Principles of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure.

Paravalvular regurgitation affects 5% to 17% of all surgically implanted prosthetic heart valves. Patients who have paravalvular regurgitation can be asymptomatic or present with hemolysis or heart failure, or both. Reoperation is associated with increased morbidity and is not always successful because of underlying tissue friability, inflammation, or calcification. Comprehensive echocardiographic imaging with transthoracic and real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography is key for characterizing the defect location, size, and shape. For paramitral defects, an antegrade transseptal approach can usually be guided by biplane fluoroscopy, and real-time 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography can usually be performed successfully. Alternative approaches to paramitral defects include retrograde transaortic cannulation or transapical access and retrograde cannulation. For oblong or crescentic defects, the simultaneous or sequential deployment of 2 smaller devices, as opposed to 1 large device, results in a higher degree of procedural success and safety because the risk of impingement on the prosthetic leaflets is minimized. Most para-aortic defects can be approached in a retrograde manner and closed with a single device. With careful anatomical assessment, procedural planning, and procedural execution, successful closure rates of 90% or more should be attainable with a low risk of device impingement on the prosthetic valve or embolization.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: assessing the learning curve.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve for the implantation of the percutaneous aortic valve via the transfemoral route. BACKGROUND: Transcutaneous aortic valve insertion is a fundamentally new procedure for the treatment of aortic valve stenosis. The number of cases needed to gain proficiency with concomitant ease and familiarity (i.e., the "learning curve") with the procedure is unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the first 44 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation as part of the PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial at our institution between November 2008 and May 2011. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 83 years (interquartile range: 77 to 87 years) and a median Society of Thoracic Surgery risk score of 9.6. Pre-procedural assessment of the aortic valve revealed a mean gradient of 53.5 mm Hg, mean aortic valve area of 0.7 mm(2), and a median ejection fraction of 59.5%. Patients were divided into tertiles based on sequence. Significant decreases in median contrast volume (180 to 160 to 130 ml, p = 0.003), valvuloplasty to valve deployment time (12.0 to 11.6 to 7.0 min, p < 0.001) and fluoroscopy times, from 26.1 to 17.2 and 14.3 min occurred from tertiles 1 to 3, p < 0.001. Significant decreases in radiation doses were also seen across the 3 tertiles, p < 0.001. The 30-day mortality for the entire cohort was 11%. CONCLUSIONS: Experience accumulated over 44 transfemoral aortic valve implantations led to significant decreases in procedural times, radiation, and contrast volumes. Our data show increasing proficiency with evidence of plateau after the first 30 cases. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Bedside assessment of cardiac hemodynamics: the impact of noninvasive testing and examiner experience.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of cardiac filling pressures is critical in the diagnosis and management of patients with dyspnea or heart failure. Echocardiography and B-natriuretic peptide (BNP) testing are commonly used to estimate these pressures, but their incremental value beyond physical examination remains unknown. METHODS: Right and left heart filling pressures were prospectively estimated as "normal" or "abnormal" by staff cardiologists and cardiovascular trainees based upon physical examination findings alone, or examination coupled with echocardiographic and BNP data in patients referred for cardiac catheterization. Net reclassification improvement was calculated to determine whether echocardiographic/BNP data had incremental value in the determination of right and left heart pressures. RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen observations were made by 9 examiners in 116 consecutive patients. Right and left heart pressures were accurately predicted from examination alone in 71% and 60% of observations, respectively. Examination-based accuracy was greater for staff cardiologists compared with trainees for right heart (82 vs 67%, P=.03) and left heart pressures (71% vs 55%, P=.03). Exposure to echocardiographic and BNP data did not enhance accuracy beyond bedside examination alone, both for left heart pressures (net reclassification improvement=-0.004; 95% confidence interval, -0.12-0.12) and right heart pressures (net reclassification improvement=0.02, 95% confidence interval, -0.09-0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac filling pressures can be estimated from physical examination with modest accuracy, which is enhanced with experience. While echocardiographic and BNP data predict cardiac filling pressures, they may not provide information of incremental value beyond examination alone. Rigorous teaching and practice of cardiac examination skills should continue to be emphasized during medical training.