Social accountability and improving care for sexual and gender diverse patients.

Social Accountability (SA) in healthcare includes understanding and responding to how social determinants affect patient health. Altruistic healthcare professionals can improve socially accountable patient care at the individual patient or family level (micro), the population or community level (meso), and/or provincial, federal, or international levels (macro). There is a well-established healthcare equity gap for Sexual and Gender Diverse (SGD) people affected by cancer. In this article, I discuss how SA has played a role in my career. As a SGD healthcare professional, I offer some personal examples of SA in action that have made a difference. For socially accountable healthcare professionals, there is almost always something to contribute to improve care, from the patient to the policy level.

A scoping review of patients as partners in undergraduate allied health curriculum: How are they involved?

INTRODUCTION: Patient participation in undergraduate education has been proven to contribute to student skills development complementing their didactic training. An increasing number of educational programs have implemented systematic patient engagement in curriculum to comply with the requirements of professional and regulatory bodies and to ensure greater focus on patient care. This scoping review aims to identify and summarize literature on the integration of patients and associated benefits in undergraduate allied health education programs. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted using a comprehensive literature search of the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL. The study was carried out and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and MetaAnalyses (PRISMA) guidance for Systematic reviews and Meta Analyses. Inclusion criteria included English language and allied health education. Exclusion criteria were outside the date range of 2011 to 2023, non-allied health programs, and clinical exposure during didactic courses. Literature reviews and commentaries were also excluded. RESULTS: A total of nineteen studies were included in the scoping review. The majority of these papers examined undergraduate programs that engaged patients in curriculum delivery while a few involved patients in feedback delivery and formal assessment. Other forms of patient involvement were through curriculum co-design. Across institutions, evidence suggested the benefits of patient involvement to students, patients, and educational programs for improved delivery of person-centred care. CONCLUSION: Patient involvement in curriculum delivery and student assessment provided valuable teaching and learning experiences for students and patients. Patient engagement also ensured that person-centered care principles were integrated into education programs. Summary of findings are provided to better prepare patients and facilitators for their role and to enhance the benefits to all participants.

Mind the gap: Gender disparities in authorship in the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences.

INTRODUCTION: Research studies tracking gender and academic publication productivity in healthcare find gender disparities in research activity, publication, and authorship. Article authorship is one of the important metrics to track when seeking to understand gender inequality in academic career advancement. Research on gender disparities in publication productivity in the field of Medical Radiation Science (MRS) is very limited thus this study analyses and explains potential gender differences in article authorship and acceptance for publication in the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) for a 5-year period (2017-2021). METHODS: Gender was inferred based on the author's first name or title (e.g., Mr, Mrs or Ms). For those who left the title blank or reported as 'Dr' or 'Prof,' a series of steps were taken to identify their gender. Where gender was impossible to ascribe, these authors were excluded. Descriptive and inferential statistics are reported for the study population. Descriptive and inferential statistics are used. Percentages of females are reported, and males constitute the other portion. Chi-square, slope analysis and z-tests were used to test hypotheses. RESULTS: Results show that female authorship overall and in all categories of authorship placement (i.e., first, last and corresponding) increased over the timeframe reviewed. The percentage gain in the increase was higher than that for male authorship. However, male authorship started from a higher baseline in 2017 and has also increased year on year and overall, as well as in each placement category examined. More female authors were in the MRS sub-specialism Radiation Therapy (RT) than in the other MRS sub-specialisms. Analysis of the acceptance rate of articles with female authors shows a weak downward trend, and this may be related to higher submission and acceptance rates of articles by male authors during the same period. CONCLUSION: Male authors are overrepresented in all categories, which raises questions about the persistence of gender disparities in JMIRS authorship and article acceptance. Positive trends in female authorship indicate progress, yet there is the persistence of the significant under-representation of women in the Medical Radiation Sciences workforce in academic publishing. Recruiting more males to address the gender imbalance in the profession should not be at the expense of females' career progression.

Understanding Indigenous peoples experiences to inform recommendations for improving cultural safety and care in radiation therapy centres in Alberta, Canada.

