be employed in prospective assessment of exposures to MPs in epidemiological studies.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone/statistics & numerical data , Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Environmental Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Young Adult
14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30321997

ABSTRACT

The measurement of personal exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) is important for epidemiological studies. RF-EMF exposure can be measured using personal exposimeters that register RF-EMFs over a wide range of frequency bands. This study aimed to measure and describe personal RF-EMF exposure levels from a wide range of frequency bands. Measurements were recorded from 63 participants over an average of 27.4 (±4.5) hours. RF-EMF exposure levels were computed for each frequency band, as well as from downlink (RF from mobile phone base station), uplink (RF from mobile phone handsets), broadcast, and Wi-Fi. Participants had a mean (±SD) age of 36.9 ± 12.5 years; 66.7% were women; and almost all (98.2%) from urban areas. A Wi-Fi router at home was reported by 61 participants (96.8%), with 38 (61.2%) having a Wi-Fi enabled smart TV. Overall, 26 (41.3%) participants had noticed the existence of a mobile phone base station in their neighborhood. On average, participants estimated the distance between the base station and their usual residence to be about 500 m. The median personal RF-EMF exposure was 208 mV/m. Downlink contributed 40.4% of the total RF-EMF exposure, followed by broadcast (22.4%), uplink (17.3%), and Wi-Fi (15.9%). RF-EMF exposure levels on weekdays were higher than weekends (p < 0.05). Downlink and broadcast are the main contributors to total RF-EMF personal exposure. Personal RF-EMF exposure levels vary according to day of the week and time of day.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Radio Waves , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Victoria , Young Adult
15.
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol ; 27(5): 497-504, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27759027

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to assess environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposures in kindergarten children. Ten children and 20 kindergartens in Melbourne, Australia participated in personal and environmental exposure measurements, respectively. Order statistics of RF-EMF exposures were computed for 16 frequency bands between 88 MHz and 5.8 GHz. Of the 16 bands, the three highest sources of environmental RF-EMF exposures were: Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM) 900 MHz downlink (82 mV/m); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) 2100MHz downlink (51 mV/m); and GSM 900 MHz uplink (45 mV/m). Similarly, the three highest personal exposure sources were: GSM 900 MHz downlink (50 mV/m); UMTS 2100 MHz downlink, GSM 900 MHz uplink and GSM 1800 MHz downlink (20 mV/m); and Frequency Modulation radio, Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz and Digital Video Broadcasting-Terrestrial (10 mV/m). The median environmental exposures were: 179 mV/m (total all bands), 123 mV/m (total mobile phone base station downlinks), 46 mV/m (total mobile phone base station uplinks), and 16 mV/m (Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz). Similarly, the median personal exposures were: 81 mV/m (total all bands), 62 mV/m (total mobile phone base station downlinks), 21 mV/m (total mobile phone base station uplinks), and 9 mV/m (Wi-Fi 2.4 GHz). The measurements showed that environmental RF-EMF exposure levels exceeded the personal RF-EMF exposure levels at kindergartens.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Radio Waves , Schools , Child, Preschool , Humans , Victoria
16.
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med ; 39(1): 29-42, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26684750

ABSTRACT

Radiofrequency-electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure of human populations is increasing due to the widespread use of mobile phones and other telecommunication and broadcasting technologies. There are ongoing concerns about potential short- and long-term public health consequences from RF-EMF exposures. To elucidate the RF-EMF exposure-effect relationships, an objective evaluation of the exposures with robust assessment tools is necessary. This review discusses and compares currently available RF-EMF exposure assessment instruments, which can be used in human epidemiological studies. Quantitative assessment instruments are either mobile phone-based (apps/software-modified and hardware-modified) or exposimeters. Each of these tool has its usefulness and limitations. Our review suggests that assessment of RF-EMF exposures can be improved by using these tools compared to the proxy measures of exposure (e.g. questionnaires and billing records). This in turn, could be used to help increase knowledge about RF-EMF exposure induced health effects in human populations.


Subject(s)
Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Radio Waves , Cell Phone , Humans
17.
Environ Int ; 92-93: 388-97, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27136346

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to: i) measure personal exposure in the Global System for Mobile communications (GSM) 900MHz downlink (DL) frequency band with two systems of exposimeters, a personal distributed exposimeter (PDE) and a pair of ExpoM-RFs, ii) compare the GSM 900MHz DL exposures across various microenvironments in Australia and Belgium, and iii) evaluate the correlation between the PDE and ExpoM-RFs measurements. Personal exposure data were collected using the PDE and two ExpoM-RFs simultaneously across 34 microenvironments (17 each in Australia and Belgium) located in urban, suburban and rural areas. Summary statistics of the electric field strengths (V/m) were computed and compared across similar microenvironments in Australia and Belgium. The personal exposures across urban microenvironments were higher than those in the rural or suburban microenvironments. Likewise, the exposure levels across the outdoor were higher than those for indoor microenvironments. The five highest median exposure levels were: city centre (0.248V/m), bus (0.124V/m), railway station (0.105V/m), mountain/forest (rural) (0.057V/m), and train (0.055V/m) [Australia]; and bicycle (urban) (0.238V/m), tram station (0.238V/m), city centre (0.156V/m), residential outdoor (urban) (0.139V/m) and park (0.124V/m) [Belgium]. Exposures in the GSM900 MHz frequency band across most of the microenvironments in Australia were significantly lower than the exposures across the microenvironments in Belgium. Overall correlations between the PDE and the ExpoM-RFs measurements were high. The measured exposure levels were far below the general public reference levels recommended in the guidelines of the ICNIRP and the ARPANSA.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Electromagnetic Fields , Environmental Exposure , Environmental Monitoring/instrumentation , Australia , Belgium , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Radio Waves
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL