ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: During the last decade, the management of gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) has been addressed by several distinct international evidence-based guidelines. In this review, we aimed to synthesise these guidelines and provide clinicians with a global perspective of the current recommendations for managing patients with GIM, as well as highlight evidence gaps that need to be addressed with future research. DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review of the literature for guidelines and consensus statements published between January 2010 and February 2023 that address the diagnosis and management of GIM. RESULTS: From 426 manuscripts identified, 15 guidelines were assessed. There was consistency across guidelines regarding the purpose of endoscopic surveillance of GIM, which is to identify prevalent neoplastic lesions and stage gastric preneoplastic conditions. The guidelines also agreed that only patients with high-risk GIM phenotypes (eg, corpus-extended GIM, OLGIM stages III/IV, incomplete GIM subtype), persistent refractory Helicobacter pylori infection or first-degree family history of gastric cancer should undergo regular-interval endoscopic surveillance. In contrast, low-risk phenotypes, which comprise most patients with GIM, do not require surveillance. Not all guidelines are aligned on histological staging systems. If surveillance is indicated, most guidelines recommend a 3-year interval, but there is some variability. All guidelines recommend H. pylori eradication as the only non-endoscopic intervention for gastric cancer prevention, while some offer additional recommendations regarding lifestyle modifications. While most guidelines allude to the importance of high-quality endoscopy for endoscopic surveillance, few detail important metrics apart from stating that a systematic gastric biopsy protocol should be followed. Notably, most guidelines comment on the role of endoscopy for gastric cancer screening and detection of gastric precancerous conditions, but with high heterogeneity, limited guidance regarding implementation, and lack of robust evidence. CONCLUSION: Despite heterogeneous populations and practices, international guidelines are generally aligned on the importance of GIM as a precancerous condition and the need for a risk-stratified approach to endoscopic surveillance, as well as H. pylori eradication when present. There is room for harmonisation of guidelines regarding (1) which populations merit index endoscopic screening for gastric cancer and GIM detection/staging; (2) objective metrics for high-quality endoscopy; (3) consensus on the need for histological staging and (4) non-endoscopic interventions for gastric cancer prevention apart from H. pylori eradication alone. Robust studies, ideally in the form of randomised trials, are needed to bridge the ample evidence gaps that exist.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) are an important class of genomic alteration in cancer. They are frequently observed in cancer samples, with studies showing that, on average, SCNAs affect 34% of a cancer cell's genome. Furthermore, SCNAs have been shown to be major drivers of tumour development and have been associated with response to therapy and prognosis. Large-scale cancer genome studies suggest that tumours are driven by somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) or single-nucleotide variants (SNVs). Despite the frequency of SCNAs and their clinical relevance, the use of genomics assays in the clinic is biased towards targeted gene panels, which identify SNVs but provide limited scope to detect SCNAs throughout the genome. There is a need for a comparably low-cost and simple method for high-resolution SCNA profiling. RESULTS: We present conliga, a fully probabilistic method that infers SCNA profiles from a low-cost, simple, and clinically-relevant assay (FAST-SeqS). When applied to 11 high-purity oesophageal adenocarcinoma samples, we obtain good agreement (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, rs=0.94) between conliga's inferred SCNA profiles using FAST-SeqS data (approximately £14 per sample) and those inferred by ASCAT using high-coverage WGS (gold-standard). We find that conliga outperforms CNVkit (rs=0.89), also applied to FAST-SeqS data, and is comparable to QDNAseq (rs=0.96) applied to low-coverage WGS, which is approximately four-fold more expensive, more laborious and less clinically-relevant. By performing an in silico dilution series experiment, we find that conliga is particularly suited to detecting SCNAs in low tumour purity samples. At two million reads per sample, conliga is able to detect SCNAs in all nine samples at 3% tumour purity and as low as 0.5% purity in one sample. Crucially, we show that conliga's hidden state information can be used to decide when a sample is abnormal or normal, whereas CNVkit and QDNAseq cannot provide this critical information. CONCLUSIONS: We show that conliga provides high-resolution SCNA profiles using a convenient, low-cost assay. We believe conliga makes FAST-SeqS a more clinically valuable assay as well as a useful research tool, enabling inexpensive and fast copy number profiling of pre-malignant and cancer samples.
Subject(s)
DNA Copy Number Variations , Neoplasms , Base Sequence , DNA , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing/methods , Humans , Neoplasms/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The homeostasis of the gastrointestinal epithelium relies on cell regeneration and differentiation into distinct lineages organized inside glands and crypts. Regeneration depends on Wnt/ß-catenin pathway activation, but to understand homeostasis and its dysregulation in disease, we need to identify the signaling microenvironment governing cell differentiation. By using gastric glands as a model, we have identified the signals inducing differentiation of surface mucus-, zymogen-, and gastric acid-producing cells. METHODS: We generated mucosoid cultures from the human stomach and exposed them to different growth factors to obtain cells with features of differentiated foveolar, chief, and parietal cells. We localized the source of the growth factors in the tissue of origin. RESULTS: We show that epidermal growth factor is the major fate determinant distinguishing the surface and inner part of human gastric glands. In combination with bone morphogenetic factor/Noggin signals, epidermal growth factor controls the differentiation of foveolar cells vs parietal or chief cells. We also show that epidermal growth factor is likely to underlie alteration of the gastric mucosa in the precancerous condition atrophic gastritis. CONCLUSIONS: Use of our recently established mucosoid cultures in combination with analysis of the tissue of origin provided a robust strategy to understand differentiation and patterning of human tissue and allowed us to draw a new, detailed map of the signaling microenvironment in the human gastric glands.
Subject(s)
Body Patterning/drug effects , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4/pharmacology , Cell Differentiation/drug effects , Epidermal Growth Factor/pharmacology , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Gastric Mucosa/drug effects , Carrier Proteins/pharmacology , Cell Lineage , Cells, Cultured , Cellular Microenvironment , Chief Cells, Gastric/drug effects , Chief Cells, Gastric/metabolism , Chief Cells, Gastric/ultrastructure , Epithelial Cells/metabolism , Epithelial Cells/ultrastructure , Gastric Mucosa/metabolism , Gastric Mucosa/ultrastructure , Gastritis, Atrophic/metabolism , Gastritis, Atrophic/pathology , Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental , Humans , Organoids , Parietal Cells, Gastric/drug effects , Parietal Cells, Gastric/metabolism , Parietal Cells, Gastric/ultrastructure , Wnt Signaling PathwayABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Guidelines give robust recommendations on which biopsies should be taken when there is endoscopic suggestion of gastric inflammation. Adherence to these guidelines often seems arbitrary. This study aimed to give an overview on current practice in tertiary referral centres across Europe. METHODS: Data were collected at 10 tertiary referral centres. Demographic data, the indication for each procedure, endoscopic findings, and the number and sampling site of biopsies were recorded. Findings were compared between centres, and factors influencing the decision to take biopsies were explored. RESULTS: Biopsies were taken in 56.6% of 9,425 procedures, with significant variation between centres (p < 0.001). Gastric biopsies were taken in 43.8% of all procedures. Sampling location varied with the procedure indication (p < 0.001) without consistent pattern across the centres. Fewer biopsies were taken in centres which routinely applied the updated Sydney classification for gastritis assessment (46.0%), compared to centres where this was done only upon request (75.3%, p < 0.001). This was the same for centres stratifying patients according to the OLGA system (51.8 vs. 73.0%, p < 0.001). More biopsies were taken in centres following the MAPS guidelines on stomach surveillance (68.1 vs. 37.1%, p < 0.001). Biopsy sampling was more likely in younger patients in 8 centres (p < 0.05), but this was not true for the whole cohort (p = 0.537). The percentage of procedures with biopsies correlated directly with additional costs charged in case of biopsies (r = 0.709, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: Adherence to guideline recommendations for biopsy sampling at gastroscopy was inconsistent across the participating centres. Our data suggest that centre-specific policies are applied instead.
Subject(s)
Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal , Referral and Consultation , Tertiary Care Centers , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy , Europe , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Young AdultABSTRACT
The scientific community has avoided using tissue samples from patients that have been exposed to systemic chemotherapy to infer the genomic landscape of a given cancer. Esophageal adenocarcinoma is a heterogeneous, chemoresistant tumor for which the availability and size of pretreatment endoscopic samples are limiting. This study compares whole-genome sequencing data obtained from chemo-naive and chemo-treated samples. The quality of whole-genomic sequencing data is comparable across all samples regardless of chemotherapy status. Inclusion of samples collected post-chemotherapy increased the proportion of late-stage tumors. When comparing matched pre- and post-chemotherapy samples from 10 cases, the mutational signatures, copy number, and SNV mutational profiles reflect the expected heterogeneity in this disease. Analysis of SNVs in relation to allele-specific copy-number changes pinpoints the common ancestor to a point prior to chemotherapy. For cases in which pre- and post-chemotherapy samples do show substantial differences, the timing of the divergence is near-synchronous with endoreduplication. Comparison across a large prospective cohort (62 treatment-naive, 58 chemotherapy-treated samples) reveals no significant differences in the overall mutation rate, mutation signatures, specific recurrent point mutations, or copy-number events in respect to chemotherapy status. In conclusion, whole-genome sequencing of samples obtained following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is representative of the genomic landscape of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Excluding these samples reduces the material available for cataloging and introduces a bias toward the earlier stages of cancer.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , Genome, Human , Mutation Rate , Neoplasm Proteins/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Aged , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/genetics , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/metabolism , Cell Transformation, Neoplastic/pathology , Computational Biology , DNA Copy Number Variations , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagus/metabolism , Esophagus/pathology , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Proteins/metabolism , Point Mutation , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Prospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
High-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) comprise a rare entity. Due to the lack of randomized controlled trials, therapy recommendations were mainly extrapolated from its pulmonary analogue, small cell lung cancer and mostly validated in small retrospective case series. The multicentric Nordic NEC Study of gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) and cancer of unknown primary (CUP) high-grade neuroendocrine neoplasms showed a significant disease control upon treatment with etoposide and platinum-based chemotherapies 1. Such a combination with etoposide and a platinum (CE) compound is currently considered standard first-line treatment for high-grade GEP/CUP NEN. High-grade mixed-neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNEN) formerly termed mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas (MANEC) also have a poor prognosis and are generally treated like other high-grade NEN. The CE protocol has significant activity in high-grade NEN and MiNEN, but the response is short-lived in most cases with response rates around 50-60â%. Second-line treatment alternatives are not established so far. The need for additional treatment options is evident.Combination chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine (CAV) showed efficacy in small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and was considered standard first-line therapy before the era of etoposide and platinum combinations. Due to a better toxicity profile, doxorubicin was replaced by epirubicin, resulting in the combination of epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and vincristine (abbreviated as EpiCO or CEV).In analogy to SCLC, selected patients with high-grade NEN were treated with the EpiCO regimen in second line (or in one patient first line) at our center. In this report we present the retrospective series of 5 cases with metastatic high-grade GEP/CUP NEN/MiNEN who received chemotherapy according to this protocol.
Subject(s)
Cyclophosphamide/therapeutic use , Epirubicin/therapeutic use , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neuroendocrine Tumors/drug therapy , Vincristine/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neuroendocrine Tumors/pathology , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Current strategies to guide selection of neoadjuvant therapy in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) are inadequate. We assessed the ability of a DNA damage immune response (DDIR) assay to predict response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in OAC. DESIGN: Transcriptional profiling of 273 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded prechemotherapy endoscopic OAC biopsies was performed. All patients were treated with platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection between 2003 and 2014 at four centres in the Oesophageal Cancer Clinical and Molecular Stratification consortium. CD8 and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemical staining was assessed in matched resection specimens from 126 cases. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were applied according to DDIR status for recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 66 OAC samples (24%) were DDIR positive with the remaining 207 samples (76%) being DDIR negative. DDIR assay positivity was associated with improved RFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.98; p=0.042) and OS (HR: 0.52; 95% CI 0.31 to 0.88; p=0.015) following multivariate analysis. DDIR-positive patients had a higher pathological response rate (p=0.033), lower nodal burden (p=0.026) and reduced circumferential margin involvement (p=0.007). No difference in OS was observed according to DDIR status in an independent surgery-alone dataset.DDIR-positive OAC tumours were also associated with the presence of CD8+ lymphocytes (intratumoural: p<0.001; stromal: p=0.026) as well as PD-L1 expression (intratumoural: p=0.047; stromal: p=0.025). CONCLUSION: The DDIR assay is strongly predictive of benefit from DNA-damaging neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and is associated with a proinflammatory microenvironment in OAC.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , DNA Damage/immunology , Esophageal Neoplasms/immunology , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Esophagectomy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Aged , B7-H1 Antigen , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Survival Rate , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Cancers occurring at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) are classified as predominantly esophageal or gastric, which is often difficult to decipher. We hypothesized that the transcriptomic profile might reveal molecular subgroups which could help to define the tumor origin and behavior beyond anatomical location. The gene expression profiles of 107 treatment-naïve, intestinal type, gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas were assessed by the Illumina-HTv4.0 beadchip. Differential gene expression (limma), unsupervised subgroup assignment (mclust) and pathway analysis (gage) were undertaken in R statistical computing and results were related to demographic and clinical parameters. Unsupervised assignment of the gene expression profiles revealed three distinct molecular subgroups, which were not associated with anatomical location, tumor stage or grade (p > 0.05). Group 1 was enriched for pathways involved in cell turnover, Group 2 was enriched for metabolic processes and Group 3 for immune-response pathways. Patients in group 1 showed the worst overall survival (p = 0.019). Key genes for the three subtypes were confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The newly defined intrinsic subtypes were analyzed in four independent datasets of gastric and esophageal adenocarcinomas with transcriptomic data available (RNAseq data: OCCAMS cohort, n = 158; gene expression arrays: Belfast, n = 63; Singapore, n = 191; Asian Cancer Research Group, n = 300). The subgroups were represented in the independent cohorts and pooled analysis confirmed the prognostic effect of the new subtypes. In conclusion, adenocarcinomas at the GEJ comprise three distinct molecular phenotypes which do not reflect anatomical location but rather inform our understanding of the key pathways expressed.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Transcriptome/genetics , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Humans , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Phenotype , Prognosis , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
While the primary risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) and its precursor lesion Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is gastro-oesophageal reflux, the infection with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the dominant risk factor for gastric cancer. Reduction of reflux by dietary measures and proton pump inhibitors has some merits in OAC prevention, and the chemopreventive effect of Aspirin and statins is being widely investigated; however, improved outcome in OAC occurs primarily as the result of secondary prevention. Early detection of neoplastic lesions in Barrett's metaplasia can be achieved by surveillance endoscopies. Novel endoscopic imaging modalities carry similar importance as the endoscopic treatment techniques as without detection of early lesions, therapy cannot be applied. Minimally invasive approaches are currently being investigated to identify patients with BO who are at particular risk of neoplastic progression. While dietary factors also play an important role in the prevention of gastric cancer and chemoprevention seems to be promising, the most beneficial effect has been shown for the eradication of H. pylori infection, which results in at least a one third reduction of gastric cancer risk. This effect can be further improved if the eradication takes place prior to the development of pre-neoplastic gastric conditions such as mucosal atrophy or intestinal metaplasia (IM). The definition of the "point of no return", after which eradication is less effective, is of high importance, although H. pylori eradication can still be beneficial even at more advance stages of mucosal changes. For this reason, patients with advanced atrophy and IM should undergo endoscopic surveillance in the same way as patients with BO. There is also need for development of non-invasive tests to identify patients at high risk of progression to gastric cancer to improve outcome of these surveillance approaches.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/prevention & control , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Secondary Prevention , Upper Gastrointestinal Tract/pathology , Chemoprevention , Esophageal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/prevention & controlABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility of a serological assessment of gastric cancer risk in patients undergoing colonoscopy in countries with low-to-moderate incidence rates. METHODS: Serum samples were prospectively collected from 453 patients (>50 years old) undergoing colonoscopies. Of these, 279 (61.6%) also underwent gastroscopy to correlate the results for serum pepsinogen I and II (sPG-I and sPG-II), sPG-I/II ratio, and anti-H. pylori antibodies with gastric histopathology findings (graded according to the updated Sydney classification and the Operative Link of Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and the Operative Link for Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) systems). RESULTS: H. pylori was found in 85 patients (30.5%). Chronic atrophic gastritis was diagnosed in 89 (31.9%) patients. High-risk OLGA (IIIâ»IV) stages were present in 24 patients, and high-risk OLGIM stages were present in 14 patients. There was an inverse correlation of sPG-I with the degree of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia (IM), as well as with the respective OLGA (r = -0.425; p < 0.001) and OLGIM (r = -0.303; p < 0.001) stages. A pathological sPG-I result was associated with a relative risk (RR) of 12.2 (95% confidence interval: 6.29â»23.54; p < 0.001) for gastric preneoplastic changes. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of serum pepsinogen allows the identification of patients at increased risk of gastric cancer. A prevention strategy of combining a screening colonoscopy with a serological screening for preneoplastic gastric changes should be considered in the general population.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Early Detection of Cancer/methods , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/blood , Colorectal Neoplasms/microbiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Helicobacter Infections/blood , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter pylori/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pepsinogen A/blood , Risk Assessment , Stomach Neoplasms/blood , Stomach Neoplasms/microbiology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
Barrett's oesophagus (BE) is the premalignant condition associated with the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). Diagnostically, p53 immunohistochemistry remains the only biomarker recommended clinically to aid histopathological diagnosis. The emerging mutational profile of BE is one of highly heterogeneous lesions at the genomic level with many mutations already occurring in non-dysplastic tissue. As well as point mutations, larger scale copy-number changes appear to have a key role in the progression to OAC and clinically applicable assays for the reliable detection of aneuploidy will be important to incorporate into future clinical management of patients. For some patients, the transition to malignancy may occur rapidly through a genome-doubling event or chromosomal catastrophe, termed chromothripsis, and detecting these patients may prove especially difficult. Given the heterogeneous nature of this disease, sampling methods to overcome inherent bias from endoscopic biopsies coupled with the development of more objective biomarkers than the current reliance on histopathology will be required for risk stratification. The aim of this approach will be to spare low-risk patients unnecessary procedures, as well as to provide endoscopic therapy to the patients at highest risk, thereby avoiding the burden of incurable metastatic disease.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Barrett Esophagus/genetics , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Genomic Instability/genetics , Mutation/genetics , Precancerous Conditions/genetics , Aneuploidy , Chromothripsis , DNA-Binding Proteins , Disease Progression , Humans , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Myosins/genetics , Nerve Tissue Proteins/genetics , Nuclear Proteins/genetics , Semaphorins , Smad4 Protein/genetics , Transcription Factors/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Protein p53/genetics , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/geneticsABSTRACT
Recent studies have suggested that Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) constitutes a risk for the development of colonic neoplasia. Hypergastrinemia can be induced by H. pylori infection, and gastrin can act as putative promoter of colorectal carcinogenesis. Aim of our study was to assess whether H. pylori infection and/or increased serum gastrin levels are associated with the occurrence of colonic neoplasms. For this, we reviewed prospectively collected data of 377 patients with a minimum age of 50 years who underwent colonoscopy. H. pylori and CagA status were determined by serology. Serum gastrin levels were measured in fasting state by commercially available assay. In H. pylori infected patients (n = 138; 36.6%), the overall prevalence of colonic neoplasms was more frequent compared to H. pylori negative patients (n = 239; 63.4%) (OR = 2.73, 95% CI: 1.76-4.24). H. pylori infection occurred more frequently in patients with hyperplastic polyps (OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.23-5.74) and adenomas presenting with low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) (OR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.14-2.99). Attributable risk for adenomas with high grade IEN and colorectal adenocarcinoma (n = 14) was not assessed due to the low number of cases. The expression of CagA was also associated with an increased risk for colonic neoplasms (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.29-3.94). Hypergastrinemia did not increase the risk for any colonic neoplasms and there was no difference in basal serum gastrin levels between H. pylori positive and negative patients. In conclusion, H. pylori infection, including CagA expression is associated with an increased risk for the development of colonic neoplasm.
Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Proteins/blood , Colonic Neoplasms/microbiology , Gastrins/blood , Helicobacter Infections/microbiology , Helicobacter pylori , Aged , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Antigens, Bacterial/biosynthesis , Bacterial Proteins/biosynthesis , Colon/microbiology , Colonic Neoplasms/complications , Colonoscopy , Female , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter Infections/immunology , Helicobacter pylori/immunology , Helicobacter pylori/isolation & purification , Humans , Inflammation/immunology , Inflammation/microbiology , Male , Polyps/complications , Polyps/immunology , Prospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HCC predominantly develops in the condition of chronic inflammation that has led to liver cirrhosis. A small proportion of patients with HCC is diagnosed in the non-cirrhotic liver (NCL). Data on patients with HCC in NCL in advanced stages are scarce. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed comparing 93 patients with HCC in NCL to 571 patients with HCC in liver cirrhosis (LC) with respect to clinical and demographic characteristics. Also factors influencing survival in patients with HCC in NCL were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients with HCC in NCL were diagnosed at older age and in more advanced tumor stages than patients with LC. More than 25% of patients with HCC in NCL presented with extrahepatic metastases. Only a minority of patients with HCC in NCL lacked any sign of hepatic damage. Risk factors for LC and risk factors for NAFLD are present in the majority of patients with HCC in NCL. The BCLC classification corresponded with the survival of patients with HCC in NCL although the therapeutic options differ from those for patients with liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: It will be one of the major challenges in the future to awake awareness of carrying a risk of hepatic malignancies in patients with chronic liver diseases apart from liver cirrhosis, especially in NAFLD. Surveillance programs need to be implemented if these are cost-effective.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/pathology , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/epidemiology , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/epidemiology , Liver Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Multiple Primary/mortality , Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease/epidemiology , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Infection with Helicobacter pylori is established as the major risk factor for gastric cancer development. Damage of the mucosal barrier due to H. pylori-induced inflammation enhances the carcinogenic effect of other risk factors such as salt intake or tobacco smoking. The genetic disposition of both the bacterial strain and the host can increase the potential towards gastric cancer formation. Genetic variance of the bacterial proteins CagA and VacA is associated with a higher gastric cancer risk, as are polymorphisms and epigenetic changes in host gene coding for interleukins (IL1ß, IL8), transcription factors (CDX2, RUNX3) and DNA repair enzymes. Application of high-throughput assays for genome-wide assessment of either genetic structural variance or gene expression patterns may lead to a better understanding of the pathobiological background of these processes, including the underlying signaling pathways. Understanding of the stepwise alterations that take place in the transition from chronic atrophic gastritis, via metaplastic changes, to invasive neoplasia is vital to define the 'point of no return' before which eradication of H. pylori has the potential to prevent gastric cancer. Currently, eradication as preventive strategy is only recommended for high-incidence regions in Asia; large population studies with an adequate follow-up are required to demonstrate the effectiveness of such an approach in Western populations.