ABSTRACT
Rhabdomyolysis is a clinical syndrome with significant morbidity and mortality that occurs as a result of traumatic and non-traumatic aetiologies. Acute kidney injury, the need for dialysis, and death, can occur due to rhabdomyolysis. This study explores the aetiologies, clinical outcomes and associated factors for poor outcomes in a cohort of patients with rhabdomyolysis in a tertiary trauma centre in Australia.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury , Rhabdomyolysis , Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Australia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Rhabdomyolysis/diagnosis , Rhabdomyolysis/epidemiology , Rhabdomyolysis/therapy , Trauma CentersABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study the barriers and facilitators to lifestyle management in PCOS from the perspectives of endocrinologists and obstetricians and gynecologists (Ob/Gyns) to inform the translation and implementation of the international evidence-based guideline on lifestyle management in PCOS. METHODS: 11 endocrinologists and ten Ob/Gyns participated in semi-structured interviews and transcripts were thematically analyzed on NVIVO software. RESULTS: Both endocrinologists and Ob/Gyns supported lifestyle as key to PCOS management but faced systemic barriers of lack of access to allied health services and had limited capacity for in-depth lifestyle discussions. They suggested team-based approach to address these barriers. Endocrinologists reported lifestyle could be a less effective treatment option and most of their patients had challenges with past failed lifestyle attempts while Ob/Gyns perceived the desire to conceive among patients a facilitator. The importance of credible, individualised and PCOS-specific lifestyle advice was highlighted. CONCLUSION: Endocrinologists and Ob/Gyns perceived lifestyle management as integral to PCOS management but experience barriers to lifestyle management related to specialist care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Resources that provide credible, individualized and PCOS-specific lifestyle advice, team care approach and professional development on motivating patients for lifestyle modification may address these barriers.
Subject(s)
Gynecology , Physicians , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome , Endocrinologists , Female , Humans , Life Style , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapyABSTRACT
Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex condition that involves metabolic, psychological and reproductive complications. Insulin resistance underlies much of the pathophysiology and symptomatology of the condition and contributes to long term complications including cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Women with PCOS are at increased risk of obesity which further compounds metabolic, reproductive and psychological risks. Lifestyle interventions including diet, exercise and behavioural management have been shown to improve PCOS presentations across the reproductive, metabolic and psychological spectrum and are recommended as first line treatment for any presentation of PCOS in women with excess weight by the International Evidence-based Guideline for the Assessment and Management of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome 2018. However, there is a paucity of research on the implementation lifestyle management in women with PCOS by healthcare providers. Limited existing evidence indicates lifestyle management is not consistently provided and not meeting the needs of the patients. In this review, barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based lifestyle management in reference to PCOS are discussed in the context of a federally-funded health system. This review highlights the need for targeted research on the knowledge and practice of PCOS healthcare providers to best inform implementation strategies for the translation of the PCOS guidelines on lifestyle management in PCOS.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Asian men who have sex with men (MSM) who have recently arrived in Australia are an emergent risk group for HIV; however, little is known about how they compare to Australian MSM diagnosed with HIV. This study compared the characteristics of these two groups. METHODS: A retrospective, cross-sectional study of MSM diagnosed with HIV between January 2014 and October 2017 in Melbourne and Sydney public sexual health clinics. Asian MSM were those who had arrived in Australia within 4 years of diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 111 Asian men, 75% spoke a language other than English, 88% did not have Medicare and 61% were international students. Compared with Australian men (n=209), Asian men reported fewer male sexual partners within 12 months (median 4 versus 10, p<0.001), were less likely to have tested for HIV previously (71% versus 89%, p<0.001) and had a lower median CD4 count (326 versus 520, p<0.001). Among Asian men, HIV subtype CRF01-AE was more common (55% versus 16%, p<0.001) and subtype B less common (29% versus 73%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asian MSM diagnosed with HIV reported lower risk and had more advanced HIV. Implications for public health: HIV testing and preventative interventions supporting international students are required.