ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Risk stratification for mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) is paramount in the decision-making process to appropriately select patients with severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). This study sought to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-derived risk score (EuroSMR score) to predict 1-year outcomes (survival or survival + clinical improvement) in patients with SMR undergoing M-TEER. METHODS: An artificial intelligence-derived risk score was developed from the EuroSMR cohort (4172 and 428 patients treated with M-TEER in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively). The EuroSMR score was validated and compared with established risk models. RESULTS: The EuroSMR risk score, which is based on 18 clinical, echocardiographic, laboratory, and medication parameters, allowed for an improved discrimination of surviving and non-surviving patients (hazard ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 3.7-5.0; P < .001), and outperformed established risk scores in the validation cohort. Prediction for 1-year mortality (area under the curve: 0.789, 95% confidence interval 0.737-0.842) ranged from <5% to >70%, including the identification of an extreme-risk population (2.6% of the entire cohort), which had a very high probability for not surviving beyond 1 year (hazard ratio 6.5, 95% confidence interval 3.0-14; P < .001). The top 5% of patients with the highest EuroSMR risk scores showed event rates of 72.7% for mortality and 83.2% for mortality or lack of clinical improvement at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The EuroSMR risk score may allow for improved prognostication in heart failure patients with severe SMR, who are considered for a M-TEER procedure. The score is expected to facilitate the shared decision-making process with heart team members and patients.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Artificial Intelligence , Heart , Echocardiography , Risk Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is an established treatment option for patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and is most commonly performed through the transfemoral access route. Percutaneous access site closure can be achieved using dedicated plug-based or suture-based vascular closure device (VCD) strategies, but randomized comparative studies are scarce. METHODS: The CHOICE-CLOSURE trial (Randomized Comparison of Catheter-based Strategies for Interventional Access Site Closure during Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) is an investigator-initiated, multicenter study, in which patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement were randomly assigned to vascular access site closure using either a pure plug-based technique (MANTA, Teleflex) with no additional VCDs or a primary suture-based technique (ProGlide, Abbott Vascular) potentially complemented by a small plug. The primary end point consisted of access site- or access-related major and minor vascular complications during index hospitalization, defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria. Secondary end points included the rate of access site- or access-related bleeding, VCD failure, and time to hemostasis. RESULTS: A total of 516 patients were included and randomly assigned. The mean age of the study population was 80.5±6.1 years, 55.4% were male, 7.6% of patients had peripheral vascular disease, and the mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 4.1±2.9%. The primary end point occurred in 19.4% (50/258) of the pure plug-based group and 12.0% (31/258) of the primary suture-based group (relative risk, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.07-2.44], P=0.029). Access site- or access-related bleeding occurred in 11.6% versus 7.4% (relative risk, 1.58 [95%CI: 0.91-2.73], P=0.133) and device failure in 4.7% versus 5.4% (relative risk, 0.86, [95% CI, 0.40-1.82], P=0.841) in the respective groups. Time to hemostasis was significantly shorter in the pure plug-based group (80 [32-180] versus 240 [174-316] seconds, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement, a pure plug-based vascular closure technique using the MANTA VCD is associated with a higher rate of access site- or access-related vascular complications but a shorter time to hemostasis compared with a primary suture-based technique using the ProGlide VCD. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04459208.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Peripheral Vascular Diseases/surgery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Vascular Closure Devices , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve/surgery , Femoral Artery/surgery , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemostasis/physiology , Humans , Male , Sutures/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Closure Devices/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has emerged to address severe mitral and tricuspid valve regurgitation in patients who are at high perioperative risk for open-heart surgery. No clinical data is available for continuous left and right atrial pressure monitoring using the steerable guiding catheter (SGC) during TEER. In a prospective single-center study, 40 patients with severe mitral (n = 20) or tricuspid (n = 20) regurgitation underwent TEER with the registration of atrial pressure via the SGC. All patients had successful TEER using the PASCAL Ace repair system, while atrial pressure was monitored continuously via the SGC. Simultaneous right or left atrial pressure monitoring via the SGC and a pigtail catheter during mitral and tricuspid TEER showed excellent reliability for SGC pressure registration. While for mitral TEER the beneficial effects of continuous atrial pressure monitoring are well known, we further evaluated the outcome of patients with tricuspid TEER. Echocardiographic and clinical results after tricuspid TEER showed a reduction of quantitative echocardiographic tricuspid regurgitation parameters and improved New York Heart Association classification after 3-month follow-up. Also, qualitative tricuspid valve assessment showed improved tricuspid regurgitation classification postimplantation and at 3-month follow-up. Furthermore, right atrial pressure was reduced by 37.6% and mean right atrial pressure by 30.6% after successful tricuspid TEER using the PASCAL Ace device. Continuous atrial pressure monitoring using the SGC of the PASCAL Ace repair system is reliable during mitral and tricuspid TEER. Furthermore, successful tricuspid TEER leads to reduced right atrial pressure.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency , Atrial Pressure , Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiac Catheters , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Humans , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Treatment Outcome , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency/surgeryABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock the use of mechanical circulatory support devices remains controversial and data from randomized clinical trials are very limited. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) - venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation - provides the strongest hemodynamic support in addition to oxygenation. However, despite increasing use it has not yet been properly investigated in randomized trials. Therefore, a prospective randomized adequately powered clinical trial is warranted. STUDY DESIGN: The ECLS-SHOCK trial is a 420-patient controlled, international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial. It is designed to compare whether treatment with ECLS in addition to early revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no-ECLS in patients with severe infarct-related cardiogenic shock. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to one of the two treatment arms. The primary efficacy endpoint of ECLS-SHOCK is 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures such as hemodynamic, laboratory, and clinical parameters will serve as surrogate endpoints for prognosis. Furthermore, a longer follow-up at 6 and 12 months will be performed including quality of life assessment. Safety endpoints include peripheral ischemic vascular complications, bleeding and stroke. CONCLUSIONS: The ECLS-SHOCK trial will address essential questions of efficacy and safety of ECLS in addition to early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.
Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Myocardial Revascularization/methods , Coronary Artery Bypass/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Sample Size , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Underweight and obesity represent classical risk factors for adverse outcome in patients treated for cardiovascular disease. AIMS: The current analysis examines the impact of underweight, overweight and obesity on intra-hospital, short and long-term outcomes in patients treated by MitraClip therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: From August 2010 until July 2013, 799 patients (age 75.3⯱â¯8.6 years, male gender 60.7%, median logistic EuroSCORE 20% [12; 31], functional mitral regurgitation (MR): 69.3%) were prospectively enrolled into the multicenter German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions registry. Patients were stratified according to body mass index (BMI) into 4 groups: BMI <20 kg/m2 (underweight), BMI 20.0 to <25.0 kg/m2 (normal weight, reference group), BMI 25.0 to <30.0 kg/m2 (overweight) and BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (obese). Significant increased rates of procedural failure, transfusion/bleeding, sepsis or multiorgan failure and low cardiac output failure were found for underweight patients only. Kaplan-Meier survival curves demonstrated inferior survival for underweight patients, but comparable outcomes for all other patients (global log rank test, Pâ¯<â¯.01). Multivariable Cox-regression analysis (adjusted for age, gender, creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL, diabetes, left ventricular ejection fraction <30% and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) confirmed underweight (as compared to normal weight) as an independent risk factor of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-2.46, Pâ¯=â¯.044) and overweight as protective against death (HR: 0.71; 95%-CI: 0.55-0.93; Pâ¯=â¯.011). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other weight groups, underweight patients undergoing MitraClip implantation are exposed to increased rates of procedural failure, bleeding and low cardiac output as well as increased short- and long-term mortality rates and should therefore be carefully discussed in the heart-team.