Phase II evaluation of capecitabine in refractory nonsquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

We conducted a multi-institutional study to assess the activity and toxicity of capecitabine in patients with persistent or recurrent nonsquamous cancer of the cervix. Eligible patients were required to possess adequate renal, hepatic and bone marrow function and a Gynecologic Oncology Group performance status of 0-2. Histologic confirmation of the original primary cancer was mandated. Patients must have received one prior systemic chemotherapeutic regimen for cervical cancer that did not include the chemotherapy that may have been administered in conjunction with prior radiation therapy. The initial dose schedule was 2500 mg/m2 orally daily in two divided doses for 14 consecutive days, followed by a 7-day rest, such that each cycle was 21 days. Responses were assessed using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. Twenty-one patients were entered into the trial. One patient was declared ineligible for wrong cell type; thus, 20 were evaluable for toxicity. A median of 2.5 cycles was administered (range 1-11). There was one septic death. Grade 4 neutropenia, renal, neurologic, and pulmonary toxicity was seen in 5%, 5%, 5%, and 10% patients, respectively. There were no responses. Nine patients (45%) each had stable disease and nine showed progression. The remaining two cases (10%) did not have subsequent disease assessment and response could not be assessed. Oral capecitabine at the dose and schedule tested has insignificant activity in nonsquamous cervical cancer patients previously treated with chemotherapy.

Phase II trial of cisplatin as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Ninety-six assessable patients with advanced or recurrent uterine sarcomas, who were no longer controllable with surgery and radiotherapy, and who had not received prior chemotherapy were treated with cisplatin 50 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Of 63 cases with mixed mesodermal tumors, five complete responses (CRs; 8%) and seven partial responses (PRs; 11%) were observed (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3% to 30.9%). Of 33 patients with leiomyosarcoma, one PR (3%) was observed (95% CI, .1% to 15.8%). Adverse effects included leukopenia (23%), nausea and vomiting (73%), and mild azotemia (42%). No patients experienced life-threatening toxicity. Cisplatin has definite activity when given at the dose and schedule that we tested for patients with mixed mesodermal sarcomas who have not received prior chemotherapy, but has little activity in patients with leiomyosarcoma.

Adjuvant therapy of ovarian germ cell tumors with cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin: a trial of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to determine the effectiveness of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with surgically resected ovarian germ cell tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After tumor removal and thorough surgical staging, patients were enrolled on this study and treated with three courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP). Reassessment laparotomy was required of consenting, appropriate patients initially, but became an optional procedure in 1989. RESULTS: Of 93 patients assessable on this trial, 89 are continuously free of germ cell cancer. At second-look laparotomy, two other patients were found to have small foci of immature teratoma; both remain clinically free of recurrence. One received subsequent alternate chemotherapy and one did not. Thus, 91 of 93 patients are currently free of germ cell cancer. Follow-up duration ranges from 4.0 to 90.3 months, with 67 patients monitored for longer than 2 years. Acute toxicity was moderate. One patient developed acute myelomonocytic leukemia 22 months after diagnosis. Another patient was noted to have a malignant lymphoma 69 months after protocol treatment. CONCLUSION: Three courses of BEP will nearly always prevent recurrence in well-staged patients with completely resected ovarian germ cell tumors and should be given to all such patients. The development of acute leukemia as a complication of treatment is disturbing and mandates careful long-term follow-up, but is unusual and does not alter the risk-to-benefit ratio of treatment.

Prolonged oral etoposide as second-line therapy for platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial was conducted to determine the activity of prolonged oral etoposide in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Platinum-resistant disease was defined as progression on platinum-based chemotherapy or recurrence within 6 months of completing therapy. The starting dose was 50 mg/m2/d (30 mg/m2/d for prior radiotherapy) for 21 days, every 28 days. A dose escalation to a maximum dose of 60 mg/m2/d was prescribed. RESULTS: Of 99 patients entered, 97 were assessable for toxicity and 82 were assessable for response. Among 41 platinum-resistant patients a 26.8% response rate (7.3% complete response [CR] and 19.5% partial response [PR] rate) occurred. The median response duration was 4.3 months (range, 1.3 to 8.7), median progression-free interval (PFI) was 5.7 months (range, 0.8 to 30.8+), and median survival time was 10.8 months (range, 1.9 to 45.8). Twenty-five of 41 platinum-resistant patients had also previously received paclitaxel; of which eight (32%) responded. Among 41 platinum-sensitive patients, a 34.1% response rate (14.6% CR and 19.5% PR rate) occurred. The median response duration was 7.5 months (range, 1.9 to 15.2+), median PFI was 6.3+ months (range, 0.9 to 20.4), and median survival time was 16.5+ months (range, 0.9 to 34.8). Of 97 patients assessable for toxicity, grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicity was common, with leukopenia occurring in 41.2% (grade 3, 29%; grade 4, 12%), neutropenia in 45.4% (grade 3, 20%; grade 4, 25%), thrombocytopenia in 9% (grade 3, 5%; grade 4, 4%), and anemia in 13.4%. Three treatment-related deaths occurred: two from neutropenic sepsis and one from thrombocytopenic bleeding after an overdose. One patient developed leukemia. CONCLUSION: This regimen is active in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian carcinoma. Additionally, the regimen is active in paclitaxel-resistant ovarian carcinoma.

Paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy in recurrent or advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a gynecologic oncology group study.

PURPOSE: On the basis of the activity of paclitaxel as a single agent in chemotherapy-naive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix in a prior Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial, a phase II study of paclitaxel and cisplatin as first-line therapy was conducted by the GOG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility included squamous cell cancer of the cervix not curable by surgery or radiation, measurable disease, WBC count > or = 3,000/microL, platelet count > or = 100, 000/microL, serum creatinine > or = 2 mg/100 mL, and adequate hepatic function. The starting dose was paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) infused over 24 hours followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) every 21 days. On the basis of toxicity, a dose escalation of paclitaxel to a maximum dose of 170 mg/m(2)/d was prescribed. RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were enrolled onto this study; 44 patients were assessable for toxicity and 41 for response. Forty (90.9%) had received prior radiation therapy. A median of six courses of chemotherapy was given (range, one to 10 courses). Neutropenia grade 3 (15.9%) and 4 (61.4%) was the most frequent severe adverse effect and was associated with fever in 13 patients (27.7%). Two patients (4.5%) died from neutropenic sepsis. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 6.8% of patients. Of 41 assessable patients, five (12.2%) had complete responses and 14 (34.1%) had partial responses for an overall response rate of 46.3% (95% confidence interval, 30.7% to 62.6%). The median progression-free interval, was 5.4+ months (range, 0.3 to 22+ months) with a median survival of 10.0+ months (range, 0.9 to 22. 2 months). Response was more frequent in patients with disease in nonirradiated sites (70% v 23%, P =.008). CONCLUSION: This regimen seems highly active in advanced and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix and is currently being evaluated by the GOG in a phase III randomized study comparing the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin with cisplatin alone.

Chemotherapy of advanced dysgerminoma: trials of the Gynecologic Oncology Group.

Between 1984 and 1989, 20 assessable patients with incompletely resected ovarian dysgerminoma were treated on two protocols of the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). All patients received cisplatin, bleomycin, and either vinblastine or etoposide. More recent patients also received consolidation chemotherapy with vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide (VAC). Eleven patients had clinically measurable disease, and 10 responded completely. Fourteen second-look procedures were done, and all were negative. Currently, 19 of 20 patients are disease-free with median follow-up of 26 months. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is highly effective in patients with advanced dysgerminoma.

A phase II evaluation of mitolactol in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Sixty patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCC) who had received no prior chemotherapy were entered onto a study of mitolactol (dibromodulcitol [DBD]). The drug was administered orally at an initial dose of 180 mg/m2 per day for 10 days and repeated every 4 weeks. There were 55 evaluable patients, of whom one (2%) had a complete response (CR), and 15 (27%) had a partial response (PR), (CR plus PR, 29%). A 95% confidence interval for the true response rate is 18.8% to 42.1%. Myelosuppression was appreciable at this dose and schedule, with 13 patients experiencing life-threatening thrombocytopenia and two drug-related deaths. The level of activity in this disease encourages us to determine a tolerable dose of this drug in combination with cisplatin for further study.

Adverse effects of intraperitoneal fluorouracil in patients with optimal residual ovarian cancer after second-look laparotomy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Twenty-seven patients with ovarian cancer who had failed combination chemotherapy were offered intraperitoneal (IP) fluorouracil (5-FU) as salvage therapy in an attempt to ascertain the efficacy of such a therapeutic method. All patients had minimal residual epithelial cancer. The median number of treatment cycles was six. Major problems with dialysate inflow and egress occurred in ten patients and required discontinuation of therapy. An additional ten patients experienced hematologic toxicity with a median nadir WBC of 2,300/microL. Therapy was altered but not discontinued because of this complication. Other adverse sequelae, such as abdominal pain, were manageable with medication. IP 5-FU is technically feasible on a multiinstitutional basis in residual ovarian cancer, but its therapeutic role remains to be defined.

Paclitaxel has moderate activity in squamous cervix cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) is a new antineoplastic drug with broad-spectrum activity in solid tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer, head and neck cancer, esophageal cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, and lung cancer. Its unique mechanism of action, polymerization of tubulin monomers, has stimulated both clinical and preclinical research on this agent. As limited drug supplies became more plentiful, a phase II trial of Taxol was initiated in patients with advanced squamous cervix cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this trial, 30 assessable patients were initially entered onto the study and four partial responses were seen. Further accrual of 22 assessable patients was then accomplished to define better the response rate with smaller confidence intervals. The starting dose of Taxol was 170 mg/m2 (135 mg/m2 for patients with prior pelvic radiation) given as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion with courses repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalations to 200 mg/m2 and deescalations to 110 mg/m2 were allowed based on adverse effects. RESULTS: The final response rate was 17% (two complete responses and seven partial responses). The primary and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The response rate makes Taxol a drug with sufficient activity to explore it in combination with other agents with similar activity.

A randomized comparison of doxorubicin alone versus doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide in the management of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: From 1979 to 1984, 356 eligible patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma no longer amenable to therapy with surgery, radiotherapy, or progestins were treated with doxorubicin alone or doxorubicin in combination with cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) with or without cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 i.v. every 3 weeks for eight drug courses. All patients had received prior therapy with progestins with subsequent progression of disease. No patients had received prior therapy with cytotoxic drugs. Of 356 patients, 300 had measurable disease. RESULTS: Among 132 patients treated with doxorubicin alone, there were seven complete responses (5%), 22 partial responses (17%), 73 with stable disease (55%), and 30 with increasing disease within 2 months of study entry (23%). For the 144 patients who received the combination, there were 18 complete responses (13%), 25 partial responses (17%), 75 with stable disease (52%), and 26 with increasing disease (18%). The median progression-free interval for those patients who received doxorubicin alone was 3.2 months, while it was 3.9 months for those who received the combination. The median survival duration for doxorubicin patients was 6.7 months, while it was 7.3 months for the combination patients. None of the unadjusted estimates of treatment differences are statistically significant. Prognostic features that had an impact on outcome included one factor associated with an increased likelihood of response (presence of measurable lung metastases) and four features associated with a poorer survival (poor performance status [PS] of 2 or 3, high pathologic grade, and presence of liver metastases or other intraabdominal disease). If these features are taken into account in multivariate analyses, there is no statistically significant evidence for differences in response rates (relative odds of response, 1.58; P = .06, one-tailed test), and survival duration is slightly longer in the combination regimen (17% reduction in death rate; P = .048). CONCLUSION: The combination of doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide thus appears to offer a small advantage over doxorubicin alone in the management of endometrial carcinoma at the expense of more frequent and severe myelosuppression and gastrointestinal toxicity.

Phase II trial of ifosfamide and mesna in advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Ifosfamide (isophosphamide) and mesna (2-mercaptoethane sodium sulfonate) were administered intravenously at monthly intervals to 46 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma refractory to or recurrent after cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy. Initially, ifosfamide was given as 1.5 g/m2/d x 5 days and mesna as 300 mg/m2 every 4 hours for three doses following ifosfamide, but the initial dose of ifosfamide was reduced to 1.2 g/m2 because of toxicity. Four of the patients initially entered were found to be ineligible: two who had had more than one prior chemotherapy regimen and two who did not have ovarian primaries. One patient received an inadequate trial and four patients had discontinuation of therapy because of toxicity, leaving 41 evaluable for response. Three patients (7.0%) had complete responses and five (13.0%) had partial responses for an overall response rate of 20.0%. Response duration ranged from 2.1 to 20.3 + months with a median of 6.9 + months. Two patients died of renal failure, one of whom had no known renal disease and received 1.5 g/m2/d x 5 days ifosfamide. The second patient received the 1.2 g/m2 dose and was found to have chronic pyelonephritis and pyonephrosis at autopsy. Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was seen in eight (19.5%), grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in four (9.8%), and grade 3 or 4 neurotoxicity in six (14.6%) of the 41 patients evaluable for toxicity. Ifosfamide/mesna is active in epithelial ovarian cancer. GOG trials in untreated patients are being initiated and toxicity is being evaluated.

Topotecan has substantial antitumor activity as first-line salvage therapy in platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian carcinoma: A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: Topotecan is known to be active in recurrent ovarian cancer, but most prior studies have focused on platinum-resistant or refractory populations. This study was undertaken to define the response rate and progression-free interval in platinum-sensitive patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after one or two prior chemotherapy regimens and in whom the interval between prior platinum therapy and the initiation of protocol therapy was greater than 6 months were treated with topotecan 1.5 mg/m(2) intravenously over 30 minutes daily for 5 days, with this cycle repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were entered onto the study; 47 were assessable for toxicity and 46 for response. The response rate was 33% (two complete responses and 13 partial responses), with a median response duration of 11.2 months. Hematologic toxicity predominated but was manageable in most patients with frequent incorporation of cytokines and RBC and platelet transfusions. Fatigue was reported in 15 patients and resulted in the discontinuation of therapy in five responding patients. CONCLUSION: Topotecan is an active drug in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer, with significant but manageable hematologic toxicity. Fatigue is also a common problem that may be dose-limiting in some patients.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel in patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma after platinum-based chemotherapy: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: This Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) trial of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Princeton, NJ) as salvage therapy for recurrent epithelial carcinoma of the ovary sought to confirm activity reported previously. If positive, the trial was to serve as a basis for phase III trials of Taxol in combination with platinum compounds in first-line therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent, persistent, or progressive ovarian carcinoma during or after platinum-based chemotherapy received Taxol 170 mg/m2 intravenously once over 24 hours every 3 weeks. All patients had measurable disease and received premedication (dexamethasone, diphenhydramine, and ranitidine) followed by Taxol. RESULTS: Of 49 patients, 45 were eligible and assessable. Among 43 patients who were assessable for response, there were eight complete and eight partial responses (37%). The median progression-free interval was 4.2 months, and median survival 16 months. Among 27 resistant patients who progressed during or within 6 months of prior platinum-based therapy or had stable disease as the best response, five complete (18%) and four partial (15%) responses were observed (33%). The median progression-free interval was 4 months. Among 16 sensitive patients who responded and progressed more than 6 months after prior platinum-based treatment, three complete (19%) and four partial (25%) responses were observed (44%). The median progression-free interval was 4.9 months. Grade 4 neutropenia (< 500/microL), the most frequent and severe toxicity, occurred in 73% of patients. Other hematologic effects were less frequent and less severe. Cardiac problems and hypersensitivity reactions were observed in one patient each. CONCLUSION: Taxol is a highly active agent in ovarian carcinoma, even in patients who are clinically resistant to platinum-based chemotherapy, and produces frequent and severe, albeit manageable, myelosuppression. It is clearly active as salvage therapy for ovarian carcinoma.