INTRODUCTION: Rates of common cancers are continuously increasing among Indigenous peoples and are above the incidence rates of non-Indigenous Canadians. When considering the intersecting social determinants of health such as culture, geography, funding, and access to basic health services, these all contribute to the unique cancer burden faced by Indigenous people. Indigenous patients sometimes feel alienated by the word "cancer", intimidated in the oncology setting and often avoid or delay seeking care, bypass screening and preventative care, and cease prescribed treatment before it is finished. Providing culturally competent, safe care to improve Indigenous health outcomes have been suggested and prioritized in health care systems across Canada. METHODS: Using an Indigenous methodology, sharing circles were held in Northern Alberta, Canada. Five Indigenous survivors of cancer and two Indigenous caregivers shared their experiences with oncology treatment in the radiation therapy centre. Results were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: This resulted in four main themes (1) historical and cultural understandings (2) reduce systemic harm by having dedicated Indigenous staff, cultural competency, and Indigenous specific supports (3) meaningful time commitment and relationship building (4) importance of kinship and Indigenous-centred, family-and-patient-centred care. These themes fed into the development of nine recommendations for policy and decision makers to improve cultural safety in the Alberta radiation therapy centres. CONCLUSION: Support for Indigenous patients and caregivers is essential to improve care in the radiation therapy centres. The findings from this work will support recommendations for health decision and policy makers within radiation therapy centres, which may be transferable to other centres within oncology and health.

Letter in response to Laing et al., "An evaluation of radiation therapy patient body mass index trends and potential impact on departmental resource planning".

"An evaluation of radiation therapy patient body mass index trends and potential impact on departmental resource planning" by Laing et al. The authors' comment that research into the experiences of larger bodied patients should focus on compassionately improving care for this patient population rather than framing large-bodied patients as a burden or problem, and should include commentary on the effects of weight-bias in the healthcare system.

Engagement in radiation therapy research: What happens after graduation?

BACKGROUND: To prepare undergraduate radiation therapy (RT) students for the professional role of Scholarly Practitioner the University of Alberta's Radiation Therapy Program (RADTH) provides research education, and students conduct novel research studies during their final practicum year with the final result being a publishable paper. A curriculum evaluation project was carried out to examine the impact of the RADTH undergraduate research education by examining the final outcomes of these research projects and whether the learners carried out further research after graduation. METHODS: Alumni who graduated from 2017 to 2020 were surveyed to seek information on the dissemination of their research projects, whether the projects resulted in a change to practice, policy, or patient care, if subsequent research has been performed by the graduates, and the motivators or barriers to conducting research post-graduation. A subsequent manual search of publication databases was conducted to fill in data gaps pertaining to publications. RESULTS: All RADTH research projects have been disseminated by conference presentation and/or publication. One project was reported to have had an impact on practice, with no impact reported for five projects and two respondents not sure about any impact. All respondents reported they have not participated in any new research projects since graduation. Barriers listed included: limited local opportunity, lack of topic ideas, other professional development, no interest in research, COVID impact, and lack of research knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: RADTH's research education curriculum successfully enables the RT students to conduct and disseminate research. All RADTH projects have been successfully disseminated by the graduates. However, participation in research post-graduation is not occurring due to a variety of factors. While MRT education programs are required to develop research skills, this education alone may not alter motivation nor ensure research participation post-graduation. Exploring other avenues of professional scholarship may be key to ensuring contribution to evidence-informed practice.

Narratives in the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences: Publishing stories in an academic journal.

Healthcare narratives can be used for education to elicit an emotional or affective response, develop critical thinking, and gain perspective on individuals' experiences with life and illness to cultivate person-centered care. This editorial describes the recent experience of the Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) in developing a new narrative submission format. The processes of engaging and supporting patient authors as well as creating a more accessible submission and review process are presented. Finally, the paper discusses the emerging impact of published narratives and the benefit of working with patients as experts and authors.

Writing your first paper Part 2: Submission, review, and post-publication.

The submission, revision and post-publication process is an often-underappreciated aspect of the manuscript writing journey. It can be quite challenging to navigate journal submission systems, understand the complexities of responding to reviewer feedback, and figuring out how to promote your work post-publication. Part one of this series discussed how to begin your research and write up the results for submission [1]. This second part highlights the rewards and challenges involved in the publication of your work.

Five years of #MedRadJClub: An impact evaluation of an established twitter journal club.

INTRODUCTION: Twitter journal clubs are a relatively new adaptation of an established continuing professional development (CPD) activity within healthcare. The medical radiation science (MRS) journal club 'MedRadJClub' (MRJC) was founded in March 2015 by a group of academics, researchers and clinicians as an international forum for the discussion of peer-reviewed papers. To investigate the reach and impact of MRJC, a five-year analysis was conducted. METHODS: Tweetchat data (number of participants, tweets and impressions) for the first five years of MRJC were extracted and chat topics organised into themes. Fifth anniversary MRJC chat tweets were analysed and examples of academic and professional outputs were collated. RESULTS: A total of 59 chats have been held over five years with a mean of 41 participants and 483,000 impressions per hour-long synchronous chat. Ten different tweetchat themes were identified, with student engagement/preceptorship the most popular. Eight posters or oral presentations at conferences, one social media workshop and four papers have been produced. Qualitative analysis revealed five core themes relating to the perceived benefits of participation in MRJC: (1) CPD and research impact, (2) professional growth and influencing practice, (3) interdisciplinary learning and inclusion, (4) networking and social support and (5) globalisation. CONCLUSION: MRJC is a unique, multi-professional, global community with consistent engagement. It is beneficial for both CPD, research engagement, dissemination and socialisation within the MRS community.

Writing your first paper: An informal guide for medical radiation sciences professionals.

Writing and submitting a paper can be a daunting prospect, especially the first time. One of the more challenging aspects is knowing how to begin. Countless projects in the workplace never make it past local dissemination or conference presentation. This informal guide will help you take that next step and begin the peer-reviewed publication journey.

Improving Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and Two-Spirit Content in a Radiation Therapy Undergraduate Curriculum.

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer and two-spirit plus (LGBTQ2S+) people have distinct healthcare needs that may be unaddressed in many undergraduate healthcare curricula. The Radiation Therapy Program (RADTH) at the University of Alberta underwent a review of the three-year didactic curriculum using an online survey. The survey sought to ascertain if, where and how topics related to LGBTQ2S + healthcare are taught. Results indicated that out of 10 RADTH program faculty respondents, three teach related topics. The total time dedicated within the three-year curriculum was approximately three and a half hours. Other findings showed that faculty are interested in receiving more education in this area and would favour discussions about how to incorporate these themes into appropriate courses. This preliminary investigation demonstrated that there has been some initial work in this area, but there is more to be done.

A survey to explore the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on radiation therapists in Norway and Canada: A tale of two countries.

INTRODUCTION: Several studies have demonstrated the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health care providers. However, there is little known about how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted radiation therapists (RTs) in Norway or Canada. The aim of this investigation was to study the psychological impact of working during the COVID-19 pandemic among RTs in Canada and Norway. METHODS: Online surveys were administered to a convenience sample of RTs and RT department managers. Approximately 2000 and 300 RTs were invited to participate from Canada and Norway, respectively. The RT survey collected information on demographics, work-related stressors, psychological impact, quality of life, and workplace support programmes. The RT manager survey collected information on departmental changes, patient volumes, staff shortages and redeployment, personal protective equipment, and infection control measures. Descriptive analysis, group comparisons and logistic regression were used to examine the impact of COVID-19 on RTs in the two countries, while open-ended questions were examined through thematic analysis. RESULTS: Work-related stress and anxiety were prevalent among Canadian (n = 155) and Norwegian RTs (n = 124), with Canadian RTs reporting higher levels. Fear of transmission, changes in PPE usage, and changes in staffing were reported as the most frequent work-related stressors. Themes related to working during the pandemic included: generalised anxiety; physical, emotional and cognitive symptoms of stress; and loneliness, as well as negative impact on health and quality of relationships. Survey findings from RT department managers in Canada (n = 12) and Norway (n = 13) suggest that the pandemic had an organisational impact on RT departments due to implemented infection control measures and changes in staffing. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to similar stressors amongst Canadian and Norwegian RTs but relatively higher levels of psychological impact among Canadian RTs. Findings demonstrate the importance of mental health support programmes in the workplace to mitigate the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on RTs.

Learning From Cancer Survivors as Standardized Patients: Radiation Therapy Students' Perspective.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: Healthcare programs have proven the benefits of standardized patients in educational activities, but limited scholarship exists on the involvement of cancer survivors in radiation therapy education. This innovative approach to simulation-based education in radiation therapy is the first to integrate cancer survivors as standardized patients in a high-fidelity environment. This research aims to examine the impact of cancer survivors on the students' learning during their simulation course. METHODS: This qualitative research used a phenomenological approach to gather data and analyze the students' view of their interactions with cancer survivors in the simulation course. The researchers conducted three focus group discussions with five of the eight radiation therapy students using a set of preformulated questions. RESULTS: The collected data were comparatively analyzed, and the research team identified four main themes: experience, teaching/coaching, patient-centeredness and gratitude. These represented the students' perspective on their experiences and the unique learning opportunities provided by the cancer survivors. FINDINGS/DISCUSSION: The simulation activities with the cancer survivors provided a safe and realistic experience for the students. This research highlighted the influence of the cancer survivors' oncology journey on the skills development of the radiation therapy students. CONCLUSION: The students benefited from the authentic patient perspective of the cancer survivors which helped build their confidence and develop their skills prior to clinical placement. This research demonstrated that incorporating cancer survivors as standardized patients in radiation therapy simulation education has added significant value to the students' learning.