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Registries , Thinness/complications , Echocardiography , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Incidence , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/complications , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Information on gender-related differences in terms of baseline characteristics and clinical outcome of patients undergoing MitraClip® implantation in daily clinical practice have been studied in smaller populations previously. This study sought to additionally evaluate gender-related differences in a larger German real-world patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the prospective and multicenter German TRAMI Registry. Between 08/2010 and 07/2013 327 women and 501 men underwent MitraClip® implantation for significant mitral valve regurgitation. Female patients were significantly older and showed higher rates of frailty compared to men. In contrast, men had significantly higher rates of comorbidities compared to women. The majority of patients underwent MitraClip® implantation for secondary mitral regurgitation, with no significant gender-related differences. MitraClip® treatment was equally effective in terms of procedural results and residual mitral regurgitation in women and men and complication rates were low. However, in this real-world analysis severe bleeding complications were significantly higher in women (p = .02) and re-intervention rates were significantly higher in men after MitraClip® treatment (p = .02). Women showed less improvement in functional NYHA class after MitraClip® treatment compared to men at 1-year follow-up (FU; p < .001). No significant differences between female and male patients were found in 1-year mortality and in re-hospitalization rates. CONCLUSION: In this analysis from a large prospective, multicenter real-world registry MitraClip® implantation is safe and effective for treatment of significant mitral regurgitation with equal postprocedural results and mortality rates during 1-year follow-up. Men and women showed a persisting and significant clinical benefit at 1-year FU after treatment. Complication and re-intervention rates were low. Additional studies are needed to further evaluate our findings on increased bleeding complications and decreased functional improvement in women at 1-year follow-up after MitraClip® therapy.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/trends , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve Prolapse/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Female , Germany , Health Status Disparities , Heart Valve Prosthesis/trends , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Prolapse/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Prolapse/mortality , Mitral Valve Prolapse/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare baseline characteristics and outcomes in patients treated with either 1 or 2 MitraClips in the German TRAMI (Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions) registry. BACKGROUND: The MitraClip community seems to silently assume that results should intrinsically be better after implantation of more than one clip, although data is still sparse. METHODS: In 2010-2013, 803 patients were enrolled prospectively into TRAMI (461 one-clip and 312 two-clip procedures). Follow-up was performed centrally at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of TRAMI-patients with two clips differed significantly from single-clip patients regarding constitutional (more men, taller body height) and heart failure-related factors (larger left ventricular dimensions, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, more severe heart failure). Also, a significant increase in two-clip procedures over time was present. After propensity score matching for differing baseline characteristics, residual moderate mitral regurgitation (MR) occurred more frequently after implantation of two clips, whereas residual severe MR could more frequently be observed after one-clip procedures. However, no or mild residual MR at discharge was present in 71.6% after single-clip and in 70.1% after two-clips implantation (p = .81). After 1 year, no significant differences regarding mortality or New York Heart Association status could be detected in the propensity matched cohorts. However, TRAMI-patients treated with two clips had a significantly higher incidence of cerebral-vascular events (p = .02). CONCLUSIONS: TRAMI data cannot support the theory that implantation of more than one clip is associated with better clinical outcomes. The finding of more cerebral-vascular events after two-clip procedures might be hypothesis-generating.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/instrumentation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hemodynamics , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/adverse effects , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes of patients with and without peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the BRAVO-3 trial with respect to the effect of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH). BACKGROUND: PAD is found frequently in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and is reported to confer an increased risk of adverse events. It is unknown whether patients with and without PAD may demonstrate a differential response to bivalirudin versus UFH. METHODS: BRAVO-3 was a randomized multicenter trial comparing transfemoral TAVR with bivalirudin versus UFH (31 centers, n = 802). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accidents (CVA). Net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) were a composite of major bleeding or MACE. RESULTS: The total cohort included 119 patients with PAD. Vascular complications occurred significantly more frequently in patients with PAD both in-hospital (25.2 vs. 16.7%; OR 1.68) and at 30 days (29.4 vs. 17.3%; OR 1.99). No significant differences were observed regarding mortality, NACE, MACE, major bleeding or CVA with bivalirudin versus UFH among patients with or without PAD. In patients with PAD, bivalirudin was associated with an increased risk of minor vascular complications at 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PAD undergoing transfemoral TAVR did not exhibit an increased risk of any major adverse events, according to the procedural anticoagulant randomization. However, patients treated with Bivalirudin had significantly higher rates of minor vascular complications.