Randomized trial of three cisplatin dose schedules in squamous-cell carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

The Gynecologic Oncology Group has conducted a randomized prospective trial comparing cisplatin 50 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 1), 100 mg/m2 every 21 days (regimen 2), and cisplatin 20 mg/m2 for five consecutive days repeated every 21 days (regimen 3). Four hundred ninety-seven evaluable patients have been accrued on this study. The response rates were 20.7%, 31.4%, and 25.0%, for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; the complete remission rates were 10.0%, 12.7%, and 8.6% for regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median duration of response ranged from 3.9 to 4.8 months, the median progression-free interval from 3.7 to 4.6 months, and the median survival time from 6.1 to 7.1 months. The difference in response rates for regimens 1 and 2 is statistically significant (P = .015) but less than the magnitude originally considered clinically significant. The differences in complete remission rates, response duration, progression-free interval, and survival times are not statistically significant. The following types of toxicity were observed: serum creatinine level greater than 2 mg/dL and/or BUN level greater than 40 mg/dL was 7%, 14%, and 17% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively; leukocyte count less than 4,000/microL was 27%, 44%, and 41% on regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Nausea and vomiting occurred in 74 patients (83%). The regimen consisting of a 100-mg/m2 single dose has produced a statistically significant higher response rate than the 50 mg/m2 regimen while producing no appreciable differences in complete remission rate, response duration, progression-free interval, or survival. In addition, the higher dose regimen was associated with greater myelosuppression and nephrotoxicity.

Randomized trial of cisplatin versus cisplatin plus mitolactol versus cisplatin plus ifosfamide in advanced squamous carcinoma of the cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin, mitolactol (dibromodulcitol), and ifosfamide have been the most active single agents in squamous carcinoma of the cervix identified so far by the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG). Combinations of cisplatin plus ifosfamide and cisplatin plus mitolactol are prospectively compared with cisplatin alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or the same dose of cisplatin plus mitolactol (C + M) 180 mg/m2 orally on days 2 to 6, or cisplatin plus ifosfamide (CIFX) 5 g/m2 given as a 24-hour infusion plus mesna 6 g/m2 during and for 12 hours after the ifosfamide infusion, every 3 weeks for up to six courses. Of 454 patients entered, 438 were eligible and analyzed for response and survival. RESULTS: CIFX had a higher response rate (31.1% v 17.8%, p = .004) and longer progression-free survival (PFS) time (P = .003) compared with cisplatin alone. The median times to progression or death were 4.6 and 3.2 months, respectively. C + M showed no significant improvement in these parameters compared with cisplatin alone. Survival was associated with initial performance score (PS; 0 was more favorable; P < .001) and with age (younger was unfavorable, P = .025). There was no significant difference in overall survival between cisplatin and either of the combinations. Leukopenia, renal toxicity, peripheral neurotoxicity, and CNS toxicity were more frequent with CIFX (P < .05). CONCLUSION: CIFX improved the response rate and PFS duration in advanced cervix cancer compared with cisplatin alone, but at the cost of greater toxicity and with no improvement in survival.

Paclitaxel, an active agent in nonsquamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of paclitaxel was initiated in advanced nonsquamous carcinoma of the cervix to determine its activity in patients who had failed standard chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had at least one measurable lesion. The starting dose of paclitaxel was 170 mg/m(2) (135 mg/m(2) for patients with prior pelvic radiation) given as a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion with courses repeated every 3 weeks. Dose escalation to 200 mg/m(2) and de-escalation to 110 mg/m(2) were allowed based on adverse effects. RESULTS: In this trial, 42 assessable patients were initially entered onto the study, and 13 responses were seen; four patients had a complete response, and nine patients had a partial response. The overall response rate was 31%. The primary and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. CONCLUSION: The response rate to paclitaxel exceeds the rates reported using other single agents in nonsquamous carcinoma of the cervix.

Ten-year follow-up of patients receiving cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma.

Fifty-six patients were randomly assigned to receive either one-day cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) chemotherapy (PAC-I) or five-day PAC (PAC-V) for advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Follow-up has been 120+ months or to death. Ninety-one percent had either suboptimal stage III or stage IV disease and 55% had grade 2 or 3 lesions. Two patients died of toxicity and were free of disease at autopsy. A third patient died of congestive heart failure with no disease at 103 months. Additionally, eight patients had a negative second-look laparotomy, and three (37.5%) are alive with no evidence of disease (NED) 133 to 144 months after diagnosis. Five patients (62.5%) died of disease 2 to 123 months after negative second-look. Patients with optimal stage III disease had a longer median progression-free interval (PFI) and survival (33.3 and 44.5 months, respectively) than those with suboptimal or stage IV disease (16.4 and 22.5 months, respectively), and the difference in median PFI is significant (P less than .02). Patients with ascites at diagnosis had a shorter median PFI and survival (14.7 and 18 months) than those without ascites (30.0 and 33.0 months). Both differences were significant (PFI, P less than .04; survival, P = .005). PAC produces response rates that are superior to those obtained historically with single-agent alkylating therapy. Late recurrences after negative second-look laparotomy suggest that 5-year survival data may be inadequate in ovarian carcinoma.

A randomized comparative trial of carboplatin and iproplatin in advanced squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

A total of 394 patients with advanced, measurable squamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix and no prior chemotherapy were randomized to therapy with either carboplatin or iproplatin. There were 23 patients ineligible for the study and 10 patients who were not evaluable; the remaining 361 patients were evaluable for response and adverse effects. Randomization was well balanced for age, performance status, and prior therapy. Both platinum analogs were given every 28 days with starting doses of 400 mg/m2 for carboplatin (340 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation) and 270 mg/m2 for iproplatin (230 mg/m2 if the patient underwent prior radiation). These doses are equivalent to cisplatin doses of 75 to 100 mg/m2. Hematologic toxicity was dose-limiting, among which thrombocytopenia was slightly more common than leukopenia. Gastrointestinal toxicity was also prominent with both agents; however, iproplatin was significantly more toxic than carboplatin (P less than .001). Renal, otic, and peripheral nervous system toxicities were absent or infrequent with both analogs. No electrolyte abnormalities were observed. The percentage of planned dosages that were actually administered was 100% of carboplatin doses and 85% of iproplatin doses (P less than .0001). The reduction in iproplatin dose was apparently due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Response rates were similar for both agents (15% for carboplatin, 11% for iproplatin) and appear to be inferior to those noted with the parent compound, cisplatin.

A randomized clinical trial of adjuvant adriamycin in uterine sarcomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

After hysterectomy, 156 evaluable patients with stage I (limited to the corpus) or stage II (limited to the corpus and cervix) uterine sarcomas were randomly assigned to adjuvant chemotherapy with Adriamycin (Adria Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio) for six months or to no further treatment. Pelvic irradiation (external or intracavitary) was optional before randomization. Of 75 patients receiving Adriamycin, 31 have suffered recurrences compared with 43 of 81 receiving no adjuvant chemotherapy. This difference is not statistically significant. Moreover, there is no difference in progression-free interval or survival. The optional radiotherapy did not influence the outcome although there was a suggestion that vaginal recurrence was decreased by pelvic radiotherapy. The recurrence rates in specific cell types (leiomyosarcoma, homologous mixed mesodermal sarcoma, or heterologous mixed mesodermal sarcoma) were not significantly different although the pattern of recurrence differed, with pulmonary metastases being more common in leiomyosarcoma and extrapulmonary recurrence being more common in mixed mesodermal sarcoma. The outcome with respect to chemotherapy was not altered even after adjusting for maldistribution of cases. Thus, we could not show a benefit for this dose schedule of Adriamycin as adjuvant treatment for uterine sarcomas.

Current therapy of ovarian carcinoma: an overview.

Significant advances in the management of ovarian carcinoma have been developed over the last decade of research. The advanced nature of the disease in a majority of the patients has underlined the importance of systemic therapy in the treatment of patients with ovarian carcinoma. The last decade has seen the identification of cisplatin-based combinations of drugs as superior to single alkylating agents in the treatment of advanced disease. The importance of aggressive surgical bulk reduction in terms of improved response to chemotherapy and survival has been demonstrated, and the necessity for careful surgical staging of disease both before chemotherapy and at the completion of treatment has been emphasized. A number of exciting new alternative therapies are currently being investigated: intraperitoneal chemotherapy, whole abdominal radiotherapy, biologic response modifiers, and in vitro drug sensitivity testing with the human tumor stem cell assay. The role of these various alternatives is not clear at this time, but their potential for significant contributions to the treatment of ovarian carcinoma holds major promise. For the present, the essentials of management of these patients include careful staging including laparotomy, aggressive surgical bulk reduction, and cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy.