ABSTRACT
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a complex inflammatory skin disease with undefined mechanistic underpinnings. Here, we investigated HS epithelial cells and demonstrated that HS basal progenitors modulate their lineage restriction and give rise to pathogenic keratinocyte clones, resulting in epidermal hyperproliferation and dysregulated inflammation in HS. When comparing to healthy epithelial stem/progenitor cells, in HS, we identified changes in gene signatures that revolve around the mitotic cell cycle, DNA damage response and repair, as well as cell-cell adhesion and chromatin remodeling. By reconstructing cell differentiation trajectory and CellChat modeling, we identified a keratinocyte population specific to HS. This population is marked by S100A7/8/9 and KRT6 family members, triggering IL1, IL10, and complement inflammatory cascades. These signals, along with HS-specific proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, contribute to the recruitment of certain immune cells during the disease progression. Furthermore, we revealed a previously uncharacterized role of S100A8 in regulating the local chromatin environment of target loci in HS keratinocytes. Through the integration of genomic and epigenomic datasets, we identified genome-wide chromatin rewiring alongside the switch of transcription factors (TFs), which mediated HS transcriptional profiles. Importantly, we identified numerous clinically relevant inflammatory enhancers and their coordinated TFs in HS basal CD49fhigh cells. The disruption of the S100A enhancer using the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated approach or the pharmacological inhibition of the interferon regulatory transcription factor 3 (IRF3) efficiently reduced the production of HS-associated inflammatory regulators. Our study not only uncovers the plasticity of epidermal progenitor cells in HS but also elucidates the epigenetic mechanisms underlying HS pathogenesis.
Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Humans , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/genetics , Skin/metabolism , Epigenomics , Epigenesis, Genetic , Stem Cells/metabolism , Chromatin/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is an inflammatory skin disease that impacts a heterogeneous group of patients and can have multiple clinical manifestations. Risankizumab is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of risankizumab according to baseline patient characteristics, and for the treatment of high-impact disease manifestations (nail, scalp and palmoplantar psoriasis), through 256 weeks of continuous treatment in the phase 3 LIMMitless study. METHODS: This subgroup analysis evaluated pooled data from patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who were randomized to risankizumab 150 mg during two double-blind, phase 3, 52-week base studies (UltIMMa-1/2; NCT02684370/NCT02684357) and were enrolled in the phase 3 LIMMitless open-label extension study (NCT03047395). Subgroup assessments included the proportion of patients who achieved ≥90%/100% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90/100). Among patients with nail, scalp and/or palmoplantar psoriasis in addition to skin psoriasis, assessments included changes from baseline in and resolution of these three psoriatic manifestations. RESULTS: Overall, a numerically similar proportion of patients (N = 525) achieved PASI 90/100 through Week 256, regardless of their baseline age, sex, body mass index, weight, PASI or psoriatic arthritis status. Patients with nail, scalp and/or palmoplantar psoriasis experienced substantial improvements in manifestation-specific indices (mean improvement from baseline to Week 256 of >81%, >94% and >97%, respectively); in patients with all three manifestations (N = 121), 44.6% achieved complete clearance of these manifestations at Week 256. CONCLUSIONS: Risankizumab demonstrated generally consistent efficacy through 256 weeks across patient subgroups and showed durable long-term efficacy for psoriatic disease manifestations.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Severity of Illness Index , Humans , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/complications , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Double-Blind Method , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Nail Diseases/drug therapy , Treatment Outcome , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A key principle of clinical studies and case reports is that they should reflect the demographics and epidemiology of the patient population concerned. Here, we have compiled a diverse group of clinical cases of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) to showcase the differences in GPP presentation in patients worldwide. We attempt to capture the broad spectrum of clinical presentations of GPP and showcase the diversity of the patient population. The patients included in this series are diverse in age, genetic background, skin phototype and medical history. Moreover, they present with a variety of clinical courses of GPP and different degrees of systemic involvement, and experience flares triggered by different inciting factors. The key learnings from this case series may support physicians in identifying and managing patients with this rare and multifaceted disease that can affect patients both physically and psychologically.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/etiology , Skin , Acute Disease , Chronic DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Effisayil 1 was a randomized, placebo-controlled study of spesolimab, which is an anti-IL-36 receptor antibody, in patients presenting with a generalized pustular psoriasis flare. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of spesolimab over the 12-week study. METHODS: The primary endpoint of the study was Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) pustulation subscore of 0 at week 1. Patients (N = 53) were randomized (2:1) to receive a single intravenous dose of 900 mg spesolimab or placebo on day 1. Patients could receive open-label spesolimab for persistent flare symptoms on day 8. RESULTS: Most patients receiving spesolimab achieved a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 (60.0%) and GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 (60.0%) by week 12. In patients randomized to placebo who received open-label spesolimab on day 8, the proportion with GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 increased from 5.6% at day 8 to 83.3% at week 2. No factors predictive of spesolimab response were identified in patient demographics or clinical characteristics. LIMITATIONS: The effect of initial randomization was not determined conventionally beyond week 1 due to patients receiving open-label spesolimab. CONCLUSION: Rapid control of generalized pustular psoriasis flare symptoms with spesolimab was sustained over 12 weeks, further supporting its potential use as a therapeutic option for patients.
Subject(s)
Psoriasis , Humans , Treatment Outcome , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Double-Blind MethodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a relevant issue and considerable differences in safety and efficacy of VIT have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers during VIT, which has already been published. For a second analysis, data concerning premedication and venom preparations in relation to systemic adverse events (AE) during the up-dosing phase and the first year of the maintenance phase were evaluated as well as the outcome of field stings and sting challenges. METHODS: The study was conducted as an open, prospective, observational, multicenter study. In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. RESULTS: Premedication with oral antihistamines was taken by 52.1% of patients during the up-dosing and 19.7% of patients during the maintenance phase. Taking antihistamines had no effect on the frequency of systemic AE (p=0.11) but large local reactions (LLR) were less frequently seen (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; p=0.02). Aqueous preparations were preferentially used for up-dosing (73.0%) and depot preparations for the maintenance phase (64.5%). The type of venom preparation neither had an influence on the frequency of systemic AE nor on the effectiveness of VIT (p=0.26 and p=0.80, respectively), while LLR were less frequently seen when depot preparations were used (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with oral antihistamines during VIT significantly reduces the frequency of LLR but not systemic AE. All venom preparations used were equally effective and did not differ in the frequency of systemic AE.
ABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the United States population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with topical agents and with alternative medicine will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of dermatologists in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as risks that may be associated. This guideline will also address the severity assessment methods of psoriasis in adults.
Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/methods , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Psoriasis/therapy , Academies and Institutes/standards , Administration, Cutaneous , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Complementary Therapies/standards , Dermatology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Foundations/standards , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
Atopical botanical complex from a novel combination of phytochemicals, denoted as herbal anti-inflammatory treatment 1 (HAT1), was developed for topical treatment of psoriasis.
Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Psoriasis , Administration, Topical , Humans , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/drug therapyABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic, multisystem, inflammatory disease that affects approximately 1% of children, with onset most common during adolescence. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and provides evidence-based recommendations. Attention will be given to pediatric patients with psoriasis, recognizing the unique physiology, pharmacokinetics, and patient-parent-provider interactions of patients younger than 18 years old. The topics reviewed here mirror those discussed in the adult guideline sections, excluding those topics that are irrelevant to, or lack sufficient information for, pediatric patients.
Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Photochemotherapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Anthralin/therapeutic use , Calcineurin Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Coal Tar/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Insulin Resistance , Mental Health , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Nicotinic Acids/therapeutic use , Obesity/epidemiology , Psoriasis/psychology , Retinoids/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 2% of the world's population. In this guideline, we focus the discussion on systemic, nonbiologic medications for the treatment of this disease. We provide detailed discussion of efficacy and safety for the most commonly used medications, including methotrexate, cyclosporine, and acitretin, and provide recommendations to assist prescribers in initiating and managing patients on these treatments. Additionally, we discuss newer therapies, including tofacitinib and apremilast, and briefly touch on a number of other medications, including fumaric acid esters (used outside the United States) and therapies that are no longer widely used for the treatment of psoriasis (ie, hydroxyurea, leflunomide, mycophenolate mofetil, thioguanine, and tacrolimus).
Subject(s)
Psoriasis/drug therapy , Acitretin/therapeutic use , Cyclosporine/therapeutic use , Drug Monitoring , Humans , Methotrexate/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Thalidomide/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Alopecia , Cicatrix , Humans , Alopecia/etiology , Alopecia/pathology , Cicatrix/etiology , Cicatrix/pathology , Female , MaleSubject(s)
Psoriasis , Humans , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Acute Disease , ConsensusABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations on the basis of available evidence.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Mental Health , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Obesity/epidemiology , Physician's Role , Psoriasis/epidemiology , Psoriasis/psychology , Quality of Life , Arthritis, Psoriatic/diagnosis , Arthritis, Psoriatic/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/epidemiology , Kidney Diseases/epidemiology , Life Style , Liver Diseases/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Obstructive/epidemiology , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Patient Education as Topic , Psoriasis/therapy , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the US population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care, providing recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with biologic agents will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of the dermatologist in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as associated risks.
Subject(s)
Biological Products/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals/therapeutic use , Certolizumab Pegol/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Piperidines/therapeutic use , Pyrimidines/therapeutic use , Pyrroles/therapeutic use , Ustekinumab/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple organ systems and affecting approximately 3.2% of the world's population. In this section of the guidelines of care for psoriasis, we will focus the discussion on ultraviolet (UV) light-based therapies, which include narrowband and broadband UVB, UVA in conjunction with photosensitizing agents, targeted UVB treatments such as with an excimer laser, and several other modalities and variations of these core phototherapies, including newer applications of pulsed dye lasers, intense pulse light, and light-emitting electrodes. We will provide an in-depth, evidence-based discussion of efficacy and safety for each treatment modality and provide recommendations and guidance for the use of these therapies alone or in conjunction with other topical and/or systemic psoriasis treatments.
Subject(s)
Dermatology/standards , Phototherapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Psoriasis/therapy , Academies and Institutes/standards , Foundations/standards , Humans , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Phototherapy/instrumentation , Phototherapy/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Treatment Outcome , United StatesABSTRACT
Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following the use of TNF antagonists has been reported and is a contraindication to use of these medications. Although the risk of reactivation of HBV during use of ustekinumab and secukinumab is low in patients with only HBV core antibody positivity, the risk is substantial in patients with chronic HBV infection. Less information is available regarding the use of pure IL-23 antagonists. Herein we discuss the successful treatment with guselkumab of a patient with HBV core antibody positivity, without evidence of HBV reactivation or other liver complications.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Hepatitis B, Chronic/complications , Interleukin-23/antagonists & inhibitors , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Contraindications, Drug , Hepatitis B Antibodies/blood , Hepatitis B Core Antigens/immunology , Hepatitis B virus/physiology , Humans , Interleukin-12/antagonists & inhibitors , Male , Middle Aged , Psoriasis/complications , Virus ActivationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Previous clinical trials have not evaluated improvement in nail psoriasis as a primary end point. OBJECTIVE: This phase 3 trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe fingernail psoriasis and moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to 40 mg adalimumab every other week or placebo. The primary efficacy end point was at least 75% improvement in total-fingernail modified Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI75) response rate at week 26. Ranked secondary end point scores evaluated at week 26 were total-fingernail NAPSI and modified NAPSI, nail pain, Nail Psoriasis Physical Functioning Severity, Brigham Scalp Nail Inverse Palmo-Plantar Psoriasis Index, and Physician's Global Assessment (fingernail psoriasis). RESULTS: Of the 217 randomized patients (108 received placebo and 109 received adalimumab), 188 (86.6%) completed 26 weeks of treatment (period A) or escaped early to the open-label period. The study met the primary end point (response rate of 3.4% with placebo vs 46.6% with adalimumab [P < .001]) and all ranked secondary end points. The serious adverse event rates (placebo vs adalimumab) in period A were 4.6% versus 7.3%; the serious infections rates were 1.9% versus 3.7%. LIMITATIONS: Patients with less than 5% BSA involvement were not eligible for enrollment. CONCLUSIONS: After 26 weeks of adalimumab treatment, significant improvements were seen in the primary and all ranked secondary end points and in signs and symptoms of moderate-to-severe nail psoriasis versus with placebo and no new safety risks were identified.
Subject(s)
Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Nail Diseases/drug therapy , Psoriasis/drug therapy , Adalimumab/adverse effects , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Subcutaneous , Male , Maximum Tolerated Dose , Middle Aged , Nail Diseases/etiology , Nail Diseases/physiopathology , Patient Safety , Psoriasis/complications , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Onychomycosis is a common disease that remains a difficult disorder to treat despite the introduction of new topical agents; and not all patients are cured. Clinical experience leads us to suggest a number of host-related factors can affect the chance of cure, but studies supporting these observations are currently lacking. Although many studies, particularly on topical agents, rely on severity classification when selecting patients for inclusion, a pilot study was unable to demonstrate any prognostic value of the extension of nail involvement. In addition, no universal severity classification exists, and most studies do not report prognostic factors. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of efinaconazole topical solution, 10% in patients with mild-to-moderate onychomycosis and determine the impact of baseline severity on treatment outcome. METHODS: Post hoc pooled analysis of two identical, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled studies in 1655 patients aged 18-70 years with a clinical and mycological diagnosis of mild-to-moderate dermatophyte toenail onychomycosis (20-50% clinical involvement). Patients were randomized (3:1) to efinaconazole 10% solution or vehicle, once-daily for 48 weeks, with 4-week post treatment follow-up. Efficacy criteria included clear nail (0% target nail plate involvement), almost clear nail (≤5% target nail plate involvement), and clinical treatment success (≤10% target nail plate involvement) at week 52. For the post hoc analysis, patients were classified as mild (20%-29% nail involvement), moderate (30%-39%), and moderately severe (40%-50%) at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 25%, 23%, and 52% of patients had mild, moderate, or moderately severe disease at baseline. Baseline nail involvement did not appear to predict treatment outcomes. The proportion of patients with mild disease who had a clear nail progressively reduced by week 36 (58%) and week 48 (41%), and even further by week 52 (37%). Of the 237 patients treated with efinaconazole who were 'clear' at week 52, 37%, 24%, and 39% had mild, moderate or moderately severe disease respectively at baseline. The majority of patients (N=634) saw at least a 50% improvement in their target toenail by week 52. Almost half of these patients (N=312, 49.2%) were moderately severe at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: This post hoc analysis supports previous data showing good efficacy of efinaconazole in mild onychomycosis. The relative contribution to overall efficacy results at week 52 of patients with moderate or moderately severe disease was unexpected for a topical therapy, and warrants further study, especially as they represent the majority of patients enrolled in the two studies. It is possible that comparable efficacy can be achieved in these more severe patients with longer treatment courses, or follow-up. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(2):175-178.
Subject(s)
Foot Dermatoses/diagnosis , Foot Dermatoses/drug therapy , Onychomycosis/diagnosis , Onychomycosis/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Triazoles/administration & dosage , Administration, Topical , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
Local adverse reactions to vaccination are typically mild and often quickly resolve. Vaccine adjuvants such as aluminum salts in combination with improper vaccination technique may result in severe local adverse reactions. As far as we know, there is only one prior case of frankly necrotic rapidly progressing vaccine site necrosis, which occurred in a pediatric patient.1 To our knowledge, this is the first adult case of vaccine site necrosis to be reported. The presumed etiology has been aluminum salt adjuvants and improper vaccination technique. Here we present an adult case of a severe local reaction to a vaccine resulting in necrosis of the epidermis and dermis with central ulceration. Skin appendages were also involved, with necrosis of eccrine coils and hair follicles. This necrotic ulceration was likely due to robust inflammatory response to aluminum salt subcutaneous injection. Correct vaccine placement, needle size, and needle length may reduce adverse local skin reactions.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(3):364-367.
.Subject(s)
Injection Site Reaction/diagnosis , Skin Ulcer/diagnosis , Vaccination/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Injection Site Reaction/therapy , Middle Aged , Necrosis/therapy , Vaccination/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Tinea pedis, or athlete's foot, is a superficial, skin infection caused by dermatophytes. It is usually topically treated. Nitric oxide is endogenously produced in humans and has a variety of physiologic and antimicrobial properties. SB208 is a novel topical treatment comprising berdazimer sodium (a nitric oxide-storing macromolecule) and a hydrogel. Admixing these two components releases nitric oxide to the application site. METHODS: A phase 2, double-blind, randomized trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of 3 doses of SB208 (2%, 4%, and 16%) vs matching vehicle, administered once daily for 14 days, in subjects with culture-confirmed interdigital tinea pedis. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of subjects with negative fungal cultures at end of treatment (day 14). Secondary outcomes at days 14 and 42 were the proportion of subjects with mycological cure (negative potassium hydroxide wet mount skin test and culture), clinical cure (reduced signs and symptoms from baseline graded on a 4-point scale). Safety was monitored through physical examinations, adverse events, and hemoglobin and methemoglobin levels. Efficacy outcomes were analyzed using a two-sided Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for general association, stratified by site. RESULTS: At day 14, a higher proportion of patients had negative fungal cultures in the pooled SB208-treated group (62%; P=0.04) than the vehicle-treated group (43%). Of SB208 groups, the 4% group had higher incidence of negative fungal cultures vs the vehicle group (67.6% vs 42.9%; P=0.03). At day 42, pooled SB208-treated groups had significantly more mycological cure vs vehicle group (47% vs 31%, respectively; P=0.08), and clinical cure was maintained in 23% of pooled SB208-treated patients vs 14% of vehicle-treated patients. No safety concerns were reported. Adverse events were mild, not serious, and considered unrelated to study medications. CONCLUSIONS: Topical SB208 was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of tinea pedis. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17(8):888-893.
Subject(s)
Antifungal Agents/administration & dosage , Nitric Oxide/metabolism , Siloxanes/administration & dosage , Tinea Pedis/drug therapy , Tinea Pedis/metabolism , Administration, Topical , Adult , Antifungal Agents/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Siloxanes/chemistry , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Component-resolved diagnosis based on the use of well-defined, properly characterised and purified natural and recombinant allergens constitutes a new approach in the diagnosis of venom allergy. Prospective readers may benefit from an up-to-date review on the allergens. The best characterised venom is that of Apis mellifera, whose main allergens are phospholipase A2 (Api m1), hyaluronidase (Api m2) and melittin (Api m4). Additionally, in recent years, new allergens of Vespula vulgaris have been identified and include phospholipase A1 (Ves v1), hyaluronidase (Ves v2) and antigen 5 (Ves v5). Polistes species are becoming an increasing cause of allergy in Europe, although only few allergens have been identified in this venom. In this review, we evaluate the current knowledge about molecular diagnosis in hymenoptera venom allergy.