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Catheterization, Peripheral , Femoral Artery , Heparin/therapeutic use , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Peripheral Arterial Disease/complications , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Aortic Valve Stenosis/complications , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnosis , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Cerebrovascular Disorders/etiology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/mortality , Europe , Female , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/mortality , Heparin/adverse effects , Hirudins/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , North America , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Peripheral Arterial Disease/diagnosis , Peripheral Arterial Disease/mortality , Punctures , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To identify prevalence/impact of previous implantation of cardiac electronic devices (CEDs), such as cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization (CRT), in a group of MitraClip (MC) candidates with LVEF < 30%. BACKGROUND: MC therapy is nowadays often considered in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%) and symptomatic severe secondary MR. METHODS: Data from the German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions (TRAMIs) registry were analyzed. Patients with pre-procedural LVEF <30% were selected and divided according to the presence of CEDs. Pre-procedural, peri-procedural, and 1-year follow-up data were analyzed. RESULTS: Out of 689 MC patients, 235 had LVEF<30%. Of these, 23% (54/235) had CRT, 36.6% (86/235) ICD, and 40.4% (95/235) had no CEDs. Risk profile was similar (median STS score CRT 6.0 (IQR: 3.0-12.0); ICD 7.0 (IQR: 4.0-12.0); No-CED 6.5 (IQR: 2.0-10.0); p = 0.8). No procedural mortality was observed and hospital mortality was 5.6% in CRT, 2.3% in ICD, and 3.2% in No-CED (p = 0.5). At discharge, severe MV regurgitation was reported in 3.8% of CRT, 3.7% of ICD, and 1.1% of No-CED (p = 0.9). One year estimated survival (CRT 75.7%; ICD 75.8%; No-CED 78%; p = 0.94) and freedom from MACCE (CRT 73.6%; ICD 75.8%; No-CED 74.5%; p = 0.88) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: A third of patients have been already submitted to CEDs implantation at time of referral for MC therapy and 40% of those with severely depressed LVEF% arrive to MC therapy before ICD/CRT implantation. The presence of CED does not impair acute MC therapy success. Mid-term follow-up outcomes are similar in patients with and without CEDs.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , Defibrillators, Implantable , Electric Countershock/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/therapy , Ventricular Function, Left , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/adverse effects , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/mortality , Electric Countershock/adverse effects , Electric Countershock/mortality , Female , Germany , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/diagnostic imaging , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/mortality , Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Prostar XL (PS) and ProGlide (PG) are common vascular closure devices (VCD) used in TAVR via transfemoral vascular approach. The impact of these VCD on vascular and bleeding complications remains unclear. METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial randomized 802 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. We stratified patients according to type of VCD used and examined the 30-day incidence of major or minor vascular complications, major bleeding (BARC ≥3b), AKI and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; death, myocardial infarction or stroke). RESULTS: A total of 746 (93%) patients were treated with either PS (n = 352, 47%) or PG (n = 394, 53%) VCD, without significant differences in successful deployment rate (PS 322 [91.2%] vs. PG 373 [94.2%] respectively, p = .20). PG was associated with a significantly lower incidence of major or minor vascular complications, compared to PS (adjusted OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.37-0.80; p < .01). Rates of acute kidney injury were also lower with the PG device. There was no significant difference between bleeding, MACCE, and death. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to PS, the PG VCD was associated with a lower rate of major or minor vascular complications and lower rates of AKI after transfemoral TAVR.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hemostatic Techniques/instrumentation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Vascular Closure Devices , Vascular Diseases/prevention & control , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/prevention & control , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Canada , Equipment Design , Europe , Female , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hemostatic Techniques/adverse effects , Hemostatic Techniques/mortality , Humans , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Diseases/etiology , Vascular Diseases/mortalityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prior studies have suggested that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are at higher risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Whether procedural bivalirudin compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a beneficial effect on early outcomes in these patients is unknown. We examined for the effect of baseline or new-onset AF within 30 days of TAVR and explored for the effect of bivalirudin versus UFH by AF status, on 30-day outcomes from the BRAVO 3 trial. METHODS: The BRAVO-3 trial multicenter randomized trial included 802 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR randomized to bivalirudin or UFH. We compared AF and no-AF groups and examined for 30-day Bleeding Academic Research Consortium type ≥3b bleeding, major vascular complications and all ischemic endpoints. Adjusted outcomes were analyzed using logistic regression methods. RESULTS: Of the study population, 41.4% (n = 332) patients had baseline or new-onset AF within 30 days of TAVR, whereas 58.6% (n = 470) had no AF. Patients with AF had greater prevalence of renal dysfunction, lower left ventricular ejection fraction, and higher euroSCORE I compared with their counterparts without AF. Among AF and no-AF patients, there were no significant baseline differences between bivalirudin and UFH groups. At 30 days the incidence of death (6.0 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.324) and stroke (3.9 vs. 2.6%, P = 0.274) was similar in AF vs. no-AF patients. However, new-onset AF (n = 38) was associated with significantly greater crude risk of 30-day stroke compared with no AF (HR 4.49, 95% CI 1.37-14.67). Regardless of AF status, there were no differences in 30-day death (P-int = 0.652) or stroke (P-int = 0.066) by anticoagulation type. CONCLUSIONS: Prior or new-onset AF is noted in more than one-third of patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR. Despite greater baseline comorbidities than non-AF patients, AF was not associated with significantly higher risk of adjusted 30-day outcomes. In the BRAVO 3 trial, early outcomes were similar regardless of anticoagulant strategy in each group.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Cause of Death/trends , Comorbidity/trends , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To determine predictors for long-term outcome in high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (TMVR) for severe mitral regurgitation (MR). BACKGROUND: There is no data on predictors of long-term outcome in high-risk real-world patients. METHODS: From August 2009 to April 2011, 126 high-risk patients deemed inoperable were treated with TMVR in two high-volume university centers. RESULTS: MR could be successfully reduced to grade ≤2 in 92.1% of patients (116/126 patients). Long-term clinical follow-up up to 5 years (95.2% follow-up rate) revealed a mortality rate of 35.7% (45/126 patients). Repeat mitral valve treatment (surgery or intervention) was needed in 19 patients (15.1%). Long-term clinical improvement was demonstrated with 69% of patients being in NYHA class ≤II. In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the post-procedural grade of MR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.55 per grade, P = 0.035), the left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 0.58 for difference between 75th and 25th percentile, P = 0.031) and the glomerular filtration rate (HR 0.33 for 75th vs 25th percentile, P < 0.001) were independent predictors for long-term mortality. Patients with primary MR and a post-procedural MR grade ≤1 had the most favorable long-term outcome. CONCLUSIONS: This study determines predictors of long-term clinical outcome after TMVR and demonstrates that the grade of residual MR determines long-term survival. Our data suggest that it might be of benefit reducing residual MR to the lowest possible MR grade using TMVR-especially in selected high-risk patients with primary MR who are not considered as candidates for surgical MVR.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Long Term Adverse Effects , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Mitral Valve/surgery , Aged , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Humans , Long Term Adverse Effects/mortality , Long Term Adverse Effects/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Adjustment/methods , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Function, LeftABSTRACT
AIMS: The transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry was established in order to assess safety and efficacy of catheter-based mitral valve interventional techniques in Germany, and prospectively enrolled 828 MitraClip patients (median age 76 years, median log. EuroSCORE I 20.0%) between August 2010 and July 2013. We present the 1-year outcome in this MitraClip cohort-which is the largest published to date. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven forty-nine patients (90.5%) were available for 1-year follow-up and included in the following analyses. Mortality, major adverse cardiovascular event rates, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classes were recorded. Predictors of 1-year mortality were identified by multivariate analysis using a Cox regression model with stepwise forward selection. The 1-year mortality was 20.3%. At 1 year, 63.3% of TRAMI patients pertained to NYHA functional classes I or II (compared with 11.0% at baseline), and self-rated health status (on EuroQuol visual analogue scale) also improved significantly by 10 points. Importantly, a significant proportion of patients regained the complete independence in self-care after MitraClip implantation (independence in 74.0 vs. 58.6% at baseline, P = 0.005). Predictors of 1-year mortality were NYHA class IV (hazard ratio, HR 1.62, P = 0.02), anaemia (HR 2.44, P = 0.02), previous aortic valve intervention (HR 2.12, P = 0.002), serum creatinine ≥1.5 mg/dL (HR 1.77, P = 0.002), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.12, P = 0.0003), left ventricular ejection fraction <30% (HR 1.58, P = 0.01), severe tricuspid regurgitation (HR 1.84, P = 0.003), and procedural failure (defined as operator-reported failure, conversion to surgery, failure of clip placement, or residual post-procedural severe mitral regurgitation) (HR 4.36, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of significant MR with MitraClip resulted in significant clinical improvements in a high proportion of TRAMI patients after 12 months. In the TRAMI cohort, the failure of procedural success exhibited the highest hazard ratio concerning the prediction of 1-year mortality.
Subject(s)
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization , Female , Heart Failure/etiology , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/instrumentation , Mitral Valve Annuloplasty/methods , Quality of Life , Registries , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with acute pulmonary embolism, systemic thrombolysis improves right ventricular (RV) dilatation, is associated with major bleeding, and is withheld in many patients at risk. This multicenter randomized, controlled trial investigated whether ultrasound-assisted catheter-directed thrombolysis (USAT) is superior to anticoagulation alone in the reversal of RV dilatation in intermediate-risk patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (63±14 years) with acute main or lower lobe pulmonary embolism and echocardiographic RV to left ventricular dimension (RV/LV) ratio ≥1.0 were randomized to receive unfractionated heparin and an USAT regimen of 10 to 20 mg recombinant tissue plasminogen activator over 15 hours (n=30; USAT group) or unfractionated heparin alone (n=29; heparin group). Primary outcome was the difference in the RV/LV ratio from baseline to 24 hours. Safety outcomes included death, major and minor bleeding, and recurrent venous thromboembolism at 90 days. In the USAT group, the mean RV/LV ratio was reduced from 1.28±0.19 at baseline to 0.99±0.17 at 24 hours (P<0.001); in the heparin group, mean RV/LV ratios were 1.20±0.14 and 1.17±0.20, respectively (P=0.31). The mean decrease in RV/LV ratio from baseline to 24 hours was 0.30±0.20 versus 0.03±0.16 (P<0.001), respectively. At 90 days, there was 1 death (in the heparin group), no major bleeding, 4 minor bleeding episodes (3 in the USAT group and 1 in the heparin group; P=0.61), and no recurrent venous thromboembolism. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pulmonary embolism at intermediate risk, a standardized USAT regimen was superior to anticoagulation with heparin alone in reversing RV dilatation at 24 hours, without an increase in bleeding complications. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01166997.
Subject(s)
Heparin/therapeutic use , Pulmonary Embolism/diagnostic imaging , Pulmonary Embolism/drug therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy/methods , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Vascular Access Devices , Acute Disease , Aged , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Heparin/administration & dosage , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/administration & dosage , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the use and outcome of radial versus femoral access in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice. BACKGROUND: The radial approach for PCI in patients with STEMI has been suggested to have a lower rate of complications and bleeding and to improve prognosis compared with the femoral approach. However, there still is a large regional and national variation in its use. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2012 a total of 17,865 patients with STEMI without cardiogenic shock undergoing primary PCI were prospectively enrolled in the observational German PCI registry of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft leitende kardiologische Krankenhausärzte (ALKK). Transfemoral (TF) access was used in 15,270 (85.5%), transradial (TR) access in 2,530 (14.2%), and other access in 65 (0.3%) patients. In this analysis, 10,264 patients from 20 centers that had performed at least 5 TR-PCI for STEMI were included. This study compared TR-PCI (n = 2,454 23.9%) with TF-PCI (n = 7,810, 76.1%). RESULTS: Procedural success was high in both cohorts. Hospital mortality (1.8 vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001) and vascular access complications (0.3 vs. 1.8%, P < 0.001%) were lower in the TR group. In the multivariate analysis radial access was associated with an improved in-hospital survival rate (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The radial approach for PCI can be performed with excellent procedural success in selected STEMI patients and is associated with a lower rate of vascular access complications and hospital mortality.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Electrocardiography , Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Aged , Female , Femoral Artery , Follow-Up Studies , Germany/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/diagnosis , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Radial Artery , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic , Survival Rate/trends , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIMS: To analyze risk and outcomes of complications during and after MitraClip implantation using multicenter data from the prospective German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions (TRAMI) registry. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data of 828 patients (mean age: 76.0 [71-81] years, 327 (40%) females) undergoing MitraClip implantation in Germany between 2010 and 2013 were analyzed. Most patients (85%) underwent elective procedures with on average implantation of 1.4 ± 0.6 clips. Emergent cardiac surgery was not required; a single patient died intraoperatively. During the in-hospital period, complications occurred in 215 (25.9%) patients, of which 106 (12.8%) were considered major. Major bleeding complications were among the most frequent major complications (7.4%), while rates of pericardial tamponade (1.9%) and clip-specific complications (embolization: 0%, partial clip detachment: 1.9%) were low. In-hospital death, stroke or myocardial infarction (MACCE) occurred in 2.2, 0.9, and 0% patients, respectively. Patients with complications appeared to be older and more critically ill pre-interventionally; in-hospital mortality was significantly higher as compared to those without procedural complications. CONCLUSIONS: MitraClip implantation appears to be a safe treatment option with low rates of MACCE and clip-specific complications. Nevertheless, MitraClip therapy is not without complications. Careful patient selection and improvements in preventing peri-procedural bleeding have the potential of reducing post-procedural complications and improving outcomes.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Elective Surgical Procedures/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Prosthesis Failure , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Chi-Square Distribution , Cohort Studies , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnostic imaging , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Patient Safety , Prosthesis Design , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term outcome and parameters associated with poor and favorable outcome in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) ≤25% and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) after percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (pMVR). BACKGROUND: There is no data on long-term outcome in this cohort of patients. METHODS: We analyzed all 34 patients with a LV-EF ≤25% and severe MR treated with pMVR in 2 university hospitals from 2009 to 2012. RESULTS: Mitral regurgitation could be successfully reduced to grade ≤2 in 30 patients (88%). Long-term follow-up (up to 5 years) revealed a steep decline of the survival curve reaching 50% already 8 month after pMVR. In contrast, estimated survival of the remaining patients showed a favorable long-term outcome. Patients deceased during the first year presented with higher right ventricular tricuspid pressure gradient (RVTG) (44.5 ± 8.4 mmHg vs. 35.2 ± 15.4 mmHg, P = 0.035) and worse RV-function (P = 0.014) prior to the procedure. One-year mortality of patients with pulmonary hypertension and depressed RV-function (n = 22) was very high (77%) compared to the remaining patients (n = 12, mortality rate of 0%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although pMVR lead to a successful reduction of MR in patients with a LV-EF ≤25%, 1-year mortality in this cohort was very high. However, a subgroup of patients showed a favorable long-term outcome after pMVR. Especially the right ventricular parameters sustained RV-function and absence of pulmonary hypertension-easily assessed with echocardiography-might be used to identify this subgroup and encourage pMVR in these patients.
Subject(s)
Heart Failure/surgery , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/surgery , Ventricular Dysfunction/surgery , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Echocardiography , Female , Heart Failure/complications , Heart Failure/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/complications , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Ventricular Dysfunction/complications , Ventricular Dysfunction/mortalityABSTRACT
AIM: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation has become an alternative to surgery in higher risk patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. The aim of the ADVANCE study was to evaluate outcomes following implantation of a self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system in a fully monitored, multi-centre 'real-world' patient population in highly experienced centres. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis at a higher surgical risk in whom implantation of the CoreValve System was decided by the Heart Team were included. Endpoints were a composite of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, or reintervention) and mortality at 30 days and 1 year. Endpoint-related events were independently adjudicated based on Valve Academic Research Consortium definitions. A total of 1015 patients [mean logistic EuroSCORE 19.4 ± 12.3% [median (Q1,Q3), 16.0% (10.3, 25.3%)], age 81 ± 6 years] were enrolled. Implantation of the CoreValve System led to a significant improvement in haemodynamics and an increase in the effective aortic valve orifice area. At 30 days, the MACCE rate was 8.0% (95% CI: 6.3-9.7%), all-cause mortality was 4.5% (3.2-5.8%), cardiovascular mortality was 3.4% (2.3-4.6%), and the rate of stroke was 3.0% (2.0-4.1%). The life-threatening or disabling bleeding rate was 4.0% (2.8-6.3%). The 12-month rates of MACCE, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and stroke were 21.2% (18.4-24.1%), 17.9% (15.2-20.5%), 11.7% (9.4-14.1%), and 4.5% (2.9-6.1%), respectively. The 12-month rates of all-cause mortality were 11.1, 16.5, and 23.6% among patients with a logistic EuroSCORE ≤10%, EuroSCORE 10-20%, and EuroSCORE >20% (P< 0.05), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ADVANCE study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of the CoreValve System with low mortality and stroke rates in higher risk real-world patients with severe aortic stenosis.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Aortic Valve/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/etiology , Aortic Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Cause of Death , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate in-hospital and short-term outcomes of percutaneous mitral valve repair according to patients' logistic EuroSCORE (logEuroSCORE) in a multicenter registry BACKGROUND: The logEuroSCORE is an established tool to predict the risk of mortality during cardiac surgery. In high-risk patients percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system represents a less-invasive alternative METHODS: Data from 1002 patients, who underwent percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system, were analyzed in the German Transcatheter Mitral Valve Interventions (TRAMI) Registry. A logEuroSCORE (mortality risk in %) ≥ 20 was considered high risk RESULTS: Of all patients, 557 (55.6%) had a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20. Implantation of the MitraClip was successful in 95.5 % (942/986) patients. Moderate residual mitral valve regurgitation was more often detected in patients with a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20 (23.8% vs. 17.1%, respectively, P < 0.05). In patients with a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20 the procedural complication rate was 8.9% (vs. 6.4, n.s.) and the in-hospital MACCE rate 4.9% (vs. 1.4% P < 0.01). The in-hospital mortality rate in patients with a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20 and logEuroSCORE < 20 was 4.3 and 1.1%, respectively (P ≤ 0.01) CONCLUSION: Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system is feasible in patients with a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20 with similar procedural results compared to patients with lower predicted risk. Although mortality was four times higher than in patients with logEuroSCORE < 20, mortality in high risk patients was lower than predicted. In those with a logEuroSCORE ≥ 20, moderate residual mitral valve regurgitation was more frequent.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Catheterization/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/instrumentation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/therapy , Mitral Valve , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Catheterization/adverse effects , Cardiac Catheterization/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Feasibility Studies , Female , Germany , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mitral Valve/physiopathology , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/diagnosis , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/mortality , Mitral Valve Insufficiency/physiopathology , Patient Selection , Prospective Studies , Prosthesis Design , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: The location and severity of vascular calcification may influence closure device success in transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The aim of this study was to analyze effects of vascular access-site calcification on vascular and bleeding outcomes post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Methods: The Randomized Comparison of CatHeter-based Strategies fOr Interventional ACcess SitE CLOSURE during Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (CHOICE-CLOSURE) trial assigned 516 patients to access site closure using a pure plug-based technique (MANTA, Teleflex) or a primary suture-based technique (ProGlide, Abbott Vascular). The principal finding of the overall study was that access-site or access-related complications were more common after the plug-based strategy compared to percutaneous closure with a suture-based strategy. In this predefined subgroup analysis, the overall cohort was split into patients with and without anterior calcification at the access site and divided by degree of calcification severity using the classification system developed in the MANTA vs. suture-based vascular closure after transcatHeter aortic valve replacement (MASH) trial. Differences in bleeding and vascular complications were compared. The primary endpoint consisted of access-site- or access-related major and minor vascular complications. Results: There were more access-site-related major and minor vascular complications for patients with anterior wall vascular calcification and MASH severe calcification. No significant interaction with choice of closure technique in terms of access-site-related major and minor vascular complications was observed (odds ratio 1.70, 95% CI 0.77-3.78, p = 0.19 for the primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy in patients with anterior calcification, odds ratio 1.78, 95% CI 0.56-5.65, p = 0.33 for primary endpoint in plug- vs. suture-based strategy with MASH severe calcification, pint = 0.97 for anterior calcification, pint = 0.95 for MASH severe calcification). Conclusions: The total number of vascular complications was found to be greater in the presence of anterior and MASH severe calcification. Overall, the presence of anterior or severe calcification does not significantly modify the efficacy of the suture-based strategy compared to the plug-based strategy.