Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 124
Filter
Add more filters

Publication year range
1.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 35(6): 496-500, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37610992

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to review the recent literature with respect to the management of missing intrauterine device (IUD) strings. As IUD use has increased over time, it is important to review management options for this uncommon but possible complication. RECENT FINDINGS: This article will cover stepwise approaches to management of missing IUD strings based on the most recent literature. Initial steps include obtaining history and using in office tools to reveal IUD strings. Subsequent steps focus on imaging guidelines including obtaining transvaginal ultrasound when available. Finally, IUD removal with tools for uterine instrumentation are discussed, focusing on using tools that do not require cervical dilation and allow for grasping of the device. SUMMARY: This paper details a stepwise approach to the management of missing IUD strings which, as discussed in the article, may become more frequent given the rise of IUD use in general and postpartum placement in specific.


Subject(s)
Intrauterine Devices , Female , Humans , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Uterus/diagnostic imaging , Ultrasonography , Postpartum Period
2.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 34(6): 359-366, 2022 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36036465

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW: This review focuses on patients who are most likely to experience morbidity associated with second trimester abortion care and risk mitigation strategies. RECENT FINDINGS: Prior cesarean birth, particularly multiple prior cesarean births, is the most significant risk factor associated with complications during second trimester abortion because of increased risks of hemorrhage, with or without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), and distorted anatomy, which increases the risk of uterine perforation. Recent data suggests that first trimester ultrasound findings may be predictive of PAS, including multiple lacunae, abnormal uteroplacental interface, and hypervascularity. Multiple common medications interact with mifepristone and are therefore contraindicated; ulipristal shares mifepristone's selective progesterone receptor modulator activity but does not share the same metabolic pathway. Recent data suggests ulipristal may be an effective adjunct for cervical preparation, avoiding potentially mifepristone's drug-drug interactions. Those ending a pregnancy due to severe early-onset hypertensive disorders have a high rate of clinically significant thrombocytopenia: platelet transfusion is recommended for those with platelets <50 000 per cubic millimeter. SUMMARY: Pregnant people presenting for care in the second trimester may have conditions that make an abortion more technically or medically complex. Clinicians can mitigate much of this increased risk with preprocedural planning, and appropriate intra-operative preparedness.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Induced , Placenta Accreta , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Pregnancy Trimester, Second , Mifepristone/therapeutic use , Pregnancy Trimester, First , Abortion, Induced/adverse effects
3.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 33(6): 458-462, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34747882

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Myths and misconceptions about family planning are pervasive around the world and can adversely affect both initiation and continuation of family planning services. Here, we review the current literature and identify major themes among them to better understand these myths and misconceptions. RECENT FINDINGS: Myths and misconceptions regarding family planning are a global phenomenon with the most recent studies focused on sub-Saharan Africa and West Africa.The belief that family planning negatively impacts future fertility was mentioned in all studies reviewed.Other major themes include misconceptions about the adverse effects, complications, mechanisms of action, and reproductive health. SUMMARY: Myths and misconceptions regarding family planning are widespread. Current literature suggests that there is a globally prevalent belief that family planning negatively impacts future fertility. Misconceptions related to adverse effects and mechanism of action were also identified. There is overall poor knowledge of sexual and reproductive health in the populations studied. Recent studies focus primarily on sub-Saharan Africa and West Africa. These findings and lessons learned may be helpful in customizing contraceptive counseling and increasing both global access to family planning and satisfied clients.


Subject(s)
Contraception , Family Planning Services , Africa South of the Sahara , Contraception Behavior , Fertility , Humans , Sexual Behavior
4.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(2): 177.e1-177.e7, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30444982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A major barrier to intrauterine device use is fear of pain during insertion. Trials exploring analgesic interventions for intrauterine device insertion have yielded mixed results, and no standardized pain management guidelines currently exist for this procedure. In an abortion-related study, self-administered lidocaine gel over a prolonged time interval showed promise as a method of pain control. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of the study was to assess pain control with intrauterine device insertion after patient-administered lidocaine gel compared with placebo. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, blinded trial of women undergoing levonorgestrel or copper intrauterine device insertion in an outpatient gynecology clinic between July 2016 and April 2017. Participants self-administered either 20 mL of 2% lidocaine gel or placebo gel vaginally at least 15 minutes prior to intrauterine device insertion. No other analgesics were administered. The primary outcome was pain during intrauterine device insertion, measured on a 100-mm visual analog scale (0 being no pain and 100 being worst pain imaginable). Secondary outcomes included anticipated and baseline pain and pain with speculum insertion and tenaculum placement. In a postprocedure questionnaire, participants reported acceptability of vaginal gel and willingness to wait for pain control. Median values were assessed because of the nonnormal distribution of visual analog scale scores using the Mann-Whitney U test. Predictors of intrauterine device insertion pain were assessed using a multiple linear regression. RESULTS: In total, 220 women were randomized and 215 were included in analysis (108 in lidocaine gel, 107 in placebo gel groups). Median (range) time from gel administration to speculum insertion was 21 (14-74) and 20 (12-43) minutes in the lidocaine and placebo groups, respectively (P = .13). The median pain scores during intrauterine device insertion were not significantly different: 65 (1-99) mm in the lidocaine group and 59 (5-100) mm in the placebo group (P = .09). Among secondary outcome time points, only median pain scores at speculum insertion were significantly different between the lidocaine and placebo groups (7 [0-81] mm vs 11 [0-80] mm, respectively; P = .046). Anticipated pain and menstrual pain were both predictors of pain with intrauterine device insertion. The majority of women in both groups found the amount of vaginal leakage following gel insertion to be acceptable (>80%). Ninety-two percent of participants (n = 194) stated they would be willing to wait before intrauterine device placement for a potential analgesic effect. CONCLUSION: Self-administered lidocaine gel at least 15 minutes before intrauterine device insertion does not appear to reduce pain compared with placebo but may help with speculum insertion. We found that women are willing to extend visit time to gain pain control. Self-administration of local anesthetic is acceptable to patients and should be considered in future research.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/adverse effects , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Pain, Procedural/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/therapeutic use , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Treatment Outcome , Vaginal Creams, Foams, and Jellies , Young Adult
5.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 31(6): 441-446, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31436540

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To provide an overview of recent research and guidelines regarding contraception and breastfeeding. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies assessed lactogenesis, breastfeeding rates, and milk supply concerns in patients starting postpartum hormonal contraception. One study showed a small but statistically significant increase in milk supply concerns between users and nonusers of postpartum hormonal contraception. Mean time to lactogenesis and breastfeeding rates were similar between patients with immediate and delayed insertion of the levonorgestrel (LNG) implant in one study and the LNG intrauterine device (IUD) in another study. Two studies assessed nursing knowledge and attitudes toward postpartum contraception in breastfeeding women, showing that postpartum nurses had incorrect knowledge of contraceptive safety in this patient population. Both studies demonstrated persistent erroneous beliefs that depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) adversely affects breastfeeding. In postpartum patients intending to breastfeed, more than half intended to initiate contraception within 6 weeks postpartum and few indicated effect on breastfeeding as a factor in their decision. SUMMARY: There are no significant differences in lactogenesis, breastfeeding, and infant growth parameters between immediate postpartum (IPP) and delayed insertion of LNG implants and IUDs. Labor and delivery and postpartum nurses have persistent erroneous beliefs that DMPA negatively affects breastfeeding. Patients desire to use contraception postpartum but prenatal counseling rates and practices are of variable content and quality.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Contraception/methods , Contraceptive Agents/therapeutic use , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Contraceptive Agents/adverse effects , Delayed-Action Preparations , Female , Gynecology/standards , Gynecology/trends , Hormonal Contraception , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Intrauterine Devices/adverse effects , Lactation/drug effects , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/adverse effects , Medroxyprogesterone Acetate/therapeutic use , Milk, Human/drug effects , Postpartum Period , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pregnancy
6.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 219(3): 235-241, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30031750

ABSTRACT

The immediate postpartum period is a critical moment for contraceptive access and an opportunity to initiate long-acting reversible contraception, which includes the insertion of an intrauterine device. The use of the intrauterine device in the postpartum period is a safe practice with few contraindications and many benefits. Although an intrauterine device placed during the postpartum period is more likely to expel compared with one placed at the postpartum visit, women who initiate intrauterine devices at the time of delivery are also more likely to continue to use an intrauterine device compared with women who plan to follow up for an interval intrauterine device insertion. This review will focus on the most recent clinical and programmatic updates on postpartum intrauterine device practice. We discuss postpartum intrauterine device expulsion and continuation, eligibility criteria and contraindications, safety in regards to breastfeeding, and barriers to access. Our aim is to summarize evidence related to postpartum intrauterine devices and encourage those involved in the healthcare system to remove barriers to this worthwhile practice.


Subject(s)
Intrauterine Devices , Postnatal Care/methods , Breast Feeding , Cesarean Section , Clinical Competence , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraindications, Procedure , Delivery, Obstetric , Female , Health Care Costs , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Insurance, Health , Intrauterine Device Expulsion , Intrauterine Devices, Copper , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Long-Acting Reversible Contraception , Pregnancy , Time Factors , Ultrasonography , Uterus
8.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 30(6): 400-406, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30399016

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To evaluate the literature on repeat use of emergency contraception and pericoital approaches to contraception. RECENT FINDINGS: Women are very interested in an oral, on-demand contraceptive option, were one available. Ulipristal acetate and a combination of levonorgestrel (LNG) and meloxicam (a cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor) both appear to be more effective at disrupting ovulation than LNG alone. Recent advisories from the United Kingdom regarding daily dosing of ulipristal for fibroids emphasize the need for more safety data. SUMMARY: Repeat pericoital dosing of 1.5-mg LNG is approximately as effective as other on-demand contraceptive methods and is overall very safe. The most common side effect is irregular bleeding. Repeat on-demand ulipristal acetate or meloxicam/other cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors have potential as an on-demand option either alone or in combination but have not been evaluated for contraceptive efficacy in a large-scale study. Given the high unmet need for contraception, even among women with access to available options, there is a distinct need for options that address needs of women who are interested in an on-demand option. On-demand oral contraception has the potential to expand the convenience of contraceptive options and overall contraceptive use.


Subject(s)
Contraception, Postcoital , Contraceptives, Oral, Synthetic/therapeutic use , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Levonorgestrel/therapeutic use , Norpregnadienes/therapeutic use , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Coitus , Contraception, Postcoital/methods , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Sexual Behavior , Treatment Outcome
9.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 23(2): 116-120, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29560743

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Evaluate bleeding patterns for the Liletta® levonorgestrel 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) using the World Health Organization Belsey definitions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter trial evaluates the efficacy and safety of Liletta® (Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00995150). We evaluated bleeding patterns for 1700 nulliparous and multiparous women using a daily diary completed by participants for the first 2 years and by questionnaire every 3 months thereafter. We assessed amenorrhea rates over 3 years and the proportion of subjects with infrequent, frequent, prolonged and irregular bleeding per 90-day reference period over 2 years for the entire study population as well as comparing nulliparous and parous women and obese and non-obese women. RESULTS: Amenorrhea rates at 1 and 3 years in levonorgestrel 52 mg IUS users were 19 and 37%, respectively. The infrequent bleeding rate increased from 14% in the first 90 days to 30% at the end of Year 1, and was maintained at the same rate through Year 2. Frequent, prolonged and irregular bleeding declined to low levels by the end of the first year. Discontinuation for bleeding-related complaints occurred in 35 (2.1%, 95% CI 1.3-2.7%) women during the first 36 months; only one subject discontinued for amenorrhea (in Year 2). Outcomes did not vary for nulliparous versus parous or obese versus non-obese women. CONCLUSIONS: Among Liletta users, amenorrhea and infrequent bleeding become more prevalent over time and amenorrhea rates continue to increase after the first year of use. Bleeding patterns do not differ significantly by parity or by obesity-status. Discontinuation for bleeding concerns is uncommon with this product.


Subject(s)
Amenorrhea/epidemiology , Contraceptive Agents, Female/adverse effects , Intrauterine Devices, Medicated/adverse effects , Levonorgestrel/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Amenorrhea/chemically induced , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Menstruation Disturbances/chemically induced , Menstruation Disturbances/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Parity , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Young Adult
11.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 29(6): 419-426, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28863005

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Contraception is a vital component of medical care for women with HIV or at high risk of acquiring HIV. Over the last several years, there has been emerging evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of various contraceptive methods, ultimately leading to a revision in the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for contraceptive use. RECENT FINDINGS: Progestogen-only injectables may be associated with an increased risk of HIV acquisition and its use has been revised to category 2 from category 1. Etonogestrel and levonorgestrel levels are lower in women who concurrently use contraceptive implant and efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy. Multipurpose technology, aimed at providing antiretroviral medication and contraception, is an area of ongoing research but is not yet clinically available. SUMMARY: It is important for providers who care for women with HIV or at high risk of HIV to inquire about pregnancy intentions. If contraception is desired, these women should be offered all available methods, with counseling regarding possible risks of contraceptive failure or HIV acquisition.


Subject(s)
Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active/adverse effects , Contraception/methods , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptive Devices, Female , Contraceptive Effectiveness , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Progression , Female , Global Health , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/transmission , Humans , Patient Preference , Pregnancy , Risk Assessment
12.
BMC Womens Health ; 17(1): 67, 2017 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28830483

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the utility and acceptability of using multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPTs) at home to monitor hCG trends following assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: One hundred and four women presenting for ART at either Stanford Medicine Fertility and Reproductive Health Clinic (Stanford, CA) or Hung Vuong Hospital (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) participated in this pilot study. Women were asked to perform the MLPT at home, primarily on days when they were also scheduled to receive standard clinic-based serum hCG testing. These tests were administered up to 6 times over the 6-week period following embryo transfer or intrauterine insemination (IUI). Concordance of serial hCG readings for each time point was assessed by comparing trends in urine MLPT results with trends in serum hCG. Stable or increasing hCG level was interpreted as an indication of a progressing pregnancy, while a declining hCG was interpreted as a lack of established or progressing pregnancy. At study end, all participants were asked about the acceptability and convenience of using the MLPT at home for monitoring hCG trends following ART. RESULTS: Data from both urine and serum testing are available for 156 of 179 clinic visits (87.2%). There was high concordance of serial trend results between the two types of tests: among the 156 sets of serum and urine hCG data points, 150 (96.2%) showed a matching trend in hCG pattern and 6 (3.8%) resulted in a discordant trend. Seventy-three percent of women reported being satisfied or very satisfied with using the MLPTs at home. Almost all (96.6%) said that the MLPT was easy or very easy to use. CONCLUSION: The MLPT offers women and health care providers a client-friendly diagnostic tool to detect very early pregnancy and monitor its progress. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01846403 (May 1, 2013), and NCT01919502 (August 5, 2013).


Subject(s)
Patient Acceptance of Health Care/psychology , Pregnancy Tests/methods , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/psychology , Adult , Chorionic Gonadotropin/metabolism , Embryo Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Pregnancy , Reproduction , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted/statistics & numerical data , United States , Vietnam
15.
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol ; 28(6): 522-529, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27676405

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Emergency contraception provides a critical and time-sensitive opportunity for women to prevent undesired pregnancy after intercourse. Both access and available options for emergency contraception have changed over the last several years. RECENT FINDINGS: Emergency contraceptive pills can be less effective in obese women. The maximum achieved serum concentration of levonorgestrel (LNG) is lower in obese women than women of normal BMI, and doubling the dose of LNG (3 mg) increases its concentration maximum, approximating the level in normal BMI women receiving one dose of LNG. Repeated use of both LNG and ulipristal acetate (UPA) is well tolerated. Hormonal contraception can be immediately started following LNG use, but should be delayed for 5 days after UPA use to avoid dampening the efficacy of UPA. The copper intrauterine device (IUD) is the only IUD approved for emergency contraception (and the most effective method of emergency contraception), but use of LNG IUD as emergency contraception is currently being investigated. Accurate knowledge about emergency contraception remains low both for patients and healthcare providers. SUMMARY: Emergency contraception is an important yet underutilized tool available to women to prevent pregnancy. Current options including copper IUD and emergency contraceptive pills are safe and well tolerated. Significant gaps in knowledge of emergency contraception on both the provider and user level exist, as do barriers to expedient access of emergency contraception.


Subject(s)
Contraception, Postcoital/trends , Contraceptive Agents, Female/administration & dosage , Contraceptives, Postcoital/administration & dosage , Adult , Contraception , Female , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Intrauterine Devices, Copper , Levonorgestrel/administration & dosage , Norpregnadienes/administration & dosage , Obesity/complications , Pregnancy
16.
Clin Obstet Gynecol ; 64(3): 411-414, 2021 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34224429
17.
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care ; 21(5): 356-60, 2016 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27367825

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess continuation rates and satisfaction among post-partum intrauterine device (PPIUD) accepters. METHODS: This prospective observational study comprised 591 Zambian women who underwent PPIUD insertion at sites of the Society for Family Health, Lusaka, Zambia. The women were contacted 6-12 months after PPIUD insertion and asked to return to the clinic for interview and examination. If the IUD strings were not visible, an ultrasound was performed. Participants were asked about their satisfaction with the PPIUD. Main outcome measures were short-term PPIUD continuation and reported complications according to time of insertion. RESULTS: Of 591 women enrolled, 305 women attended the follow-up appointment for interview and examination, giving a power of 80% to estimate an expulsion rate of 10 ± 5%. The IUD was inserted within 10 min of placental delivery (post-placental insertion) in 24.3% of participants (n = 74) and within 48 h (immediate post-partum insertion) in 71.1% of participants (n = 217). The total expulsion rate was 5.6%. Expulsion rates for post-placental and immediate post-partum insertions were 10.8% and 4.1%, respectively. No significant difference in expulsion rates was found (p = 0.10). Of those with an expulsion, 76.5% (n = 13) recognised that it had occurred. There were no reported complications, and 94.1% of women reported being satisfied or very satisfied with their PPIUD (n = 287). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, expulsion rates were lower than previously reported, particularly for immediate post-partum insertions. Attention to high fundal placement at insertion is a likely explanation for the low expulsion rates. Contrary to conventional wisdom, these low expulsion rates indicate that previous notions regarding insertion timing may not be accurate. Satisfaction levels were also favourable. PPIUD can be safe, acceptable and feasible in an African setting.


Subject(s)
Intrauterine Device Expulsion , Intrauterine Devices , Patient Satisfaction , Postpartum Period , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Prospective Studies , Time Factors , Zambia
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL