Treatment patterns of patients with HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens: a cohort study in the French nationwide healthcare database.

PURPOSE: To assess real-world treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who received cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or fulvestrant at first line. METHODS: Patient characteristics, treatment history, and outcomes data were extracted from the French 'Système National des Données de Santé' (SNDS) database for patients diagnosed with HR+/HER2- mBC between January 2014 and June 2019 and who received combination therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor and endocrine therapy. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to assess time to next treatment (TTNT) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 6061 patients including 4032 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and 2029 patients who received CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant. Median follow-up was 13.5 months (IQR 9.5-18.1). The median TTTD of first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs and CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant was 17.3 months (95% CI 16.8-17.9) and 9.7 months (95% CI 9.0-10.2), respectively. Chemotherapy was the most common second line therapy. Median TTTD of subsequent treatment lines was progressively shorter following first line treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors + AIs (2nd line: 4.6 months (95% CI 4.4-4.9) and with CDK4/6 inhibitors + fulvestrant (2nd line: 4.7 months (95% CI 4.3-5.1). TTNT was longer than TTTD across lines of therapy. CONCLUSION: This real-world analysis confirms the effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitor-based regimens in French patients and highlights the frequent use of chemotherapy as second line therapy.

Molecular and Clinical Portrait of HER2-low Invasive Lobular Carcinomas.

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILCs) have a low frequency of ERBB2 amplification, therefore restricting the use of conventional anti-HER2 therapies for this histologic special type. Conversely, ILCs with low HER2 overexpression may represent a broader target for the use of emerging antibody drug conjugate therapies targeting HER2, since these treatments have proven effective in HER2-low breast cancers. Very scarce data about HER2-low ILCs have been so far published, although these tumors could have different prevalence and histomolecular specificities compared with invasive breast carcinoma of no special type (IBC-NST). Our aims in that context were to decipher the clinicopathological and molecular features of a large series of HER2-low ILCs. Comparative evaluation of HER2-low prevalence was done based on a retrospective series of 7970 patients from Institut Curie, with either primary invasive lobular (N = 1103) or no special type (N = 6867) invasive carcinoma. Clinicopathological and molecular analyses of HER2-zero, HER2-low, and HER2-positive ILCs were performed on a subgroup of 251 patients who underwent surgery for a primary ILC between 2005 and 2008. The mutational profile of these 251 cases was determined from RNAseq data. Compared with HER2-negative IBC-NSTs, the HER2-negative ILCs were found to display a higher frequency of HER2-zero cases (59.4% vs 53.7%) and a lower frequency of HER2-low (40.6% vs 46.3%) (P < .001). Clinicopathological features associated with HER2-low status (vs HER2-zero) in ILC were older age, postmenopausal status, nonclassic ILC histological types, higher grade, proliferation, and estrogen receptor expression levels. Survival curve analysis showed a significantly lower risk of local recurrence for HER2-low (vs HER2-zero) ILCs, but no association was found between HER2 status and either breast cancer-specific survival or distant metastasis-free interval. ERBB3 was the unique mutated gene exclusively associated with HER2-low ILCs yet being mutated at a low frequency (7.1%) (false discovery rate < 0.05). In conclusion, HER2-low ILCs exhibit their own particularities, both on clinical-pathological and molecular levels. Our findings call for larger multicenter validation studies.

E-Cadherin Mutational Landscape and Outcomes in Breast Invasive Lobular Carcinoma.

Invasive lobular carcinomas (ILC) are characterized by the loss of E-cadherin expression and CDH1 gene inactivation. Diagnostic reproducibility for this tumor type is currently suboptimal and could be improved by a better understanding of its histomolecular and clinical heterogeneity. We have analyzed the relationship between the presence, type, or position of CDH1 mutations, E-cadherin expression, and clinicopathological features (including outcome) in a retrospective series of 251 primary ILC with a long follow-up (median: 9.5 years). The mutational status of E-cadherin gene (CDH1) was determined by RNA sequencing from frozen tumor samples. E-cadherin immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with antibodies directed against the intracellular domain (clone 4A2C7) and the extracellular domain (clone NCH38). IHC expression of p120 and ß-catenin was also assessed in E-cadherin diffusely positive cases. Three major patterns of E-cadherin membrane expression were identified by IHC, with good agreement between the 2 clones (overall concordance: 83.8%, Kappa 0.67): null/focal expression (≤10%) (72.8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 83.8% for NCH38), heterogeneous expression (11%-89%) (19.2% of cases for 4A2C7 and 6.9% for NCH38), and diffuse expression (≥90%) (8% of cases for 4A2C7 and 9.3% for NCH38). E-cadherin membranous expression, when present, was abnormal (incomplete labeling and/or reduced intensity). ILC with diffuse E-cadherin expression showed abnormal ß-catenin or p120-catenin staining in 21% of cases. Interestingly, these cases with diffusely expressed E-cadherin had a CDH1 mutation rate as high as the E-cadherin null/focal cases (∼70%) but were enriched in nontruncating mutations. Regarding CDH1 mutation location, intracytoplasmic domain mutations correlated with a divergent E-cadherin IHC phenotype between the 2 antibodies (4A2C7 ≤ 10%/NCH38 ≥ 10%). Clinico-pathological correlation analyses found that stromal amount (inversely correlated with tumor cellularity) and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were less abundant in ILC with E-cadherin null/focal cases. In addition, CDH1 truncating mutations were associated with radiohistologic size discordance and were identified in multivariate survival analysis as an independent poor prognosis factor in terms of metastasis risk and breast cancer-related mortality. Overall, our study highlights the importance of the precise mutational status of CDH1 in the clinical, radiological, histologic, and phenotypic expression of lobular carcinomas. These findings should be taken into account in future attempts to improve diagnostic criteria or methods for ILC, as well as for clinicobiological studies dedicated to this tumor type.

Could a Long-Acting Prodrug of SN-38 be Efficacious in Sacituzumab Govitecan-Resistant Tumors?

We previously proposed that sacituzumab govitecan (SG, Trodelvy®) likely acts as a simple prodrug of systemic SN-38 as well as an antibody drug conjugate (ADC). In the present commentary, we assess whether a long-acting SN-38 prodrug, such as PLX038, might be efficacious in SG-resistant patients. We first describe possible mechanisms of action of SG, with new insights on pharmacokinetics and TROP2 receptor occupancy. We argue that SG is not an optimal conventional ADC and that the amount of systemic SN-38 spontaneously hydrolyzed from the ADC is so high it must have activity. Then, we describe the concept of time-over-target as related to the pharmacology of SG and PLX038 as SN-38 prodrugs. To be clear, we are not in any way suggesting that PLX038 or any SN-38 prodrug is superior to SG as an anticancer agent. Clearly, SG has the benefit over antigen-independent SN-38 prodrugs in that it targets cells with the TROP2 receptor. However, we surmise that PLX038 should be a more efficacious and less toxic prodrug of systemic SN-38 than SG. Finally, we suggest possible mechanisms of SG resistance and how PLX038 might perform in the context of each. Taken together, we argue that-contrary to many opinions-SG does not exclusively act as a conventional ADC, and propose that PLX038 may be efficacious in some settings of SG-resistance.

On-Chip Magnetic Extraction of Circulating Cell-Free DNA from Biological Samples.

In recent years, the analysis of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) containing tumor-derived DNA has emerged as a noninvasive means for cancer monitoring and personalized medicine. However, the isolation of cfDNA from peripheral blood has remained a challenge due to the low abundance and high fragmentation of these molecules. Here, we present a dynamic Magnetic ExTRactiOn (METRO) protocol using microfluidic fluidized bed technology to isolate circulating cfDNA from raw biological materials such as undiluted serum. This protocol maximizes the surface area for DNA binding within the chip in order to capture short DNA fragments. It uses only a few µL of sample and reagents. The protocol can be automated, and it is fully compatible with sensitive DNA amplification methods such as droplet-based digital PCR (ddPCR).

Tolerance of Concurrent Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Pembrolizumab for Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Real Life Experience.

Purpose: The current standard-of-care management of locally advanced triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is based on neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab, surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and adjuvant pembrolizumab. However, the safety of combining pembrolizumab with adjuvant breast RT has never been evaluated. This study evaluated the tolerance profile of concurrent pembrolizumab with adjuvant RT in patients with locally advanced TNBC. Methods and Materials: This bicentric ambispective study included all the patients with early and locally advanced TNBC who received neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy with pembrolizumab and adjuvant RT as part of their treatment. The tolerance profile of adjuvant RT was evaluated and compared in patients who received concurrent pembrolizumab and in patients for whom pembrolizumab was withheld. Results: Fifty-five patients were included between July 2021 and March 2023. Twenty-eight patients received adjuvant RT with concurrent pembrolizumab (RT+P group), and 27 patients had pembrolizumab withheld while receiving adjuvant RT (RT-only group). Two patients developed grade ≥3 toxicity (1 grade 3 pain in the RT+P group and 1 grade 3 radiodermatitis in the RT-only group), and there were no differences in terms of toxicity between the RT-only and the RT+P groups. No cardiac or pulmonary adverse event was reported during RT. With a median follow-up of 12 months (10-26), no patient relapsed. Conclusions: In this study of limited size, the authors did not find a difference between the RT-only and RT+P groups in terms of toxicity. More studies and longer follow-up may add to the strength of this evidence.

Fulvestrant and everolimus efficacy after CDK4/6 inhibitor: a prospective study with circulating tumor DNA analysis.

In a prospective study (NCT02866149), we assessed the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i pre-treated mBC patients and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes throughout therapy. Patients treated with fulvestrant and everolimus had their ctDNA assessed at baseline, after 3-5 weeks and at disease progression. Somatic mutations were identified in archived tumor tissues by targeted NGS and tracked in cell-free DNA by droplet digital PCR. ctDNA detection was then associated with clinicopathological characteristics and patients' progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and best overall response (BOR). In the 57 included patients, median PFS and OS were 6.8 (95%CI [5.03-11.5]) and 38.2 (95%CI [30.0-not reached]) months, respectively. In 47 response-evaluable patients, BOR was a partial response or stable disease in 15 (31.9%) and 11 (23.4%) patients, respectively. Among patients with trackable somatic mutation and available plasma sample, N = 33/47 (70.2%) and N = 19/36 (52.8%) had ctDNA detected at baseline and at 3 weeks, respectively. ctDNA detection at baseline and PIK3CA mutation had an adverse prognostic impact on PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. This prospective cohort study documents the efficacy of fulvestrant and everolimus in CDK4/6i-pretreated ER + /HER2- mBC and highlights the clinical validity of early ctDNA changes as pharmacodynamic biomarker.

Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at Institut Curie Hospitals: efficacy, safety, and impact of brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) has been approved by FDA in April 2021 for pre-treated metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC), following the ASCENT trial results. METHODS: We set up an ambispective bicentric cohort study to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of SG in patients with mTNBC treated at Institut Curie Hospitals, with a focus on patients with brain metastases. RESULTS: This study included 99 patients treated through the French Early Access Program to SG from May 2021 to January 2023. Median age was 55 years [26-89], N = 8 patients (8%) had BRCA1/2 mutation, N = 12 (12%) de novo stage IV disease and N = 31 (31%) brain metastases. Patients had previously received a median of two [1-10] lines of treatment in advanced setting. After a median follow-up of 9.7 months, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.9 months (95%CI[3.4-5.0]) and 8.6 months (95%CI[7.1-11.9]), respectively, while objective response rate was 29% (95%CI[21-39]). Among patients with brain metastases, median PFS and OS were 3.7 months (95%CI[2.6-6.2]) and 6.7 months (95%CI[6.3-NR]), respectively, with intracranial tumor responses. Dose reductions were required in N = 17 patients (17%) within a median of three [2-11] cycles, due to gastrointestinal toxicity (N = 6; 6%), hematological toxicity (N = 9; 9%) including febrile neutropenia (N = 2; 2%), liver enzyme elevation (N = 1; 1%), and physical deterioration (N = 1; 1%). There was no related death to SG. CONCLUSIONS: The observed response rate and safety of SG are consistent with the results of the ASCENT trial, with efficacy observed in patients with brain metastases, but observed PFS and OS are numerically shorter.

Elacestrant in ER+, HER2- MBC with ESR1-mutated tumors: Subgroup Analyses from the Phase III EMERALD Trial by Prior Duration of Endocrine Therapy Plus CDK4/6 Inhibitor and in Clinical Subgroups.

PURPOSE: Elacestrant significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with manageable safety versus standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine therapy (ET) in patients with ER+, HER2- mBC and tumors harboring ESR1 mutation following ET plus a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (ET+CDK4/6i). In patients with ESR1-mutated tumors, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of elacestrant versus SOC based on prior ET+CDK4/6i duration, and in clinical subgroups with prior ET+CDK4/6i ≥12 months. METHODS: EMERALD, an open-label phase III trial, randomized patients with ER+, HER2- mBC, 1-2 prior lines of ET, mandatory CDK4/6i, and ≤1 chemotherapy to elacestrant (345 mg daily) or SOC (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant). PFS was assessed across subgroups in post-hoc exploratory analyses without adjustment for multiple testing. RESULTS: In patients with ESR1-mutated tumors and prior ET+CDK4/6i ≥12 months, median PFS (mPFS) for elacestrant versus SOC was 8.6 versus 1.9 months (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.26-0.63). In this population, mPFS (in months) for elacestrant versus SOC was 9.1 versus 1.9 (bone metastases), 7.3 versus 1.9 (liver and/or lung metastases), 9.0 versus 1.9 (<3 metastatic sites), 10.8 versus 1.8 (≥3 metastatic sites), 5.5 versus 1.9 (PIK3CA mutation), 8.6 versus 1.9 (TP53 mutation), 9.0 versus 1.9 (HER2-low), 9.0 versus 1.9 (ESR1 D538G-mutated tumors), and 9.0 versus 1.9 (ESR1 Y537S/N-mutated tumors). Subgroup safety was consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Duration of prior ET+CDK4/6i ≥12 months in mBC was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in PFS for elacestrant compared to SOC and was consistent across all subgroups evaluated in patients with ER+, HER2-, ESR1-mutated tumors.

Circulating extracellular vesicles provide valuable protein, but not DNA, biomarkers in metastatic breast cancer.

Detection of cell-free circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and cancer-specific extracellular vesicles (EVs) in patient blood have been widely explored as non-invasive biomarkers for cancer detection and disease follow up. However, most of the protocols used to isolate EVs co-isolate other components and the actual value of EV-associated markers remain unclear. To determine the optimal source of clinically-relevant circulating biomarkers in breast cancer, we applied a size exclusion chromatography (SEC) procedure to analyse separately the content in nucleic acids of EV-enriched and EV-depleted fractions, in comparison to total plasma. Both cellular and mitochondrial DNA (cellDNA and mtDNA) were detected in EV-rich and EV-poor fractions. Analysing specific mutations identified from tumour tissues, we detected tumour-specific cellular alleles in all SEC fractions. However, quantification of ctDNA from total plasma was more sensitive than from any SEC fractions. On the other hand, mtDNA was preferentially enriched in EV fractions from healthy donor, whereas cancer patients displayed more abundant mtDNA in total plasma, and equally distributed in all fractions. In contrast to nucleic acids, using a Multiplexed bead-based EV-analysis assay, we identified three surface proteins enriched in EVs from metastatic breast cancer plasma, suggesting that a small set of EV surface molecules could provide a disease signature. Our findings provide evidence that the detection of DNA within total circulating EVs does not add value as compared to the whole plasma, at least in the metastatic breast cancer patients used here. However, analysis of a subtype of EV-associated proteins may reliably identify cancer patients. These non-invasive biomarkers represent a promising tool for cancer diagnosis and real-time monitoring of treatment efficacy and these results will impact the development of therapeutic approaches using EVs as targets or biomarkers of cancer.