Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
N Engl J Med ; 360(1): 20-31, 2009 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19118302

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Selective digestive tract decontamination (SDD) and selective oropharyngeal decontamination (SOD) are infection-prevention measures used in the treatment of some patients in intensive care, but reported effects on patient outcome are conflicting. METHODS: We evaluated the effectiveness of SDD and SOD in a crossover study using cluster randomization in 13 intensive care units (ICUs), all in The Netherlands. Patients with an expected duration of intubation of more than 48 hours or an expected ICU stay of more than 72 hours were eligible. In each ICU, three regimens (SDD, SOD, and standard care) were applied in random order over the course of 6 months. Mortality at day 28 was the primary end point. SDD consisted of 4 days of intravenous cefotaxime and topical application of tobramycin, colistin, and amphotericin B in the oropharynx and stomach. SOD consisted of oropharyngeal application only of the same antibiotics. Monthly point-prevalence studies were performed to analyze antibiotic resistance. RESULTS: A total of 5939 patients were enrolled in the study, with 1990 assigned to standard care, 1904 to SOD, and 2045 to SDD; crude mortality in the groups at day 28 was 27.5%, 26.6%, and 26.9%, respectively. In a random-effects logistic-regression model with age, sex, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, intubation status, and medical specialty used as covariates, odds ratios for death at day 28 in the SOD and SDD groups, as compared with the standard-care group, were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 0.99) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In an ICU population in which the mortality rate associated with standard care was 27.5% at day 28, the rate was reduced by an estimated 3.5 percentage points with SDD and by 2.9 percentage points with SOD. (Controlled Clinical Trials number, ISRCTN35176830.)


Subject(s)
Bacteremia/prevention & control , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Decontamination , Gastrointestinal Tract/microbiology , Oropharynx/microbiology , APACHE , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria/isolation & purification , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Intensive Care Units , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial
2.
Infection ; 37(5): 432-7, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19499184

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to determine (1) the increase in antimicrobial resistance to frequently used antibiotics in the hospital setting over time and (2) the correlation between the amount of use of an antibiotic in a specific medical specialty and the observed resistance to that antibiotic in that specialty. METHOD: The total use of antibiotics and the use of ciprofloxacin (CIP), co-amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (AMCL) and first and second-generation cephalosporins (CEF), respectively, in individual medical specialties were measured between 2001 and 2006 by means of prevalence surveys (two per year). The antimicrobial susceptibility patterns among E. coli isolated from hospitalized patients between 2003 and 2006 were obtained from the Laboratory Information System. Trends over time and correlation between use and resistance were calculated. RESULTS: 6,639 patients were included in the prevalence surveys, of whom 3.0% (195) were treated with CIP, 9.7% (642) with AMCL, and 3.5% (232) with CEF. 4,790 E. coli isolates were obtained from hospitalized patients. Resistance to all antibiotics significantly increased over time, with the regression line showing that the strongest increase in resistance was for CIP (2.6% per year). There were large variations in antimicrobial use between various medical specialties. A significant correlation was found between the ward-specific prevalence of use and the percentage of resistance for CIP (R = 0.81, p < 0.001) and AMCL (R = 0.82, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: At the level of individual medical specialties within one hospital, a higher prevalence of antimicrobial use among patients was associated with a significantly higher observed antimicrobial resistance. The use of CIP was associated with a stronger increase in resistance than the use of beta-lactams.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Escherichia coli Infections/drug therapy , Escherichia coli Infections/microbiology , Escherichia coli/drug effects , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Hospitals , Humans , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
3.
Clin Infect Dis ; 35(4): 353-8, 2002 Aug 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12145715

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine whether use of mupirocin nasal ointment for perioperative eradication of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is effective in preventing the development of surgical site infections (SSIs). A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was used. Either mupirocin or placebo nasal ointment was applied twice daily to 614 assessable patients from the day of admission to the hospital until the day of surgery. A total of 315 and 299 patients were randomized to receive mupirocin and placebo, respectively. Eradication of nasal carriage was significantly more effective in the mupirocin group (eradication rate, 83.5% versus 27.8%). In the mupirocin group, the rate of endogenous S. aureus infections was 5 times lower than in the placebo group (0.3% and 1.7%, respectively; relative risk, 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-1.62). Mupirocin nasal ointment did not reduce the SSI rate (by S. aureus) or the duration of hospital stay.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Mupirocin/therapeutic use , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Staphylococcal Infections/prevention & control , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Ointments , Orthopedics , Perioperative Care , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 21(5): 319-23, 2000 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10823564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of different risk factors for the development of surgical-site infections (SSIs) in orthopedic surgery with prosthetic implants. DESIGN: In a cohort of 272 patients, the following possible risk factors were studied: age, gender, method of hair removal, duration of operation, surgeon, underlying illness, and nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Infections were recorded following the Centers for Disease Control criteria. The relation between risk factors and SSI was tested in univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis. SETTING: Community hospital in Breda, The Netherlands. RESULTS: 18 (6.6%) of 272 patients experienced SSI: 11 superficial and 7 deep SSI. These infections led in three cases to removal of the prosthesis and caused 286 extra days in hospital. The main causative pathogen was S aureus. In multiple logistic regression analysis, the following factors were independent risk factors for the development of SSI: high-level nasal carriage of S aureus (P=.04), male gender (P=.005), and surgeon 1 (P=.006). The only independent risk factor for SSI with S aureus was high-level nasal carriage of S aureus (P=.002). CONCLUSION: High-level nasal carriage of S aureus was the most important and only significant independent risk factor for developing SSI with S aureus.


Subject(s)
Nose/microbiology , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Analysis of Variance , Cohort Studies , Humans , Length of Stay , Logistic Models , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Population Surveillance , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 79(3): 198-201, 2011 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21763031

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage at hospital admission in The Netherlands was 0.03% in 1999-2000. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the prevalence of MRSA carriage in The Netherlands has changed over the last few years. In five Dutch hospitals, 6496 unique patients were screened for nasal S. aureus carriage at hospital admission by microbiological culture between 1 October 2005 and 7 June 2007. In total, 2036 of 6496 (31.3%) patients carried S. aureus in their nose, and seven of 6496 (0.11%) patients were nasal carriers of MRSA. Compared with 1999-2000, the prevalence of MRSA carriage in the Dutch population at hospital admission has increased more than three fold; however, this increase was not significant (P=0.06, Fisher's exact test). This prevalence is still among the lowest in the world, probably as a result of the stringent Dutch infection control policy, and the restrictive use of antibiotics in The Netherlands.


Subject(s)
Carrier State/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Nose/microbiology , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carrier State/microbiology , Female , Humans , Male , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/classification , Staphylococcus aureus/genetics , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL