Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 53: 103613, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36564271

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous research has shown that, in comparison with non-pregnant women of reproductive age, pregnant women with COVID-19 are more likely to be admitted to critical care, receive invasive ventilation, and die. At present there are limited data in relation to outcomes and healthcare utilisation following hospital discharge of pregnant and recently pregnant women admitted to critical care. METHODS: A national cohort study of pregnant and recently pregnant women who were admitted to critical care in Scotland with confirmed or suspected COVID-19. We examined hospital outcomes as well as hospital re-admission rates. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and March 2022, 75 pregnant or recently pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were admitted to 24 Intensive Care Units across Scotland. Almost two thirds (n=49, 65%) were from the most deprived socio-economic areas. Complete 90-day acute hospital re-admission data were available for 74 (99%) patients. Nine (12%) women required an emergency non-obstetric hospital re-admission within 90 days. Less than 5% of the cohort had received any form of vaccination. CONCLUSIONS: This national cohort study has demonstrated that pregnant or recently pregnant women admitted to critical care with COVID-19 were more likely to reside in areas of socio-economic deprivation, and fewer than 5% of the cohort had received any form of vaccination. More targeted public health campaigning across the socio-economic gradient is urgently required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Male , Cohort Studies , Intensive Care Units , Critical Care , Scotland/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy
2.
J Crit Care ; 55: 100-107, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31715526

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: ICU occupancy fluctuates. High levels may disadvantage patients. Currently, occupancy is benchmarked annually which may inaccurately reflect strained units. Outcomes potentially sensitive to occupancy include premature (early) ICU discharge and non-clinical transfer (NCT). This study assesses the association between daily occupancy and these outcomes, and evaluates benchmarking care across Scotland using daily occupancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Population: all Scottish ICU patients, 2006-2014. EXPOSURE: bed occupancy per unit-day; Outcomes: proportion of early discharges and NCTs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. Outcome rates were calculated above various occupancy thresholds. Polynomial regression visualised associations, and inflection points between occupancy and outcomes. Spearman's rho correlations between occupancy measures and outcomes were reported. RESULTS: 65,472 discharges occurred over 57,812 unit-days. 1954(3.0%) discharges were early; 429 (0.7%) were NCTs. Early discharge rates above 70%, 80% and 90% occupancy were 3.9%, 5.0% and 7.5% respectively. Occupancies at which outcome rates greatly increased were near 80% for early discharge, and 90% for NCT. Mean annual occupancy was not correlated with outcomes; annual proportion of days ≥90% occupancy correlated most strongly (early discharge rho = 0.46,p < .001; NCT rho = 0.31, p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate a clear association between daily ICU occupancy and early discharge/NCT. Daily occupancy may better benchmark care quality than mean annual occupancy.


Subject(s)
Bed Occupancy , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Aged , Benchmarking , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Admission , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL